Indian Pennywort: Increasing Telomere Length and Activating Telomerase Activity

Given the very recent study proving that SARS-CoV-2 and its Spike Protein reduce Telomere length, I found it necessary to search for effective, natural therapeutics to ameliorate this condition. After much searching, Nature does, indeed, provide such a therapeutic. It is in the form of an herb known as Centella asiatica, or, Indian Pennywort aka Gotu Kola.

Centella asiatica (CA) is a very important medicinal herb used in the orient[4], which is also becoming popular in the West[5]. Commonly known as mandukparni or Indian pennywort or jalbrahmi, it has been used as a medicine in the Ayurvedic tradition of India for thousands of years and listed in the historic ‘Sushruta Samhita’, an ancient Indian medical text[6,7]. The herb is also used by the people of Java and other Indonesian islands. In China, known as gotu kola, it is one of the reported “miracle elixirs of life” known over 2000 years ago.

Periodic Table Of Elements Wavelength Spiral

Periodic Table Of Elements Wavelength Spiral

IRON MAN actor Terrence Howard recently shared intriguing insights on Joe Rogan’s podcast about how the periodic table, cosmic octaves, and tones shape our reality.
Walter Russell’s periodic table is not just a list of elements; it is a dynamic representation of the universe’s energy. Unlike the traditional table, Russell’s version organizes elements in spirals and octaves, each representing different stages of energy and matter.
By starting with hydrogen and mastering its energy, you can begin to harness the creative power of the universe.
Walter Russell may indeed have been way ahead of his time, as Nikola Tesla suggested. He firmly believed he had the ability to see the very essence of the creation, and also believed that every man has consummate genius within him. “Mediocrity is self-inflicted and genius is self-bestowed”, he said. But if all else fails, the good news is, there’s always figure skating.
Walter Russell Spiral Chart

This is Walter Russell’s complete periodic table.  This chart is unique in giving home to all elements, including many that were undiscovered at his time.  Russell predicted even the characteristics of such elements.  He pronounced the existence of unstable heavy elements that, in his words, “could not survive being removed from the intense pressures of being buried deep in earth” which predated the nuclear era.  Russell also predicted the need for “heavy water” needed for the use of nuclear power, which is a doubled hydrogen atom.

This spiral chart has been broken down into several separate charts for easy readability, however this chart remains central to Russell’s work as cosmogonist (a person who works on universal theory).

All of Russell’s work can be found at:

How can millions of people, all exhibiting signs of COVID have whole genome sequences that match the SARS-CoV-2 reference genome if viruses don’t exist?

Millions of people with COVID symptoms were independently swabbed and sequenced using whole genome sequencing (WGS) technology. WGS uses random primers to extract genetic sequences from samples.

Each lab is given a sample from an infected person and asked to identify any novel pathogen that has not been seen before using only the data in the sample.

In over 100 countries, the genome sequences (which are nearly 30,000 nucleotides long) came back that were virtually identical.

This can’t happen by chance. AFAIK, there is only one way it can happen: the same base pathogen is infecting people all over the world.

AFAIK, nothing in science (except gravity) has been more widely independently replicated all over the world than the SARS-CoV-2 viral sequence.

So if viruses don’t exist, how would you explain this?

And, if it wasn’t a virus that was sequenced, then what exactly was sequenced?

And why has the SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequence never been publicly seen before in human history until 2019?

The furin cleavage site (FCS) and the 2016 Moderna patent

The hypothesis that the virus was engineered in a lab fits the observation.

Consider for example, the very unusual 19-nucleotide “furin cleavage site” sequence sitting between the S1 and S2 proteins. AFAIK, this particular 19-nucleotide sequence is not found in nature nor can any of the experts I talked to explain how it could evolve naturally.

But this unusual sequence is found in a Moderna patent (US Patent No. 9587057) filed in 2016.

How does Moderna explain that? They said they’d check into it in 2021, but that was years ago and we never heard back. I guess they are still checking!

