More Disturbing News on COVID Vaccines

COVID-19 Vaccine

Pfizer’s new COVID-19 Vaccine for which it claims a 90 percent success rate (less than the survival rate for the actual virus ironically which is over 98 percent) also has some disturbing ingredients.

Children’s Health Defense explained in an August 6th article,

“mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG).”

CHD goes on to explain:

“The use of PEG in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis. Roughly seven in ten Americans may already be sensitized to PEG, which may result in reduced efficacy of the vaccine and an increase in adverse side effects. If a PEG-containing mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 gains FDA approval, the uptick in exposure to PEG will be unprecedented—and potentially disastrous. Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology but is more concerned with its bottom line.”

This is the reason why it must be kept at a temperature of -70 degrees. Colder that the Antarctic otherwise it is, in Pfizer’s own words, “ineffective.”

This is apart from the inclusion of foetus material from living animals, something that would be of concern to vegetarians and vegans not to mention various religious groups and philosophies.

CHD goes on to say, “LNPs “encapsulate the mRNA constructs to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake” and, additionally, rev up the immune system (a property that vaccine scientists tamely describe as LNPs’ “inherent adjuvant properties”)”

This is a polite way of saying that LNPs are adjuvants. This means they are designed to stimulate hyper-inflammatory responses in human beings in an effort to induce the creation of antibodies that allow the manufacturer to claim high “effectiveness” rates, despite those adjuvants causing severe adverse reactions (for which the company cannot be sued by the way). In fact according to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions. That means ALL. Not some. ALL

Be very careful what you inject into your body.

https://www.seetvnews.com/post/more-disturbing-news-on-covid-vaccines

Spanish Flu Deaths

Spanish Flu Deaths

(Tom: You have to do your own homework on mask research to decide for yourself if there is an increased chance of bacterial infection in your lungs from the rebreathing of exhaled toxins from the inside of the mask.)

“it is possible that — as in 1918 — a similar pattern of viral damage followed by bacterial invasion could unfold, say the authors. Preparations for diagnosing, treating and preventing bacterial pneumonia should be among highest priorities in influenza pandemic planning, they write. “We are encouraged by the fact that pandemic planners are already considering and implementing some of these actions,” says Dr. Fauci.”

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/bacterial-pneumonia-caused-most-deaths-1918-influenza-pandemic

Childhood Cancers

Childhood Cancers

Debi Leeper writes: “I spent time with one of Australia’s top lead cancer researchers. They said “it’s very well known vaccines cause cancers”.

There many other things that contribute to the development of cancers however when you look at the ingredients in those injectable products it is easy to see why.

Finish reading:

Carl Sagan On Curiosity

Carl Sagan On Curiosity

Karen Hadley writes: Carl Sagan describes the problem with modern education. I never lost my curiosity. My eclectic curiosity can make me a little random or non-sequitur at times but that’s okay with me. Being this way makes me a much better writer because if I want to, I can get curious about almost anything. And that curiosity triggers study, understanding, development of a viewpoint and then the ability to write about that topic.

Dr Peter Dingle’s letter to Mr Joyce of Qantas

Qantas Vaccination Announcement

Feel free to circulate or use for your self

Dear Mr Joyce,

I am very concerned as a long term Qantas flier, a long term advocate of Qantas and health researcher over your claims to have a “Vaccine Passport”. Clearly you have received some poor information not based on the science and have made a very rash and potentially damaging and dangerous decision.

Firstly, this vaccine has been pushed and rushed at “Warp Speed”, without proper or long-term testing, and the high risks to the public that such a rushed medication carries. The vaccine touted for use is an RNA (genetically) based vaccine, something that has never ever been released to the public before. It is experimental. The medium and long-term effects of this gene-altering vaccine on our bodies is completely unknown.

Secondly, the vaccine does not stop people from carrying the disease nor does it stop the spread. It is designed to stop a person catching the illness. Despite 50 years of flu vaccine it still goes around every year as do all respiratory viruses and they mutate as this virus is already doing and it continues to go around. A person who has multiple vaccines for Covid 19 can still carry the virus and in fact get sick and die from the virus. Let me make it plainer. A substantial body of research has shown that having health professionals vaccinated did not under any circumstances alter the course or spread of the flu virus.

Thirdly, the vast majority of the claims about the effectiveness of the vaccines are both embellished and using statistics that you are unfamiliar with. According to comments published in the British Medical Journal last week (see the link below) the vaccine is not very effective. While the information from Pfizer’s looks impressive when you do the real numbers the absolute risk reduction for an individual is only about 0.4% (0.0043-0.0004=0.0039). The Number Needed To Vaccinate (NNTV) = 256 (1/0.0039), which means that to prevent just 1 Covid-19 case 256 individuals must get the vaccine; the other 255 individuals derive no benefit, but are subject to vaccine adverse effects. And this is to do with cases not even death. It will be even less effective for death. Probably around 1 in 4000 like the flu vaccine. These are facts in the scientific journals which I can provide any time and in fact publish them regularly on my social media groups.

Finally, catching the illness is not the problem it is the major health conditions that occur in a relatively small group in our society that is most susceptible that is the problem. After reviewing hundreds of papers the most susceptible group, other than those which severe medical conditions, are those over 75 with, according to the US Centre For Disease Control, 2.5 comorbidities. That is the elderly who are already very sick and who in most cases are not going to be flying anyway. That is why the majority of deaths in Australia and around the world have ben in elderly care (not a good word) facilities. For the vast majority of the population it is a mild illness with fewer complications than the annual flu. This is substantiated in the studies and multiple health professionals including an official statement by the Chief Health Officer of NSW Dr Kerry Chant that this is “a mild illness”.

On a logistic note will the passport be for the current version of the Covid 19 virus or the last years virus which effectively is what the flu vaccine is? You will need multiple passports for each travel people do.

While Australia is currently free from Covid 19 the vaccine will not prevent the spread once the borders open to international travel. This is well recognised in the scientific and health community.

Clearly you have just relied on very poor information and made a very damaging and dangerous comment. I would suggest before this goes any further you consult the science. I have reviewed hundreds of studies on the topic and derive no gain or support from my information. Unlike the people selling you your information I am happy to provide you with free unadulterated independent information, which by the way is supported by a large portion of the community that you think you are protecting.

I have no doubt that you made your comment with the best intentions. You just relied on very poor information. In the best interest of Qantas and Australians I seriously suggest you review your situation and make a public retraction very soon.

Peter Dingle PhD

Here is a link you can follow https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4347/rr-4

Covid-19 vaccine candidate is unimpressive: NNTV is around 256

It is not enough to merely agree on this. We, every single one of us, needs to make our voice herard if we are to retain our freedoms!
Email the Qantas CEO at: alanjoyce@qantas.com.au
Post on the facebook fan page at facebook.com/Qantas
Message Qantas support at: https://www.qantas.com/au/en/support/contact-us/customer-care-feedback-form.html?int_cam=contact-us-feedback

Idol Worship

Idol Worship

This is about the level of scientific credibility that should be assigned to it. Nah, on second thoughts, idol worship does not harm your children anywhere near as much as vaccines do.

Dr Michael Yeadon Quote

Dr Michael Yeadon Quote

If you do not believe this whole COVID response is a complete and utter plandemic/scam, please read again the text in this image and the previous article: http://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=30703

COVID NOT Increasing Total Deaths!

US Deaths Per Age Category

(Tom: Further proof that the whole COVID-19 response is a planned control operation.)

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States.

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

https://web.archive.org/web/20201126223119/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19