Did they say ANYTHING that was true?
Researchers have not directly demonstrated the complete physical input-to-output chain claimed for these products, raising basic questions about what went in and what came out.
The claim is specific: material identified as “mRNA” is injected, and human cells allegedly produce a defined “spike” protein.
This article does not claim that nothing happens after vaccination, nor that the vial contains nothing dangerous.
Biological changes, immune responses, symptoms, adverse events, and death have been reported after vaccination.
And the contents of the vial raise many serious safety questions.
The narrower question is whether the specific molecular identities claimed for the injected material and the alleged translation product have been directly established.
I found no published experiment that demonstrates either of the following:
- An intact physical molecule recovered from a finished vaccine vial, with a complete experimentally determined sequence matching the complete intended sequence.
- An intact physical product recovered from a vaccinated human, with a complete experimentally determined amino-acid sequence matching the complete intended “spike” sequence.
Which raises questions:
- Where is the complete physical sequence (not the “intended” one) of the material injected into people?
- Why is Pfizer’s “100% maximum sequence coverage” treated as proof of a complete molecule when only 55.6% was said to be uniquely assigned and the remainder depended on repeated-position assumptions?
- Where is the complete physical sequence of the product allegedly produced inside vaccinated people?
- How can one reported mass-spectrometry signal (“LDPPEAEVQIDR”) establish the identity of an entire alleged “spike” protein?
- Why is a mechanism being treated as directly demonstrated when neither the complete physical input nor the complete physical output has been directly identified?
Finish reading: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/covid-mrna-vaccines-never-directly
