Category: General Interest

Posted on

Harvesting Herbs For Growth

Harvesting Herbs For Growth

You grew the herbs. They looked perfect. You cut what you needed for dinner and the plant stopped growing back.
You didn’t underwater it. You cut it in the wrong place.
Basil is where most people learn this the hard way. The plant wants to grow one tall stalk and flower. When you pinch the tip just above a leaf pair, it splits into two stems. Pinch those two and you get four. Within a month of regular pinching, one leggy seedling becomes a dense bush producing far more leaves than it started with.
Pull individual leaves from the bottom instead, and the plant races upward, flowers early, goes bitter, and finishes weeks ahead of schedule.
The same idea — cut with the plant’s growth pattern, not against it — applies to almost everything in the herb pot.
🌿 Quick rules by herb:
– Basil — pinch stem tips above a leaf pair, starting when the plant is six inches tall. The more you pinch, the bushier it gets
– Cilantro — cut whole outer stems at ground level, leave the center rosette intact. It bolts on a heat timer no pruning can override, so sow a fresh round every few weeks
– Rosemary and thyme — cut only into green growth where leaves are visible below the cut. Cutting into bare brown wood on rosemary removes that branch for good
– Mint — the opposite of everything above. Cut it hard and often. Aggressive harvesting keeps it compact and flavorful. Neglected mint gets leggy and loses its punch
– Parsley — same approach as cilantro but on a longer timeline. Cut outer stems at the base, leave the inner crown growing, and it produces well into fall
The herb didn’t fail. The cut was in the wrong place
Posted on

Elderberries vs Pokeweed

Elderberries vs Pokeweed

Elderberry picking goes wrong when the bag comes home full of pokeweed instead.
The berries look similar at a glance. The stems give it away before the berries ever could.
– Elderberry — tiny, BB-sized, in broad flat clusters that fan out like an umbrella. Thin woody stems with visible bark
– Pokeweed — pea-sized, hanging in long drooping lines like a grape cluster. Thick fleshy stems stained magenta-red with no bark at all
– Elderberry leaves are compound with multiple leaflets branching opposite each other — pokeweed leaves are large, simple, and alternate along the stem
If the berries hang in a long line off a thick red stem, that’s pokeweed. Don’t eat it — the plant is not edible at any stage.
Check the stems first. The berries can fool you. The stems can’t.
Posted on

Perennial Vegetables

Perennial Vegetables

Plant once. Harvest for a decade.
These nine perennial vegetables skip the annual cycle of buying transplants, prepping beds, and starting over.
Asparagus produces for 20+ years from a single crown. Rhubarb delivers 15+ years of stalks. Walking onions replant themselves when their topsets bend over and root into the ground.
Jerusalem artichoke yields around 10 lbs per plant with almost no maintenance. Sorrel and lovage come back each spring. Good King Henry works as a spinach substitute. Sea kale produces blanched shoots for a decade.
Horseradish is the one to contain — it spreads aggressively. Give it a buried barrier or its own bed.
The two-year wait for most of these is the price of not buying starts again.
Posted on

Tomato Pruning

Tomato Pruning

You pruned the suckers off your Roma and wondered why it produced less fruit. You didn’t prune your Brandywine and it became a tangled mess that rotted from the inside.

Same plant family. Opposite pruning rules. The tag on the transplant tells you which.

The two types that matter most:

Determinate tomatoes (Roma, Celebrity, Rutgers) grow to a set height, produce most of their fruit in a concentrated window, and stop. Every sucker on a determinate becomes a fruit-bearing branch. Removing suckers removes fruit. Don’t prune them — just take off the lowest leaves where they touch the soil to reduce splash-borne fungal contact. Cage them. Let them bush out.

Indeterminate tomatoes (Brandywine, Cherokee Purple, Sungold, most cherry types) grow and produce continuously until frost. Left unpruned, each sucker becomes a full secondary stem that produces its own suckers — and the interior becomes dense, shaded, and damp. Prune the suckers. Train to one or two main stems on a tall stake or string. Pinch new suckers when they’re small. Check twice a week in warm weather — they appear fast.

