Combine Creatine With THIS To Fight Aging

Your NAD is being drained by two hidden enzymes, your gut may be the starting point of every aging process in your body, and creatine does something to your mitochondria that has nothing to do with muscle. This episode rewrites what you thought you knew about longevity, anti-aging biology, and how your body actually produces and delivers energy at the cellular level.

Host Dave Asprey sits down with Professor Andrew Salzman, MD / Chief Medical Officer at Wonderfeel, a physician, inventor, and biomedical entrepreneur with more than 30 years of experience in drug discovery and development. An alumnus of Harvard Medical School, Yale University, and Columbia University, Dr. Salzman has authored more than 170 scientific publications and holds 50 patents.

He invented the original clinical-stage PARP-1 inhibitor, leading to the world’s first clinical treatment for raising NAD levels and fighting cancers caused by the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Genentech licensed his breakthrough technology for $600 million. His research into gastrointestinal microbiota, autoimmune disease, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial ATP production now forms the foundation of how millions of patients get treated worldwide.

At the 23 minute mark the professor goes into a great explanation of the gut lining and how key it is to maintaining health.

One gem, not exercising for 20-30 minutes after eating allows for better digestion. Go for your walk after that.

Click to view the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zK3uATWTWts

COVID ‘mRNA’ Vaccines Never Directly Shown to Do What They’re Claimed to Do

Comirnaty Never Shown To Do What Claimed

Did they say ANYTHING that was true?

Researchers have not directly demonstrated the complete physical input-to-output chain claimed for these products, raising basic questions about what went in and what came out.

The claim is specific: material identified as “mRNA” is injected, and human cells allegedly produce a defined “spike” protein.

This article does not claim that nothing happens after vaccination, nor that the vial contains nothing dangerous.

Biological changes, immune responses, symptoms, adverse events, and death have been reported after vaccination.

And the contents of the vial raise many serious safety questions.

The narrower question is whether the specific molecular identities claimed for the injected material and the alleged translation product have been directly established.

I found no published experiment that demonstrates either of the following:

  • An intact physical molecule recovered from a finished vaccine vial, with a complete experimentally determined sequence matching the complete intended sequence.
  • An intact physical product recovered from a vaccinated human, with a complete experimentally determined amino-acid sequence matching the complete intended “spike” sequence.

Which raises questions:

  • Where is the complete physical sequence (not the “intended” one) of the material injected into people?
  • Why is Pfizer’s “100% maximum sequence coverage” treated as proof of a complete molecule when only 55.6% was said to be uniquely assigned and the remainder depended on repeated-position assumptions?
  • Where is the complete physical sequence of the product allegedly produced inside vaccinated people?
  • How can one reported mass-spectrometry signal (“LDPPEAEVQIDR”) establish the identity of an entire alleged “spike” protein?
  • Why is a mechanism being treated as directly demonstrated when neither the complete physical input nor the complete physical output has been directly identified?

Finish reading:  https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/covid-mrna-vaccines-never-directly

Giorgio Cantarini and Roberto Benigni

Giorgio Cantarini and Roberto Benigni

He showed up for his audition alone, without his mother, wearing an enormous overcoat that seemed to swallow his tiny body. Roberto Benigni looked at the little boy and immediately thought he looked like a clown. What he didn’t know was that this child was about to take on one of the most important roles in his film.

It was 1996, and Roberto Benigni, Italy’s beloved comedian, was trying to do something almost everyone around him considered impossible. He wanted to make a movie set inside a Nazi concentration camp. Not a documentary and not a horror film, but a story about a father’s love so powerful that it could create a world of wonder for his child inside one of the darkest places on earth.

His friends told him to give up. He was known as a comedian, not someone who made historical dramas. He wasn’t even Jewish, so some people questioned what gave him the right to tell such a story.

But Benigni knew exactly where the idea had come from, and it wasn’t arrogance. It came from his father.

