Gordon Cooper

Gordon Cooper

On May 16, 1963, Gordon Cooper was alone in Faith 7, orbiting Earth at 17,500 miles per hour in a capsule so small he could barely turn around.

He had been in space for more than thirty-four hours.

Then the alarms began.

First a faulty sensor falsely indicated the spacecraft was tumbling out of control. Cooper calmly switched it off. Then came the real emergency: a short circuit knocked out the entire automatic attitude-control system—the system that kept the capsule properly oriented for reentry. Without it, the spacecraft could not be aligned for the precise angle needed to survive the plunge back into the atmosphere.

Too shallow, and it would skip off the air like a stone across water, back into orbit. Too steep, and it would burn up like a meteor. The window was narrow. Every computer that was supposed to make that calculation was dead.

On the ground, Mission Control watched the telemetry go dark. They could see the problem. They could not fix it.

Cooper did not panic.

He uncapped a grease pencil and drew reference lines directly on the inside of his window to track the horizon against the stars. He had spent months memorizing star patterns as part of backup navigation training. Now he used them. He aligned the capsule manually by eye, matching the horizon marks to known constellations.

He timed the reentry burn with his wristwatch.

When the moment arrived—calculated in his head, confirmed by the stars—he fired the retrorockets. The capsule shuddered. The sky turned to plasma. For several minutes, radio blackout swallowed him whole. No voice from Earth could reach him. No data came back.

Then the parachutes deployed.

Faith 7 splashed down in the Pacific, four miles from the recovery ship USS Kearsarge—the most accurate splashdown of the entire Mercury program.

A man with a grease pencil, a wristwatch, and starlight had outperformed every automated system NASA had built.

We often speak of technology as the hero of spaceflight. And it frequently is.

But Gordon Cooper’s flight is a reminder that behind every machine, there must still be a human being who can look out the window, think clearly under crushing pressure, and decide what to do when everything else fails.

The final backup was never the software.

It was him.

Avivo Village

Avivo Village

Avivo Village in Minneapolis is an innovative shelter designed to provide people experiencing homelessness with a safer and more stable place to stay. Instead of large dorm-style spaces typical of many shelters, it offers small, private, lockable rooms inside a warehouse, giving residents greater dignity, security, and personal space.

Beyond providing warmth and safety during harsh winters, the community also connects residents with essential services such as mental health care, addiction treatment, and housing support. By combining shelter with comprehensive assistance, Avivo Village aims to help people move beyond temporary emergency housing and toward long-term stability.

Bentley Kiev Third Place Retail Seller in Europe

It’s good to be a Ukrainian oligarch during wartime.
John Leake Mar 23, 2026

Bentley Kiev was recognized as the third-place winner in the 2025 European Scorecard Awards for top-performing retailers, according to a March 2026 announcement by Bentley’s Regional Director for Europe, Richard Leopold.

The ranking refers to top retailer sales within the European region, with the average Bentley selling for roughly $400,000.

The announcement of the “Best of the Best” retailer awards highlighted Bentley Padova (1st) and Bentley Rotterdam (2nd) and Kiev (3rd).

The announcement reminded me of the the observation by Peter Thomas Bauer, a Hungarian-born British development economist:

Foreign aid is a mechanism by which poor people in rich countries are taxed to support the lifestyles of rich people in poor countries. The aid primarily serves three Ms—: munitions, monuments, and Mercedes for leaders and cronies.

When Everything Falls At Once

When Everything Falls

Dear Reader,

There is an old saying on Wall Street: “In a crisis, all correlations go to one.”

Most people hear that and nod politely. Few understand what it actually means for their savings.

Here is what it means. In normal times, your stocks move one way, your bonds another, your real estate another. They don’t march in step. That gap between them is what people call “diversification.” It is the whole idea behind the modern portfolio — spread your risk across different assets, and when one falls, the others hold you up.

It sounds smart. It even works right up until the moment it doesn’t.

Economists measure how closely two assets move together using a number called correlation. It runs from -1 to +1. A correlation of +1 means two assets move in perfect lockstep — if one goes up 5%, the other goes up 5%. A correlation of -1 means they move in perfect opposition. A correlation of zero means they’re independent of each other.

In the real world, nothing is that clean. But here is a useful example. Think about an oil company like ExxonMobil and a consumer staples company like Procter & Gamble — the people who make Tide detergent and Gillette razors. Their correlation is somewhere around 0.3.

