Dr Brian May

Dr Brian May

In 1970, a 23-year-old physics student at Imperial College London was deep into his doctoral research on cosmic dust when he faced an impossible choice.
Brian May had spent three years studying the zodiacal dust cloud—the faint glow of sunlight reflecting off tiny particles scattered throughout the solar system. He’d built his own equipment, collected data, analyzed measurements, and was making genuine progress toward his PhD in astrophysics.
But he was also the guitarist for a rock band that was starting to gain serious attention.
The band was called Queen. They’d just signed a record deal. Tours were being planned. The opportunity was real, immediate, and unlikely to wait while May finished his academic work.
Standing at that crossroads, May made a decision that would leave a question unanswered for 36 years: he chose the guitar over the telescope.
Queen’s rise was meteoric. By the mid-1970s, they were one of the biggest bands in the world. “Boheman Rhapsody” became one of rock’s most iconic songs. May’s guitar work—his distinctive tone created using a homemade guitar called the Red Special—became instantly recognizable. Albums sold millions. Stadiums filled with fans singing along to “We Will Rock You” and “We Are the Champions.”
May’s academic work sat unfinished, his thesis incomplete, his research abandoned but never quite forgotten.
For most people, that would have been the end of the story. A promising academic career sacrificed for rock stardom—a trade-off that millions would gladly make. The PhD simply wasn’t meant to be.
But Brian May wasn’t most people.
Even as Queen dominated the rock world throughout the 1970s and 80s, May maintained his interest in astronomy and astrophysics. He read scientific journals. He attended lectures when touring schedules allowed. He stayed connected to the academic world he’d left behind, following developments in his field, watching as technology advanced and understanding of the solar system deepened.
His thesis supervisor, Professor Michael Rowan-Robinson, had told him decades earlier: “You can always come back and finish.”
May had never forgotten those words.
In 2006, more than three decades after walking away from Imperial College to tour with Queen, Brian May decided it was time.
He contacted Professor Rowan-Robinson, who was still at Imperial College and still remembered his former student who’d left to become a rock star. They discussed whether it was feasible to complete the work May had started in 1970.
The challenge was significant. Astrophysics had advanced enormously in 36 years. The technology May had used for his original observations was obsolete. The data he’d collected was valuable but incomplete by modern standards. Simply picking up where he left off wouldn’t work—he’d need to update his research, incorporate decades of new discoveries, and meet current academic standards.
But the core of his original work remained valid. His observations of the zodiacal dust cloud were still relevant. His research questions were still meaningful. And Rowan-Robinson was willing to supervise him to completion.
May threw himself into the work with the same intensity he’d brought to Queen’s music.
While still maintaining his music career—performing with Queen + Paul Rodgers and working on various projects—May carved out time to update his thesis. He revisited his original data from the early 1970s. He studied the decades of subsequent research on zodiacal dust. He incorporated modern measurements and refined his analysis using contemporary techniques.
The thesis he ultimately submitted was titled “A Survey of Radial Velocities in the Zodiacal Dust Cloud.” It examined the motion of dust particles in the plane of the solar system, work that contributed to understanding how dust behaves in space—research relevant to everything from asteroid studies to the formation of planetary systems.
In August 2007, Imperial College London awarded Brian May a PhD in astrophysics.
Not an honorary degree—universities frequently give those to celebrities and donors without requiring actual academic work. This was a real PhD, earned through genuine research, peer review, and the same rigorous standards applied to any doctoral candidate.
The examination was conducted by experts in the field who evaluated his work on its scientific merits, not his fame as a guitarist. The thesis had to withstand the same scrutiny any astrophysics PhD would face. May had to defend his research, answer technical questions, and demonstrate mastery of his subject.
He passed.
At age 60, Brian May—rock legend, guitarist whose solos had been heard by hundreds of millions—became Dr. Brian May, astrophysicist.
The accomplishment made headlines around the world, but not because a celebrity had purchased a credential or received an honorary title. It made news because it was genuinely remarkable: a world-famous musician had returned to complete legitimate academic work abandoned 36 years earlier, proving that it’s never too late to finish what you started.
