Click to view the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5f-kogwxEA
Theo Colborn
She went shopping and found poison on every shelf.
Not the kind that burns your throat, but the kind that smiles back at you in pastel bottles.
In the late 1970s, she pushed a metal cart down fluorescent aisles just like everyone else. The wheels rattled. The radio overhead played soft rock. Everything looked clean, reassuring, modern. Floors sparkled. Labels promised freshness, safety, progress.
She was a mother. She was a scientist. And she could not stop reading the ingredients.
At first it was a quiet discomfort, the kind you feel but cannot yet name. She had spent her days in laboratories, learning how small chemical changes could ripple through the body for years. She understood dose, accumulation, latency. She knew that harm did not always announce itself right away. Sometimes it waited. Sometimes it hid inside normal life.
So when she picked up a bottle of glass cleaner, she noticed the words no one else paused on. When she turned over a popular shampoo, she felt her stomach tighten. When she passed the cosmetics counter, with its pink promises and gentle language, she felt something close to grief.
These were not industrial solvents locked behind warning signs. These were products sitting under kitchen sinks. These were powders shaken near cribs. These were creams rubbed into skin every morning by women who trusted them.
At home that night, she lined items up on her kitchen table. Dish soap. Floor cleaner. Baby lotion. Lipstick. Laundry detergent. She opened her notebook, the same kind she used in her professional work, and began writing names that had no place near a child.
Formaldehyde releasers. Phthalates. Chlorinated compounds. Ingredients known to persist in the body, known to interfere with hormones, known to accumulate quietly in fat and blood.
What unsettled her most was not just that the chemicals existed. It was that no one had bothered to look at them together. No one had asked what happens when exposure is constant, low level, lifelong. No one had asked what happens to developing bodies, to unborn children, to women whose biology is shaped by cycles and sensitivity.
This was not an accident. It was an absence.
At work, she raised questions. She asked colleagues whether anyone was tracking long term effects. She asked regulators why safety testing stopped at short windows. She asked why women and children were treated as afterthoughts rather than central subjects.
The room often went quiet.
She was told she was overthinking it. That the doses were small. That the products were approved. That people had been using them for years.
Years, she knew, meant nothing in toxicology.
She began to test anyway. Not dramatically. Methodically. She studied how chemicals behaved once inside the body, how they mimicked hormones, how they confused signals that had taken millions of years to evolve. She followed the data where it led, even when it made people uncomfortable.
What she found was not a single smoking gun but a pattern. Tiny disruptions repeated daily. A chorus of whispers instead of a scream. Changes that did not look like poisoning, but like something softer and harder to trace. Early puberty. Fertility problems. Developmental delays. Cancers that appeared decades later, with no obvious culprit left behind.
The betrayal settled in slowly.
This was not about one bad product or one careless company. It was about a system that assumed safety until proven otherwise, while quietly shifting the burden of proof onto families who would never know what harmed them.
When she spoke publicly, she chose her words carefully. She did not want panic. She wanted clarity. She wanted the world to understand that absence of evidence was not evidence of absence.
Years later, she would stand on stages far from grocery aisles, explaining these ideas to rooms full of strangers. On the red circle of a TED stage, she spoke calmly about invisible chemicals, vulnerable windows of development, and why the smallest exposures can matter the most. Millions watched not because she frightened them, but because she respected them enough to tell the truth without drama.
Her name, Theo Colborn, became inseparable from a field that barely existed when she first felt uneasy in that store. Endocrine disruption entered public language. Precaution stopped sounding radical and started sounding responsible.
She never framed herself as a hero. She framed herself as a witness.
What sustained her was not fear but protection. The belief that knowing is a form of care. That testing is an act of love. That asking harder questions is how you stand between harm and those who cannot defend themselves.
Today, many of the ingredients she warned about are regulated, renamed, or quietly removed. Not all. Not everywhere. But the conversation exists because someone once refused to accept that clean-looking meant safe.
Every time you flip a bottle over and read the fine print, you are walking in that legacy. Every time you choose curiosity over convenience, you are continuing work that began with one woman, one cart, and a notebook full of chemical names.
The shelves still shine. The labels still reassure. But fewer of us are shopping blind.
And that is how protection often begins. Not with alarms, but with attention.
