The Pfizer Papers

The Pfizer Papers

I know more about the inner workings of the drug companies than most “experts” who are looking in from the outside because I’ve been empowered as a medical expert in lawsuits against the pharmaceutical industry to examine their inner secret records concerning various drugs. I thought I knew most of what could be known about how morally and scientifically degraded their operations really are, and I’ve tried to describe it in my books and scientific articles. That was until I read The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity, edited by Dr. Naomi Wolf with Amy Kelly.

The subtitle title is far too modest. It’s not just about Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity; it also sheds light on the massive collusion that hid the truth within the papers, including, as a start, the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), who were in charge of Operation Warp Speed and all things related to the mRNA COVID jabs, as well as the FDA and CDC, which were monitoring and compulsively lying about their high toxicity and deadliness.

https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/new-evidence-is-overwhelming-naomi

Going Green Will Cost More

AEMO’s shock admission about the limited scope of its renewables modelling reveals a significant gap between Chris Bowen’s green rhetoric and reality

Australians are still in the dark about whether renewables are really the most cost-effective choice for our needs after our market operator made a frank admission about its future pricing models, writes Nick Cater.

https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-and-analysis/aemos-shock-admission-about-the-limited-scope-of-its-renewables-modelling-reveals-a-significant-gap-between-chris-bowens-green-rhetoric-and-reality/news-story/89f0dcc78660f1fcb56543a361b3252a

The Largest Study Ever On UBI Was Just Conducted, And…

UBI Change In Time Use

Authored by Peter Jacobsen via the Foundation for Economic Education,

In the 2020 election, an interesting candidate made his way onto the scene for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination: Andrew Yang. Yang made a splash in particular for his promise to give everyone $1,000.

Andrew Yang’s campaign strategy took a similar approach to Trump’s 2016 campaign in hyper-focusing on a single issue. For Trump, the single issue was immigration. For Yang, that issue was universal basic income (UBI).

Yang’s version of UBI was alluring in its simplicity. Every person in the country would receive a nice, round $1,000 per month. It didn’t matter if you were rich or poor, old or young. A vote for Yang was a vote for cash.

Many from his own party denounced the idea of giving rich people $1,000 per month. But Yang held strong to the payment being universal. By making sure every person gets $1,000, you avoid some incentive issues and the bureaucracy that accompanies typical welfare programs.

Why UBI?
Why have a UBI at all? Yang gave several reasons. One primary concern Yang had was that technology would soon begin to displace many low-skilled jobs. UBI would help the country get ready to take care of displaced workers.

But Yang claimed a myriad of benefits for UBI beyond just a safety net. UBI would free people up to be creative and entrepreneurial. A guaranteed income would provide people with the security they need to pursue their passions, start businesses, or go back to school. Contrary to the claims of detractors, a UBI wouldn’t increase laziness—it would improve people’s productivity!

Sometimes, UBI supporters even highlighted how it would make government smaller if it replaced our current complicated welfare system. Though, to my knowledge, no advocate of this policy has ever explained a realistic path toward abolishing current welfare programs.

So, is Yang right? Would UBI free the inner entrepreneur in all Americans, or would it just mean some people would engage in more leisure? Let’s look at the evidence.

The Disappointing Basic Income Study
Researchers Eva Vivalt, Elizabeth Rhodes, Alexander W. Bartik, David E. Broockman, and Sarah Miller’s working paper, titled “The Employment Effects of a Guaranteed Income: Experimental Evidence from Two U.S. States,” was recently put out by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).

The study “leverag[ed] an experiment in which 1,000 low-income individuals were randomized into receiving $1,000 per month unconditionally for three years.” What were the results?

First, it made the recipients poorer:
“Overall, the transfers led to a reduction in annual total individual income of about $1,500 in our main survey measure, compared to the control group.”

Why? Well, people worked less (1.3 hours per week less) and stayed unemployed for longer!

Not only do the recipients work less; this happened to other adult members of the household as well.

Unemployment duration “increased by 1.1 months” for recipients.

But did people use this time to find a better job? It doesn’t seem like it.

Recipients appear to be more selective in their applications, but the authors say, based on their survey measurements, “We do not see much in the way of differences in the types of jobs participants applied for,” and “the results do not support any changes in quality of employment.”

Were people doing other productive things in unemployment, though? The results are unimpressive.

The authors examine whether the receipt of basic income increases entrepreneurship. While they find people claiming to have more entrepreneurial intention, this does not translate into actual entrepreneurial activity.

