Great News! Fungi vs PFAS Chemicals

Fungi vs PFAS Chemicals

The “forever chemical” met something older.

PFAS — per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — are the most stubborn pollutants humans have invented. They don’t break down in sunlight, water, soil, or human bodies. They accumulate in blood, in liver tissue, in groundwater, and they stay there for decades. Maine’s farm soils were contaminated by sludge spreading, firefighting foam, and industrial discharge. The state had thousands of acres where PFAS levels exceeded safety thresholds, and conventional remediation was a joke. You can’t filter what doesn’t degrade. You can’t dig up what has already spread through the soil profile.

Maine’s Department of Environmental Protection funded a project using wood-rot fungi mycelium to biologically break down PFAS. The mechanism is enzymatic. White-rot fungi — species like Phanerochaete chrysosporium — evolved to decompose lignin, one of the most complex and resistant organic polymers on Earth. Their enzymes, called laccases and peroxidases, cleave carbon-fluorine bonds that other organisms can’t touch. The mycelium in this photo, spreading through mulch in a contaminated Aroostook County field, is literally digesting PFAS molecules and converting them into harmless byproducts.

The turkey in the background, foraging in the mist, is the proof. Before the mycelium treatment, this soil was too contaminated for agricultural use. Wildlife avoided it. The fungi broke down the PFAS over 18 months of managed treatment, and the soil now tests below detection thresholds for the most common PFAS variants. The turkey doesn’t know about enzymatic degradation. It just knows the ground is safe to scratch again.

The second-order effect is agricultural. Maine’s dairy industry was devastated by PFAS contamination in feed crops grown on sludge-amended soils. Farmers faced bankruptcy, herd culling, and permanent land loss. The mycelium treatment offers a path to recovery. It’s not fast — it takes one to two growing seasons — but it’s permanent. The fungi don’t just bind PFAS. They destroy it. And the byproduct is improved soil structure, increased organic matter, and restored microbial diversity.

Other states are watching because Maine proved that the oldest technology on Earth — fungal decomposition — might be the only one capable of undoing our newest mistake.

Dai Lee Asks, PM Answers By Non-Answering

Dai Lee

Independent MP Dai Le rattled Albanese in Question Time after asking him to give Australians a straight assurance that no government MP, and no close relation of a government MP, used prior market-sensitive knowledge of Labor’s capital gains tax and negative gearing changes for private financial benefit.
It was a basic integrity question. Dai Le was not asking for theatre. She was asking whether anyone close to the government had the chance to position themselves ahead of major tax changes that could affect property decisions, investments, market behaviour and household finances across the country.

Albanese did not give the assurance. He stood up, snapped back at her, and tried to turn the whole thing into a personal jab by telling her this was not a local council, this was serious government, a clear shot at her former role as a councillor instead of a direct answer to the actual question.

Dai Le raised a point of order and asked him to be direct, but Albanese still refused to answer the substance. That is why the moment matters. Not because Dai Le asked something outrageous, but because the Prime Minister was given a chance to simply say no one benefited from inside knowledge and he chose to attack her instead.

Dai Le hit a raw nerve, and she deserves credit for asking the question every Australian should want answered.

Quote of the Day

“Rest satisfied with doing well, and leave others to talk of you as they will.”
Pythagoras – Mathematician (582 – 497 BC)

Quote of the Day

“Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding.”
Albert Einstein – Physicist (1879 – 1955)

Resistance Training

Dr Pete Sulak writes:
A new study dropped last week that I want to put in front of you.

Harvard’s School of Public Health followed 147,000 adults for thirty years, tracking exactly how much strength training they did each week and how long they lived. The paper was just published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine. Cleanest data we’ve had on this question.

The headline: 90 to 120 minutes of strength training per week is the longevity sweet spot.

Not five hours. Not daily heavy lifting. 90 to 120 minutes. Roughly two 45-minute sessions, or three 30-minute sessions a week.

At that range, the data showed:

13% lower all-cause mortality
19% lower cardiovascular death
27% lower death from neurological disease (Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, ALS)

Here’s what surprised me. More didn’t help. Past 120 minutes a week, the curve flattened. People doing five and ten hours of resistance training a week got no additional longevity benefit over people doing two.

That’s a different message than most of us absorbed from the fitness industry.

Here’s why it matters for the audience reading this. Lean muscle mass is one of the strongest predictors of long-term outcomes in nearly every chronic disease category, cancer included. Sarcopenia (the muscle loss that accelerates with age) is one of the most overlooked drivers of decline, and one of the hardest things to reverse once it sets in.

This study put a specific, doable number on what it takes to protect against that. Two hours a week. Two or three sessions. Loading your muscles against resistance.

Bodyweight counts. Resistance bands count. Filled water bottles count. Two-pound cans of soup count. The thing that matters is the resistance, not what’s supplying it.

If you’ve been telling yourself you’d start when you have time, the floor turned out to be lower than most of us thought.

I’ll be praying for you today.

Standing with you,

Dr. Pete