The story resonated because it defied easy categorization. We’re used to dividing people into categories: artists versus scientists, creative types versus analytical minds, rock stars versus academics. Brian May refused to fit into any single box.
He’d always been both.
As a child, May had been fascinated by the night sky. He built telescopes with his father. He studied physics and mathematics not because he had to, but because he loved understanding how the universe worked. When he got to Imperial College—one of the world’s top science universities—he excelled academically while also playing guitar in bands.
The guitar he played, the legendary Red Special, was itself a fusion of science and art. May and his father had built it by hand when Brian was a teenager, using materials including parts of an old fireplace mantle, motorcycle springs, and knitting needles. Every design choice was carefully calculated for acoustic properties and tonal qualities. The result was an instrument with a unique sound that would become part of rock history.
That blend of scientific thinking and artistic creativity defined everything May did. His guitar solos were technically complex but emotionally powerful. His approach to music was both intuitive and analytical. He didn’t see science and art as opposites—to him, they were different expressions of the same curiosity about the world.
Earning the PhD wasn’t about proving anything to critics or adding credentials to his resume. May didn’t need the degree for career advancement—he was already one of the most successful musicians in history. He pursued it because the unfinished work bothered him, because he’d always wondered what conclusions his research would reach, because he valued knowledge for its own sake.
After earning his PhD, May didn’t treat it as a culmination but as a beginning. He became increasingly active in science advocacy and public education about astronomy. He served as Chancellor of Liverpool John Moores University for over a decade. He co-founded Asteroid Day, an annual event raising awareness about asteroid impacts. He collaborated with NASA on various projects, including creating stereoscopic images from the New Horizons mission to Pluto.
He published books combining his interests, including academic books about stereoscopy and popular books about astronomy illustrated with historic 3D photographs. He gave lectures at universities worldwide, speaking about both his astrophysics research and the intersection of science and creativity.
And he continued making music, because he never had to choose between being a scientist and being an artist—he was always both.
The 36-year gap in his academic career became part of his story, not a failure but proof that paths don’t have to be linear. You can start something, set it aside for a valid reason, and come back to it decades later if it still matters to you.
That message resonated far beyond the worlds of rock music and astrophysics. Students who’d left school to work could see that returning was possible. People who’d abandoned dreams for practical reasons found encouragement. Anyone who’d ever felt they had to choose between two passions saw an example of someone who ultimately refused to choose.
When May received his doctorate, he joked in interviews that his thesis was “the world’s longest delayed homework assignment.” But beneath the humor was a serious point: intellectual curiosity doesn’t expire. Knowledge you once pursued remains valuable even if you step away from it. And completing something you started, even decades later, brings its own satisfaction independent of external recognition.
The story of Dr. Brian May, astrophysicist and rock legend, stands as a reminder that human beings are not meant to fit into single categories. We can contain multitudes. We can excel in completely different domains. We can be both the person shredding guitar solos in front of 80,000 fans and the person quietly analyzing data about cosmic dust.
In fact, the same qualities that made May an exceptional musician—attention to detail, pattern recognition, creative problem-solving, dedication to craft—translated directly to his scientific work. The disciplines weren’t as separate as they seemed.
Today, when astrophysicists discuss zodiacal dust or musicians analyze Brian May’s guitar technique, they’re talking about the same person—someone who proved that you don’t have to choose between passion and profession, between art and science, between finishing what you started and embracing new opportunities.
You can have both. It might just take 36 years.
But as Dr. Brian May demonstrated: some things are worth coming back to finish, no matter how long the journey takes.