How did that sequence make its way into people everywhere in the world so quickly?

A virus could do that.

Is there another explanation that is more likely? Or even a possibility?

See this article for a more in-depth discussion. Others strongly disagree and are convinced this was human engineered.

Quantitative PCR

Viruses replicate.

Does SARS-CoV-2 replicate? Yes.

How do we know that?

Because we can use qPCR and track viral load over time in someone who is infected. This viral load increases by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude in infected people, and then drops off after the virus is cleared.

If there is no virus, how do we explain the shape over time of the qPCR results?

It can be explained by foreign (i.e., non-host) genetic material that is capable, either on its own or with the help of a host cell, of replication. A virus explanation fits the observation. And we know it isn’t a bacteria or parasite because we’d be able to see that easily.

So is there a new pathogen that replicates that nobody in human history has discovered yet? That seems very unlikely.


Antibodies are created when foreign antigens (such as foreign proteins) enter our bodies.

A virus can cause antibodies to be created and we can measure that.

If it isn’t a virus but is simply a reaction to external stress, then why are antibodies being created?

Viral similarity

The genomic sequence that all these labs discovered is most similar to a bat coronavirus.

If a bat coronavirus isn’t a virus either, then what is it?

What exactly were they working on in the Wuhan Institute of Virology for the past decade?

… and why wasn’t anyone let in to examine the records if they weren’t hiding anything?

Barnstable County

See the study here. Basically, over 1,000 healthy people congregated, and 469 then developed COVID. They gene sequenced 133 patients, and 90% had the delta variant which was the popular variant at the time.

Virology explains this. It spread between people who were congregating in close quarters, exactly as we’d expect a virus to spread.

What’s the better explanation?

Other viruses: what are they and why do they match their associated diseases?

If viruses don’t exist, then how can the estimated tens of thousands of viruses which have been sequenced be so aligned with the symptomatic patients who have the associated disease?

I never found out the answer to any of these questions.

The measles virus

The measles virus is one of the most infectious viruses known to man. An infected person can spread the virus to up to nine out of ten susceptible people who are close contacts.

So we know for a fact that the rate of infectivity depends on the genetic sequence of the virus.

If it isn’t a virus, then what causes measles to jump so quickly from an infected person to an uninfected person and why is the infectivity dependent on the genetic sequence?

And we can genomically sequence people before they get infected, and then after they get infected, showing the only difference is the presence of the virus.

Is there any evidence that something else was found to be causing this?

Science is about using all available evidence

There was an excellent article written by Norman Doidge in 2020 entitled “Medicine’s Fundamentalists.” It points out that scientists should be using “all available evidence” and not be limited to only that data collected in carefully controlled experiments using the “scientific method.” This is why I disagreed with Dr. Kaufman at the start of the conversation.

If you look at the definition of science, you find it is:

“The systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained.”

There is no limitation as to what constitutes evidence that can be considered in a scientific hypothesis.

If your hypothesis is correct, all the data should be explainable.

An apology

I apologize for getting frustrated during the interview. I am very passionate about this topic.

Is there an alternative hypothesis that matches all the observations above?

I’m not aware of any other explanation other than SARS-CoV-2 is a virus.

If there is a better explanation, please answer in the comments.

That’s the important thing to focus on here.

It is not who won or lost the debate.

It is: “What does the data indicate?”

Discussion On mRNA Vaccines

Important statement from Dr. Joseph Fraiman, physician and clinical scientist. Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults

Healing Is Voltage

Dr Jerry Tennant

Conversation with Dr. Jerry Tennant, MD, MD(H), PSc.D

In this episode, I speak with world renown Dr. Jerry Tennant. We discuss his journey of healing himself from a life-threatening illness by discovering how to regenerate cellular voltage.

I have studied his work and used his products for the past 6 years in my office with exceptional success for my patients and quoted his brilliant research and books in my own book Light Medicine – A New Paradigm – The Science of Light, Spirit and Longevity. I consider his Restore Nutritional formula the best and most comprehensive in the world, I use it myself and recommend it to my patients.