What about education? Do people go back to school? Mostly no.

The authors say, “By and large, we do not observe significantly improved education outcomes in our sample, though there are some indicators of minor improvements.”

So what did people do with the extra time they got from working less?

In short, the answer is, they relaxed.

In concluding the results of the paper, the authors say, “[P]articipants in our study reduced their labor supply because they placed a high value, at the margin, on additional leisure.”

The authors provide an even more in-depth breakdown of time usage from their study. They estimate the number of minutes per day allocated doing different activities. The above graphic gives a breakdown.

The results? Well, apart from the “other activities” category, the biggest increases in time were non-commuting transportation, social leisure, and solitary leisure. Some time was also spent in home production (doing work around the house) and “self-care.”

On the flip side, people spent less time working, sleeping, caring for children, generating income, and engaging with their communities. Furthermore, less time was spent on self-improvement, searching for jobs, and exercise.

The numbers here may seem small, but if you apply this to millions of people daily, it becomes very weighty.

Not all of the results were statistically significant, but the major point is, overall, people used the time they gained from working less to engage in leisure, and there is no evidence of an increased use of time in other categories UBI proponents purport to care about, such as creative output, entrepreneurship, community engagement, self-improvement, or even spending time with children.

Where does this leave UBI advocates? Well, at best the evidence shows a UBI would cause people to work less and relax more. Insofar as the case for UBI is built on unleashing the stifled engine of human creativity, it seems like UBI isn’t up for the job.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/largest-study-ever-ubi-was-just-conducted-and

Massive Study Confirms Heart Damage Only Occurs in COVID-Vaxxed Kids

The study involving 1.7 million children found myocarditis and pericarditis only occurred in kids who received the COVID jabs.

No cases were found in the unvaxxed group, making it clear that these heart issues are directly tied to the shots.

Led by Oxford University’s Professor Colm D. Andrews and published as a preprint in MedRxiv, the study also delivered another blow: the so-called vaccine wore off after just 14 to 15 weeks.

The so-called “conspiracy theorists” warned that the COVID shots were all harm and no benefit. Now, the data speaks for itself—again.

Even more alarming, a separate report has revealed a catastrophic 500% increase in deaths among vaxxed children compared to their unvaxxed peers.

The data is clear. The shots were a crime against children.

How many more kids need to suffer before the medical community accepts this uncomfortable reality?

https://substack.com/@vigilantfox/note/c-72504335

EU President Likens Free Speech to Infectious Disease

Ursula von der Leyen advocates “pre-bunking” in the public forum to “vaccinate” people against “disinformation.”

EU President Ursula von der Leyen just joined the ranks of former Senator John Kerry and other globalist ghouls in declaring war on free speech by perversely proclaiming that the EU citizenry needs to be “vaccinated against disinformation.”

Like every censor in history, she characterizes her censorship program as a means of expunging erroneous information and ideas from public discourse. By using the word “disinformation,” she implies that she and her clique are already the sole possessors of the truth about everything, and that everyone who has and shares heterodox ideas is necessarily in error.

Her entire premise is FALSE for the following reasons:

1). Knowledge about the world is constantly evolving through constant inquiry, discussion, and dissemination. Knowledge is NOT a static thing. This is why countries with stifling censorship regimes have experienced intellectual, scientific, and artistic stagnation. Their rulers try to freeze the human mind in its state at their moment in history.

2). NO state, university, or ecclesiastical committee has ever been in possession of the full truth of any matter. Official orthodoxies have always been challenged by heterodox thinkers. Indeed, virtually every major advance in human insight has been performed by heterodox thinkers.

3). As John Milton observed in his 1644 pamphlet, Areopagitica, contending with error is an intrinsic part of learning and discovery. We literally learn by making mistakes and correcting them. If free speech is suppressed for the objective of preventing the propagation of erroneous thought—or “vaccinating against it”—it will become extremely difficult if not impossible for people to learn and discover.

4). Without a single exception in history, the people who hold power always advocate the orthodoxy that sustains and extends their power and that of their friends and supporters.

Ursula von der Leyen is the quintessence of this principle. As president of the EU, she conducted secret negotiations with Pfizer CEO to purchase a 20 billion Euros of Pfizer’s fraudulent and dangerous vaccine so that it could be inflicted on all the citizens of the European Union. She is currently under criminal investigation for her conduct in this affair that has come to be known as Pfizergate.

It takes a special kind of chutzpah for a powerful state official who is probably guilty of committing a major crime—a crime that has been systematically and ruthlessly concealed—to lecture the public about the need for censorship. The time has come for the citizens of Europe to rid themselves of Ursula von der Leyen and her clique of corrupt tyrants.

To be sure, there is increasing evidence that the Biden Administration has been exerting pressure on Germany—which remains an American vassal state—and the EU to step up its censorship regime. I will cover this strange development in a subsequent post.

 

It’s never too late to begin resistance training

Resistance Training

  • Sarcopenia, or age-related muscle loss, affects adults over 60, with a higher prevalence in hospitalized and nursing home residents. Resistance training is recommended as the primary treatment
  • Resistance training creates micro-tears in muscles, which repair and strengthen during recovery. Beginners are advised to start with comfortable weights for eight to 12 repetitions in three sets, prioritizing proper form
  • Regular resistance training improves muscle strength, bone density, balance and reduces fracture risk. It also has positive effects on insulin sensitivity, glucose regulation and inflammation
  • Blood flow restriction (BFR) training, or KAATSU, enhances muscle growth using very light or no weights. It’s particularly beneficial for elderly individuals who may risk injury by heavy lifting
  • The ideal strength training regimen is 20 to 40 minutes, two to three times weekly. Excessive training may reduce longevity benefits. Pair resistance training with adequate protein intake for optimal muscle maintenance and growth

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/health-healing/it-s-never-too-late-to-begin-resistance-training/

Medical coder blows the whistle on the COVID-19 illusion

Joining me today is medical whistleblower, Zowe Smith, here to discuss what she witnessed during the alleged pandemic while working as a medical coder — one who translates medical data into standardized codes used for billing, insurance claims and medical research. All departments submit their codes for treatments given and actions taken, giving the medical coder a unique national medical overview, what Zowe describes as a “Sim-City-like view” of all that is taking place. She describes the illusion that was created using this system and the many different manipulations that took place, and are ongoing to this day; improper PCR testing, cycle threshold discrepancies, combination of flu and pneumonia with the presented COVID numbers, and the conflation of clear injection side effects with illusion of COVID-19. At its most basic level, this is medical fraud. Yet when considering the full breadth of willful deceptions and deadly fallout that followed, this rises undeniably to the level of medical genocide.

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/human-rights/medical-coder-blows-the-whistle-on-the-covid-19-illusion/

Methylene Blue Is Beneficial for Slowing Skeletal Aging and Treating Brain Disorders

Story at-a-glance

  • Methylene blue, first synthesized in 1876, evolved from a textile dye to an essential medical compound. It promotes mitochondrial health by enhancing energy production and reducing oxidative stress
  • Recent research suggests methylene blue is useful in the treatment of traumatic brain injury and conditions like Alzheimer’s disease
  • A March 2024 study indicates methylene blue supports bone health by inhibiting osteoclast differentiation, reducing the risk of age-related bone loss when combined with lifestyle modifications
  • Methylene blue offers various other health benefits, including reducing UTI risk, improving skin health, managing osteoarthritis and enhancing the effects of niacinamide on metabolic health
  • When selecting methylene blue, opt for pharmaceutical-grade (USP) varieties with 99% purity; avoid industrial or chemical-grade options, as they contain harmful contaminants. Recommended dosages are included

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/10/21/methylene-blue-bone-brain-health.aspx

Cellular Health Revolution: Unveiling Hidden Threats and Empowering Solutions

Mercola Crucial Health Secret

  • In my recent appearance on The Jimmy Dore Show, we discussed how mitochondrial dysfunction, caused by modern toxins, is at the root of many diseases. ATP production has decreased by up to 75% compared to a century ago
  • I shared insights from my latest book, “Your Guide to Cellular Health: Unlocking the Science of Longevity and Joy,” including that seed oils, like soybean and corn oil, are major culprits in damaging cellular health, while natural sugars can be beneficial when used wisely
  • Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and EMFs from devices like cellphones and Wi-Fi routers pose significant risks to mitochondrial function, necessitating practical steps to reduce exposure
  • Powerful foundations and industry interests have shaped medical education and public health policies, often prioritizing pharmaceutical interventions over natural approaches
  • Restoring cellular health involves eliminating physical and EMF toxins, adopting a whole foods diet, optimizing sun exposure and addressing gut health imbalances

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/10/20/cellular-health-revolution.aspx