Luigi Benigni had spent two years in a Nazi labor camp during World War II. When Roberto was a child, his father would sit down with the family at night and tell them about what he had experienced. But Luigi did not describe it exactly as it had happened. He didn’t want to frighten his children. Instead, he told the stories the way a father might explain something terrible to someone he loved, finding the dark humor, the absurd moments, and the small pieces of humanity that somehow survived the horror. He turned something frightening into a story his children could bear to hear.

As Roberto grew older, he began to understand what his father had given him. He realized that this was the film he wanted to make.

He also discovered the story of Rubino Romeo Salmonì, an Italian Jew who had been deported to Auschwitz, survived, and later wrote a memoir that contained elements of bitter comedy. Salmonì had experienced something almost impossible to describe, yet he still chose to look at parts of it through irony. Not because he wanted to minimize what had happened, but because humor was one of the ways he managed to remain human in the middle of it.

Benigni was determined not to get the story wrong. He sent drafts of his screenplay to Jewish scholars and Holocaust historians in Milan. He also consulted the Grand Rabbi of Rome. He knew the subject was too serious to approach carelessly.

The film became *La Vita è Bella*, or *Life Is Beautiful*. It tells the story of Guido, a warm and endlessly imaginative Jewish Italian man who falls in love, builds a family, and eventually watches the Nazis come for the people he loves. Inside the concentration camp, separated from his wife, Guido makes a desperate decision. He tells his young son that everything happening around them is actually an elaborate competition. Points can be earned by following the rules, staying quiet, hiding, not crying for food, and never asking for his mother. The grand prize, Guido insists, is a real American tank.

The little boy believes every word.

And that meant the child playing him had to believe it too. Not pretend to believe it, but truly believe it with the complete trust of a five-year-old who has no reason to doubt his father.

That became one of the biggest challenges Benigni faced.

His solution was remarkably simple. He never told Giorgio Cantarini what the movie was really about.

Giorgio was only five years old and couldn’t read yet, so he learned his lines by listening to them being repeated. At one point, he asked what the word “Jewish” meant because he had never heard it before. Benigni gently redirected the conversation. On set, he played games with Giorgio between takes, kept him relaxed, and made him laugh. Benigni later remembered that sometimes Giorgio would arrive in a bad mood, just like any child can, and his job in those moments was simply to make the boy feel safe enough to play.

That is why the fear on Giorgio’s face in some scenes was real. So was the excitement and happiness. The affection he showed toward the man playing his father was not something he had to manufacture. It was simply the natural trust of a five-year-old who believed the person beside him could turn anything into an adventure.

The audience could feel that honesty because it was genuine.

*Life Is Beautiful* was released in Italy in December 1997 and reached international audiences in 1998. The response was immediate and deeply divided. Some Holocaust survivors wept in theaters. Critics debated whether comedy had any place in such a terrible part of history. Some considered the film dishonest, while others believed it captured something deeply truthful, the idea that when circumstances become unbearable, love can create its own kind of fiction, and sometimes that fiction becomes an act of courage.

Then came the 71st Academy Awards in 1999.

When Roberto Benigni’s name was announced for Best Actor, he didn’t simply walk to the stage. He climbed over the backs of the seats in front of him, scrambling across the theater as the audience erupted in laughter and applause. He finally reached the podium breathless and overwhelmed.

That night, *Life Is Beautiful* won three Oscars: Best Actor, Best Foreign Language Film, and Best Original Score. Benigni became the first person to win the Academy Award for Best Actor for a performance delivered entirely in a language other than English. It remains the only time it has happened.

Three years later, Giorgio Cantarini appeared in *Gladiator*, playing Russell Crowe’s son. He was eight years old and already had an Oscar-winning movie on his résumé from before he was old enough to read.

In later interviews, Giorgio has remembered the warmth of those days on the set. He remembered the man playing his father always making sure he was comfortable and always finding a way to make him smile.

He didn’t understand what they were really making. And that was exactly the point.

A father, both on screen and behind the scenes, had protected the child from the darkness surrounding the story. Giorgio saw only the game. He saw the adventure. He saw a father who wanted to keep him safe.

He never had to see the horror.

*Life Is Beautiful.* Roberto Benigni spent his career believing in those words. And for one extraordinary film, he found a five-year-old boy who believed them too.