In this time where self-assembly nanotechnology transforms the blood and hijacks our electrical life force, Dr Tennant explains how the polarity flip of cellular voltage causes blood changes, chronic fatigue and all diseases of aging, the very premise that I have worked to explain to people. He discusses how to use the biomodulator to reset the autonomic nervous system and the scalar wave biotransducer to flip the polarity of the cellular batteries so they can hold a charge. He also discusses Bohr effect which is the relationship between oxygen transport and pH – and the inability to give of oxygen to the tissues even if the pulse oximeter shows normal oxygen levels. This is how doctors misunderstand physiology and miss the main cause for chronic fatigue and illness! You do not want to miss this conversation.

Dr Tennant – Genius, scholar, inventor, humanitarian, innovator, healer, teacher, entrepreneur, historian — these are just a few of the terms that describe Dr. Jerry Tennant whose remarkable life, dedicated to healing and innovation, has changed the paradigm of western medicine.

Over the course of his career, he has worked with preeminent doctors across multiple fields. He is one of the few surgeons to be awarded the Corboy Award for Advancements in Ophthalmology and the American Academy of Ophthalmology Award, and has taught surgeons around the world to do outpatient eye surgery and was instrumental in getting Congress to pay for this, saving Medicare millions of dollars every year.

However, once a mysterious case of chronic illness forced Dr. Tennant to retire, he was forced to move into a different area of medicine. Despite needing over 16 hours of sleep a day, Dr. Tennant discovered that cellular voltage was the key to recovery. By balancing his cell voltage, he was able to recover on his own.

Now, Dr. Tennant shares his low voltage insights as a world-renowned speaker and has codified the treatment process through his professional protocol.

Watch here:

Wells Fargo Fires Employees Over “Mouse Jigglers”

Mouse Jigglers

In the era of hybrid work, with employees splitting their time between two days in the office and three days working remotely, employers have ramped up using productivity monitoring software. However, employees have outsmarted some of these surveillance programs with gadgets like mouse movers, otherwise known as ’mouse jigglers.’

The popularity of mouse jigglers has exploded on TikTok in the last several years. Firms have been cracking down on these devices following a surge in fake work activity, which has weighed on productivity.

Wells Fargo, in a new disclosure with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, first reported by Bloomberg, had terminated over a dozen employees in its wealth- and investment-management unit for their use of mouse jigglers.

They were “discharged after review of allegations involving simulation of keyboard activity creating the impression of active work,” according to the disclosures.

(Tom: Tom: I recall over ten years ago reading how more than 30%; of people would cheat to pass an exam. I thought at the time that it would not go well for society with a large percentage of people dishonest and unethical.

To those interested in knowing from whence came this dishonesty I have penned a few articles you might find of interest.

Behind every bad condition will be found a psychiatrist.

In 1947 the then president of the World Federation of Mental Health, Brock Chisholm, said, “The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong are the belated objectives of nearly all Psychotherapy.”

Chisholm further stated that if they were to be successful they needed to infiltrate the professions to introduce their ideas (more correctly called “insanities”) there.

This year is the 76th anniversary of his speech. Looking around at the average intelligence level, morality, ethics and consequent problems with crime, drugs, sexual perversions etc. I’d say the psychiatrists were remarkably successful!

If we as parents and teachers do not instill in our children respect for one another, tolerance for differences, that there is right and wrong, the difference between right and wrong, that actions have consequences and that regardless of what has happened in the past one has the ultimate responsibility for the actions one takes in the present, then we are, by our neglect, cocreating a society where psychiatry’s evil intentions are widely manifest, as is happening at present.

Psychiatry Is NOT Your Friend!

Microplastics in Human Blood: Polymer Types, Concentrations and Characterization Using μFTIR

(The instrument, the micro Fourier Transform Interferometer (μFTIR), permits the acquisition of infrared spectra of natural surfaces.)