The quick guide:

– Determinate (bush) — don’t remove suckers. Remove only the lowest leaves. Cage it. Harvest comes in a concentrated flush — good for canning and preserving

– Indeterminate (vining) — remove suckers regularly. Stake or string trellis. One or two leaders. Harvest is continuous small batches through the season — good for fresh eating

– Semi-determinate (Better Bush, Mountain Magic) — remove suckers below the first flower cluster, leave everything above. Short stake or sturdy cage

– Dwarf (Tiny Tim, Micro Tom) — minimal pruning. Remove lower leaves for airflow. Small stake if it leans. Container-friendly
The Roma you pruned like a Brandywine lost fruit it was never going to replace. The Brandywine you didn’t prune needed the airflow you never gave it.

Read the tag. Match the type.

Posted on

My Cousin Vinny

My Cousin Vinny

It was 1992, and audiences were howling with laughter.
On screen, Joe Pesci stumbled through an Alabama courtroom as Vinny Gambini—a Brooklyn personal injury lawyer who’d failed the bar exam six times, never tried a criminal case, and showed up wearing a maroon velvet suit that made the judge’s face turn purple.
It was a comedy. A farce. Entertainment.
Nobody expected law schools to start teaching from it.
But that’s exactly what happened.
Within a few years of My Cousin Vinny’s release, something strange started appearing in law school syllabi across America: a comedy film listed alongside Supreme Court cases and legal textbooks.
Criminal procedure professors assigned it. Evidence courses screened it. Trial advocacy instructors made it required viewing.
Because buried inside this slapstick comedy about an incompetent lawyer was something almost impossible to find in Hollywood: perfect legal procedure.
The discovery happened gradually. A defense attorney watched it on cable and paused mid-scene. “Wait—that cross-examination is actually correct.” An evidence professor noticed the impeachment technique was textbook-accurate. Trial lawyers realized the expert witness sequence was flawless.
By the late 1990s, legal scholars were writing academic papers about it. The American Bar Association was recommending it. Judge Joseph Bellacosa of the New York Court of Appeals called it “particularly rich in its use of the Constitutions, rules of evidence, civil and criminal procedure.”
A Joe Pesci comedy had become the gold standard for courtroom accuracy.
Here’s why that’s remarkable:
Most legal dramas sacrifice accuracy for drama. A Few Good Men features a climactic speech that would get you disbarred. The Verdict has procedures that make real lawyers cringe. Even prestige courtroom films choose compelling storytelling over legal reality.
My Cousin Vinny did both.
The plot seems simple: two college kids are wrongly accused of murder in rural Alabama. Vinny Gambini—their cousin who just passed the bar after six attempts and has never set foot in a courtroom—shows up to defend them.
He’s a disaster. He insults the judge. He doesn’t know basic procedure. He wears ridiculous outfits. Every scene suggests his clients are doomed.
Then the trial actually starts, and something shifts.
The prosecution presents two eyewitnesses who claim they saw the defendants’ car fleeing the murder scene at high speed. In most movies, the hero lawyer would give a passionate speech about reasonable doubt.
Vinny does what real lawyers do: he destroys their testimony using physical evidence and logic.
The first witness claims he saw the car while cooking breakfast. Seems solid—until Vinny cross-examines him about the grits. How long were they cooking? What type? Instant or regular?
Through relentless, methodical questioning, Vinny establishes that regular grits take twenty minutes to cook properly. The witness’s timeline is impossible. He couldn’t have seen what he claimed.
The courtroom erupts when Vinny asks: “Were these magic grits? Did you buy them from the same guy who sold Jack his beanstalk beans?”