Clear That ‘Something Behind The Scenes Is Breaking’ Holter Warns, We’re Headed For A Derivative Meltdown

Financial writer and precious metals expert Bill Holter (aka Mr. Gold) said at the beginning of November that there was “more risk in the financial system now than any time ever.”  

There are so many ways the system can break down it’s hard to keep track, but let’s start with exploding silver prices that happened at the end of last week.  Holter says,

“In a 48-hour period of time, silver was up over $5 per ounce.  It’s pretty clear and pretty obvious that something behind the scenes is breaking. 

We know that the lease rates have exploded.  We know that the borrow rates on SLV have exploded. 

We also know that in the last 5 to 7 years, silver has been in a deficit… At this point, you are looking at a 400-million-ounce deficit on an annual basis, and global production is 850 million ounces…

The rumor is somebody has put in a $20 billion order, which would mean 400 million ounces. 

If that is the case, that order cannot be met, and that will create shark infested waters…

If somebody stands for delivery and it looks like it may be difficult for them to get delivery, then everybody is going to stand for delivery because they know that their contracts are worthless.”

What would happen if there is an actual failure to deliver in the silver market?  Mr. Gold says,

If that gets confirmed, then that one day you will see a huge spike, but markets won’t open after that.  That will cascade.  What will happen is all the COMEX contracts for both silver and gold will default. 

That will spill over to the rest of the CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange).  It has contracts on US Treasuries and stocks.  They have contracts on everything.  If the silver contracts blow up and the gold contracts blow up, how much confidence are you going to have on pork bellies or stocks…

The derivative market is $2 quadrillion.  In the future, you are going to measure your wealth by how many ounces of silver and how many ounces of gold you own…

Once you get a failure to deliver, you will get a Mad Max scenario.  Failure to deliver will melt down all derivatives. 

The world runs on credit, and credit runs on faith.  If you break faith, then you have a real problem in the financial markets and the real economy.”

In closing, Holter warns, “The problem is there is very little collateral left.  Everything has been borrowed against already.” 

Holter is not alone in his thinking about huge risk in the system.  It appears billionaire investors Jeff Gundlach and Ray Dalio agree with Holter, and they are warning of liquidity problems.  For the first time in their successful careers, they are both buying physical gold.

On a total system stopping derivative meltdown, Holter says, “Most people think it is not possible, and it can’t happen.  Mathematically, a meltdown in derivatives that melts everything down is coming.  It’s over.  Mathematically, it’s over.”

There is much more in the 41-minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog as he goes One-on-One with financial writer and precious metals expert Bill Holter/Mr. Gold as the risk in the financial system increases for 12.2.25. 

Watch: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/clear-something-behind-scenes-breaking-holter-warns-were-headed-derivative-meltdown

Vaccine Toxin Schedule

Vaccine Toxin Schedule

“If a child gets all of the vaccines in the entire schedule, they get almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminium … 600 micrograms of mercury, plus over 200 different chemicals.
That’s why they’ve never been proven to be safe.”

-Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

Why The Mediterranean Diet Is So Successful

Mediterranean Diet Pyramid

  • A number of studies have confirmed the health benefits of a Mediterranean-style diet — most of which are likely due to it being low in sugars, moderate in protein and high in fresh fruits and vegetables, along with healthy fats
  • Eating a Mediterranean-style diet has been linked to a number of health benefits, including prevention and reversal of metabolic syndrome, improved cardiovascular health and reduced risk for stroke
  • Other benefits include reduced risk of adult acne, rheumatoid arthritis, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s disease and cancer, and improved overall health and longevity

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/01/16/why-the-mediterranean-diet-is-so-successful.aspx

Albert Battel

Albert Battel

On that day, the rules of war were broken. For one shocking, unbelievable moment, the unthinkable happened: German soldiers aimed their rifles directly at the notorious SS. The Nazi regime was suddenly fighting itself.
In the middle of World War II, a strange and tense standoff took place on a bridge in Przemyśl, Poland.
At the center of this conflict was a 51-year-old lawyer turned army officer named Albert Battel.
He was wearing the wrong uniform for a hero. But on that day, he decided that saving lives was more important than following orders.
The Jewish quarter of Przemyśl had been closed off with barbed wire for a long time. The people inside were terrified.
Everyone knew that when the SS trucks arrived, it meant “resettlement”—a polite word the Nazis used for deportation to death camps.
In July 1942, the order came down. The SS was coming to empty the ghetto.
Albert Battel was a Wehrmacht (regular army) officer stationed in the town.
He wasn’t a young, hot-headed soldier. He was a middle-aged man who had lived a quiet life practicing law before the war.
But when he heard the SS was coming to take the Jewish workers and their families, something inside him refused to accept it.
As the SS convoy roared toward the bridge over the River San, which was the only entrance to the ghetto, they found the way blocked.
Battel had ordered his own soldiers to lower the barrier.
When the SS commander demanded to pass, Battel refused. He didn’t have permission from his superiors.
He didn’t have orders from Berlin. He simply stood his ground. The situation became incredibly dangerous. The SS threatened him, but Battel played his final card.
He ordered his machine-gunners to aim their weapons. He told the SS that if they tried to cross the bridge, his men would open fire.
It was a moment of total silence. German soldiers aiming at German police. The SS commander, realizing Battel was serious, backed down. The trucks turned around.
Blocking the bridge was only the first step. Battel knew the SS would come back eventually. He needed to act fast.
He took his own military trucks and drove straight into the Jewish ghetto. He wasn’t there to arrest people; he was there to save them.
He knocked on doors and told families to grab what they could.
Using a loophole in the rules, he claimed these people were “essential” to the war effort. He loaded up to 100 Jewish families—men, women, and children into the army trucks.
He drove them out of the ghetto and into the safety of the local military barracks.
For that day, and the days that followed, those families were safe under the protection of the Wehrmacht.
News of what happened reached the highest levels of the Nazi government. Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS, was furious. He ordered an investigation into Battel.
Himmler wrote a note in Battel’s file, promising to have him arrested and expelled from the Nazi party the moment the war was over.
Battel was eventually removed from his command and forced into retirement early due to heart problems.
He lost his career and his reputation among his peers.
Albert Battel survived the war, he died in 1952 in West Germany. At the time of his death, he was largely forgotten.
He never wrote a book about his actions or bragged about standing up to the SS.
However, the people he saved did not forget.
Years later, survivors began to tell the story of the officer who blocked the bridge.
In 1981, Yad Vashem (The World Holocaust Remembrance Center) recognized Albert Battel as Righteous Among the Nations.
Albert Battel’s story teaches us a powerful lesson about courage.
Courage is not about being fearless. Battel was likely terrified of being shot for treason
He was operating inside a system built on total, terrifying obedience. In Nazi Germany, the principle was rigid: Befehl ist Befehl (An order is an order), and questioning authority meant execution. Yet, in that impossible vacuum, Battel found the tiny, crucial space to rebel.
His action shatters every excuse used to justify inaction during the war. It proves that the final, most powerful authority belongs not to the general, the state, or the uniform, but to the individual conscience.
In a time of darkness, one man stopped a convoy of death simply by saying, “Not today.”
Even when the entire world is screaming at you to conform, the choice between simple obedience and fundamental decency remains entirely, beautifully, and terrifyingly yours.
Battel showed that even in the worst circumstances, we always have a choice between doing what is told and doing what is right.
We Are Human Angels
Authors
Awakening the Human Spirit
We are the authors of ‘We Are Human Angels,’ the book that has spread a new vision of the human experience and has been spontaneously translated into 14 languages by readers.
We hope our writing sparks something in you!

Edwin Moses

Edwin Moses

Edwin Moses walked onto a dusty Ohio State track in 1976, set down his physics notebook beside the hurdles, and told his coach he was going to rewrite the rhythm of the race by taking thirteen steps between hurdles instead of the fourteen every expert insisted was physically impossible.
He was an engineering student, not a sports prodigy. He had no scholarship. He had no elite training. He ran workouts alone because there was no hurdling coach for him. Moses studied film like a scientist. He measured stride angles. He calculated force and drag. He scribbled equations on scrap paper and taped them above his dorm room desk. He believed the event followed predictable laws of motion and he could break them if he learned the math.
The experiment worked on his very first try. Moses glided through ten hurdles with control that startled teammates. The longer stride meant fewer adjustments. Fewer adjustments meant no hesitation. By spring he won the Olympic Trials. By summer he was in Montreal wearing United States colors that had been a fantasy months earlier.
Then he ran the four hundred hurdles faster than any human in history.
He did not stop there. After Montreal he built a training schedule with the same logic he once used for lab work. He timed every run. He tracked heart rate, fatigue, and oxygen levels. He studied race film frame by frame to eliminate wasted motion. When he returned to competition, he began a streak the world still struggles to comprehend.
Nine years. One hundred and twenty two consecutive wins. No false starts. No collapses. No excuses.
Competitors tried to match his stride pattern. They failed. Coaches tried to decode his rhythm. They failed. Reporters waited for arrogance. Moses gave them none. He spoke about discipline, spacing, timing, and respect for the craft. He believed mastery came from patience and relentless analysis, not talent alone.
Even at the Los Angeles Olympics in 1984, with the weight of a nation on his shoulders, he lined up with the same quiet expression. He ran his race, held the thirteen step pattern, and crossed the finish with daylight between him and the field.
Edwin Moses did not dominate through force.
He used clarity, intelligence, and perfect rhythm to turn an event into a system only he understood.

