Category: Health Tips

A deeply alarming set of statistics from an mRNA vaccine study in live animals is raising critical questions about food safety and livestock viability.

In a trial involving 525 hogs injected with a live mRNA vaccine, the 21-day outcomes were catastrophic:

• 25 Animals SUCCUMBED TO DEATH.
• 55 Animals became severely ANOREXIC, nearing death.
• 20 Animals suffered from debilitating LAMENESS.
• 12 Animals exhibited severe LOSS OF CONDITION.
• 25 Additional animals presented with NEAR-DEATH symptoms.

This equates to a staggering 30% morbidity and mortality rate.

Only 70% of the herd remained viable to any extent, presenting a dire threat to any farming operation.

Most disturbingly, post-mortem analysis revealed remnants of the live virus vaccine persisted within the tissue of the deceased animals. The implications are twofold and severe:

For the CONSUMER: This raises a monumental food safety question. The potential for a live virus vaccine to be present in the meat supply introduces a unknown variable into the food chain, a concern for every family prioritizing health and transparency.

For the PRODUCER: This is an existential threat. Adopting a pharmaceutical technology that could potentially decimate 30% of a herd is not merely a poor business decision—it is a fast track to financial ruin, destroying livelihoods and generational farms.

This isn’t just a study; it’s a warning. Share this information. Demand accountability and transparency. Support the farmers who prioritize the health of their animals and, by extension, the public.

https://x.com/forallcurious/status/1969559540904706417

The new ACIP Committee has been delicately chipping away at the mRNA guidelines with archeological tools. Yesterday, they fired up the jackhammer. The Wall Street Journal ran the story under the intentionally confusing headline, “COVID-19 vaccine recommendations dropped by panel, shots won’t require a prescription.”

The news was that the CDC’s vaccine committee (called ACIP) met again yesterday for its second full day. They ultimately voted to further limit the covid mRNA shots, this time adding a requirement for “shared clinical decision-making” before anyone under 65 or not in a ‘high-risk’ group can get the shots. They nearly voted to require a prescription, it was so close, but that vote failed by a small margin.

Corporate media and its pet experts were alarmed, worried, fretful, and terrified, squawking things like this is the end, nobody’s following the science, and so forth and so on.

But, apart from that, the meeting was a bloodbath for the jabs. In the clip above, Pfizer and Moderna declined to respond to a direct question from a committee member. Even worse, they were forced to sit through a several lengthy presentations by the newly formed “Vaccine Working Group” about all the growing questions and problems over the jabs.

“Beyond antibody changes,” one presenter began, “the vaccinations have also been linked to long-lasting shifts in cytokine profiles, with elevated inflammatory cytokine persistence for months. These immune alterations may contribute to an increased risk of recurrent infection in some individuals.”

That was just the first bullet point.

The Workgroup continued through problem after problem, discussing biodistribution (it spreads all over the body, including into the brain), frameshifting (it creates random ‘nonsense’ proteins), and implausibly high levels of DNA contamination, including parts of a monkey virus (SV40), especially in the Pfizer shot.

💉 Even more astonishing, following the meeting, the CDC itself tweeted a very critical comment from Dr. Malone, questioning how the drugmakers can even tell the shots work.

What Dr. Malone meant is that there is no agreed-upon measurement —like a specific antibody level— that reliably predicts whether a person “is protected” from covid, either in terms of bare infection or severe disease.

Absent “consensus” on even what proves protection exists, how can the drugmakers claim the shots produce protection? Stop saying that.

Malone was pointing out that pharma’s claims of efficacy were only based on large-group statistical conclusions, rather than any hard-science-based —i.e. measurable— biological effect. Whereas, most other vaccines do have established correlates of protection— meaning that there are well-defined, measurable biological markers (often specific antibody levels) that can reliably predict immunity.

Anyway, Malone had a solid point, and he made it well. But the more important development was that his point was then re-published by the official US government Twitter account for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And that wasn’t all. The CDC also published a whole string of clips, the most recent including a clip of Dr. Retsef Levi stating that, “Sub-clinical myocarditis can cause death. It’s proven. It’s not questionable. Nevertheless, we are not talking about this with patients, and we are not stating that risk.”

They are prying the Overton Window open, inch by inch, one post at a time.

You should see the crazed hysteria in the comments by the medical fetishists, who are mad as hornets that their beloved CDC is now being used to push all this anti-vaxx propaganda. Don’t actually read the comments. There’s no logic; the pro-vaxxers never try to rebut the claims on the merits; it’s just name-calling and non-sequiters.

Some may wonder why, with all these evident problems, the Committee didn’t just withdraw authorization from the shots altogether? The short version is, this problem didn’t develop in a day, and it won’t be fixed in a day. The Committee appears to be carefully building an unassailable scientific record before pulling the plug. Still, every time they get a whack at the Pfizer piñata, they hit it a little harder.

The clock is ticking, louder and louder.

https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/unprescribed-saturday-september-20

RFK Jr.: “Gardasil is probably the single worst mass vaccine that we’ve ever seen. This vaccine targets millions of preteens and teens for whom the risk of dying from cervical cancer is zero. Nobody in their right mind would ever take this vaccine if they actually read the clinical literature.”

“Death rates in the Gardasil trials were 37 times the death rates for cervical cancer. Children who take that vaccine, the Gardasil vaccine, are 37 times more likely to die from the vaccine than they are to die from cervical cancer. The problem with Gardasil, like most vaccines, is it was never tested against a true placebo, an inert placebo.”