It’s hilarious. It’s also perfect impeachment technique—using specific details to expose impossible testimony.
The second witness is an elderly woman who claims she saw the car clearly. Vinny doesn’t call her a liar. Instead, he establishes through gentle questioning that she needs thick glasses to see distances, wears them inconsistently, and couldn’t possibly have identified a speeding car from her window at that distance.
He uses her own testimony to destroy her credibility. No drama. No shouting. Just methodical cross-examination.
Then comes the sequence that law professors obsess over.
Vinny calls his girlfriend, Mona Lisa Vito, as an expert witness on automobiles. The prosecutor immediately objects—she’s not qualified.
The judge demands her credentials.
What follows is two minutes of textbook-perfect expert witness qualification. Mona Lisa lists her father’s career as a mechanic, her childhood working in his shop, her training, her certifications, her specific expertise in American automotive engineering from 1963 to 1972.
It’s exactly how expert witnesses establish credibility in real trials.
Then Vinny examines her about the tire marks at the crime scene. He asks open-ended questions. He lets her explain the technical details. He builds logically to the conclusion: the tire marks physically could not have come from his cousin’s car—the vehicle lacked the mechanical specifications to make those marks.
When the prosecutor tries to cross-examine her, he fails spectacularly. She knows more about cars than anyone in that courtroom, and it shows.
Legal experts point to this scene as a masterclass in expert witness examination. The qualification. The direct examination. The failed cross-examination. All of it tracks exactly how real trials work.
Even the comedy comes from accurate legal procedure. Judge Haller holds Vinny in contempt repeatedly—for inappropriate clothing, for addressing the judge incorrectly, for procedural violations. This isn’t exaggerated. Real judges enforce these standards exactly this way.
The voir dire sequence where Vinny questions potential jurors? Accurate. The discovery violations? Correct. The objections and their legal basis? Precise.
Screenwriter Dale Launer wasn’t a lawyer, but he spent months researching. He interviewed defense attorneys, studied trial transcripts, consulted legal experts. He wanted the legal framework to be bulletproof so the comedy could work.
He succeeded beyond imagination.
Marisa Tomei won an Oscar for her performance. But the film’s legacy extends far beyond entertainment.
Today, it’s cited in legal journals and continuing legal education seminars. Harvard Law School has screened it. Trial advocacy courses use clips to demonstrate proper technique. The National Institute for Trial Advocacy references it in training materials.
A 2008 survey of lawyers ranked it the seventh-best legal film ever made for accuracy—ahead of prestige dramas and documentaries.
Because My Cousin Vinny understood something most legal films miss: real trials aren’t won by dramatic speeches. They’re won by mastering procedure, understanding evidence, and methodically building a case.
Vinny Gambini looks like a buffoon in his leather jacket and attitude. But watch carefully, and you see him doing everything right: he studies the evidence, he identifies inconsistencies, he prepares his witnesses, he follows proper examination technique.
The joke isn’t that he’s incompetent. The joke is that everyone—including the audience—assumes he’s incompetent because he doesn’t look like their idea of a lawyer.
Thirty years later, law students still watch Vinny stumble through that Alabama courtroom, laughing at his mistakes—until they realize he’s been building an airtight defense the entire time using flawless legal strategy.
It’s a comedy about an underestimated lawyer who wins through actual competence.
And accidentally, it became the most legally accurate courtroom film Hollywood ever made.
Posted on