What does that mean in plain English?

It means they mostly do their own thing. When oil prices surge and ExxonMobil climbs, Procter & Gamble may not move much at all. After all, people buy soap and razors no matter what crude oil costs. Some weeks they move together, some weeks they don’t. The connection is loose and unreliable. That looseness is exactly what makes owning both of them safer than owning just one.

A correlation of 0.3 is what diversification is built on. It’s what your advisor is betting on when he tells you your portfolio is “balanced.”

The problem is that 0.3 is a peacetime number.

The Moment the Safety Net Disappears

When real fear (not a little dip) hits a market, something ugly happens. All those “different” assets start moving the same way. Down.

In calm times, the average correlation between two stocks is about 0.3. Low enough that owning both gives you some protection. In a full panic, that number jumps to 0.7 or higher. Bonds, commodities, and real estate all start falling in step with stocks, too.

Your carefully built portfolio, the one your advisor told you was “diversified,” starts sinking like a single ship.

Why does this happen?

Because the big players aren’t selling by choice, they’re selling because they have to.

Hedge funds get margin calls. Banks hit their risk limits. Mutual funds face a wave of redemptions — people pulling money out all at once. These institutions don’t get to sell what they want. They sell what they can. And what they can sell is whatever is large and liquid enough to find a buyer — the biggest stocks, bond ETFs, and yes, even gold and long-term Treasuries.

This is what traders call the “dash for cash.” In that phase, no one cares about long-term value. They want dollars. Safe, liquid, boring dollars. And to get them, they dump everything else.

Even Your “Safe” Stuff Can Drop First

Many investors think they are protected because they own gold or government bonds. In the first leg of a panic, that comfort is a lie.

In 2008, gold fell more than 30% at one point. Not because gold was bad. Because big players needed cash, and gold was one of the few things that still had buyers. In March 2020, stocks fell. Corporate bonds fell. Gold fell. Even many government bonds fell. All at once. All for the same reason.

The system wasn’t broken. It was working exactly as a leveraged market works. When you owe money right now, you don’t think about what an asset is worth in five years. You think about what it will sell for in the next five minutes.

This is the part that surprises people. Safe havens aren’t safe on Day One. They are safe across the full arc of a crisis — after the forced selling stops and the real story takes over.

Take gold. Yes, it can get hit hard in the initial panic. But once the dust settles and central banks start cutting rates and printing money — which they always do — gold tends to shine. It finished 2008 up about 10% for the full year, even after that terrifying mid-year drop. It surged after the dot-com bust. It ran hard after the Great Recession.

The pattern is clear: gold gets sold first, then bought hard.

What Has Actually Worked

If everything falls together in a crisis, what actually holds up in the worst of it?

Two things: cash and short-term Treasury bills.

Not long-term bonds, as those can fall sharply when interest rates spike. Not money market funds that own risky debt. Plain cash and T-bills: the kind of money that is there, that is safe, and that no one is forced to sell.

T-bills have almost no interest-rate risk. The U.S. government backs them. You can turn them into cash fast. During recent bouts of market chaos, when stocks and long bonds both fell, T-bills barely moved.

Think of it this way:

T-bills help you survive the crash. Gold helps you survive the money printing that comes after.

Both have a role. Neither one alone is enough.

What to Do Now

We have a war. We are seeing rising tensions across the Middle East. And we have a stock market that, as of this writing, is still priced for a world where none of that matters much.

That gap between what is happening and what markets are pricing won’t last forever. It never does.

Here are the moves worth making now, while you still can:

Build a real cash buffer. Several months of living costs, in actual cash or T-bills, not in some “safe” fund that quietly owns risky long-term bonds. This is what keeps you from becoming a forced seller.

Shorten your bond exposure. If you hold bonds, lean toward short maturities. Long-term bonds can fall just as hard as stocks when rates spike. We have seen it happen.

Split your money into two buckets. Survival money — cash, T-bills, maybe some physical gold. And risk money — stocks, real estate, longer bonds, anything that can swing around. Know which is which. Keep them separate in your head and in your accounts.

Hold gold as insurance, not as a trade. A modest, steady slice of gold isn’t a bet on the next headline. It’s long-term protection against what almost always follows a major crisis: governments printing money to fix the mess they made.

