Clair Patterson

Clair Patterson

(Tom: We all owe this being a debt of thanks!)

He discovered how old the Earth was. Then he discovered something that could destroy us all.

For thousands of years, humanity wondered about the age of our planet. Religious texts offered one answer. Philosophers debated another. Scientists made educated guesses based on fossils and rock layers. But nobody actually knew.

Until a quiet scientist named Clair Patterson figured it out in 1953.

He should have become instantly famous. His name should have appeared in every textbook. Instead, what he discovered next turned him into a target. He found himself standing alone against one of the most powerful industries on Earth, fighting a battle that would determine whether millions of children would grow up with damaged minds.

And for decades, almost nobody knew his name.

Patterson’s journey began in the late 1940s at the University of Chicago. He was a young geochemist with an impossible assignment: measure the precise amount of lead isotopes in a meteorite fragment called Canyon Diablo.

The theory was elegant—if he could measure these specific lead ratios accurately, he could calculate when the solar system formed, and therefore, when Earth was born.

But there was a problem that nearly broke him.

Every time he tried to measure the lead in his samples, the numbers were wildly inconsistent. One day high, the next day higher, never stable. His equipment seemed fine. His calculations were correct. Yet the data was chaos.

Most scientists would have given up or blamed the methodology. Patterson was different. He possessed an almost obsessive attention to detail and patience that bordered on stubborn madness.

One day, he realized something shocking: the problem wasn’t his rock sample. The problem was everything else.

There was lead everywhere. On the lab benches. In the air. Tracking in on people’s shoes. Floating as invisible dust particles. The entire world was contaminated, and it was sabotaging his measurements.

So Patterson did something unprecedented. He built the world’s first ultra-clean laboratory.

He scrubbed every surface until his hands bled. He sealed cracks in walls with tape. He installed specialized air filters. He made his assistants wear protective suits and wash repeatedly before entering. For years, he cleaned and refined and eliminated every possible source of contamination.

Finally, in 1953, he achieved it. He got a clean reading. He ran the numbers through a mass spectrometer, performed the calculations, and suddenly held an answer that no human in history had ever known:

4.55 billion years.

The Earth was 4.55 billion years old.

It’s said that in his excitement, he drove straight to his mother’s house in Iowa and told her he’d solved one of humanity’s oldest mysteries. The weight of not knowing had finally lifted.

But while building his clean room, Patterson had stumbled onto something far more disturbing.

Where was all this lead coming from?

Lead is naturally rare on Earth’s surface. It stays locked deep underground in mineral deposits. It doesn’t float freely in the air. It doesn’t coat laboratory tables. Yet it was everywhere—in quantities that made no sense.

Patterson began testing the world outside his lab. Ocean water. Mountain snow. Everywhere he looked, lead levels were hundreds of times higher than natural background levels.

And then he understood.

Since the 1920s, oil companies had been adding a compound called tetraethyl lead to gasoline. It prevented engine knock and made cars run smoother. But every car on every road was functioning as a poison dispersal system, spraying microscopic lead particles into the air with every mile driven.

Lead is a neurotoxin. It damages developing brains. It lowers IQ. It causes behavioral problems, aggression, and cognitive impairment. And an entire generation of children was breathing it every single day.

Patterson had to make a choice.

He was a geochemist. His job was studying rocks and isotopes, not fighting corporations or advocating for public health. He had stable funding and a promising academic career. He could have simply published his Earth-age discovery and moved on to the next project.

But he couldn’t unsee what he’d found.

In the mid-1960s, he published papers warning that industrial lead contamination was poisoning the environment and harming human health.

The response was swift and brutal.

The lead industry was massive, wealthy, and had no intention of losing billions in revenue. Their chief scientific defender was Dr. Robert Kehoe, who had spent decades assuring the public that environmental lead was natural and harmless. Kehoe was polished, well-funded, and had the backing of powerful corporations.

