This farmer explains what he does to protect his cattle from flies.
Your Daily Dose of Inspiration
You are not what was done to you.
You are what you became in spite of it.
Richard Norris Williams
Norway Launches Robotic Fish That Eats Plastic Waste from Harbors
Wind Turbine Blades To Shelters
Denmark is turning discarded wind turbine blades into stylish bike shelters. This creative use of hard-to-recycle materials promotes sustainability while providing practical public infrastructure.
A Letter From George
Dear Tom,
We sent them ten simple questions.
Ten clear, values-based questions on life, family, freedom, and truth.
And what did Tasmania’s political class do?
They ran for cover.
The Labor Party, the Liberal Party, the Greens, the Nationals, and the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party did not respond to our questionnaire.
Not one had the basic decency to be transparent with the public.
This isn’t just silence. It’s cowardice.
They don’t want to be accountable to you.
They don’t want to be pinned down on abortion, gender ideology in schools, parental rights, religious freedom, or the right of faith-based schools to employ staff who actually believe in their mission.
And sadly, this refusal to engage tells you everything you need to know.
Let’s be blunt: Labor and the Liberals have both abandoned our values.
Labor, under Dean Winter, has already pledged to maintain taxpayer-funded access to late-term abortion, with no conscience safeguards. They plan to criminalise prayer and counselling that doesn’t affirm gender ideology and sexuality, through a sweeping “conversion therapy” ban.
They are committed to defending Tasmania’s radical Anti-Discrimination Act, which already erodes religious liberty and offers no protection to faith-based schools trying to uphold their values. And let’s not forget, every single Labor MP voted in favour of Tasmania’s euthanasia legislation in 2021, helping to make it one of the most extreme assisted suicide laws in the country.
Labor is proudly flying the flag of the hard Left, and they’re coming for your conscience.
And the Liberals? They helped them do it.
Premier Jeremy Rockliff’s Liberals have vowed to reintroduce their own conversion-practices ban, one that opens the door to criminalising parents, priests, and counsellors who simply dare to disagree. They have refused to commit to any protections for life, parental rights, or freedom of speech.
They’ve said nothing about safeguarding the most basic freedoms for families and people of faith in this campaign. And yes, seven Liberal MPs, including then-Premier Peter Gutwein and now-Premier Jeremy Rockliff, voted in favour of the euthanasia bill in 2021. The party refused to take a stand, and that enabled the bill to pass.
Rockliff calls himself a moderate, but in reality, he’s just tagging along with the same activist agenda.
The minor parties showed us nothing better.
We expect the Greens to be against our values. The Nationals, and the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers are supposed to be conservative, but when given the opportunity to prove it, they went completely silent.
Not a word. Not a reply. Not a single answer.
They want your vote without earning your trust.
Only one independent candidate, John Macgowan in Clark, had the courage to engage with the issues, answering thoughtfully and in full. Mr Macgowan answered “Yes” to nine of our ten questions, and, while staking a personal pro-life position, he did not support rolling back abortion laws, stating he would only consider doing so if there were clear public support.
This election has revealed a brutal truth: the political establishment in Tasmania is either hostile or indifferent to your values.
They’re afraid to answer your questions because they don’t represent you.
They don’t believe in your freedom.
They don’t believe in your family.
They don’t believe in your faith.
So now, it’s up to us to make that truth known. Loudly. Publicly. Unapologetically.
Let’s show these politicians that ignoring the silent majority comes at a cost.
For life, family, and freedom,
George Christensen and the team at CitizenGO
Japan’s Shocking mRNA Vaccine Revelations: 21 Million Vaccination Records Expose Alarming Death Trends
Japan’s Shocking mRNA Vaccine Revelations: 21 Million Vaccination Records Expose Alarming Death Trends
Peak in deaths occurs 3 to 4 months after vaccination
f you thought the mRNA vaccine saga couldn’t get any wilder, Japan just dropped a bombshell that’s shaking the narrative to its core. A group of 350 Japanese volunteers, led by the United Citizens for Stopping mRNA Vaccines, has unleashed a staggering 21 million vaccination records—yes, you read that right—obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. This isn’t some small-fry dataset; it’s a colossal trove of vaccination dates, lot numbers, and, most chillingly, deaths. And what it reveals? Well, let’s just say it’s not the “safe and effective” mantra we’ve been spoon-fed.
By analyzing the 21 million records, Prof Murakami of Tokyo Science University uncovered a disturbing peak in deaths 90–120 days after mRNA vaccination, with higher doses showing earlier death peaks. That’s right—folks who got more jabs died sooner, suggesting a cumulative toxicity that builds with each shot.
