The West Destroyed Ukraine in Order to Save It

Ukraine Neutrality Proposal

On the 71st Anniversary of Austrian neutrality, reflections on how the Russo-Ukrainian War could have been avoided if NATO had accepted Putin’s Dec. 15, 2021 proposal for Ukrainian neutrality.
John Leake
Oct 26
I started following US, Ukrainian, and Russian affairs while I was living in Vienna in the years 2000–2010. On dreary winter weekends, I sometimes went to Burg Cinema, where the The Third Man, a 1949 film noir masterpiece, still played on the big screen every Sunday. Shot on location in Vienna during the Four Powers Occupation of 1945–1955, the film and its deeply intriguing back story never ceased to fascinate me. As I recounted in my recent book, Mind Viruses: America’s Irrational Obsessions:
The Four Power occupation began in the spring of 1945 when the Soviet army entered Austria from the east and the American army entered from the west and converged on the capital of Vienna. By then it was already evident that as soon as Nazi Germany was defeated, the wartime alliance of the United States and Soviet Union would give way to a fierce rivalry over the fate of Europe. Austria lay in the middle of this conflict. To prevent each other from gaining the upper hand, the US military (along with those of Britain and France) occupied parts of Austria while the Soviet military occupied others. By 1947, US Department of Defense became convinced that withdrawing Western troops would leave the country open to complete Soviet occupation.
After Stalin died in 1953, Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov told Austrian Chancellor Julius Raab that he was willing to entertain Austrian independence. In April 1955, Raab travelled to Moscow to discuss the matter. Despite his reputation for icy formality, Molotov quickly warmed up to Raab. Ten years after their armies had engaged in the most brutal warfare in history, the two men became conspicuously amiable over a state dinner of conviviality and frequent toasts, and they ironed out the terms of an Austrian neutrality deal. Raab agreed to pay for the “German assets” and oil fields left by the Soviets. Molotov also promised the release and repatriation of Austrian POWs still languishing in Russia.
The Western powers were amazed by the deal, with British diplomat, Geoffrey Wallinger reporting to London that it “was far too good to be true.” Nevertheless, it proceeded as planned and was signed by the representatives of all Four Occupying Powers on May 15, 1955, and came into force on July 27. By October 25, all occupying soldiers had withdrawn from the country, and the next day, Austria’s parliament enacted a Declaration of Neutrality that Austria would never join a military alliance such as NATO or the Warsaw Pact or allow foreign troops to be based in the country. Russia and the United States have honored Austrian neutrality ever since. Today (October 26, 2026) is the seventy-first anniversary of the Austrian Declaration of Neutrality and Day of National Celebration.
Upon his return from Moscow, Chancellor Raab addressed a crowd assembled outside the chancery. His voice breaking with emotion, he said, “I must thank the Lord God that we have been able to experience this hour for Austria.” And indeed, Austrian neutrality has been a great blessing for the nation and its people, and it enabled Vienna to become one of the most open, laid-back, and cosmopolitan capitals in Europe. I believe a similar neutrality arrangement for Ukraine would have served its people equally well.
This brings me to the timely point of this essay. Shortly after President Biden was sworn into office in January 2021, tensions between the United States and Russia began to ratchet up over various disagreements. In the autumn of 2021, Russian intelligence told President Putin that, in addition to the ongoing training and equipping of the Ukrainian military, CIA and British intelligence (MI6) are essentially controlling Ukrainian intelligence and turning it into a “springboard for operations against Moscow.” President Putin found these reports highly alarming, and on December 15, 2021, he submitted a security proposal to the US government, with Ukrainian neutrality a key provision. The Biden administration rejected it out of hand.
As NATO secretary Jens Stoltenberg later recounted to the EU Parliament:
In the autumn of 2021, Russia actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what they sent us, and that was a precondition for not invading Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that.
Why wasn’t Stoltenberg at least willing to try an Austrian style neutrality deal for Ukraine? Given that the Russians proposed it, they had a strong motive to abide by it. If they subsequently violated the terms of their own proposal, the West would have a clear cause for war with Russia.
Implied in Stoltenberg’s statement is that, in December 2021, he found the prospect of imminent war with Russia in Ukraine preferable to making a concession to Russia to avert war for an indeterminate period, perhaps for as long as Austria had remained at peace with Russia.

