Category: Vaccines

As posted by a FB friend, Carlie Marie, who is a nurse:

Being a nurse we are programmed to believe the sales pitch: Vaccines are safe, effective, and save lives.

Our careers are run on blind faith only being taught how to be assertive, overcome objections, and basically medically bully anyone who doesn’t want us to tick off our boxes that come in pre printed care plans.

It was a much too slow of an evolution for me. In 1998, I had been working with newborns. Injecting them with Hep B when the head of NICU said to stop. The mercury was binding in the brains maiming and killing. I injected babies in less than 24 hours of life every single shift.

Two years later my own newborn son was injected with my consent after being told there was no mercury. That it was changed to thimerosal and safe. LIES.

After a few too many beautiful dead babies I left that unit and went to work the Hemodialysis unit that was based in the same hospital. There I learned, not many got immunity and if they did it was short lived. I realized we were injecting every new baby 3 times with mercury and aluminum 3 times by 6 months of age with ZERO risk factors and no effectiveness.

Then I realized gardasil was bad when my daughter was injected and THEN warned of the sudden, severe, neurological side effect of losing consciousness. When I wanted to tear that nurse apart for not telling us that or giving us the sales sheet with that on it before the injection I took to the internet.

I still believed all were okay except those two. On blind faith and through indoctrination, ofcourse. After all, I was a seasoned nurse.

Then when the pediatrician went insane on me with misinformation that my late in life surprise son would be dead soon after learning to crawl due to me refusing Hep B I realized the doctors didn’t know shit about them.

That is when my earth tilted on it’s access. I went to the clinic after hours, using my keys to collect actual package inserts for every single common vaccine. They are always in the prep stations trash unopened with an intact seal.

The content in black and white was horrifying!

I have since spent countless hours researching and looking back on life and career with ugly dots being connected. I have been screaming the truth from the rooftops these last three years.

I only hope I can be forgiven for what I accepted into my own body repeatedly as an adult nurse being titre tested for immunity and perpetrated on people throughout my nursing career.

An FDA presentation from the FDA website. Shocking because the FDA doesn’t ever publicly talk about potential adverse events from vaccines. Also, this presentation exposes how *WE* are trial participants. They will give the vaccine to millions (?) and watch to see how we react. We aren’t talking about a little soreness here. Adverse events they are concerned about run the gamut from an allergic reaction to miscarriages to lifelong autoimmune disease to seizures to death.

Is it time to have a truthful discussion on CV19, fatality rates, treatments, natural supplementation, and how to protect the most at-risk?

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

The linked presentation available is, in my opinion, a must watch.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CIQ1J16A_9X/

(Tom: Don’t talk to the brain damaged from the last rushed vaccine about whether or not to get this one!)

Peter Todd, a lawyer who represented many of the claimants, told the Sunday Times: “There has never been a case like this before. The victims of this vaccine have an incurable and lifelong condition and will require extensive medication.”

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/brain-damaged-uk-victims-swine-flu-vaccine-get-60-million-compensation-1438572

Remarkably, zero of the 561 unvaccinated patients in the study had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to 0.063% of the (partially and fully) vaccinated. The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling. Our results give agency to calls for research conducted by individuals who are independent of any funding sources related to the vaccine industry. While the low rates of developmental disorders prevented sufficiently powered hypothesis testing, it is notable that the overall rate of autism spectrum disorder (0.84%) in the cohort is half that of the US national rate (1.69%). The practice-wide rate of ADHD was roughly half of the national rate. The data indicate that unvaccinated children in the practice are not unhealthier than the vaccinated and indeed the overall results may indicate that the unvaccinated pediatric patients in this practice are healthier overall than the vaccinated.

Vaccines are widely regarded as safe and effective within the medical community and are an integral part of the current American medical system. While the benefits of vaccination have been estimated in numerous studies, negative and nonspecific impact of vaccines on human health have not been well studied. Most recently, it has been determined [1,2] that variation exists in individual responses to vaccines, that differences exist in the safety profile of live and inactivated vaccines, and that simultaneous administration of live and inactivated vaccines may be associated with poor outcomes. Studies have not been published that report on the total outcomes from vaccinations, or the increase or decrease in total infections in vaccinated individuals.

A few independent (non-CDC) studies do exist that have compared outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. A small survey study of 415 families with homeschooled children by Mawson et al., 2017 [9] that compared vaccinated with completely unvaccinated children reported increased risk of many diagnoses among the vaccinated children including (condition, fold-increase): allergic rhinitis (30.1), learning disabilities (5.2), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (4.2), autism (4.2), neurodevelopmental disorders (3.7), eczema (2.9), and chronic illness (2.4). The increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders appeared to be higher in cases of preterm births. A study from Germany (Schmitz et al., 2011) [10] reported no increases in adverse outcomes other than atopy.

