Elisabeth Bik

(Tom: Gosh I love people with talent, courage and integrity!)

Elisabeth Bik

Elisabeth Bik is a Dutch microbiologist. PhD from Utrecht in 1996. Fifteen years at Stanford medical school working on microbiomes.

An ordinary scientific career. Right up until 2013.

That year she found out somebody had plagiarised a piece of her own published work.

So she started hunting plagiarism. Nine months of it. Then she opened a PhD thesis that had lifted text from somewhere else, and her eye caught something different.

A duplicated image.

She sat there thinking, wait. That happens?

That same evening she opened a handful of papers in PLOS One. She found more before bed.

She had discovered something about herself. She can see things in images other people cannot.

A duplicated patch. The same cell photograph appearing twice in one paper under two different labels. A band on a gel copied, flipped, and pasted back in.

January 2014. She found duplicated and altered images across a set of papers from an American medical school.

So she started doing it in her spare time. Evenings. Weekends.

Then she decided to find out how common it actually was.

She sat down and went through 20,621 published biomedical papers. Forty journals. Twenty years of the literature.

By eye. There were no tools for this. She just looked.

She found inappropriate image duplication in 782 of them.

One in 25.

And 196 of those were not honest mistakes. Those were figures that had been altered. Rotated. Flipped. Shifted. Somebody sat down and did it on purpose.

Her own reaction was flat. One in 25 papers I looked at had image problems. I thought that is a lot.

Now the part that says the most about the system.

She wrote to the researchers. She wrote to the journal editors.

Mostly nothing came back.

So in 2016 she published the whole thing herself, with Arturo Casadevall and Ferric Fang, in the journal mBio.

Understand who was not doing this work.

Scientific publishing is an industry worth billions. There are editors. There are peer reviewers. There are universities with entire research integrity offices.

Nobody had been looking at the pictures.

One woman with good eyes was doing it unpaid, after dinner.

And these are the papers medicine is built on. Every drug your doctor reaches for sits on top of this literature.

2018 she left her job in industry and made it her full time work.

Nobody employs her. She is funded by strangers donating through a subscription page.

Since then she has raised concerns about more than 7,600 papers. By late 2024 that had fed into more than 1,300 retractions. Over 1,000 corrections. Hundreds of formal notices of concern.

Papers by senior figures. University presidents. Institute directors. Drug company research.

Then in 2020 she looked at hydroxychloroquine.

The Marseille professor Didier Raoult had published a study reporting success using it against Covid. The claim went around the world. Governments moved on it. Millions of people took it.

Bik went through the paper and raised problems with the methodology and the missing patient data. Then she raised concerns about dozens more papers from him and his institute.

29 April 2021. A lawyer acting for Raoult and his colleague Eric Chabrière filed a criminal complaint with a prosecutor in Marseille.

Aggravated moral harassment. Attempted blackmail. Attempted extortion.

She denies all of it. The payment remark they pointed to was a joke, she said, and her donation page is public.

Her inbox filled with threats. Anonymous accounts went after her appearance. Somebody promised her justice in a real prison in France.

She posts under her own name. Almost nobody else in this field does.

Then more than a thousand researchers signed an open letter standing behind her.

2021 she was given the John Maddox Prize. 2024 the Einstein Foundation Award. She gave that prize money away. It funds other people doing the same work.

Now the honest caveat, because she would want it there.

Her method has real critics. The digital forensics expert Hany Farid has argued that eye-based analysis cannot be audited. You can’t audit her brain, is how he put it. A validation exercise put her accuracy at around 90 percent, which means roughly one call in ten needs another look.

Fair. And it does not touch the number underneath.

One in 25.

Because here is what has not been fixed.

Ten years on, many of those original 782 papers are still sitting in the journals. Uncorrected. Some of them well past anything you could blame on an innocent error.

She is still going. Still unpaid.

An industry worth billions had nobody looking at the pictures.

She did it in the evenings, for free, and they tried to have her charged for it.

Old vs Younger Muscles

Old vs Younger Muscles

Eggs are the best source of protein but they are inadequate to maintain or build muscle mass in older muscles.

As you age this ratio of protein intake to body weight needs to be increased. The older your body, the more protein is required to maintain muscle mass. It is now commonly recognised that people over 70 need closer to 2 grams of protein a day per kilo of body weight.

