Study: Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Reduces Male Fertility – And It’s Worse Than It Looks

Problems In Bed

On Friday, the journal Andrology published a peer-reviewed paper showing large decreases in sperm counts among men after the second dose of Pfizer’s mRNA Covid jab.

Based on counts from men who donated sperm to three fertility clinics in Israel, this finding is devastating – medically and politically.

It cuts to the heart of the hottest button question of all about the mRNA shots, whether they have hidden fertility risks. That issue has simmered since early 2021, following my reporting that data showed the shots had caused excess miscarriages in rats – and other reports showing that measurable amounts of vaccine reached the ovaries and testes in test rats.

Ever since media “fact-checkers” and public health authorities have dismissed and mocked the concerns and anyone who raises them:

Now – after a half-billion men have received mRNA shots – the skeptics appear to be right. Again. The Israeli paper offers hard evidence that the vaccines may present a systemic risk to men’s sperm counts. What was a conspiracy theory is now just a theory. AGAIN.

The paper raises questions about the mechanism of action that must be answered immediately. And on top of the myocarditis risk, the finding is more evidence that encouraging – much less forcing – men under 40 to take the mRNA vaccines was a catastrophic mistake.

However, the authors qualified their findings by reporting that after five months, sperm levels recovered. Thus the decreases were only temporary, they wrote.

Put aside the fact that a five-month decrease hardly qualifies as temporary for someone trying to start a family – or compared to a “vaccine” that loses effectiveness against Omicron within weeks or months.

As other writers have pointed out, the actual data in the paper do not really support the argument that sperm levels returned to normal after five months. In fact, by some measures, levels continued to decline.

Rather than acknowledging this fact, the authors offered the best possible spin on their data, while at the same time publishing the figures themselves near the end of the paper so that other researchers could see the reality for themselves.

This tactic is now commonplace among researchers putting out data that might raise concerns about the mRNA shots. It is likely a response to the overwhelming political pressure to hide the deepening crisis around the safety and efficacy of shots that governments have given to over a billion people worldwide.

Below is the crucial chart, which shows that “total motile count” – the number of sperm in the ejaculated semen – plunged 22 percent three to five months after the second shot (T2) and barely recovered during the final count (T3), when it was still 19 percent below the pre-shot level.

Even more importantly, the fall in sperm counts CAN NOT be blamed on short- or even medium-term inflammation as mRNA-generated spike proteins cause our immune cells to ramp up the systemic production of anti-spike antibodies. If that were the case, one would expect to see a short-term decrease in sperm count that reverses over time. Instead, total sperm counts are unaffected shortly after the mRNA shots, then decrease months later and hardly recover.

To play down this unpleasant reality, the researchers instead focused on the fact that median rather than average counts did recover after five months. (The median is the numerical midpoint of a series; If a series goes 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, the median will be 3, but the average will be 30 divided by 5, or 6.)

Both the median and the average can be valuable statistics. Using the median rather than the average will hide extreme outliers. In this case, the fact that the average fell much more than the median is a sign that some of the men probably had near-zero sperm counts in both the second and third time periods – and that fact is arguably more important than the median change.

All of which is to say that this data cannot be easily explained away and should not be ignored, as badly as the media would like to do so. The fall in sperm counts is part of an emerging and increasingly dark picture about the long-term health impacts of the mRNA shots – and should all by itself convince parents not to risk exposing their children to these powerful biotechnologies.

https://anonymouswire.com/study-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-reduces-male-fertility-and-its-worse-than-it-looks/

Post Covid Infection Brain Inflammation Leads to Cognitive Dysfunction

Post Covid Brain Ailments

Post Covid Infection Brain Inflammation Leads to Cognitive Dysfunction

She winds up recommending more vaccination, ignorant of or ignoring the fact that vaccination does not provide immunity.

The other thing I got from it is how important is an anti-inflammatory diet for people exposed to Covid. I recommend you either do some research on anti-inflammatory foods to add to your diet or get a copy of my book which devotes several pages to inflammatory and anti-inflammatory foods. https://howtolivethehealthiestlife.com/

What is the best diet for humans? Spoiler alert – there isn’t one!

Blood Glucose Meal Responses

New research led by Prof. Eran Segals and Dr. Elinavs indicates a drastic change in blood sugar levels between two individuals on identical diets – this may explain why some struggle to lose weight while others, on the same diet, stay lean and fit. The scientists even developed an algorithm that can calculate ones blood level based on his or her biology and lifestyle.