When Patterson challenged this narrative, the industry attempted to buy his silence. Representatives visited him offering generous research grants and institutional support. All he had to do was redirect his focus elsewhere.

Patterson refused.

So they tried to destroy him professionally.

His funding from petroleum-connected sources was immediately cut. The industry pressured his university to dismiss him. They used their influence to block his papers from peer-reviewed journals. They publicly dismissed him as an overzealous geologist stepping outside his expertise.

For years, it worked. Patterson was marginalized, labeled an alarmist, and isolated from mainstream scientific discussions.

But Patterson had something the industry couldn’t counter: evidence from before the contamination began.

He realized he needed a time machine—a way to prove what Earth’s atmosphere was like before automobiles. So he traveled to one of the most remote places on the planet: Greenland.

In brutal, freezing conditions, Patterson and his team drilled deep into ancient glaciers, extracting long cylinders of ice. These ice cores were frozen time capsules. Snow that fell in 1700 was preserved deep in the ice. Snow from 1900 was higher up. Snow from the 1950s was near the surface.

Back in his clean lab, Patterson carefully melted layers of ice from different time periods and measured their lead content.

The results were devastating to the industry’s claims.

For thousands of years, atmospheric lead levels were essentially zero. Then, starting precisely in the 1920s—exactly when leaded gasoline was introduced—the levels shot upward like a rocket. The graph was unmistakable. The contamination wasn’t natural. It was recent, man-made, and accelerating.

Armed with this irrefutable proof, Patterson returned to the fight.

He testified before congressional committees, sitting across from industry lawyers who tried to confuse the science. He wasn’t comfortable with public speaking.

He was nervous, awkward, and preferred the quiet predictability of his laboratory. But he refused to back down.

He told legislators they were poisoning their own children. He showed them the ice core data. He made the invisible visible.

Slowly, reluctantly, the truth broke through.

Other scientists began supporting his findings. Public health advocates took notice. Parents started demanding action. The tide turned.

In the 1970s, the United States passed the Clean Air Act and began the slow process of removing lead from gasoline. It took years of regulatory battles, but eventually, unleaded gasoline became the standard.

The results were nothing short of miraculous.

Within years, blood lead levels in American children dropped by nearly 80%. An entire generation was saved from cognitive impairment, behavioral disorders, and reduced intelligence. Millions of lives were protected from lead-related health problems.

Clair Patterson had won.

Yet when he died in 1995, few outside the scientific community knew his name. He never received a Nobel Prize. He never became wealthy. He simply returned to his laboratory and continued studying the chemistry of the oceans and the history of the Earth.

Patterson’s story is a reminder of what integrity looks like when nobody’s watching.

It’s easy to do the right thing when the crowd is cheering. It’s infinitely harder when powerful interests are trying to ruin you, when your career is threatened, when taking the money would be so much easier.

He could have stayed silent. He could have enjoyed a comfortable, well-funded career studying rocks while children’s minds were damaged. He could have said, “Not my problem.”

But he looked at the data, looked at the world, and decided truth mattered more than comfort.

He gave us the age of the Earth—a number that changed our understanding of time itself.

And then he gave us a future—a world where children could grow up without poison in their lungs.

We often imagine heroes as soldiers, activists, or celebrities. But sometimes a hero is just a stubborn man in a white lab coat, scrubbing a floor over and over, refusing to accept a convenient lie.

He cleaned the room.

And then he cleaned the world.

Energy and Wealth: The Correlation That Built Nations

From an International Man Communique newsletter.

The relationship between energy consumption and national wealth is one of history’s most consistent patterns.

From coal-fired Britain to oil-powered America to today’s renewable energy leaders, access to abundant, affordable energy has been the foundation of economic prosperity. This correlation isn’t coincidental — it’s mechanical. Energy powers industry, transportation, communication, and virtually every productive activity that generates wealth.