And because older bodies have a protein response ceiling, they do need the protein intake spaced over the day – .4 grams of protein per meal per kilo of body weight, 30 grams of protein per meal, rather than loaded at one meal.

Inside our muscle cells the signal to grow new muscle is controlled by what scientists have labeled mTORC1 (mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1). If switched off, no new muscle tissue is built from the available protein. When switched on, the body grows new muscle.

As we age the same amount of protein does not produce the same muscle building response it did in our youth. The switch is not inactive, it just takes more protein the activate the switch. Specifically the amino acid Leucine.

In our youth, only 1.7 grams of Leucine was needed to flip the mTORC1 switch to ON. After age 70, 2.8 to 3 grams of Leucine per meal is required to flip the switch.

To flip that switch and counter anabolic resistance we need more leucine than is available from a regular serving of two or three eggs for breakfast. We need to supplement with 35-40 grams of whey protein or with 3 grams of the specific amino acid Leucine.

The optimum window for protein ingestion after resistance training narrows as we age. To realise maximum benefit from protein post resistance exercise, have it within 30 minutes of your workout.

Vitamin D upregulates protein synthesis pathways and supports satellite cell proliferation, new muscle fiber creation and regeneration. 70% of people tested have less than the optimal blood level of Vitamin D (75-125 nmol/L). This helps explain why two people with the same diet and exercise will experience vastly different muscle mass gains.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDt9-pS7rI0

Billy Mills

Billy Mills

He was a young man alone in a hotel room, at the lowest moment of his life, certain the world had no place for him.

He had been an orphan since he was twelve. He had been told, over and over, in a hundred ways, that he did not belong. And on that night, the weight of it all had nearly finished him.

Then he heard a voice — and what he did next would carry him all the way to one of the greatest moments in the history of the Olympic Games…

His name is Billy Mills.

Mills was born in 1938, an Oglala Lakota, and raised on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota — one of the poorest places in America. His mother died when he was eight. His father died when he was twelve. And in the space of those four years, a boy became an orphan.

But his father had left him something worth more than money. Sydney Mills had told his grieving son to look past his broken heart toward a dream: “You have broken wings now, son. But someday you could have the wings of an eagle.”

Billy found his wings in running — good enough to earn a scholarship to the University of Kansas and a place among the nation’s best college athletes. But even there, the cruelty followed him: a photographer setting up a team picture once ordered him out of the shot, because of the color of his skin.

It was one rejection too many, piled on a lifetime of them. And in a hotel room near Louisville, the darkness nearly swallowed him whole. He came to the very edge of giving up.

And then he heard something — not with his ears, but from somewhere deeper: a voice that sounded like his late father’s, saying one word. Don’t.

He didn’t give up. Instead, through his tears, he reached for a piece of paper and a pen, and he wrote down a single sentence — a goal so wildly beyond him that he had no earthly reason to believe it. “Gold medal,” he wrote. “Olympic 10,000-meter run.” He had no evidence he could do it. He wrote it anyway, and he began, from that night, to chase it.

Around that time, he met a young woman named Patricia. They married in 1962, while still in college, and she became the steady anchor that would hold his life together for the next sixty years and more.

After Kansas, Mills became an officer in the U.S. Marine Corps and kept training — even as his own body fought him. He had hypoglycemia and diabetes, which made his energy crash late in long races. And of every event he could have chosen, he’d fallen in love with the one his body was least built for: the 10,000 meters, the longest race on the Olympic track.

By 1964, against the odds, he’d made the U.S. Olympic team — though almost no one noticed. His best time trailed the world record, held by Australia’s great Ron Clarke, by nearly a full minute. When the team reached Tokyo, they didn’t even give Mills proper racing shoes at first; those were saved for the men expected to win.

Billy Mills was not one of those men.

On October 14th, 1964, nearly forty runners lined up on a rain-soaked cinder track in Tokyo’s National Stadium. Ron Clarke set a brutal pace from the gun, trying to break the field apart. By the halfway point, only a handful of runners could still hang on.

Somehow, impossibly, Billy Mills was one of them.

As the stadium lights came on against the darkening sky, the real race began. With two laps to go, three men pulled clear: Clarke, Tunisia’s Mohamed Gammoudi, and Mills. On the final lap, weaving through runners being lapped, there was contact — Mills was bumped and knocked off stride, and Gammoudi burst into the lead. Mills dropped to third, his blood sugar crashing, his vision starting to blur.