A Loon On A Lake

A Loon On A Lake

A woman delivering groceries in the rain stopped for a big black and white bird dragging itself across a parking lot, and everyone standing around it was sure both its legs were broken, until a stranger on the phone asked her one question.
“Is the ground wet?”
Deb Lindqvist is 54. She lives in St. Cloud, Minnesota.
For 26 years she worked at a printing plant on the edge of town. In August 2024, the plant closed. Ninety one people lost their jobs in one afternoon.
Deb sent out applications every morning. Most never got an answer.
So in the evenings she delivered groceries through an app on her phone. Bags in the back seat, a phone clipped to the dashboard, six or seven dollars a trip.
She didn’t tell many people. She said she felt like she’d gone from somebody who knew exactly what she was doing to somebody who didn’t know where she was supposed to be.
On Tuesday, the 29th of October, it rained all evening. Hard, cold rain, the kind that comes before the first snow.
At about 10:40 p.m., she was loading her last order outside a grocery store on the east side of town.
That’s when she saw a group of people standing in a circle in the middle of the parking lot.
In the middle of the circle, on the wet asphalt, was a bird.
It was big. Bigger than a duck. Black head, a sharp grey beak, a white chest and a black back covered in tiny white squares.
It was trying to move. It pushed itself forward on its belly, flapped, and fell flat again.
A teenager was filming it. A man in a store vest said it must have been hit by a car. Somebody else said its legs were broken.
A woman brought a plastic bowl of water and set it down by the bird’s face. It didn’t drink.
Two men tried to nudge it with a shopping cart toward the grass strip by the road. The bird panicked, flapped hard, and slid across the puddles into a parking space.
Deb said it was the most helpless thing she had ever seen.
She called animal control. Closed until morning.
She called the police non emergency line. They gave her the number for a wildlife rehab center.
A volunteer called back ten minutes later. His name was Joel. He’s 47 and he has driven injured birds around central Minnesota for 15 years.
Deb described it. Joel listened.
Then he asked, “Is the ground wet?”
She looked at the parking lot. Rain was still coming down. Every space was shining under the yellow lights.
“Like a lake,” she said.
“That’s a loon,” Joel said. “And I don’t think its legs are broken.”
He explained.
Loons spend almost their whole lives on water. Their legs are set so far back on their bodies that they can’t walk on land. On the ground, all they can do is push themselves along on their bellies.
And they can’t take off from land at all. A loon needs a long run across open water, sometimes hundreds of feet, to get into the air.
At the end of October, loons fly south at night. In heavy rain, from high up, a wet parking lot under streetlights looks exactly like water.
“It came down to land on a lake,” Joel said. “It found out too late it was concrete.”
It wasn’t hurt. It was stranded.
Joel told her exactly what to do. Don’t put it in water. Don’t let anyone grab it. Keep your face away from the beak, because loons stab.
Deb took the beach towel she kept in her trunk. She dropped it over the bird, slid her hands underneath, and lifted it into an empty box from the store.
It was heavier than she expected. About ten pounds. It went completely still in the dark.
She kept the box on her passenger seat with the heater on low and waited 40 minutes for Joel.
The teenager who had been filming asked if he could wait too. He stood under the store awning the whole time.
When Joel arrived, he looked in the box with a flashlight and smiled.
“Young one,” he said. “Born this summer. Probably its first trip south.”
He took the loon to the rehab center overnight. A vet checked it. No broken bones. No lead in its blood. Just a sore chest and a few scraped feathers.
The next afternoon, Joel called Deb and asked if she wanted to come to the release.
She almost said no. She had deliveries.
She went anyway.
They drove to a big lake north of town. Grey water, bare trees, nobody else around.
Joel set the box at the edge of the water and opened it.
The loon sat still for a few seconds. Then it slid out, pushed into the lake, and was suddenly a completely different animal.
It dived. It came up 30 feet away. It shook its head and called, a long, low sound across the water.
Then it turned, ran across the surface with its wings beating, ran and ran, and lifted off.
Deb said she didn’t realize she was crying until Joel handed her a tissue.
“People always think they’re broken,” Joel told her. “They’re not broken. They’re just somewhere they can’t take off from.”
Deb drove home without turning the radio on.
She still delivers groceries. She’s also started volunteering for the rehab center on her nights off, driving birds to the vet and to lakes.
In January, she got a job in the office of a school district. She starts work at seven every morning.
She kept the beach towel in her trunk.
“Just in case it rains,” she says.
Sometimes nothing is wrong with you. You just landed somewhere that only looked like the right place.