The Industrial Revolution provides history’s clearest demonstration. Britain’s dominance in the 18th and 19th centuries directly correlated with its exploitation of coal reserves. Coal powered steam engines, which mechanized textile production, iron smelting, and transportation. Britain’s GDP per capita increased roughly 10-fold between 1750 and 1900, precisely tracking its exponential increase in coal consumption.

Nations without coal access — or unwilling to industrialize — remained agrarian and poor. The energy-wealth gap widened dramatically during this period, creating the modern developed-developing world divide. As an aside, this is how a nation with crooked teeth and zero cuisine could go about bullying and colonizing much of the world.

America’s ascent to superpower status followed an identical pattern, but with oil instead of coal. The discovery of Pennsylvania oil in 1859, followed by massive Texas fields in the early 1900s, gave America an unprecedented energy advantage. Cheap, abundant petroleum powered automobiles, aviation, petrochemicals, and eventually plastics — entire industries that wouldn’t exist without energy density only oil provides.

By 1950, America consumed half the world’s energy and produced half its GDP. This wasn’t correlation; it was causation. Energy powered the factories, transported the goods, and literally fueled American prosperity.

Post-war Japan and Germany demonstrated how energy access drives reconstruction. Both nations were devastated in 1945, yet rebuilt rapidly by securing reliable energy supplies. Germany imported coal and developed nuclear power. Japan, lacking domestic energy, built the world’s most efficient industrial base to maximize limited resources. Both became economic powerhouses not despite energy constraints but by prioritizing energy infrastructure. In fact, this is why supply chains matter. In any event, their GDP growth rates directly tracked energy consumption increases through the 1960s-80s.

The correlation holds in reverse, too…

The 1970s oil shocks proved that energy scarcity creates immediate economic contraction. When OPEC embargoed oil shipments, Western economies plunged into recession. GDP growth rates turned negative precisely when energy supplies tightened and prices spiked. The lesson was unmistakable: modern economies simply cannot function without abundant energy. Prosperity requires power, literally.

China’s recent transformation provides the most dramatic modern example.

Between 1980 and 2020, China’s energy consumption increased 20-fold while GDP grew 50-fold. China went from producing 2% of global GDP to 18% by becoming the world’s largest energy consumer. They built coal plants at unprecedented rates, imported massive oil and gas quantities, and invested heavily in renewables.

Energy access didn’t just correlate with growth — it enabled it. You cannot manufacture steel, operate factories, or power cities without energy. China’s wealth came from energy-powered industrialization.

Today’s correlation remains unchanged. The wealthiest nations — America, Germany, Japan, South Korea — consume vastly more energy per capita than poor nations. Sub-Saharan Africa, with minimal electricity access, remains poor not coincidentally but consequently. Energy poverty is economic poverty.

The pattern is mathematical: energy powers machines, machines amplify human productivity, productivity creates wealth. No nation has ever developed without dramatically increasing energy consumption.

The energy-wealth correlation isn’t just historical observation — it’s economic law. Prosperity requires power, and those who control abundant, affordable energy will dominate economically. It’s always been that way, and it likely always will be.

Editor’s Note: The historical pattern laid out above is unmistakable: energy is the foundation of wealth, and shifts in energy access signal much larger economic realignments.

As the global system moves into a period of tighter resources, rising geopolitical tension, and structural strain, the consequences will be felt first in markets and capital flows.

Quote of the Day

“The greatest weapon against stress is our ability to choose one thought over another.”
William James – Philosopher (1842 – 1910)

Choose mental peace over emotional conflict. Your future health and happiness depends on it.

Boost Fitness With Music

Boost Fitness With Music

Physical activity is essential for preventing chronic disease and supporting mental health, yet people are moving less than ever.

The WHO recommends 150 minutes of moderate activity or 75 minutes of vigorous activity per week, but many people do not meet this recommendation. This is problematic, as inactivity raises the risk of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, breast and colon cancer, cognitive decline, and more

In 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that 31% of adults — about 1.8 billion people — did not meet recommended activity levels.