(Tom: This is a very worthwhile video to watch. The conclusion of a 1,000 person study was that there is no perfect diet for all people! Each person reacts differently. I have been saying for years now that every spirit/mind/body combination in unique and you need to become your own health researcher to determine what is best for you.)

Meet Charles Eugster, The 97 Year Old Athlete

Inspirational! And the video that plays after this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwqtQw58NZU) is also worthwhile. Two snippets: “I would like to suggest for healthy aging, the first thing in work, the second thing is nutrition and the third thing is exercise. In that order.” “Retirement is a financial catastrophe and a health disaster.”

Bayer and Monsanto’s Sinister Seventeen

Bayer Monsanto Sinister Seventeen

Bayer completed its purchase of Monsanto in 2018, in a move that the company’s own investors have rebelled against in recent months to the tune of a multi-billion dollar class action lawsuit against the company.

Since then, the German pesticide, GMO and pharmaceutical company’s reputation had been considerably damaged due to being associated with Monsanto and its ongoing Roundup/cancer lawsuits.

Bayer and Monsanto have a lot in common, starting with the toxic products they have brought to market.

This is just a shortlist of the top reasons – the ‘Toxic 16’ –  why you should boycott Bayer-Monsanto, an unethical corporation and a scourge on humanity and the planet.

1. Agent Orange

Monsanto became one of the two primary manufacturers of this war chemical during the early 1960s.

This combination of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T was used often for chemical warfare during the Vietnam War as an herbicide and defoliant. Monsanto’s formula had far more dioxin, a byproduct considered one of the most toxic substances known to man, than the  version made by Dow Chemical.

Exposure to the chemical has left a legacy of multi-generational birth defects, cancer, and countless other diseases in military veterans and the Vietnamese people.

2. Aldicarb

Classified as “extremely hazardous” by the World Health Organization, its highest category, this pesticide created by Bayer was previously used on citrus trees before 2010, when Bayer and the EPA reached an agreement to stop using it.

It’s classified as a dangerous neurotoxin. Despite these risks, the EPA has recently considered reapproving it.

3. Aspartame

Discovered accidentally during research on gastrointestinal hormones, Monsanto acquired manufacturer G.D. Searle in 1985 and began marketing the controversial sweetener as NutraSweet.

While it is still deemed to be safe by the FDA, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services previously released a report listing 94 health issues that may be caused by the sweetener and a recent French study linked it to increased risk of breast and obesity-related cancers.

4. Atomic Bomb and Nuclear Weapons

Monsanto acquired the Thomas and Hochwalt Laboratories and turned their division into its own Central Research Department.

From 1943 to 1945, the group coordinated techniques to refine chemicals for use in atomic weapons.

5. Baycol

In 2001, Bayer recalled this drug for patients with high cholesterol after it was reported to cause at least 31 deaths and was connected to a muscle disorder called rhabdomyolysis, a condition that caused the kidneys to clog with protein from dying or dead muscle tissue.

The recall cost Bayer $1.2 billion, and some reports have linked it to far more deaths.

6. Bovine Growth Hormone

Developed by Monsanto and three other companies including pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly, recombinant bovine growth hormone, also known as rBST, has been shown to increase concentrations of IGF-1, a protein naturally found in milk. Higher blood levels of this protein have been linked to an increased risk of pre-menopausal breast cancer and other health problems.

rBST was banned in the EU in 1990. It is still allowed in the U.S., and the FDA doesn’t even require companies to label its use in their products.

7. DDT

Monsanto became one of the first manufacturers of this insecticide back in 1944.

In 1972, DDT was banned throughout the United States after the harmful effects of the chemical were revealed by outside research. A recent study suggests that granddaughters of women who were exposed to DDT decades ago are more likely to menstruate early, more susceptible to becoming obese and may even have a 4x higher risk of developing breast cancer.

The chemical was also linked to large-scale deaths of bald eagles and other birds, documented in Rachel Carson’s landmark book ‘Silent Spring.

8. Essure

Bayer began marketing Essure birth control devices in 2002 after receiving FDA approval as a female sterilization device that required no surgery.

Over the years, the product has injured tens of thousands of women. A 39,000 person class action lawsuit resulted in a $1.6 billion settlement from Bayer in 2020. Bayer has since discontinued Essure.

9. Ethoxyquin

Developed by Monsanto in the 1950s, this synthetic pesticide and antioxidant is not widely used in human food, but still used in pet foods and animal feed. It has been found to have toxic and mutagenic effects in animals and humans. You can read more about ethoxyquin in GMO/Toxin Free USA’s report.

