From Tommy Wells…
Focusing cancer treatments on shrinking the tumor has been a catastrophic failure. 100 years ago Otto Warburg, Nobel Prize winner, informed the world that cancer was a metabolic dysfunction. Nobody in science listened. For 100 years the medical establishment looked the other way, and for the past 60 years has distracted people with genetics. Despite the war on cancer being a dismal failure and metastatic cancers being nearly impossible to stop with traditional treatments, the mainstream continued on its merry way making billions off of unsuspecting customers, er patients, who have been tricked into believing that the tumor is the enemy.
Let’s think about something. Knowing that tumors are magnets for heavy metals, toxic chemicals, parabens, and various carcinogens (links below), what do you think the outcome would be of obliterating a tumor with chemotherapy or radiation? Obviously all that toxicity would be spewed out into the blood stream and deposited all throughout the organs and tissues. (Not to mention the toxic nature of the treatment itself) This is why treatments so often cause cancer to come back…it’s because the system is more toxic than it was before, when the original tumor had all the bad stuff relatively contained and isolated from the system. Fat cells do the same thing — if you were to obliterate a whole swath of fat cells, toxicity would flood the system too. They are both warehouses for toxicity. Incidentally, tumors often form in deep layers of fat.
The goal should not be for doctors to shrink the tumor. The goal should be for the patient to flood his body with light and living foods, which will build up and strengthen his immune system so that IT can shrink the tumor at its own pace, so that the body can deal with the wastes. Cancer-elimination is one of the major jobs of the immune system — it knows how to do it, but it needs the light/energy to do so!
But even if the tumor doesn’t shrink, people live decades sometimes with tumors in them. Tumors don’t generally kill people (unless they happen to block a major organ function); toxic/acidic terrains are what kill people — via systemic poisoning. This is why end-stage cancer patients look snake-bit… …it’s because they’re actually being poisoned to death.
Chemo, radiation and surgery should all be discontinued for the vast majority of cancer cases. A new paradigm demands a new treatment. The new paradigm is energy: adding energy. Adding light. Adding strength and building up the immune system, detoxing the body. You don’t get rid of cancer by flooding the body with more toxic chemicals.
“Until quite recently, scientists have focused on the tumor itself,” said the study’s senior author Ernst Lengyel, MD, Ph.D., professor and chair of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Chicago Medicine. “Everyone does.”
“But given the lack of progress with that approach and the fact the tumors are complex organs comprised of different tumor-supporting cell types (stroma), “we thought it might be better to focus less on the cancer and more on the stroma, the supporting tissue that surrounds the cancer and enables its growth.”
https://m.medicalxpress.com/news/2019-05-metabolism-cells-metastasis-ovarian-cancer.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28067071 “There were significantly higher concentrations of methoxychlor, dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT), hexa-chlorobenzene (HCB), and chlordane in tumor tissue samples compared to the surrounding normal tissue.”
Pesticides in tumor tissue: https://www.longdom.org/open-access/organochlorine-pesticides-in-the-females-suffering-from-breast-cancer-and-its-relation-to-estrogen-receptor-status-2157-7609.1000156.pdf
Metals strongly accumulate in tumors: https://www.maedica.ro/articles/2007/2007_Vol2(5)_No1/2007_Vol2(5)_No1_pg5-9.pdf
https://tmu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/accumulation-of-chromium-and-nickel-metals-in-lung-tumors-from-lu “Data suggest that accumulation of Cr and Ni in lung tumors may play a role, at least in part, in the development of lung cancer in Taiwan.”
Parabens in tumors: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jat.1786
Tom’s comments…
So, this begs the old question, “Which comes first, the chicken or the egg?” Does the body create cancer to encapsulate toxins or do tumours attract toxins? If the former, then having less toxins in the body should generate less cancer. This would apear to be born out by the fact that of 150 Egyptians mummies tested for cancer, only one was found to have it whereas today 50% of women and two thirds of men will get cancer.
So my strategy is to consume as few toxins as possible and to detox the body. What’s yours?