
This does not negate the desirability of being the best you can be – of planning, preparation and learning as much as you can.

Tom's Blog on Life and Livingness

This does not negate the desirability of being the best you can be – of planning, preparation and learning as much as you can.

Disney spent over $100 million making it. Viggo Mortensen fell off galloping horses to film it. Audiences around the world were moved to tears by it.
Then historians said most of it probably never happened.
And somehow, that’s not even the most interesting part of the story.
Hidalgo arrived in theaters in 2004 as an epic true story. A legendary 3,000-mile race across the Arabian desert. A scrappy American Mustang named Hidalgo competing against pure-blooded Arabian stallions worth more than most houses. One man. One horse. The impossible odds of the ultimate underdog.
It was stunning cinema. Sandstorms. Locust swarms. The kind of raw, sweeping beauty that makes you forget you’re sitting in a theater.
There was just one problem.
Equestrian historians and Arab scholars began examining the film’s “Based on a True Story” claim and found almost nothing they could verify. The Ocean of Fire race had no official record. No Arab historical sources confirmed the event ever existed. Frank T. Hopkins, the real man the film was built around, left behind memoirs full of extraordinary claims that experts struggled to substantiate. The conclusion most historians reached was uncomfortable for a $100 million Disney epic.
The race probably never happened.
The backlash was swift. The “true story” label took a beating.
And then something unexpected occurred.
The audiences didn’t particularly care.
Not because they were fooled. But because Hidalgo was never really about historical accuracy, and somewhere underneath the sandstorms and the spectacle, everyone watching already knew it.
The film was about something that doesn’t require documentation.
It was about the underdog. The outsider. The one told from the beginning that their bloodline was wrong, their breeding was insufficient, their presence in the race was an embarrassment. A Mustang, untamed, mixed, unbothered by pedigree, standing at the starting line alongside animals whose entire value was the purity of what they came from.
And refusing to lose.
Viggo Mortensen understood exactly what he had signed on for.
He didn’t approach the role like an actor playing a horseman. He approached it like a man who intended to become one. He rode bareback. He fell off galloping horses. He jumped onto moving mounts at full speed. He spent months learning the relationship between a rider and an animal until the camera couldn’t find the seam between performance and reality.
One Paint stallion named TJ did most of the close-up work, including the unforgettable locust swarm sequence that became one of the film’s most iconic moments. Something real developed between them across those months of filming. The kind of trust that doesn’t follow a script.
When production ended, Mortensen didn’t walk away.
He bought TJ.
At the Hollywood premiere, one of the most carefully staged and image-conscious events the entertainment industry produces, Viggo Mortensen arrived on horseback. He rode TJ down the red carpet. Stopped for photographs. Did interviews with his horse standing beside him, hooves on the pavement, completely unbothered by the cameras and the crowd.
It was either the most authentic thing anyone had ever done at a Hollywood premiere or the most perfectly chosen gesture imaginable.
Probably both.
Nearly twenty years later Hidalgo still finds new audiences. Not because scholars have verified the race. Not because the historical record has been settled.
But because the film speaks to something that doesn’t need a historical record to be true.
Everyone who has ever been told they weren’t the right kind. The right bloodline. The right background. The right credentials. Everyone who has stood at a starting line surrounded by people who belonged there by birth while they arrived by sheer refusal to accept the verdict handed to them.
That story doesn’t need documentation.
It just needs to be told.
*The greatest journey was never about winning a race across the Arabian desert.*
It was about staying wild in a world that never stops trying to smooth you down.



From mid-2024 through 2025, dietitians at a women’s and children’s hospital in Yangzhou, China, randomized 60 women with PCOS to two diets for 12 weeks.
PCOS affects 8 to 13% of women of reproductive age, and 50 to 70% have insulin resistance. The WHO says it cannot be cured. In May 2026, a Lancet consensus renamed it polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome.
Thirty went keto: under 50 grams of carbs a day, with fats like avocado, nuts, olive oil and fatty fish. Thirty ate a China-adapted Mediterranean-style diet with whole grains, legumes and fruit, the diet the authors call most widely recommended. Both had matched calorie targets, counseling and exercise advice.
Of 13 keto women with no periods at the start, 12 got them back, versus 5 of 15 on the Mediterranean-style diet. Excluding women already regular (3 versus 12), 26 of 27 reached regular cycles on keto, versus 8 of 18. Insulin resistance fell 72% versus 35%. Frontiers in Nutrition published it in September.
Be straight about it. One hospital, 60 Chinese women, 12 weeks, open label, self-reported cycles, not yet repeated. The keto group lost about 22 pounds more on the same calorie targets, so real intake may have differed, and the authors can’t separate ketosis from weight loss and adherence.
Testosterone didn’t change. Nobody measured ovulation or pregnancy. Diabetes and thyroid patients were excluded. Zero dropouts and unbroken ketosis: unusually tidy data. The authors advise keto first, then Mediterranean long term. Never start, stop or change medication without your doctor.
The point is not that keto cures PCOS, or that the Mediterranean diet failed. Both helped. The point is that for a condition now named for its metabolism, the low-carb plate moved periods and insulin further.
The new name says metabolic. Start at the plate.
Source:https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1698947074922811&set=pcb.1698948178256034

In late 2014, astronaut Barry Wilmore, aboard the International Space Station, mentioned that he could use a ratcheting socket wrench. There was no such tool on the station, no hardware store in orbit and no supply ship heading his way that could bring one.
The station did have something new on board, an experimental 3D printer that had arrived a few months earlier to test whether parts could be made in microgravity. Engineers on the ground designed a wrench to suit it, turned the design into a digital file and sent it up to the station.
The printer spent about four hours building the tool layer by layer out of plastic, and when it was finished the crew had a working ratchet wrench. Nothing had been launched, packed or shipped, because the only thing that had traveled from Earth was data.
That made it the first object designed on the ground and manufactured in space, and it proved a point that matters for long missions, where a crew can't wait months for a missing part. A file can cross the distance far faster than any rocket, and for the first time one had arrived as a tool.

Stop wasting money on expensive NAD+ supplements that only turn into $5 niacin in the body. Discover the truth about NAD supplements, why they became so popular, and a few inexpensive NAD boosters that don’t require an expensive NAD supplement.
Click to view the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPqKQBpChbI
It’s genuinely refreshing to hear someone speak the unvarnished truth instead of peddling a carefully manufactured load of bullshit designed to deceive, manipulate, and brainwash the masses…
Click to view the video: https://x.com/ricwe123/status/2113155114227642511?s=20

Some very telling data on Ivermectin.
Click to view the video: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FqeYi7T1f/

Ziploc is being sued for failing to tell you their product releases billions of microplastics into your food after freezing…