A very comprehensive collection from medical doctors and PhD scientists who explain clearly why vaxcines are not safe or effective.
Flu Shots Increase Risk 500% of Acute Respiratory Infection
(Tom: It does not take a PhD in medicine to feel disinclined to get a flu shot when they increase your risk of getting severely ill from COVID-19 by 500%! This from the British Medical Journal.)
Article:
Rapid Response:
Flu shots and the risk of coronavirus infections
John Watkins is right; we need to think beyond containment, but he overlooks the possibility that seasonal flu shots are potential contributors to the current outbreak. (BMJ 2020;398:m810—February 28)….A randomized placebo-controlled trial in children showed that flu shots increased fivefold the risk of acute respiratory infections caused by a group of noninfluenza viruses, including coronaviruses. (Cowling et al, Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:1778) From Table 3, vaccine recipients had 20 noninfluenza virus-positive ARIs and 19 virus-negative ARIs; non-recipients had 3 noninfluenza virus-positive ARIs and 14 virus-negative ARIs. These figures yield an odds ratio of 4.91 (CI 1.04 to8.14).
Such an observation may seem counterintuitive, but it is possible that influenza vaccines alter our immune systems non-specifically to increase susceptibility to other infections; this has been observed with DTP and other vaccines. (Benn et al, Trends in Immunology, May 2013) There are other immune mechanisms that might also explain the observation.
To investigate this possibility, a case-control study is in order as we study and care for the victims of covid-19. Influenza vaccines have become sacred cows in some quarters, but they shouldn’t be.
ALLAN S. CUNNINGHAM 2 March 2020
When big companies fund academic research, the truth often comes last
Internal industry documents obtained through litigation have revealed many examples of industry sponsors influencing the design and conduct of research, as well as the partial publication of research where only findings favourable to the funder were published.
For instance, in 1981 an influential Japanese study showed an association between passive smoking and lung cancer. It concluded wives of heavy smokers had up to twice the risk of developing lung cancer as wives of non-smokers and that the risk was dose related.
Tobacco companies then funded academic researchers to create a study that would refute these findings. The tobacco companies were involved in every step of the funded work, but kept the extent of their involvement hidden for decades. They framed the research questions, designed the study, collected and provided data, and wrote the final publication.
Niall McCrae and David Kurten: EU Numbers Show Correlation Between Flu Vaccine and Coronavirus Deaths
This is an excellent article and drops many blockbusters so is well worth your time reading to the end.
Does This CDC Study Deliver the Knockout Blow in the COVID Lockdown Debate?
For weeks, the nation’s economy has been under lockdown to curb the spread of the Wuhan Coronavirus. It’s contagious. That’s true, but in the span of a few days, the entire COVID narrative has virtually collapsed.
Most people are more likely to wind up six feet under because of almost anything else under the sun other than COVID-19.
The CDC just came out with a report that should be earth-shattering to the narrative of the political class, yet it will go into the thick pile of vital data and information about the virus that is not getting out to the public. For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged ita month ago.
Until now, we have been ridiculed for thinking the death rate was that low, as opposed to the 3.4% estimate of the World Health Organization, which helped drive the panic and the lockdowns. Now the CDC is agreeing to the lower rate in plain ink.
Plus, ultimately we might find out that the IFR is even lower because numerous studies and hard counts of confined populations have shown a much higher percentage of asymptomatic cases. Simply adjusting for a 50% asymptomatic rate would drop their fatality rate to 0.2% – exactly the rate of fatality Dr. John Ionnidis of Stanford University projected.
Comparing COVID-19 to previous seasonal and pandemic influenzas reveals a similar fatality rate.
Dr Judy Mikovits
I posted this or similar content that some people reported was removed from YouTube due to it contradicting their community standards. So here are some links to where you can still view the content.
JUDY MIKOVITS, PHD EXPOSES THE TRAIL OF CORRUPTION & THE COVER-UP THAT CONTINUES TODAY
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Si3uTRc7YYlB/
PLANDEMIC, A FILM ABOUT THE GLOBAL PLAN TO TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES, LIBERTY, HEALTH & FREEDOM
https://www.bitchute.com/video/25tow1hbXwy1/
Dr. Judy Anne Mikovits is an American researcher who earned her BA in chemistry with a specialization in biology from the University of Virginia in 1980 and her PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology from George Washington University in 1992. In her 35-year quest to understand and treat chronic diseases, she has co-authored seminal papers culminating at least a decade of research in each of four fields: immunology, natural products chemistry, epigenetics, and HIV/AIDs drug development.
Stupdity vs Intelligence
It is also Criminality versus Creativity. When you rehabilitate in a person the ability to create you automatically extinguish criminality.
11,000 Deaths A Year
One commenter wrote: They stick formaldehyde, aluminum, mercury and more like polysorbate 80 that opens up the brain barrier causing brain swelling in your baby from these metals on the first day right from a hepatitis shot they won’t need for years down the road? There definitely is something wrong with this.
Here’s a video talking about waiting 6 months to give your baby water. Take as long as you like to think about this that your baby is getting toxic metals into the brain on the first day, but you’re advised to wait until 6 months to give them water. Google purposefully gives wrong information on the first pages, so they are invested and in on it too! https://www.parents.com/baby/feeding/when-can-my-baby-start-drinking-water/
Russia Developing Coronavirus Treatment That Disinfects the Body With UV Light From Inside
Saw a couple of months ago that this was developed by a Turkish guy. Good on the Ruskies for not being closed minded! After all, if sunlight kills it…
Thanks to Facebook, anti-vaxxers will soon be the majority – study
“Our theoretical framework reproduces the recent explosive growth in anti-vaccination views, and predicts that these views will dominate in a decade,” the study, published in journal Nature, found. (Tom: Yay! Truth is seeping through the society! And may it continue at an even greater speed!)