This new study of polymer microplastics in 20 healthy donors confirms exactly my findings and those of live blood practitioners around the world. 90% of individuals had these polymers in the blood. I have been saying that everyone is contaminated. I have not seen clean blood in a long time. The particle sizes were enormous – just as we are seeing. The polymer identification is consistent with our near infrared spectroscopy. Additional unmentioned sources – and the most important ones – of this polymer plastic contamination of the blood is the self spreading C19 bioweapon and the geoengineering warfare.

Check out methylene blue for handling this!

Dr. Naomi Wolf Responds to UK Media Regulator OfCom

This is Dr. Wolf’s statement to the Royal Courts of Justice, London, United Kingdom, on June 11, 2024.

Statement of Dr. Naomi Wolf to the Court

Dear Mrs Justice Farbey

I am here today because OfCom, the media watchdog agency, concluded that my presentation of information from scientific reports about the Pfizer injection, on Mark Steyn’s TV show in October 2022, caused “harm.” Ofcom also referred to me in public documents as a “conspiracy theorist,” using that discrediting characterization of my work, as part of its decision to penalize Steyn for airing the show in which I brought forth the evidence I did.

I wish to describe to the court please the nature of the evidence I presented on GBNews. I then wish to describe my credentials, and lastly, I wish to make some points about the history of censorship.

The material I described to Mark Steyn is not my work. I am a nonfiction writer and journalist. I am not a medica doctor or a scientist. The material I presented is from scientific reports compiled by 3250 highly credentialled doctors and scientists, the WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis research team (see addendum), that convened from 2021 to the present, to read through and issue reports based upon the 450,000 internal documents released under court order due to a successful lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration by US attorney Aaron Siri. These are internal Pfizer documents submitted to the FDA for the purpose of securing the Emergency Use Authorization that allowed for the rollout in the US of an experimental injection that bypassed normal trials. They are primary internal documents produced by Pfizer/BioNTech, that date from November 2020 to February 2021 and that record the 43,000 plus adverse events and more than 1220 deaths recorded by Pfizer in those three months.

The documents go into detail about serious side effects and explain their mechanisms; the Pfizer documents contain internal reports on stroke, liver damage, kidney damage, many forms of blood clotting and blood damage (including the thrombotic thrombocytopenia that recently triggered the withdrawal of the AstraZeneca vaccine in the UK in 2024; we broke that story in 2022); many neurological events including dementias, epilepsies and Guillain-Barre syndromes, and serious respiratory issues.

The documents include a section in which 80 per cent of the pregnant women lost their babies, and another section in which two babies’ deaths in utero were due to “maternal exposure” to the vaccine, in Pfizer’s words. There is a great deal of information in the Pfizer documents, including charts, showing damage to women’s menstrual cycles, including serious damage such as hemorrhaging, passing tissue, and bleeding every day. There is documentation of lipid nanoparticles (the fatty casing for the mRNA) accumulating in the ovaries of women — more with each injection. There is documentation of damage to babies from nursing from vaccinated mothers, and of one baby who died of multi-organ system failure after ingesting a vaccinated mom’s breast milk. The Pfizer documents contain a warning to vaccinated men not to have intercourse with women of childbearing age. These are just some of the findings that our doctors and scientists summarized in their now 104 reports.

OfCom seeks to portray this material as “harmful.” But can findings be “harmful” if they are true? I am a reporter and I base my opinion on facts.

The Reports’ accuracy is not in doubt. They have been published on hundreds of news outlets globally for nearly three years, and we have received no lawyer’s letter from Pfizer of any kind, let alone stating that anything in them is incorrect. The Reports were published in book format: The WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Reportshardcover, pdf and ebook. This book was a Top Ten Amazon Bestseller, including selling in the UK. One of the Reports was published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. A second volume of these reports, to whose citation OfCom still objects, is being published in September 2024 by a major US imprint, Simon and Schuster: The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity. The book is currently for sale on Amazon UK.

