If you ask the question, “What works?” to arrive at optimal solutions, life simplifies out rather quickly.
2 bulls in a paddock – no calves.
2 cows in a paddock – no calves.
1 bull + 1 cow in a paddock – calves.
So at least one bull and at least one cow produce calves and cause the group to grow. That works.
Sanity, balance and order produce a future.
But if what you want is the destruction of the family unit, the country, the society and civilisation, then you mess with what works to produce confusion and disorder.
~~~~~~~~~
Smaller societal units wherein each knows the other by name is productive of a feeling of belonging and inclusion. The Amish found when you get over 40 families in a group you lose a sense of connection with the other individuals in the group.
Conversationally and socially we tend to gravitate to individuals with whom we share common interests and ideals. That’s what makes it so each for the tech giant to facilitate information siloing, where we are fed a constant diet of what we have liked and little else.
It makes it possible to be totally ignorant of whole swathes of information to which you are not exposed. Like iatragenic (medically caused) deaths which are the third leading cause of death in the US. Like injuries and deaths from vaccines. Like the excess mortality rate, currently at unprecedented levels in many Covid jabbed countries.
So when you introduce a large number of immigrants into a country who do not share the same background, culture, ethnics or ideals you are introducing friction into the lives of the immigrants and the existing inhabitants.
Friction generates heat, enough heat and you get a fire. There are plenty of place in the world where fires are burning.
And they are burning within countries who were relatively orderly prior to mass immigration.
Some push the view that nation states and nationalism are productive of war but that ignores the true cause of war, the hidden promoters of war, the bankers who make money from financing both sides and those who otherwise feel they stand the benefit from the destruction of one or both parties. Such as the US neocons do by financing the war in the Ukraine in an attempt to destabilize and weaken Russia. And let’s not open up the discussion on the repatriation of some of the taxpayer funded relief as political donations.
The larger the group the easier it would appear to be for the nefarious to control the group for their benefit rather than the benefit of the members of the group.
What works? Smaller societal units wherein each member knows the others by name and where the members in the group have a say in the rules and direction of the group.