Curcumin Shows a Balanced Anticancer Profile, According to Sarcoma Cell Study

Turmeric Root and Powder

  • A laboratory study from Wroclaw Medical University tested and compared five plant compounds — curcumin, berberine, biochanin A, cucurbitacin E, and CAPE — for their ability to affect fibrosarcoma cancer cells versus healthy muscle cells
  • The compounds disrupted energy production far more in the cancer cells, where adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels dropped by roughly 83% to 92%, compared with 23% to 73% in healthy cells
  • All five pushed cancer cells into permanent growth arrest. However, curcumin stood out, producing the strongest effect, raising senescent cancer cells from about 16.5% to more than 75%
  • In a wax moth larvae safety screen, curcumin and berberine were best tolerated, while biochanin A proved most toxic, showing strong anticancer activity does not guarantee safety
  • The work used animal cell lines and a simple invertebrate model, so the researchers are clear these compounds are not a treatment for cancer and need testing in more advanced models

Keep reading: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2026/10/22/curcumin-anticancer-effects-study.aspx

Erin Gruwell and the Freedom Writers

Erin Gruwell and the Freedom Writers

In September 1994, a 23-year-old teacher named Erin Gruwell walked into Room 203 at Woodrow Wilson High School in Long Beach, California, ready to begin her first day of teaching English. What she found was a classroom divided by race, fear, and years of anger. Latino students sat together, Black students kept to their own corner, Cambodian students stayed separate, and the few white students remained isolated. They were not simply avoiding one another. Many genuinely hated each other.

Long Beach was still living with the aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles riots. Gang violence was widespread, and many of Erin’s students had already experienced things no teenager should have to face. Some had watched friends die. Others were homeless, living with relatives, or dealing with parents who were in prison or had been deported. The school had placed them in its lowest-track classes and labeled them “at-risk,” as though their futures had already been decided. Although they were freshmen, many could barely read at an elementary school level. Erin was even warned by the administration not to waste resources on students who probably would not graduate.

Her first day quickly turned into a struggle. Some students ignored her, others walked out, and a few even threw books. Most new teachers might have followed the standard curriculum, tried to get through the year, or decided the job was not worth the trouble. Erin chose a different approach. Instead of focusing only on what the students were doing wrong, she started paying attention to what they were going through. She noticed how they separated themselves by race, how easily arguments turned into fights, and how something as small as a look could spark violence. She began to understand that this was not simply a difficult English class. For many of these teenagers, the classroom reflected the same tensions and dangers they faced outside school.

One incident made that reality impossible to ignore. A student passed around a racist drawing that mocked another student’s appearance, and the class laughed. Erin could have sent the student to the principal or assigned detention, but she stopped the lesson instead. Holding up the drawing, she explained how similar caricatures had been used to dehumanize Jewish people before millions were murdered in the Holocaust. Then she asked the students how many had ever been shot at. Every hand went up. She asked how many had lost friends to violence, and every hand remained raised.

For once, the room fell silent for a different reason. The students knew what it meant to live in fear, to be judged, and to be treated as though their lives mattered less than other people’s. They had never thought about how their own experiences connected to the history they were being asked to study. Erin helped them make that connection, and it changed the way she approached her teaching.

She abandoned the standard curriculum and brought *The Diary of Anne Frank* into the classroom. At first, the students questioned why they should care about a white girl who had died decades earlier. But as they read about Anne hiding from people who wanted to kill her, trying to make sense of fear while holding on to hope, they began to see something familiar. Anne was not just a name in a history book. She was a teenager who had experienced hatred and had found a way to record her thoughts and feelings.

Erin deepened that connection by inviting Holocaust survivors to speak to her students. When Renee Firestone, a survivor of Auschwitz, visited Room 203 and shared her story, many of the teenagers cried. They had never met someone who had survived a genocide, but they understood the pain of loss and the struggle to survive. History no longer felt distant or irrelevant. It had become something real, something they could connect to their own lives.