Official Release Notice of ‘Cultivating Life: Growing Food Sustainably’

OK, drum roll please! I finally felt I had enough good material in a logical and useful sequence to release version 1 of ’Cultivating Life: Growing Food Sustainably’

The whole sits at over 1,800 pages so is reasonably comprehensive. The first section of it, about 80 pages, is on preparedness planning and actions to take in a SHTF situation. It is so important I hold the view that everyone should own it and that money should not be a barrier to doing so. So I am releasing it for $1. That’s right, a single solitary dollar.

And not just for you. For you, your family, friends, co-workers, neighbours, in fact, anyone with whom you wish to share the link.

Why? Because in a worst case scenario, the more of us who have predicted the possibility and prepared for it, the better the survival potential of all of us.

So head on over to seedtotable.com.au, pay a dollar and set aside some time to read it over a cuppa.

And yes, I would love to hear your feedback. Good, bad, indifferent, suggestions, all welcome.

Cheers!

Posted on

Norman Joseph Woodland – Barcode Inventor

Norman Joseph Woodland

In 1948, a 27-year-old engineer sat on a Miami Beach shoreline and dragged four fingers through the wet sand.
The ocean water immediately filled the narrow trenches. He watched the lines settle into the grit.
He had just solved the largest bottleneck in American retail.
His name was Norman Joseph Woodland.
A few months earlier, the president of a regional supermarket chain had walked onto the Drexel Institute campus in Philadelphia looking for an engineering solution to a financial hemorrhage.
Post-war supermarkets were expanding rapidly, carrying thousands of items. Checkout lines stretched down the aisles. Cashiers had to memorize or manually type the price of every tin, box, and bottle. Errors were costing the industry millions every quarter.
The executive asked the dean to build an automated machine to read product prices. The dean declined. The university did not accept commercial retail projects.
Bernard Silver, a graduate student, overheard the conversation and relayed the problem to Woodland.
Woodland dropped out of graduate school the following week. He emptied his savings and moved to his grandfather’s apartment in Miami Beach to work on the problem full-time.
Their first attempt was chemical. They formulated a specialized ultraviolet ink and painted it onto sample grocery labels. The system technically functioned, but the ink was unstable. Standard warehouse heat degraded the formula. Printing specialized ultraviolet ink onto millions of disposable paper labels was economically impossible.
They needed a structural solution that could be printed with cheap, standard black ink.
Woodland spent his mornings walking the Florida coastline, thinking about Morse code from his Boy Scout days. He knew two variables — dots and dashes — could represent the entire alphabet.
Sitting in the sand, he realized he could stretch a dot downward into a narrow vertical line and a dash into a thick vertical line.
He pressed four fingers into the sand and pulled them toward his body. The parallel tracks remained. He drew a circle around them. His first design was a bullseye. A circular pattern could be scanned from any angle.
In October 1949, Woodland and Silver submitted an application for a “Classifying Apparatus and Method.”
They returned to Philadelphia to build a physical prototype in Woodland’s living room.
They needed massive illumination to read the light reflection off the black and white paper. Lasers did not exist. They purchased a 500-watt incandescent light bulb — the exact model used in cinema projectors. They rigged it to an RCA-931 photomultiplier tube originally designed to read audio tracks on motion picture film.
They slid a piece of paper with the printed lines past the blazing light. An oscilloscope recorded the bounce. It worked. The machine read the lines and translated them into an electronic signal.
The prototype was the size of a standard desk. The 500-watt bulb generated dangerous heat. During testing, the bulb routinely set the paper labels on fire.
The patent office formally granted US Patent 2,612,994 in October 1952.
Woodland took the patent documentation to IBM. He asked the corporation to buy the rights and manufacture the system.
IBM’s engineering division evaluated the prototype. They agreed the underlying logic was sound. They also told him it was commercially useless.
To function in a neighborhood grocery store, the system needed a bright, highly focused light source that didn’t generate destructive heat. It also needed a localized computer small enough to process the signals at the register.
Neither of those technologies existed in 1952. IBM declined the offer.
Woodland had exhausted his personal savings. He needed a stable income.
He sold the patent in 1952 to the Philco Corporation for $15,000. Silver took his half. Woodland took the remaining $7,500. It was enough to help buy a modest house. He never saw another dollar from the intellectual property. Philco eventually sold the patent to RCA.
Woodland accepted a salaried engineering job at IBM. He filed his employment paperwork and went to work on unrelated projects.
The 1950s passed. Cashiers continued to type prices by hand.
In 1960, the first working optical laser was successfully demonstrated in a laboratory. It provided the exact cold, focused light his invention required.
By the late 1960s, early microprocessors were entering commercial manufacturing. The processing power required to decode the printed lines could finally fit on a checkout counter.
The patent expired in 1969. The intellectual property entered the public domain. The $15,000 payment was the only financial transaction attached to his name.
In 1970, the grocery industry formed an ad hoc committee to standardize an automated checkout system. IBM submitted a corporate proposal. They placed Woodland on the development team. He was fifty years old.
Another IBM engineer, George Laurer, evaluated Woodland’s original bullseye design. Laurer flattened the circles into the vertical rectangular bars we recognize today. The rectangles were less prone to ink smearing during the high-speed cardboard printing process.
On June 26, 1974, a cashier named Sharon Buchanan stood at a register in the Marsh Supermarket in Troy, Ohio.
A customer placed a ten-pack of Wrigley’s Juicy Fruit chewing gum on the counter.
Buchanan slid the yellow package over a flat glass scanner embedded in the counter. A red helium-neon laser beam hit the printed lines. The register chimed. The receipt printed the price: sixty-seven cents.
It was the first commercial scan in history. The pack of gum is now held in the archives of the Smithsonian Institution.
He invented the future twenty-five years before the world built the tools to read it.
Today, the system he mapped out in the sand is scanned ten billion times every twenty-four hours.
It tracks global shipping containers crossing oceans. It processes patient medical wristbands in hospital wards. It logs the milk in your refrigerator.
Woodland retired from IBM in 1987. He died in 2012 at the age of ninety-one.
He lived out his life in a quiet residential neighborhood in New Jersey. His obituary in the local newspaper noted his long career in mechanical engineering.
The grocery stores in his town used the scanners. He waited in the same lines as everyone else.
Posted on