Top 20 most under-rated healing herbs you need to know about
When you think of cooking, what herbs come to mind? Rosemary, Basil, Oregano, Peppermint, and Sage? Perhaps Lavender, Thyme, and Tarragon make your list as well. There is a long list of common kitchen herbs which are staples in the lives of most natural living enthusiasts.
We grow them for their medicinal properties or to use as flavoring in our favorite dishes. But there is much more to the world of herbs than just these everyday constituents. A wealth of lesser-known botanicals with incredible health benefits, interesting flavors, beautiful foliage, and intriguing aromas exist in the world, just waiting for the avid herbalist to cultivate and appreciate them.
The following are 20 of the most under-rated healing herbs which might just feel right at home in your garden.
Finish reading: https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/food-cooking/top-20-most-under-rated-healing-herbs-you-need-to-know-about/
Rebounding: The Cancer-Fighting Movement Hack
Bouncing isn’t just fun—it’s powerful terrain therapy.
And just 10 minutes of rebounding = 10,000 steps in biological benefit.
Most people aim for 10,000 steps a day. But did you know you can get the same metabolic and cardiovascular benefit with just 2,000–3,000 jumps on a rebounder?
That’s just 10–15 minutes of light bouncing.
But here’s the kicker:
Rebounding does MORE than walking.
It’s one of the only movements that:
Activates the lymphatic system in all directions
Increases oxygenation at the cellular level
Stimulates mitochondrial energy
Detoxes trapped toxins and metabolic waste
Improves circulation—without joint strain
Study 1 (NASA, 1980): Rebounding was 68% more efficient than jogging for cardiovascular health, with significantly less strain on joints.
Study 2 (Int J Sports Sci, 2018): Just 15 minutes of rebounding significantly improved lymph flow and immune function.
Study 3 (J Cancer Sci Ther, 2012): Lymphatic stimulation enhances immune surveillance and removal of cancerous cells.
HOW TO START:
• 5 minutes gentle bouncing in the morning
• Progress to 10–15 minutes daily
• Keep feet low to activate lymph without fatigue
• Bonus: Breathe deeply as you bounce to increase detox response
Walking heals.
But rebounding?
It cleanses your terrain—from the inside out.
This content is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice. Always consult your doctor before starting a new therapy.
View video: https://x.com/sulackpete/status/2006167272608375295?s=20
Build Muscle Faster
- Low-fat protein after exercise delivers amino acids into your bloodstream faster, giving your muscles a stronger signal to repair and grow
- High-fat meals slow digestion and weaken your muscle-building response, even when the total amount of protein is the same
- A stronger and faster leucine surge from lean protein helps activate muscle repair more effectively, improving your recovery window
- Higher daily protein intake — around 0.8 grams per pound of ideal body weight — supports better muscle gain, fat loss, bone strength, and metabolic stability
- Simplifying your post-workout meal and choosing low-LA, low-fat protein sources help you recover more quickly and get better results from every training session
Finish reading: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2025/12/30/meal-fat-content-muscle-building.aspx
The Day My Grandma Gave Me Words That Quieted My Fear Forever
I was about eleven years old the day my grandmother said something that quietly rearranged how I see the world.
It was an ordinary school day. Nothing dramatic. Just the usual mile-long walk from school, past familiar houses, down the road that led to my grandparents’ farmhouse. Most days, I’d burst through the door talking about class or homework or whatever small thing felt big at that age.
But that day was different.
I walked in quieter than usual. Slower. Carrying something heavy I didn’t yet have words for.
Grandma noticed immediately.
She didn’t ask what was wrong. She didn’t rush me or fill the silence. She simply took my coat, led me into the kitchen, and did what she always did when someone needed comfort without knowing it yet.
She made hot chocolate.
She set out cookies.
She sat down and waited.
Halfway through my drink, the truth finally slipped out.
“I thought this girl at school liked me,” I said, staring into my cup. “But today she said something mean. I don’t think anyone at school likes me.”
For an eleven-year-old, that felt like the whole world collapsing. Like being quietly rejected by life itself.
Grandma didn’t jump in with reassurances. She took a slow sip of her coffee, the way she always did when she was choosing her words carefully. Then she looked at me, soft but steady, and said:
“Totty,” she began.
She always called me Totty instead of Kathy.
“Totty, a few people in life will really like you. Some people won’t like you at all. But most people?”
She paused.