Violet Hensley

Violet Hensley

In 1931, a fifteen-year-old girl in the Arkansas backwoods told her father she wanted to make a fiddle.

He pointed to his tools and a pile of wood. “There’s what you need. Help yourself.”

Violet Brumley picked up a knife and started whittling.
Her father, George Washington Brumley, had made his first fiddle in 1888 when he was fourteen years old—back when homesteaders built everything themselves because buying wasn’t an option. He’d traded fiddles for wagons, shotguns, milk cows. A fiddle was worth a dollar, maybe, if you sold it for cash.

Violet watched him work, learning which woods sang and which stayed silent. She memorized the curve of the neck, the arch of the top, the precise placement of the sound post. No blueprints. No instruction manual. Just memory and feel.

It took her months to finish that first fiddle. When she drew the bow across the strings, the sound was perfect.

She was hooked.

But life had other plans.

At eighteen, Violet married Adren Hensley. The babies started coming—nine children in all, born while the family scraped by on subsistence farming. They were so poor, Violet later joked, that “if the flies had anything to eat, they’d bring their own food.”

Between 1932 and 1934, she made three more fiddles. Then fiddle number four.

Then nothing. For twenty-seven years.

Nine children don’t raise themselves. Fields don’t plow themselves. There was no time for five-gallon buckets of wood shavings and 250-hour crafting projects when you were trying to keep your family fed.

The fiddles gathered dust. The music stayed quiet.

The family moved to Oregon to pick fruit—strawberries, potatoes, prunes. Migrant work. Survival. In 1959, they heard about cheap land near Yellville, Arkansas—forty acres for $250. They moved back, bought the land, started over.

Violet was in her forties. Her children were growing up. And slowly, quietly, she picked up her knife again.

In 1961, she made fiddle number five.

The break was over. She was a fiddle maker again.

By 1962, at age forty-six, someone convinced her to enter the local Turkey Trot Talent Show in Yellville. She came in second. At the show, she met Jimmy Driftwood, a folk musician who invited her to play at his theater in Mountain View.

That led to the War Eagle Craft Fair.

Which led to Silver Dollar City discovering her in 1967.
The theme park in Branson, Missouri, originally wanted her as a woodcarver. But when they heard her play the fiddles she’d made with her own hands—heard her unique style, her Ozark rhythms, her refusal to play like anyone else—they changed their minds.

They wanted her to fiddle.

And suddenly, after fifty years of obscurity, Violet Hensley became famous.

Not movie-star famous. Folk-legend famous. The kind where Charles Kuralt shows up to interview you for CBS News. Where National Geographic features you in 1970. Where producers from Captain Kangaroo and The Beverly Hillbillies call asking if you’ll appear on their shows.

She traveled to promote Silver Dollar City, appearing on The Art Linkletter Show in 1970, walking around eating ice cream with “Granny” when The Beverly Hillbillies filmed episodes at the park. In 1977, she danced with Mr. Green Jeans on Captain Kangaroo. In 1992, she was on Live with Regis and Kathie Lee.

Through it all, she kept making fiddles. Seventy-four in total, each one taking about 260 hours of work. She used native Ozark woods—buckeye, sassafras, pine, spruce, basswood, cherry, curly maple, bird’s eye maple, quilted maple. She’d cut down the trees herself with a handsaw.