Ask the brutal question. If all your risky assets dropped 30 to 40% at the same time, would you be ruined? If the answer is yes or even maybe, cut your positions now while markets are still open and buyers still exist.

Avoid leverage. The “dash for cash” is driven by people who borrowed too much. Don’t be one of them. Margin debt turns a bad drawdown into a wipe-out.

Wrap Up

To be sure, I don’t want you to panic. I’m merely trying to imitate the great Wayne Gretzky by skating to where the puck will be, so to speak, in six months. Then, I think the ripples, waves, and tsunamis from this incursion into Iran will be upon us, rather than some abstract thought experiment.

When that next wave hits, most people will be shocked to learn their “diversified” portfolio was the same trade all along.

But not you. You already know better. The question is whether you act on it.

All the best,

Sean Ring
for The Daily Reckoning
feedback@dailyreckoning.com

Quote of the Day

“In the midst of winter, I found there was, within me, an invincible summer. And that makes me happy. For it says no matter how hard the world pushes against me, within me, there’s something stronger, something better, pushing right back.” – Albert Camus, Philosopher (1913 – 1960)

Tu Youyou

Tu Youyou

She tested an ancient herbal remedy on herself first—then it saved millions of lives and earned her the Nobel Prize.

China, 1930s. A girl named Tu Youyou grows up during turbulent times—war, occupation, social upheaval. As a teenager, she contracts tuberculosis and has to suspend her studies. Lying in bed recovering, watching life continue without her, she makes a decision about her future.

If she survives this, she will dedicate her life to healing. She will make sure others don’t have to suffer as she has.

Tu Youyou keeps that promise.

She studies pharmacology, eventually becoming a researcher at the China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Beijing. She’s methodical, detail-oriented, and deeply curious about both ancient remedies and modern science.

Then comes 1967.

The Vietnam War is raging. Chinese soldiers serving there are dying—not just from combat, but from malaria. The mosquito-borne disease is killing troops faster than bullets. It’s decimating military operations across Southeast Asia.

And the parasite is getting smarter. It’s developing resistance to chloroquine and other modern antimalarial drugs that once worked reliably. Soldiers are dying, and medicine is failing them.

The Chinese government launches Project 523—a secret military research program to find new malaria treatments. They turn to an unconventional approach: mining ancient Chinese medical texts for forgotten remedies.

Tu Youyou, then 39 years old, is appointed to lead the project.

Her team begins the painstaking work of reviewing over 2,000 traditional Chinese medicine recipes from ancient manuscripts. They’re looking for anything that mentions treating fever, chills, or symptoms that might indicate malaria.

One herb keeps appearing in texts spanning nearly two millennia: qinghao, sweet wormwood (Artemisia annua). Ancient healers had used it to treat intermittent fevers.

Tu Youyou begins experimenting with extraction methods. She tries boiling the herb, the traditional preparation method for many Chinese medicines.

It doesn’t work. The extracts show no antimalarial activity.

She tries again. And again. Dozens of attempts using different solvents, temperatures, and techniques. Nothing works consistently. The active compound remains elusive.

Then she finds something crucial in an ancient text.

Ge Hong’s “A Handbook of Prescriptions for Emergencies” (4th century CE) mentions preparing qinghao by soaking it in cold water and wringing out the juice. Not boiling. Cold extraction.

Tu Youyou realizes the problem: heat was destroying the active compound.

She adjusts her method, using low-temperature ether extraction instead of boiling. This time, it works. The extract shows powerful antimalarial activity in laboratory tests, killing the malaria parasite efficiently.

But laboratory success means nothing if the treatment isn’t safe for humans.

Tu Youyou needs to test it on people. But she refuses to risk patients’ lives before knowing the treatment is safe. Clinical trials require evidence of safety first.

So she does what any dedicated scientist facing ethical constraints would do.

She tests it on herself.

Tu Youyou takes the experimental artemisinin extract, monitoring herself for adverse reactions. When she experiences no serious side effects, her research team volunteers to try it as well.

Only after confirming through self-experimentation that the compound wouldn’t cause immediate harm do they proceed to formal clinical trials.

The results are extraordinary.

Artemisinin doesn’t just slow malaria down or suppress symptoms. It destroys the malaria parasite in ways scientists had never observed before. It works against drug-resistant strains. It acts quickly. And it’s remarkably effective even in severe cases.

