PFAS In Medications

PFAS In Medications

When you hear “PFAS,” you probably think of nonstick cookware, waterproof jackets, or contaminated drinking water. You probably don’t think of the prescription sitting in your medicine cabinet. Yet fluorinated compounds classified as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are built into a surprisingly wide range of approved pharmaceuticals, often not because they’re essential to how those medicines treat disease, but because they make the drug easier to formulate.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2026/09/21/pfas-containing-medicines-alternatives.aspx

Dr. Charles Hoffe Testimony On Covid Shot Damages

Dr Charles Hoffe COVID Vaccine Testimony

“The COVID injections were more dangerous than COVID.”

“The increase in all cause mortality started after the vaccine rollout.”

“In the United Stated they had had approximately one million excess deaths since hte COVID vaccine rollout.”

“So this idea that the vaccines have saved millions of lives is absurd. The number of people dying is higher than ever.”

“Vaccine injury reporting in Canada appeared to have been censored.”

“The open VAERS in the United States records 39,000 people who died unexpectedly within 28 days of their COVID shot. And 72,000 who were permanently disabled within 28 days of their COVID shot.”

Click to view the video: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1E4zbzXkQz/

Hug A Tree – Improve Your Life

Hug A Tree - Improve Your Life

A visionary Chinese-American immunologist, Dr. Qing Li, dedicated his entire career to unlocking a profound biochemical truth hidden within the forest canopy: trees are medicine. Long dismissed by conventional Western medicine as mere scenic backdrops, Dr. Li’s pioneering research proved that trees actively release airborne organic compounds called phytoncides. When inhaled, these invisible chemical messengers enter your bloodstream and spark an immediate internal revolution. They act as biological hunters, systematically tracking down and neutralizing toxic stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline while radically multiplying your body’s “Natural Killer” (NK) immune cells. Dr. Li’s life’s work demonstrated that a simple walk in the woods triggers an automated, cellular defense network—healing the human body from the inside out in ways no synthetic prescription has ever matched.

This groundbreaking science transforms the ancient concept of “forest bathing” from a poetic escape into a clinical necessity. Dr. Li’s data revealed that the immune boost from just a single, immersive weekend in the forest isn’t fleeting; it leaves an elevated blueprint in your blood that shields your nervous system and reinforces your immune defense up to 30 days. In a modern world build for chronic noise, digital saturation, and perpetual survival-mode, his research delivers a dramatic wake-up call to modern medicine. The ultimate antidote to our modern epidemic of anxiety and physiological burnout cannot by synthesized in a laboratory. It is an elemental, evolutionary technology already waiting for us right outside our doors, free for the taking and perfectly engineered to protect our peace.

Microwave Safe?

Microwave Safe?

That label on the container was never a health promise. It is a heat test, nothing more.

Microwave safe is a manufacturing term, not a medical one. It means the plastic will not warp, melt, or leach above the limits the FDA sets during its own testing, and that testing is the whole of the promise. It says nothing at all about what breaks loose from the surface when you run that container at full power with hot, wet, fatty food pressed against the walls for minutes at a time.

Engineers at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln measured exactly that and published the numbers in Environmental Science and Technology in 2023. They filled polypropylene baby food containers and reusable pouches with water and with dairy, ran them for three minutes at full power, and then counted what had come off the plastic. The worst case reached 4.2 million microplastic particles and 2.1 billion nanoplastic particles per square centimeter of container surface, which is a patch about the size of a fingernail. Storing those same containers cold in the fridge for six months released particles too, but three minutes of microwave heat did far more damage than half a year of cold storage.

The team then dripped the released particles onto human embryonic kidney cells growing in a dish and watched what happened over the next 48 hours. At the highest concentration, 77 percent of those cells were dead within two days, which is a far steeper drop than the researchers expected going in. That is a lab dish and not a human stomach, so nobody can hand you an honest risk number yet, and the researchers were careful to say as much themselves.

The swap costs nothing, which is the whole argument here. Move the food into a glass or ceramic dish before it goes anywhere near the microwave, keep plastic wrap from resting against the surface of hot food, and never reheat in a takeout clamshell, a yogurt tub, or an old margarine container. Those were built to hold cold food one single time and then get thrown away, and nobody ever tested them for three minutes at full power with your dinner sitting inside.

Ways To Cook Mushrooms Without Losing 80% Antioxidants!

Cooking Mushrooms

(Tom: I do not possess a microwave so did some research on the data in this video.)

Just watched a video which talked about the substance agaritine which is apparently not good for us and how cooking white button mushrooms removes it but boiling or steaming them leached out beneficial antioxidants like ergothioneine.

The video recommends microwaving but I do not have a microwave. I usually fry my mushrooms in butter. What affect does this have on ergothioneine and agaritine? So I asked ChatGPT the question…

Yes — your usual method of frying white button mushrooms in butter is actually quite a reasonable approach if your aim is to reduce agaritine without throwing away water-soluble compounds. The research is rather more reassuring than the video may have made it sound.

What happens when you fry them?

For white button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus), the best direct evidence I found is a household-processing study that specifically tested frying in oil and butter.