“Someone asked me a long time ago what my secret was of putting the tone into a fiddle,” she said. “The tone just comes in with the wood as best as I can figure.”

Her fiddles became treasures. Collectors paid thousands. Museums displayed them. But Violet kept a few she wouldn’t sell for any price.

She also learned to clog at age sixty-nine—doctor’s orders, after they told her to stop breaking horses and bareback riding. Her signature move became playing the fiddle on top of her head while clogging, her face beaming with pure joy.

For decades, she demonstrated at Silver Dollar City’s festivals. She released three albums with her family—daughters Sandra and Lewonna, husband Adren, son Calvin. The old-time tunes her father had taught her, songs that weren’t widely circulated, preserved through her hands and voice.

In 2004, the Arkansas Arts Council designated her an Arkansas Living Treasure.

But Violet had one dream left.

She’d grown up listening to the Grand Ole Opry on a battery-powered radio when she was nine years old, just after the show debuted in 1925. For ninety years, she’d listened to that program, playing along in her Arkansas cabin, imagining what it would be like to stand on that stage.

It seemed impossible. She was too old, too unknown, too far from Nashville’s spotlight.

Then fiddler Tim Crouch read her autobiography and found mention of her dream. He contacted Opry star Mike Snider.

And on August 6, 2016, at ninety-nine years old, Violet Hensley walked onto the Grand Ole Opry stage.

She wore a purple dress hand-sewn by her daughter Sandra. She carried fiddle number four, the one she’d made when she was seventeen years old.

The audience of 4,400 people rose to their feet before she even played a note.

Snider warned them: “This little lady plays her way.“

Violet launched into “Angelina Baker,” and the band scrambled to keep up with her rapid-fire fiddling. Her unique style—developed in isolation, learned from her father and the old-time fiddlers of the Ozarks—was unlike anything Nashville had heard.

When she finished, the applause was thunderous.

She returned in 2017 for her 100th birthday. Then again in 2018. Three times on the Opry stage, each time leaving audiences with their jaws on the floor.

In 2018, at age 101, she was inducted into the National Fiddler Hall of Fame.
And she kept going.

At 105, she contracted COVID-19. Her symptoms were mild. She recovered.

Today, at 109 years old, Violet Hensley is still alive in Yellville, Arkansas.

Her vision is too poor to make complete fiddles now, but she can still whittle by feel. She still demonstrates her craft. She still plays—fifty-eight years performing at Silver Dollar City and counting.

Her daughters say that while her muscles and words may fail her sometimes, the music never does. “For 109, she probably remembers more than we know, but just can’t say it. She feels it.”

The girl who made her first fiddle in poverty, who spent decades raising children in obscurity, who didn’t become famous until she was in her fifties, who finally achieved her lifelong dream at ninety-nine—she’s still here.

A living bridge to an Ozarks that barely exists anymore. A testament to craft, to patience, to the long game. A reminder that dreams don’t have expiration dates.

Her story started with a father telling his daughter to help herself to his tools. It continues with a 109-year-old woman whose handmade fiddles are museum pieces, whose music has inspired generations, whose life proves that fame delayed isn’t fame denied.

Violet Hensley didn’t become a legend by starting early or burning bright and fast.

She became a legend by never stopping. By making seventy-four fiddles one knife stroke at a time. By playing the music she loved for a century, whether anyone was listening or not.

And when the world finally noticed, she was ready. She’d been practicing for ninety years.

Would you have had the patience to spend decades perfecting a craft in obscurity, knowing your moment might never come?

How a Generation of Women Was Misled About Hormone Therapy

The FDA’s removal of hormone therapy warnings after 23 years validates what many women suspected.

“Was I misled?”

That’s the question I hear most from my patients lately—asked with anger, exhaustion, and the quiet devastation of women who wonder if they lost years of their lives to menopause symptoms they were told were untreatable.

The answer came earlier this month when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced it would remove “black box” warnings from hormone therapy products after 23 years. For many women, the reversal is an admission that arrives decades too late.