Over the following decades, artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) become the gold standard for treating malaria worldwide. The World Health Organization recommends them as first-line treatment.

The impact is staggering. In regions of Africa and Southeast Asia where children once died routinely from malaria, mortality rates plummet. Millions of lives—particularly children under five—are saved.

Tu Youyou’s discovery doesn’t just treat a disease. It transforms global public health.

In 2015, at age 84, Tu Youyou receives the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. She becomes the first Chinese woman ever to win a Nobel Prize in science, and the first citizen of mainland China to win a Nobel in any scientific category.

The Nobel Committee’s citation is clear: “for her discoveries concerning a novel therapy against Malaria.”

When Tu Youyou gives her Nobel lecture, she’s characteristically modest. She emphasizes the collaborative nature of the research, the contribution of her team, and the wisdom embedded in traditional Chinese medicine that made the discovery possible.

But make no mistake: her brilliance, persistence, and courage were essential.

She bridged ancient wisdom and modern science. She persisted through countless failures. She risked her own health to ensure patient safety. And she turned a 1,600-year-old herbal remedy into a 21st-century lifesaving drug.

Today, artemisinin-based treatments have saved an estimated millions of lives. The exact number is difficult to calculate, but studies estimate ACTs have prevented hundreds of millions of malaria cases and millions of deaths since their widespread adoption.

Think about that scale. One woman’s discovery, rooted in ancient texts and validated through modern science, has fundamentally altered the trajectory of one of humanity’s oldest and deadliest diseases.

Malaria has killed more humans throughout history than perhaps any other disease. It shaped the rise and fall of civilizations, influenced military campaigns, and devastated populations for millennia.

And a Chinese pharmacologist, mining forgotten medical manuscripts and combining ancient preparation methods with modern extraction techniques, found a way to fight back.

Tu Youyou’s story is about more than scientific achievement. It’s about respecting traditional knowledge while subjecting it to rigorous modern testing. It’s about persistence in the face of repeated failure. It’s about ethical courage—testing experimental treatments on yourself before asking others to take the risk.

And it’s about remembering what it feels like to be sick and helpless, then dedicating your entire life to making sure others don’t have to endure the same fate.

The girl who nearly died from tuberculosis grew up to save millions from malaria.

All because she kept a promise she made to herself in a hospital bed decades earlier.

An Interesting Dream

Had an interesting dream last Sunday. As a result of which I realised I am a dealer.

Not a drug dealer who sells drugs to overcome emotional of physical pain.

Not an arms dealer who sells weapons to wage war.

I am a Solutions Dealer. I point people to solutions to problems.

You got a communication problem?
I got a course I can recommend to fix that!

You got a relationship problem?
I know a course that will fix that!

Got a friend with a drug problem?
I know a program that will fix that!

Got a child with a study problem?
I have a solution for that too!

Got a moral dilemma, an ethics problem?
Got something for that too!

Lack purpose or direction in life?
Even have a blog post for that one!

Lonely?
Got that one totally taped!

Now I read somewhere that sanity is the ability to create problems and intelligence is the ability to solve them. If you have too few problems you overly fixate on one. I even know how to solve THAT one too!

(I didn’t solve all the problems I know how to solve, I am not the smartest man who ever lived! I just know where to find the solutions.)

But that puts me into a sanity related problem. To stay sane I need to invent some more problems!

So I have decided my problem is how to help as many people as possible live a better life!

You want to improve something in your life? Call me! Your local Solutions Dealer!

Net Zero Activists Stumped By Shock New Evidence Showing No Link Between CO2 & Temperature Over Last Three Million Years

Scientists Examining Ice Core Sample

The climate science world (‘settled’ division) is in shock following the discovery in ancient ice cores that levels of carbon dioxide remained stable as the world plunged into an ice age around 2.7 million years ago. Levels of CO2 at around 250 parts per million (ppm) were said to be lower than often assumed with just a 20 ppm movement recorded for the following near three million-year period. In addition, no changes in methane levels were seen in the entire period. Massive decreases in temperature with occasional interglacial rises appear to have occurred without troubling ‘greenhouse’ gas levels, and this revelation has caused near panic in activist circles.

https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/net-zero-activists-stumped-shock-new-evidence-showing-no-link-between-co2-temperature-over