We performed a retrospective analysis spanning ten years of pediatric practice focused on patients with variable vaccination born into a practice, presenting a unique opportunity to study the effects of variable vaccination on outcomes. The average total incidence of billed office visits per outcome related to the outcomes were compared across groups (Relative Incidence of Office Visit (RIOV)). RIOV is shown to be more powerful than odds ratio of diagnoses. Full cohort, cumulative incidence analyses, matched for days of care, and matched for family history analyses were conducted across quantiles of vaccine uptake. Increased office visits related to many diagnoses were robust to days-of-care-matched analyses, family history, gender block, age block, and false discovery risk. Many outcomes had high RIOV odds ratios after matching for days-of-care (e.g., anemia (6.334), asthma (3.496), allergic rhinitis (6.479), and sinusitis (3.529), all significant under the Z-test). Developmental disorders were determined to be difficult to study due to extremely low prevalence in the practice, potentially attributable to high rates of vaccine cessation upon adverse events and family history of autoimmunity.

http://ipaknowledge.org/ipak-vaxxed-v-unvaxxed-study.php

Abstract: Vaccination is a medical intervention that comes with a risk for some people. In the expression of infectious diseases, it is known that the pathogen alone does not cause disease: it is a combination of the pathogen, environment, and genetic factors that determines expression and severity of the disease in individuals. In 1960 Macfarlane Burnet, Nobel Prize laureate for immunology, stated that genetics, nutrition, psychological and environmental factors may play a more important role in resistance to disease than the assumed benefits of artificial immunity induced by vaccination. He considered that genetic deterioration of the population may be a consequence of universal mass vaccination and he postulated that in the long-term vaccination may be against the best interests of the state. The current belief that much of the burden of infectious diseases can be alleviated if every child, in every geographical location, has access to multiple vaccines, does not consider the influence of genetics and environment on the health of populations. The historical record shows that deaths and illnesses to infectious diseases fell due to public health reforms – and prior to the introduction of most vaccines. Since 1990 there has been a 5-fold increase in chronic illness in children in developed countries and an exponential increase in autism that correlates directly with the expansion of government vaccination programs. Many individuals are genetically predisposed to the chronic illnesses that are increasing in the population and since 1995 governments have not used mortality or morbidity to assess outcomes of vaccination programs.
Human health can be protected in government policies if the precautionary principle is used in the correct format that puts the onus of proof of harmlessness on the government and pharmaceutical industry, and not the general public. This has not been done in current vaccination programs and we cannot rule out the possibility that the increased use of vaccines is destroying the genetic fabric of society as MacFarlane Burnet postulated.

Wilyman, J. Misapplication of the Precautionary Principle has Misplaced the Burden of Proof of Vaccine Safety. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law Nov 2020 2:23-34.

https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_cb9f1c190ed547198bc085074466aaea.pdf

Pfizer’s new COVID-19 Vaccine for which it claims a 90 percent success rate (less than the survival rate for the actual virus ironically which is over 98 percent) also has some disturbing ingredients.

Children’s Health Defense explained in an August 6th article,

“mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG).”

CHD goes on to explain:

“The use of PEG in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis. Roughly seven in ten Americans may already be sensitized to PEG, which may result in reduced efficacy of the vaccine and an increase in adverse side effects. If a PEG-containing mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 gains FDA approval, the uptick in exposure to PEG will be unprecedented—and potentially disastrous. Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology but is more concerned with its bottom line.”

This is the reason why it must be kept at a temperature of -70 degrees. Colder that the Antarctic otherwise it is, in Pfizer’s own words, “ineffective.”

This is apart from the inclusion of foetus material from living animals, something that would be of concern to vegetarians and vegans not to mention various religious groups and philosophies.

CHD goes on to say, “LNPs “encapsulate the mRNA constructs to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake” and, additionally, rev up the immune system (a property that vaccine scientists tamely describe as LNPs’ “inherent adjuvant properties”)”

This is a polite way of saying that LNPs are adjuvants. This means they are designed to stimulate hyper-inflammatory responses in human beings in an effort to induce the creation of antibodies that allow the manufacturer to claim high “effectiveness” rates, despite those adjuvants causing severe adverse reactions (for which the company cannot be sued by the way). In fact according to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions. That means ALL. Not some. ALL

Be very careful what you inject into your body.

https://www.seetvnews.com/post/more-disturbing-news-on-covid-vaccines

Debi Leeper writes: “I spent time with one of Australia’s top lead cancer researchers. They said “it’s very well known vaccines cause cancers”.

There many other things that contribute to the development of cancers however when you look at the ingredients in those injectable products it is easy to see why.

Finish reading: