FLASHBACK: Unvaccinated Children Appear To Be Immune To The Mysterious Virus Currently Spreading In The Midwest

Enterovirus-D68-EV“Mainstream media wants to sensationalize the Disneyland schmeasles joke, which contained almost half infected vaccinated individuals, yes they were vaccinated, you know “immune” but yet they got the measles.
Did you know that in the fall of 2014, the CDC reported 1,153 VACCINATED children in 49 states developed a “mystery polio-like illness”. The respiratory illness called EV-D68 enterovirus was linked to 14 deaths, and 115 cases of paralysis from acute flaccid myelitis. This outbreak was ten times worse than the “measles outbreak” and it disabled many and was deadly.
There was no media campaign to drive public awareness of this or fuel panic. In comparison, there were a 100 something measles cases and ZERO deaths, but lawmakers have used this fake outbreak to simultaneously introduce laws across the country to force injections containing known toxins, kick kids out of school, encourage division amongst the public, segregate our population and deny children their constitutional right to an education and violate our fifth and fourteenth amendments. It’s a violation of The Nuremberg Code and forces ordinary Americans to pay for more influential corporations who cannot be sued and are immune from all liability for the products they make. Tax-payers pay for the vaccine-injured, NOT the government, and NOT the pharmaceutical companies. vactruth.” TG
http://asheepnomore.net/2014/10/01/unvaccinated-children-appear-immune-mysterious-virus-currently-spreading-midwest/

Senior MIT Scientist Warns 1 In 2 Children Will Have Autism by 2025

This is VITAL data to be shared and acted upon!
It explains why Roundup and GMOs are deadly and is a major wake-up call regarding eating processed foods.
The overuse of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide on our food is causing glyphosate toxicity and it is now being considered as the single most important factor in development of autism and other chronic disease. At a recent panel discussion about GMOs, a senior scientist has stated that one in two children will be autistic by 2025.
http://www.realfarmacy.com/senior-mit-scientist-warns-1-2-children-will-autism-2025/Autism Glysophate Link

Peer Review Conflict Of Interest

Peer Review Conflict Of Interest

“Peer review is a flawed process, fulll of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works.” Richard Smith, past editor of the BMJ and chief executive of hte BMJ Publishing Group for 13 years.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/014107680609900414

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published. or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasureion this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” Marcia Angell, former Editor-in-Chief of the NEJM.

Just this week there was a study published that proved the more Covid shots you got the more likely you were to get Covid. The study was requested to be retracted although there was no valid reason given for it to be retracted. It just did not support the narrative that vaccines were “safe and effective”, the lie that is in the process of killing millions.

Stories of research funding bodies and journal peer reviewers rejecting proposed qualitative methods or study findings due to “bias” are not uncommon. Usually, I find this relates to a perception by peer reviewers that the way data have/will be collected or analyzed is too closely aligned with the personal agenda of the researcher (s).
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1609406917748992

 

Direct observation (when a mother observes that her baby died within 24 hours of receiving vaccinations) is scorned in favour of “peer-reviewed” and “double-blind” clinical trials by the denizens of scientific and clinical laboratories..
Well, I learned a year ago of a surveyor in the UK who found out that a huge percentage of researchers ADMITTED skewing results in favour of their research sponsor.
Here’s another reason why we should be just as leery of the authoritarian edicts from the “science” brigade as we are their scorned “anecdotal evidence”.