My team and I have presented these findings, at the following bodies’ request, to EU Parliamentarians such as MEP Christine Anderson; to MEPs in The Netherlands; to the staffs of US Congressman Tom Massie and US Senator Ron Johnson; to Wyoming State Senators Tim Salazar and Bo Biteman; to the Australian Parliament, twice;  to MP Andrew Bridgen of the UK Parliament, and to scores of professional gatherings of physicians and hospital administrators, as well as at universities. Our Volunteers presented the material I shared on Mr Steyn’s show to the Brazilian Parliament and will soon present to the Government of South Korea. Our findings are being syndicated and republished by Israeli and British and Dutch news sites.

The evidence I presented on Mr Steyn’s show is also summarized in a book of mine titled Facing the Beast, which has been published in Sweden, Germany and The Netherlands and was a bestseller in Europe as well as in the US.

In short, all over the world, including in Britain, this same work for which OfCom has penalized Mark Steyn and attacked me reputationally, has been published and is widely recognized and honored, including by many governing bodies. So not only is OfCom out of alignment with other governments in free societies around the world, but it is also pushing back to suppress material that many UK citizens already know to be both factual and important.

As a result of this material, as well as other research, judicial decisions are turning against the manufacturers of this injection and against those governing bodies that suppress people’s right to information about it. Two state Attorneys General, of Missouri and Louisiana, sued the White House for violating the First Amendment in pressuring social media companies to smear and censor critics of the vaccine. This lawsuit showed that the origin of the attacks on my reputation, which OfCom echoed, started with the US White House unlawfully targeting a tweet of mine about risk to women from injections. This lawsuit has been successful to date and the US Supreme Court is deciding the case. A California court just ruled that lawsuits against vaccine mandates could proceed.

Last month, the AstraZeneca vaccine was suspended worldwide, including in the UK.

Can all these thoughtful senior government leaders, these Parliaments, these judges and courts, these publishers and news outlets outside of Britain, be wrong, and OfCom alone be right?

Is there a risk that the rest of the world will base common sense reasoning on the important information in our Reports, and the UK, whose information stream is held hostage by OfCom, will be isolated from life-saving information?

Now let me go please to my own CV. OfCom told the world that I was a “conspiracy theorist”. By doing so, the agency immeasurably damaged my career and reputation.

I am a Yale graduate, a Rhodes Scholar, and was twice a graduate student at Oxford University. I earned a DPhil from Oxford in 2015, in English Literature. I have written eleven nonfiction books, nine of them international bestsellers. I wrote a book, The Beauty Myth, that is credited with being a key part of the “Third Wave” of feminism, including in Britain. I advised President Bill Clinton’s reelection campaign and was an advisor to VP Al Gore’s campaign for Presidency of the US.

I have been published in every major Western European and North American news outlet, including having been a columnist for the Guardian, The Sunday Times of London, and Project Syndicate. My books have been published by major US and UK publishers, including Random House, Simon and Schuster, Chatto and Windus, Penguin, Vintage and Virago Press. I have appeared many times on most major network and radio shows in Britain and North America, from CNN to MSNBC to CBS, NBC and ABC in the US, to BBC, Channel 4, “Women’s Hour”, ITV, and countless regional shows. I have published opinion pieces and features for decades internationally – from The Washington Post to Time to The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, and in the UK, in The Guardian, The Sunday Times, as mentioned above, in Marxism TodayOxford Magazine, The Daily Mail, The Evening Standard, The Telegraph, The Express, and have been asked to lecture worldwide, from Penn to Northwestern to Tufts; I have lectured at New College, Oxford University and to undergraduates of the English Faculty at Oxford, and at St Catherine’s College, Oxford University. I lectured repeatedly at Rhodes House, with a leadership program I designed to train the Rhodes Scholars as public intellectuals. I lectured at the University of Chester, and, in the US, I was a Fellow at Barnard College and a professor at SUNY. I had a Rothermere American Institute Fellowship at Oxford University. My Oxford  D Phil re-explored a lost hero of British LGBTQ history, John Addington Symonds. It became a bestselling book, Outrages, which was a Blackwell’s selection. I brought my work to many UK literary festivals, including the Edinburgh and Hay Book Festivals.