10. Fossil Fuel-based Fertilizer

In 1955, Monsanto began manufacturing petroleum-based fertilizer after purchasing a major oil refinery. Petroleum-based fertilizers can kill beneficial soil microorganisms, sterilizing the soil and creating farmer dependence, like an addiction, to the synthetic replacements. Fertilizer runoff causes ground and water pollution and is responsible for algae blooms and massive marine life die-off. Not the best addiction to have, considering the impact of fossil fuel dependence on climate change…

11. GMOs

Also known as genetically modified organisms, the term GMO is used to describe a plant or animal that has been engineered in a lab.

Monsanto first brought gene-spliced corn, cotton, soy and canola with DNA from bacteria and viruses to market in the mid 1990s. Monsanto was the largest of the GMO seed corporations, but Bayer wasn’t far behind.

Both corporations have spent millions to keep these lab creations from being labeled. A  database of studies showing evidence of harm, released by GMO/Toxin Free USA, has shed light on the countless health risks posed by these organisms.

Bayer’s 2018 acquisition of Monsanto makes the combined corporation the largest in the world for seeds and pesticides, owning 25% of the market.

12. HIV-Tainted, Blood-Clotting Medicines

A division of Bayer named Cutler Biological sold millions of dollars of HIV-tainted blood-clotting medicines to hemophiliacs, according to DrugWatch.com.

The medicine infected thousands in the U.S. and abroad with HIV and hepatitis C. Many died.

Bayer set up a $600 million fund with three other companies to settle lawsuits, but did not admit wrongdoing.

13. Neonics

Bayer patented a substance called imidacloprid back in 1985 as the first commercial neonicotinoid.

Neonicotinoids are a class of insecticides widely implicated in the destruction of bee and bird populations. These pesticides have been the subject of bans and lawsuits throughout Europe and beyond. While there is a growing movement to ban neonicotinoid insecticides in the U.S., they are still allowed and are widely used on many food crops.

14. PCBs

Monsanto began expanding its chemical operations into polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) during the early 1920s to produce coolant fluids for large-scale electrical equipment.

Fifty years later, tests exposed the immense health damage PCBs were causing to laboratory rats.

A decade later, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency published a report citing PCBs as the cause of cancer in animals.

These substances were banned globally in 2001, but lawsuits by individuals, cities and states have continued against the company in recent years as PCBs are continually being found in bodies of water throughout the United States.

15. Polystyrene

This Bayer-produced synthetic plastic product is still widely used in packaging.

It ranked 5th in the EPA’s 1980s listing of chemicals whose production generates the most hazardous waste overall.

16. Roundup

The main ingredient in this popular herbicide is glyphosate, which was declared a “probable human carcinogen” back in 2015 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Created by Monsanto, Roundup’s introduction has also led to ‘Roundup Ready’ genetically modified crops that have been engineered to withstand large doses of the toxic herbicide. Not only an herbicide, massive amounts of Roundup are sprayed on non-GMO crops such as peas, beans, lentils, sugarcane and grains to desiccate the crops for quicker and easier harvesting. Roundup is the most widely used herbicide in the world, now found falling down in rain and in most people’s blood.

Glyphosate was first patented by Stauffer Chemical as a chelator used to clean and descale commercial pipes and boilers, and later as an antibiotic thought to be effective against malaria.

Glyphosate binds to and removes vital minerals from our soil, our food and our bodies.

The antibiotic properties of glyphosate have been linked to damage to the microbiome in humans and soil. A healthy and diverse microbiome has been found to play a critical role in the immune system and in mental health.

17. Saccharin

Artificial sweetener, saccharin, was Monsanto’s first product.

Studies were carried out in the early 1970s and a 1998 study by the National Cancer institute linked the synthetic sweetener to cancer in humans. A warning label was added to the artificial sweetener and it was listed as a carcinogen. It was later banned for a short time but the ban was lifted when industry demanded more research and evidence.

It wasn’t government regulation that toppled saccharin, the first artificial sweetener —at least not directly. The threat of a saccharin ban led producers to research and create alternatives. In 1965 aspartame was discovered; in 1976 sucralose; and in 2002 neotame. Today, saccharin, once the undisputed king of artificial sweeteners, lags behind newer and competing synthetic sweeteners.

https://gmofreeusa.org/bayer-monsantos-sinister-seventeen-17-terrible-and-toxic-products-from-bayer-and-monsanto/