Then Erin introduced an idea that would change the classroom even more. She gave each student a journal. These notebooks were not meant to be graded assignments, and she did not expect perfect grammar or polished essays. She simply wanted them to write honestly about their lives. They could keep their entries private or choose to share them with the class. There would be no red marks correcting every mistake and no judgment about what they chose to say.

At first, many students left their pages blank. Trust was difficult for teenagers who had repeatedly been let down by adults. But gradually, they began to write. One described watching his brother get shot. Another wrote about sleeping in a car because his family had nowhere to live. A student admitted that she hid her intelligence because being smart could make her a target. These were not ordinary school assignments. They were personal accounts of fear, grief, and survival.

As the students became more comfortable sharing their stories, the divisions between them began to weaken. A Latino student discovered that a Black classmate had also lost a brother to gang violence. A Cambodian refugee and a student from South Central Los Angeles realized that their families had escaped similar hardships. They started to understand that beneath the racial hatred and hostility were experiences of pain that were not so different from one another. Their backgrounds were different, but grief, fear, and the desire to survive were feelings they could all recognize.

Erin’s methods did not win much support from the school administration. When she asked to take her students on field trips, she was told that they were too expensive or risky. Requests for better books were rejected because of budget limitations. She wanted her students to have the same opportunities and attention as everyone else, but the system seemed to have already decided what they were worth. Rather than accept those restrictions, Erin took on three jobs, working at Nordstrom, a Marriott hotel, and selling real estate. She used the money to buy books and pay for field trips herself. She refused to let the school’s low expectations determine how far her students could go.

Meanwhile, Room 203 was changing. Students who had rarely finished a book began reading eagerly. Those who had once refused to speak in class started sharing their writing. Teenagers from rival gangs sat beside one another without the hostility that had once seemed unavoidable. The violence that had defined the classroom began to fade, not simply because Erin enforced rules, but because the students were learning to understand one another. Once they knew the stories behind each other’s anger, it became harder to see one another as enemies.

By their senior year, all 150 students were on track to graduate. These were the same teenagers the administration had warned Erin would probably never finish high school. Yet every one of them made it to that point. Their journals, which had begun as a simple way for students to express themselves, eventually became a book. Published in 1999, *The Freedom Writers Diary* brought together the voices of all 150 students, sharing their experiences with poverty, racism, violence, and the struggle to build a future.

The book reached readers around the world because it was honest. It did not present the students as statistics or reduce their lives to academic problems. It allowed them to tell their own stories in their own words. Teachers began using it in classrooms, and in 2007, the story reached an even larger audience through the film *Freedom Writers*, starring Hilary Swank as Erin. The movie showed how education could be about far more than standardized tests and grades. It could begin with recognizing students as people whose experiences deserved to be heard.

But the greatest measure of Erin’s work was not the success of the book or the film. It was what happened to the students themselves. Many went on to college, becoming the first members of their families to do so. Some eventually became teachers, carrying Erin’s approach into their own classrooms. Others became social workers, counselors, and advocates, dedicating themselves to helping young people facing the same kinds of challenges they had once known.

Erin also founded the Freedom Writers Foundation to help teachers around the world use writing, literature, and storytelling to build stronger connections with their students. Through its work, the foundation has reached hundreds of thousands of students.

Years later, former Freedom Writers reflected on what had happened in Room 203. One student remembered believing that he might not live to see his eighteenth birthday, only to go on to earn a master’s degree. Another said Erin had done more than teach English. She had taught them that they mattered.

That was the real lesson of Room 203. Writing gave the students a way to speak about their lives, and a dedicated teacher helped them discover what they could achieve. But at the heart of it all was something even simpler: Erin saw young people whom the school had largely given up on, and she refused to believe that their circumstances defined their future.

When she walked into that classroom in September 1994, she was a 23-year-old teacher facing students who had every reason to distrust another adult. Some threw books at her, and many had been told, directly or indirectly, that they were unlikely to succeed. Erin gave them journals instead, asking them to write their truths. She introduced them to Anne Frank, brought Holocaust survivors into their classroom, and worked three jobs to provide the books and experiences the school would not fund.

By graduation, all 150 students had made it. Many went on to college, their writing became a bestselling book, and their story inspired a film. It all began because one teacher refused to accept that being labeled “at-risk” meant being incapable of success. She gave her students the chance to be heard, and they showed what could happen when someone finally believed in them.