Frying in butter reduced agaritine by about 35–70%, depending on the cooking conditions.
One experiment found that frying at about 100°C for 5 minutes reduced agaritine by approximately 69% when butter was used.
Very little of the removed agaritine ended up in the cooking fat, suggesting that much of it was degraded rather than simply transferred into the butter.
More recent research also found that all tested heat treatments reduced agaritine, with no toxic degradation products detected in that particular study.

So your frying method is doing a useful job on the agaritine.

But what about ergothioneine?

This is where I would not automatically conclude that microwaving is superior.

Ergothioneine is quite different from agaritine. It is a water-soluble antioxidant, and the major problem with boiling is that compounds can leach out of the mushroom into the cooking water.

If you boil mushrooms and throw away the water, you potentially throw away some of those compounds with it.

Frying has an advantage here: there is little or no water for the water-soluble compounds to leach into.

However, frying isn’t completely benign. Studies of mushroom cooking show that frying can cause greater losses of some nutritional compounds than gentler methods, particularly when temperatures are high.

Importantly, though, I couldn’t find good evidence establishing that ordinary pan-frying destroys a large proportion of ergothioneine specifically in white button mushrooms. The cooking literature tends to measure broader antioxidant activity or groups of compounds rather than giving us a clean “X% of ergothioneine survives frying” figure.

So I’d rank your practical options like this:

Method Agaritine Nutrient Retention
Raw Highest Highest
Boiled & water discarded Much lower Some water-soluble compounds lost into water
Steamed Reduced Better than boiling for avoiding leaching
Microwaved Reduced substantially Generally good overall retention
Fried gently in butter Reduced substantially Good practical compromise
Fried very hot/for a long time Reduced substantially Greater heat-related losses

There is an interesting wrinkle here: a study of white button mushrooms found that phenolic compounds were drastically reduced by boiling, whereas the lack of direct water contact during frying helped prevent that leaching.

What I’d do in your kitchen

I’d keep doing what you’re doing.

I’d use moderate heat rather than extremely high heat, and cook the mushrooms until they are properly cooked and browned but not burnt or excessively dried.

Something like:

Slice, butter in pan, cook on moderate heat until the mushrooms have released their moisture and are nicely browned, eat the mushrooms and butter together.

That gives you three useful things:

Cooking substantially reduces agaritine.
You’re not dumping water containing soluble compounds down the sink.
You’re retaining the compounds that have moved into the butter rather than discarding a cooking liquid.

And there’s one particularly reassuring point about the agaritine issue: the scientific literature does not support the idea that eating normally cooked button mushrooms represents some major established health hazard. Agaritine is a naturally occurring compound of toxicological interest, but its concentration varies considerably and cooking substantially reduces it.

Bottom line: I wouldn’t buy a microwave just for this purpose. Your butter-fried white button mushrooms are a perfectly sensible way of preparing them, and may actually give you a better compromise between reducing agaritine and avoiding the nutrient losses associated with boiling.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM5uLdaVnUg

Four Minutes A Day To Stay Free

Sarah Otto, Nutritionist (Master of Human Nutrition), writes:

How long do you think you’d need to exercise each day to measurably reduce your risk of falling, improve your ability to live independently, and strengthen your body enough to change your future care needs?

Thirty minutes? An hour?

Try four.

Researchers at Penn State took 97 adults with an average age of 74 and asked them to do something almost absurdly simple: four exercises, for 30 seconds each, once a day. Pushups (modified if needed, against a wall or countertop is fine). Chair stands. Arm rows with a resistance band. And stepping up onto a low platform.

Four minutes total. Including rest breaks.

Before the study, these participants were averaging about 18 minutes of total exercise per week. Far below any guideline you’ve ever seen. Most had mobility limitations. Many had probably been told, in one way or another, that decline was just part of getting older.

Twelve weeks later, they were measurably, significantly stronger.

They could do 4.2 more chair stands in 30 seconds. They could balance on one leg for 3.6 seconds longer. They could get up from a seated position 2.3 seconds faster.

Those numbers might not sound dramatic on paper. But in the world of aging research, they’re enormous. Because those specific tests predict your future risk of falling, your likelihood of needing a nursing home, and your ability to live independently.

Four minutes a day shifted the trajectory.

And here’s what I find just as remarkable. The participants actually did it. On 81% of study days, they completed the routine. That adherence rate is almost unheard of in exercise research. And it happened because the programme was short enough, simple enough, and achievable enough that people didn’t quit.

The lead researcher put it in a way I keep coming back to: “Exercise is the key to freedom. Freedom is the ability to do what you want to do. And if you can’t do what you want to do, you’re not free.”

He wasn’t talking about running marathons. He was talking about getting up from a chair. Climbing stairs. Walking without fear of falling. The things that keep your life yours.

If you’ve been putting off exercise because you don’t have the time, the energy, or the confidence to do a “proper” workout, this study just removed every one of those barriers.

Four exercises. Four minutes. A wall to lean on. A chair to stand up from. A resistance band. And a step.

That’s it.

Scientific Reference

Dandekar, S. et al. “Brief daily functional strength training to improve functional performance in older adults with mobility disability: A randomized trial.” PLOS ONE, March 2026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336748