I built a successful civic tech company, DailyClout, which makes US legislation transparent to all and socially sharable.

It would take chutzpah, as my grandmother would say, for OfCom to seek to smear a CV such as mine, as I was one of the most respected female intellectuals in Europe and America, pre-2021/2022. However, OfCom did, and their megaphone was much bigger than mine. While I was unable to face them to defend myself, OfCom brought the power of government amplification to bear down against my reputation in Britain and worldwide. As a result, I have lost the devoted and robust following of readers and publishers I had in Britain and other countries, lost investor funds in my company, and lost any possibility to speak to my former audiences or publish in my former UK outlets. The damage to my reputation is incalculable. And OfCom’s vague smear against me is false. I am not a ”conspiracy theorist” but a reporter and nonfiction writer recognized around the world for decades for my fact-based journalism and nonfiction – though indeed under attack since 2021, when I reported on harms to women from mRNA injections; harms that many peer reviewed studies have now confirmed.

Lastly I wish to speak about censorship. My DPhil and the book based on it traced the history of censorship law in Britain and America. What I learned from that research, is that there is ultimately no such thing as censorship because the truth always surfaces eventually. In other words, censorship by the state simply does not work.

The UK used to be the home of free speech. It had some of the most robust debates in the world, until the mid-19th century, and a long history of relatively strong press freedom. That changed in 1857, with the Obscene Publications Act. With the Comstock Laws in the US almost two decades later, the idea of sweeping state censorship was entrenched in democracies where it had not been before.

Since 1857 to the present, many subjects were targeted by UK and US censors. In Britain, content about same-sex relationships was unlawful to publish. So was sexually suggestive material of any kind. Then medical information about birth control became targeted by legal punishments. In 1877, Annie Besant and Charles Bradlaugh were tried for the crime of publishing a decades-old pamphlet on birth control. A great deal of what is now considered classical British and American literature has been censored by the State: from D H Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover, to The Well of Loneliness by Radclyffe Hall; from James Joyce’s Ulysses to George Orwell’s Animal Farm.

My point is that censoring pamphlets on birth control did not stop birth control information from becoming known over time. Censoring discussion on gay men and lesbians, did not stop homosexual or lesbian relationships from taking place or eventually from being discussed. Censoring Animal Farm stopped no one eventually from reading and valuing Animal Farm.

What you decide in this courtroom will be a decision for history. And history changes. The truisms that were accepted about the mRNA vaccines in 2022, are already out of date in 2024. Eventually, everyone will know that Mark Steyn was right to let me share sober data about risks from an experimental injection, a version of which has already this year been pulled from the UK market. Please decide with this question in mind: will Britain remain a free nation in which people can absorb different points of view, and decide for themselves? Or will they be subject to a nanny agency, whose brief is so wide in “chilling” open debate and serious reporting, that the censors of 1857 could scarcely have foreseen the sweep of its powers?

Britain’s greatest writers, such as John Milton, always argued for free speech. The Aeropagitica, Milton’s 1644 defense of freedom of speech, was controversial when it was published. But it saw the light of day. With OfCom chilling ideas before they can even emerge into the light of public consideration, will Britain have John Miltons in the future? Or a James Joyce, or a Radclyffe Hall, or an Orwell? Can such writers and journalists survive now in Britain, with OfCom keeping watch? (We are fighting the same fight for free speech in America too).

Martin Luther King Jr argued that the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice. The arc of a moral media is long as well, but I wager it bends toward truth.

Please may this Court consider how gravely the people of Britain – the birthplace and earliest home of free speech and a free press — deserve free expression, as do the people of mine; so that we can make informed decisions for ourselves, as adults; and so that we can have living cultures at all.

Thank you for the chance to make this statement.


Dr Naomi Wolf

CEO, DailyClout