Every camera in the stadium was locked on the two favorites. Mills was fading into the background of his own race.

And then, with about a hundred meters to go, Mills glanced at a runner beside him and thought he saw, on the man’s singlet, the image of an eagle. His father’s words came roaring back. Wings of an eagle. “I can win,” he thought. “I can win.”

He swung wide into an open lane, onto firmer ground, and he unleashed everything he had left on that final straightaway — a burst of speed no one in that stadium believed was still in him.

On the broadcast, the announcers were still calling the duel between Clarke and Gammoudi when analyst Dick Bank grabbed the microphone and screamed the words that became legend: “Look at Mills! Look at Mills!”

He blew past Gammoudi. He blew past Clarke. And Billy Mills — the orphan from Pine Ridge nobody had come to watch — broke the tape in 28 minutes, 24.4 seconds: a new Olympic record, nearly fifty seconds faster than he had ever run in his life.

No American had ever won Olympic gold in the 10,000 meters. And in the more than sixty years since, no American ever has again.

Afterward, Mills went looking for the runner whose eagle had lifted him — and found there had been no eagle on the man’s jersey at all. He had imagined it. The wings his father promised him had been inside him the whole time.

Mills was never forgotten. His story became the 1983 film Running Brave; he was inducted into hall of fame after hall of fame; in 2012, President Obama awarded him the Presidential Citizens Medal; and in 2024, at eighty-six, he returned to the Olympics in Paris to donate his 1964 Team USA tracksuit to the sport’s museum.

Yet if you ask Billy Mills what that race in Tokyo really meant, he doesn’t talk about the medal. He talks about healing. Tokyo, he has said, was where a broken soul finally found some peace — where the vision that had once kept him alive was proven real.

And then he did the most Lakota thing of all. In his tradition, one who receives a great gift holds a “giveaway,” returning the blessing to the community. In 1986, Mills co-founded Running Strong for American Indian Youth, which today brings clean water, food, shelter, and hope to Native communities across more than thirty states.

Now in his late eighties, Billy Mills still lives with Patricia, his wife of more than sixty years, and still travels to speak to Native young people about the power of a dream.

He didn’t just outrun Ron Clarke and Mohamed Gammoudi that night in Tokyo. He outran the voice that had told him, his whole life, that he didn’t belong — and spent the rest of that life making sure the children of Pine Ridge would never face that voice alone.

Chickenpox vs Shingles

Dr Suzanne Humphries On Joe Rogan

There’s a hidden truth beneath the story of the chickenpox and shingles vaccines that no vaccine “expert” will ever tell you.

Dr. Suzanne Humphries: “In the old days, we would all get chickenpox.”

It was never a big deal.

Then came the vaccine.

By preventing chickenpox in kids, it created more of a much worse disease.

Dr. Humphries: “Chickenpox, we used to get continuously.”

“It was very rare for adults to get shingles before the chickenpox vaccine came out, extremely rare.”

“But since then, the rate of shingles in adults and children has skyrocketed.”

Why?

Because adults who were exposed to children with chickenpox received a natural immune boost that kept shingles in check.

There’s further evidence that childhood chickenpox prevented other future illnesses, including cancer.

Scientists knew that licensing a chickenpox vaccine carried significant risks of worsening other diseases.

Before it came out, one of the world’s leading varicella experts also noted that chickenpox was long considered too mild to justify a vaccine.

Big Pharma was well aware of all these concerns.

But they marched ahead with the chickenpox vaccine anyway.

As a result, they’ve reduced a disease that was never even a problem, and worsened other, far more serious, illnesses.

These are the kinds of things that you’ll never hear from vaccine “experts,” pharmaceutical companies, or the media.

Which is why we launched Shot Week.

This week, we have gone through and exposed the lies used to justify Big Pharma’s vaccines, from measles shots to mRNA Covid shots.

But the full web of lies that has been spun to justify vaccines is far too much to unravel in a few posts on X.

So we’re promoting one book that breaks down the entire decades-long propaganda and censorship campaign.

This book is a must-read for every new parent.

Click to view the video:  https://x.com/standforhealth1/status/2088676693972017511?s=20