Global inactivity has risen by 5 percentage points since 2010, and if this trend continues, it could reach 35% by 2030, putting millions at risk for preventable illness. But why is it so hard to get moving?

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/consciousness/your-favorite-tunes-could-be-the-key-to-better-workouts-and-feeling-great/

 

RFK Jr On FDA

RFK Jr On FDA

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vocal critic of the FDA’s approach to public health, has been advocating for a broader acceptance of alternative medicine and health practices. According to Kennedy, the FDA’s stringent regulations have suppressed natural health solutions, such as stem cells, raw milk, and exercise, in favor of pharmaceutical interventions. He argues that the FDA has been complicit in a system that prioritizes profit over human well-being, warning that this may soon come to an end as public awareness grows.
Kennedy’s criticism extends to the pharmaceutical industry, which he claims has a vested interest in preventing the widespread use of alternative therapies that cannot be patented. His remarks suggest that the current public health system has been overly influenced by corporate interests, to the detriment of public health. By advocating for transparency and the preservation of medical records, Kennedy calls on professionals within the system to stand up for their patients and the truth about health practices.
As the conversation around healthcare reform intensifies, Kennedy’s statements are sparking debates about the role of government agencies and big pharma in regulating health practices. His warning to the FDA reflects a larger movement towards more patient-centered care and the growing demand for a healthcare system that values holistic approaches. Whether or not his perspective will lead to change, it’s clear that the conversation about the future of health and wellness is evolving.

Pet Vaccine Data

Pet Vaccine Data

Just so you’re aware – most pet vaccines are now mRNA and there can be shedding. Many vaccines for livestock and poultry and now mRNA as well (and what exactly happens when you eat meat that is mRNA, or eggs or…no one knows?). I homestead and avoid these, but even so, pork bought at the store is mRNA meat, chicken, eggs, etc… Some states, TN is the current one, are trying to force every livestock animal in the state to be vaccinated regardless of where they live. They will euthanize any animal that doesn’t have proof of being vaxxed.

This is just a single photo of pet vaccines – the traditional vs the mRNA ones. Most vets have no clue. I called mine, we talked almost 30 minutes and they have no idea which is which or why I am concerned. Our vet practice has 8 vets, none of them understand the mRNA issue.

I asked if they have any of the traditional ones (and gave them the names), they said no. I asked which rabies vaccines they offer, they are the mRNA ones with additional words in the name but the same mRNA vaccine (Nobivac). Some vets are no longer able to order the traditional vaccines even if you are willing to pay for the whole vial. Just a heads up because people don’t realize this is in our food supply now. Started with pigs about 5-6 years ago – now poultry with the bird flu vaccine (some hatcheries don’t vax unless requested, but they are trying to get a federal law going to force every chick leaving a hatchery to be vaxxed first…). Cows in Europe, especially Britain, have mRNA vaccines now and they are pushing to get them started here in the US.

Not to scare anyone, but to let you know. And organic doesn’t equal vaccine free – and don’t take me down that bunny path because organic isn’t truly organic most of the time. As a master gardener through OSU, I’ve heard it straight from the professor’s mouths – farmers can use anything they need to get a crop to harvest and still allow the organic label to be used.

Talk to your vets – ask about the vaccines. I opted to have my pets get a blood test to prove their ’expired’ vaccine status still showed fully immune to rabies so we didn’t need to get that one this year. Studies show the rabies vaccine doesn’t need to be given over and over, they often have life-long immunity. Not to distemper or leptospirosis, but rabies yes.

– Bekah Wilson –

DTP Vaccine Data

DTP Vaccine Data

Not long ago… RFK JR talked about Bill Gates and The DTP Vaccine causing the Mass Genocide of African Girls.

“The most popular vaccine in the world is the the DTP vaccine.