“They won’t think much about you either way.”
I remember blinking at her, surprised.
“They might notice your shoes. Or your smile. Or say hello in passing,” she continued. “But once you’re out of sight, they’ll go right back to their own lives.”
Even at eleven, it landed.
She wasn’t being unkind. She was being honest in the gentlest way possible. She was telling me that one person’s words didn’t define my worth. That most people aren’t judging us as harshly as we imagine. That they’re usually just busy surviving their own days.
Then she added something that stayed with me even longer.
“If someone walks by and doesn’t say hello, it probably isn’t personal. Maybe they’re distracted. Maybe they’re worried about something you can’t see. And if someone is rude when you haven’t done anything wrong,” she said, “there’s a good chance they’re carrying something heavy themselves.”
In other words: not everything is about you. And that’s not a bad thing.
That moment settled into me quietly. It didn’t erase hurt forever. But it gave me somewhere to return.
Even now, years later, when I feel left out.
When someone’s silence stings.
When words land harder than they should.
I go back to that kitchen.
To the hot chocolate.
To my grandma’s calm voice.
And I remind myself:
If I didn’t do anything wrong, then it probably has more to do with them than me.
That small piece of wisdom has softened a lot of hard days.
And I’ve never forgotten it.
Aluminium In Brain
A study published in the journal Nature compared the aluminum content in human brain tissue of people with Alzheimer’s disease, familial Alzheimer’s disease, autism spectrum disorder and multiple sclerosis with healthy controls. According to the authors, “detailed statistical analyses showed that aluminum was significantly increased in each of these groups compared to control tissues.” They go on to mention that:
“We have confirmed previous conclusions that the aluminum content of brain tissue in Alzheimer’s disease, autism spectrum disorder and multiple sclerosis is significantly elevated. Further research is required to understand the role played by high levels of aluminum in the aetiology of human neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disease.”
The researchers used tissue from twenty control brains of healthy individuals to compare against the brain tissue of people who have had a diagnosis of the neurodegenerative conditions mentioned. The fact that all disease groups had significantly higher brain aluminum content than the control group is quite concerning. That being said, it’s not proof that aluminum actually plays a direct role in each of these diseases. More research would need to be done on this topic.
Finish reading: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-64734-6
The Class Sketch
First broadcast in 1966 on The Frost Report, The Class Sketch remains one of the sharpest and most observant pieces of British television comedy ever written. In barely two minutes, it manages to expose the absurdities and cruelties of the British class system with a precision that many longer dramas have failed to match.
Performed by John Cleese, Ronnie Barker and Ronnie Corbett, the sketch uses height as its central visual joke. Cleese’s tall, patrician figure represents the upper class, Barker’s average build the middle class, and Corbett’s small stature the working class. Their physical positioning does most of the work before a word is spoken.
The dialogue is deceptively simple. Each character explains how they view those above and below them, culminating in Corbett’s perfectly judged line: “I know my place.” When the others list what they “get” from the class system — superiority, status, security — Corbett’s character quietly concludes: “I get a pain in the back of my neck.” It’s a punchline that lands because it’s funny, but also because it’s painfully true.
What makes the sketch so enduring is its economy. Written by Marty Feldman and John Law, it avoids topical references and instead focuses on something deeply ingrained in British culture. The humour doesn’t rely on fashions or politics of the moment; it relies on attitudes that, for many viewers, still feel familiar.
More than half a century on, the sketch continues to be referenced because Britain’s relationship with class has never quite loosened its grip. Accents, education, wealth and background still shape opportunity and perception. The idea that people instinctively “look up” or “look down” remains embedded in everyday life, even if the symbols have changed.
That’s why The Class Sketch still feels relevant today. It has been cited in discussions about politics, inequality and even football, and it continues to circulate online among audiences far younger than its original viewers. Its brilliance lies in how effortlessly it reveals a system that many would rather pretend no longer exists.
Ultimately, The Class Sketch endures because it does what the best comedy always does: it tells the truth quickly, clearly, and with a laugh. It is not just one of the funniest sketches ever made, but one of the most perceptive — a reminder that while Britain has changed in countless ways since 1966, its uneasy relationship with class remains stubbornly intact.
How It Looked vs Felt
12 Health Recommendations
The 12 points are valid health recommendations but for longevity, Italians are 7th in Europe.