What Happened in 2002
In July 2002, preliminary data from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) were published in JAMA, showing that combined hormone therapy (estrogen and progestin) increased the risk of breast cancer, stroke, and pulmonary embolism. Major media outlets interpreted early signals from the study as definitive danger, and the announcement led to an instant and dramatic decline in the use of hormone therapy.
Women who had been sleeping well for the first time in years suddenly poured their medications into the trash. Pharmacies fielded calls from panicked patients demanding immediate discontinuation. Primary care doctors, most of whom had never been trained deeply in menopause management, told their patients to “stop now and ask questions later.”

Women did stop, and many suffered in silence for the next 20 years.

The FDA’s Historic Reversal
On Nov. 10, the FDA announced that it is initiating the removal of broad “black box” warnings referencing risks of cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, and probable dementia from hormone replacement therapy products for menopause.

When FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary spoke publicly about the shift, he didn’t mince words. He said the media had frightened women away from a potentially life-changing therapy, and he noted the difference between estrogen-only therapy and synthetic combination regimens. He acknowledged, openly, that the “fear machine” had begun long before the scientific data had been fully understood.

He also said something that struck many women deeply: “After 23 years of dogma, the FDA is stopping the fear that has steered women away from this life-saving treatment.”

For many of my patients, that sentence felt like a validation they had waited half a lifetime to hear.

The Devil Is in the Details
The details that matter most sat quietly in the medical literature for years—in the 2002 article and the two follow-up studies published in 2011 and 2020 in JAMA.

The Study Population Was Older
Women recruited in the WHI study were all postmenopausal, aged 50 to 79 years, with an average age of 63—more than a decade past the onset of menopause. Most had not used hormones before, and many had cardiovascular risk factors.

The Hormones Were Synthetic
The adverse results found among older women taking combined conjugated equine estrogen and medroxyprogesterone acetate—both older, synthetic formulations developed in a different era—were generalized to all hormone therapy types and all age groups.

Estrogen-Only Therapy Showed Different Results
The estrogen-only group in the WHI study—women who had hysterectomies and therefore received estrogen without synthetic progestins—had a lower rate of breast cancer.
In the storm of fear that followed, no one wanted to hear nuance.

The Critical Factor
Yet even in the early 2000s, there were physicians who paused, confused because something about the reporting didn’t align with what they were seeing clinically. The hormones used in the WHI study weren’t the bioidentical estradiol and progesterone that many clinicians were already prescribing with good results. More importantly, the women who seemed to benefit most from hormone therapy were those who began it near menopause—not in older age.

Timing is critical. The body responds to estrogen very differently pre-menopause versus a decade post-menopause. After years of low estrogen, the blood vessels lose their flexibility, plaque accumulates, and metabolic changes settle in. The risk-benefit balance is fundamentally different for women who initiate hormone therapy at different ages.

This is what we in medicine now call the “timing hypothesis”—a concept that should have been central to every headline but was lost entirely.

And for two decades, women lived inside that headline and endured the consequences of fear and misinformation.

What Women Lost
The point is not that hormone therapy is perfect or appropriate for everyone. It’s that women were never given the chance to make an informed choice.

Women who begin hormone therapy earlier—ideally within 10 years of menopause—tend to experience improved sleep, reduced anxiety and irritability, and protection against bone loss.

Many report better cognition, improved cardiovascular markers, and enhanced sexual health and relationship well-being. Although spoken about more quietly, perhaps the most profound benefit is the simplest one: the return of themselves.

Takeaways
The new FDA guidelines do not signal a new fad or a sudden reversal. They mark a return to evidence-based medicine—the kind that millions of women should have received all along.
Hormone therapy is not appropriate for every woman, and it is not a cure-all. However, it is a powerful tool, and for the right woman at the right moment, it can restore a quality of life she thought she’d lost forever.

Our job now—as clinicians, as journalists, as a society—is to give women back what fear took from them: clarity, choice, and control.

Everything that follows in this series of columns will build on that mission.

Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/how-a-generation-of-women-was-misled-about-hormone-therapy-5951141