JAMA just published a study in order to bury a severely disturbing truth – that Covid vaccine policy victimized pregnant women by killing an untold number of their babies. There, I said it. Period.
JAMA just published a study that purportedly compared the rates of fetal malformations in mothers who got the COVID jab versus the fortunate ones who did not. In the study, they purposely:
- Only looked at live births, not all pregnancies – misses 32% of them
- Only looked ’til one year old: misses another 10-40%
- Only looked at billing codes: misses another 20-40%
Doing the above (and propensity weighting the groups, which invites immense additional opportunity for chicanery), they happily arrived at the following conclusion:
In this cohort study of pregnancies exposed to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the first trimester, exposure was not associated with an increased risk of any major congenital malformations.
Problem: Thalidomide (yes, %$#$! thalidomide) and other major teratogens were not discovered to be toxic to babies… until they looked at all births, not just the live ones. Happened over and over, to the point that the WHO and EMA both emphasize the necessity of including prenatal losses in teratogenicity surveillance.
Description of “The Fake”
Recall one of the definitions of the famous Disinformation Playbook Tactic called “The Fake:”
To evade these standards, some companies choose to manufacture counterfeit science—planting ghostwritten articles in legitimate scientific journals, selectively publishing positive results while underreporting negative results, or commissioning scientific studies with flawed methodologies biased toward predetermined results. These methods undermine the scientific process—and as our case studies show, they can have serious public health and safety consequences.
Did you get that last part? “These methods can have serious public health and safety consequences.” You don’t say. Like causing deaths to unborn babies and traumatizing women? I am so $%^# ’ing sick of this %$#, I want to scream (and punch a wall).
My interpretation of this data, knowing how modern “Science” operates, is that “they” know there has been a massive increase in congenital malformations among the vaccinated. Thus, the “esteemed” researchers (whores, sorry) were tasked with publishing a “negative study” to counter the data emerging from around the world, thus making any assertion that Covid vaccines are teratogenic a “controversial” topic with conflicting data.”
Welcome to modern science, folks. Any doctor reading this who belongs to the AMA should be absolutely ashamed of themselves.
https://open.substack.com/pub/pierrekory/p/covid-scientific-misconduct-rages