We got rid of it in this country because it was causing severe brain injuries or death, 1 in every 300 children….

We used it in the 80’s and that’s why there was all this litigation against vaccine companies that precipitated the passage of the Vaccine Act, that then gave them immunity from liability…

In Europe they don’t use it, in America they don’t use it, but they give it to 161 million African children every year.”

Bill Gates asked the Danish government to support that program and said it saved 30 million lives.

The Danish government said, Show isis the Data. Bill Gates wasn’t able to.

The Danish Government went to Africa and did their own studies and they looked at 30 years of DTP data and what they found shocked them all.

They found that African girls who got the DTP were dying at 10x the rate of unvaccinated girls.

They were dying of things that nobody had ever associated with the DTP vaccine.

They were dying of anemia, malaria, bilharzia, pulmonary disease, respiratory disease, and pneumonia.

Nobody noticed for 30 years that it was the vaccinated girls and not the unvaccinated girls that were dying.

What happened was these girls were not dying of Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis… the vaccine protected them against those, but it RUINED their immune systems.

They were unable to defend themselves against minor diseases that other children with hearty immune systems were able to fend off.…”

Twain On Education

Twain On Education

Mark Twain tears apart the myth of education as obedience.
A diploma proves you followed instructions.
A grade proves you memorized the map.
Neither proves you understand the territory.
Schools produce workers who know how to comply.
Curiosity produces minds that know how to think.
Twain’s warning is sharp: intelligence is not measured by how well you pass tests — it’s measured by how well you question them.

A Crow Anting

A Crow Anting

When a crow feels unwell, irritated, or burdened by parasites, it doesn’t panic. It doesn’t flee. And it doesn’t rely on chance.

Instead, it seeks out an ant colony.

This behavior, strange at first glance, is one of the most elegant examples of natural intelligence in the animal world. Rather than hunting the ants, the crow deliberately allows them to crawl across its body. What looks like surrender is actually strategy.

The crow spreads its wings, lowers itself to the ground, and positions its feathers carefully. It remains mostly still, shifting only slightly, as ants swarm over its body. This is not accidental. The crow knows exactly what it is doing.

As the ants move through the feathers, they release formic acid, a chemical they naturally produce as a defense mechanism. For the crow, this substance acts as a powerful, natural disinfectant. Formic acid helps kill bacteria, fungi, mites, lice, and other parasites that can weaken birds over time. It also reduces irritation and may soothe inflamed skin beneath the feathers.

Scientists call this behavior anting, and it has been observed in over 200 bird species, including crows, jays, starlings, and sparrows. There are two main forms. The first, known as passive anting, is when the bird simply lies down and allows ants to crawl freely through its feathers. The second, active anting, is even more remarkable.

In active anting, the crow picks up individual ants in its beak and deliberately rubs them onto specific areas of its body, especially under the wings and along hard-to-reach feather lines. Before doing so, the bird often squeezes the ant gently, triggering the release of formic acid before application. The motion closely resembles how humans apply topical medicine.

This is not instinctive chaos. It is targeted treatment.

Researchers believe anting serves multiple purposes. It helps control parasites, may inhibit the growth of harmful microorganisms, and could even help condition feathers by neutralizing substances that interfere with preening oils. Some studies also suggest it may provide relief during molting, when new feathers cause discomfort and itchiness.

What makes this behavior extraordinary is that the crow is not born knowing chemistry. Yet through observation, evolution, and learning, it has mastered a biological partnership that functions like a living pharmacy. The ants defend themselves. The crow heals itself. Neither species invents the system, yet both benefit from its existence.

This knowledge is not written anywhere. It is passed down silently, generation to generation, through behavior rather than language.

In a world that often underestimates animals, anting is a quiet reminder that intelligence does not always look like problem-solving puzzles or tool use. Sometimes it looks like knowing exactly where to go when your body is failing you.

The crow does not call it medicine.

But it works.