Glyphosate – Pipe Cleaner To Food Poison

Glyphosate - Pipe Cleaner To Food Poison

The hidden truth about Glyphosate: It started as a pipe chelator — and it was never meant to touch our food. Most people think Glyphosate (Roundup’s main ingredient) is just a weedkiller. But here’s the lesser-known truth: it was originally patented and used as a powerful chelating agent to clean pipes and boilers. What Glyphosate Really Is A chelator is a molecule that tightly binds to minerals (calcium, magnesium, zinc, iron, manganese, etc.) and makes them unavailable. In 1964, Stauffer Chemical patented glyphosate (U.S. Patent 3,160,632) specifically as a descaler to dissolve mineral buildup in hot-water pipes and industrial systems. It was excellent at pulling calcium and magnesium out of pipes. In the 1970s, Monsanto repurposed it as an herbicide. Suddenly this pipe cleaner was being sprayed on food crops — especially Roundup-Ready GMO plants — and has been ever since. How It Steals Minerals at Every Level • Pipes: Binds and flushes out mineral deposits. • Soil: Locks up essential trace minerals so plants can’t access them. It also harms soil microbes that normally release these minerals. • Plants: Crops absorb less zinc, magnesium, iron, manganese, and calcium. Glyphosate residues remain in the plant tissue we eat. • Humans & Animals: When we consume these foods, glyphosate continues chelating inside our bodies — binding minerals and stripping them from our cells, enzymes, and organs. This affects every living being. Why This Matters So Much Minerals are the foundation of health. They power: • Magnesium: Energy production (ATP), muscle/nerve function, sleep, blood pressure, blood sugar control. • Zinc: Immune function, DNA repair, hormones, skin, brain function, wound healing. • Potassium: Heart rhythm, muscle contraction, fluid balance. • Iron, Manganese, Calcium, Boron, Selenium, Copper: Oxygen transport, bones, antioxidants, thyroid, detoxification. Today, most people are deficient in these minerals — not from lack of calories, but because modern industrial farming and glyphosate have depleted our soils. Trace minerals that once came naturally through healthy soil into our food are now largely missing. Processed foods, filtered water, and stress make it worse. The result: widespread fatigue, anxiety, brain fog, weak immunity, hormone issues, muscle cramps, poor sleep, and rising chronic illness. Bottom Line Glyphosate was never designed to touch our food. Its core job is to bind minerals and disrupt life processes. Yet it’s now one of the most used chemicals on Earth, with residues in our bread, oats, vegetables, and more. We can’t fix mineral deficiency by just “eating more veggies” if the soil is broken. Real solutions require regenerative farming, remineralizing our bodies (through better food and targeted supplementation after testing), and reducing exposure. Our health depends on getting these minerals back. Share if this opened your eyes. What mineral deficiency symptoms have you or your family noticed?