Murakami estimates that 600,000 to 610,000 Japanese may have died post-vaccination, a figure that aligns eerily with Japan’s excess death statistics. But here’s the kicker—why haven’t these deaths been plastered across headlines? Prof Murakami suggested that they’re happening three to four months later, slipping under the radar of official reports because doctors do not see them as cause of deaths if they are not within a few days after vaccination. The government’s not connecting the dots, folks, and it’s no surprise why. These delayed deaths don’t fit the narrative of “safe and effective.” Instead, they point to a silent crisis that’s been swept under the rug.
The good news is this: while Big Pharma pushes forward with its next pet project—the self-replicating mRNA vaccine (aka replicon vaccine)—the Japanese public isn’t buying it. Out of 4.2 million doses rolled out last October, only 10,000 were administered. That’s a measly 0.24% uptake rate. Let that sink in. The people of Japan, armed with growing skepticism and fueled by groups like the United Citizens, have rejected this experimental jab en masse. And they’re not just sitting quietly—over 100,000 signatures were submitted to Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, demanding a halt to mRNA vaccinations.
Why the resistance? The replicon vaccine, hyped as a “next-gen” solution, is already raising alarms. According to the press conference, the pharmaceutical company behind it (Meiji Seika Pharma) has admitted to higher rates of adverse effects and deaths compared to the original Pfizer and Moderna jabs. If the first round of mRNA shots was bad, this self-replicating version sounds like a sci-fi horror show. No wonder Japan’s saying, “Thanks, but no thanks.”
This isn’t just Japan’s battle—it’s a global wake-up call. The United Citizens group, with 70,000 supporters and 3,000 volunteers, is pushing for international collaboration to stop mRNA vaccines, including a planned influenza shot set for fall 2025.
The group’s database, though currently Japanese-only, is being prepped for English translation, and they’re inviting researchers worldwide to dive in.
But it’s not all smooth sailing. The group’s facing heat—legal heat. Meiji Seika Pharma has slapped a lawsuit on Congressman Kazuhiro Haraguchi and others for speaking out against the replicon vaccine. Haraguchi himself claims he developed lymphoma post-vaccination, with spike proteins found in his lymph cells. Coincidence? You tell me.
This 21-million-record bombshell isn’t just numbers on a spreadsheet—it’s lives, families, and a healthcare system that’s failed to ask the hard questions. The peak in deaths at 90–120 days, the staggering estimate of 600,000+ deaths, and the public’s rejection of the replicon jab scream one thing: people are waking up. Japan’s data, painstakingly gathered by volunteers, is a clarion call to rethink the mRNA experiment before more lives are lost.
Want to dig deeper? The database is online. Contact the United Citizens for Stopping mRNA Vaccines to join the fight. This isn’t over, folks. Share this, spread the word, and let’s keep pushing for the truth.
Because if we don’t, who will?
Signing off for now
A17
Finish reading: https://open.substack.com/pub/pharmafiles/p/japans-shocking-mrna-vaccine-revelations
Bladeless Wind Turbines
Thank A Teacher
The Origin Of Chips
When a wealthy diner insulted his cooking, chef George Crum reportedly retaliated with a razor, salt, and a potato—accidentally creating one of America’s favorite snacks.
This all happened around 1853 AD at Moon’s Lake House in Saratoga Springs, New York, where George Crum, born George Speck, worked as a chef.
The story often told is that a customer sent his French-fried potatoes back, complaining they were too thick and not salty enough.
In response, Crum is said to have sliced the potatoes paper-thin, fried them to a crisp, and deliberately oversalted them.
To his surprise, the disgruntled customer loved them, and “Saratoga Chips” were born.
However, there’s more to this tale than just a chef’s pique. Some accounts, including her own obituary, credit Crum’s sister, Kate Speck Wicks, with the invention.
Interestingly, George Crum never publicly disputed his sister’s claim during his lifetime, adding another layer to the chip’s origin.
The popular “spite” narrative, while dramatic, lacks strong contemporary documentation from the 1850s. Even the identity of the picky customer, often rumored to be Cornelius Vanderbilt, isn’t confirmed by primary sources.
Regardless of the exact catalyst, George Crum did go on to open his own successful restaurant, Crum’s House, prominently featuring these new crispy chips.
Whether born of a chef’s quick thinking, a sister’s accidental discovery, or a bit of both, the potato chip undeniably changed snacking forever.