“And the CDC and HHS say, if you don’t test it against a true placebo, it’s not science. You have no way of gauging whether the injuries you’re seeing from the product are being caused by that product, or whether they’re just bad, sad coincidences. The entity that is actually performing the study is, and paying for the study, is Merck.”

“Merck got to decide which injuries were being caused by Gardasil and which were just bad coincidences. And because it had that power, it just wrote them all off as bad coincidences.”

“You can do that when there’s no placebo, because the injuries they were seeing in the control group, where the girls were getting aluminum neurotoxins, were identical to the injuries they were getting in the Gardasil group.”

“So they said, well, we don’t have to report any of these as vaccine injuries. They were able to license something that is insanely dangerous.”

https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1969148240911020251

A bombshell new peer-reviewed study has dropped a hammer on the official Covid narrative, concluding that both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the mRNA “vaccines” share “deliberately engineered” features consistent with gain-of-function biological weapons research.

The researchers behind the study warn that the mRNA injections have caused “unprecedented levels of morbidity and mortality.”

The study’s paper was authored by 11 scientific and legal experts.

It was published in the prestigious Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

The paper argues that the genetic signatures of SARS-CoV-2, and the dangerous spike protein it shares with the vaccines, “represent a violation of the Biological Weapons Convention.”

The study lays out what many have long suspected but few dared to say: COVID-19 was not a natural accident, and the vaccine rollout only deepened the harm.

“Far from benign, these vaccines have unleashed profound harm, disrupting nearly every system of the human body and contributing to unprecedented levels of morbidity and mortality,” the paper states.

Lead author Dr. Andrew Zywiec did not mince words:

“The systemic toxicity unleashed by these interventions, manifesting as autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular devastation, aggressive cancers, and catastrophic reproductive harms, represents not merely a public health failure but a profound betrayal of trust.”

The paper details a cascade of harms linked to the vaccines, from “autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular catastrophes to pregnancy complications and aggressive cancers.”

Joseph Sansone, Ph.D., who has filed suit to prohibit mRNA “vaccines” in Florida, called the study historic:

“This is the first peer-reviewed journal article stating that both Covid and the Covid injections violate the Biological Weapons Convention and that both COVID-19 and the Covid injections are biological weapons.”

The authors identify multiple red flags in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, including the notorious furin cleavage site, absent in nature but known to “enhance infectivity” in engineered viruses.

The paper cites military scientists who previously described SARS-CoV-2 as containing “evidence of manipulation” that makes it an “attractive pathogen.”

According to the authors, these manipulations were not just reckless science; they were illegal under the 1975 Biological Weapons Convention.

The study directly accuses former NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci and U.S. intelligence officials of concealing the engineered origins of the virus.

It points to Project DEFUSE, a 2018 EcoHealth Alliance proposal to DARPA that outlined creating coronaviruses with features eerily similar to SARS-CoV-2, including the furin cleavage site.

While DARPA rejected the proposal, EcoHealth and Wuhan collaborators allegedly pursued the experiments with other funding.

The paper highlights the now-infamous Feb. 1, 2020, Fauci call with top virologists.

Some of those virologists admitted that the virus looked engineered before co-authoring the widely cited “Proximal Origin” paper claiming the opposite.

That paper, the study notes, became one of the most cited publications of 2020 and was used worldwide to suppress the lab-leak theory.

“The deliberate concealment of critical genomic features delayed public awareness and pandemic mitigation efforts, potentially allowing wider spread and more deaths,” the authors state.

Perhaps the most disturbing claim is that the spike protein from the mRNA injections doesn’t just vanish after 48 hours, as promised.

The study cites evidence of spike protein and vaccine nucleic acids lingering in the body for months, even years, detected in heart tissue, blood plasma, placentas, breast milk, and now even tumors.

“Prolonged protein expression, exemplified by S1 spike protein detection more than 700 days post-Covid vaccination, underscores the potential for irreversible harm,” the authors warn.

Military data cited in the paper show alarming spikes in myocarditis (151%), pulmonary embolism (43%), ovarian dysfunction (35%), and multiple cancers following the “vaccine” rollout.

The paper lands just as HHS pulled broad authorization for Covid “vaccines” and canceled nearly $500 million in mRNA research contracts.

Its conclusion is blunt:

“The surge in autoimmune diseases, aggressive cancers, pregnancy losses, cardiovascular fatalities, societal fragmentation, and the looming risks of advanced mRNA platforms demand an immediate halt to mRNA vaccine and biologic use, comprehensive investigations into the motives behind this unprecedented violation of public trust, and robust measures to restore safe therapeutics and ethical public health practices.”

Co-author Dr. Irene Mavrakakis went further, demanding:

“Complete recall of all COVID-19 vaccines and biologics and a moratorium on all mRNA biologics,” along with the criminal prosecution of decision-makers who “were criminally negligent and failed in their duties.”

She added that vaccine manufacturers must lose the liability shields granted under federal law.

This study represents the most direct challenge yet to the official Covid narrative.

It doesn’t just question safety, it raises the possibility that both the virus and the “vaccines” were products of deliberate engineering, with catastrophic consequences.

And the authors are clear, warning the public that the damage is ongoing, and the truth can no longer be ignored.

https://slaynews.com/news/major-study-covid-vaccines-deliberately-engineered-cause-unprecedented-levels-death/