Professors Scolyer, Allen, McLaws and Johnston

Professors Scolyer, Allen, McLaws and Johnston

A tale of four Australians – what do Professors Scolyer, Allen, McLaws and Johnston have in common?

All have Dr. before their names and AO after.

All have died from turbo cancer which was most likely caused by the covid vaccine that they promoted.

All didn’t need the vaccine but chose to have it to advance their careers.

All knew that mandates are the tools of bullies, criminals and dictators.

All lived by the system, advanced by the system and eventually killed by the system.

All will be remembered for not speaking up when they could have helped stopped the madness

Vadim Zeland

Vadim Zeland

(Tom: This aligns with what I understand, that when we descend from making things happen by lightly deciding they will happen down to using energy to make them happen we are less likely to obtain the desired result.)

Somewhere in Russia, there is a man who does not want to be found.

Not because he is hiding from trouble. Not because he is ashamed of what he has written. But because he genuinely believes that who he is has nothing to do with whether his ideas are true — and that making himself the story would only get in the way.

When readers ask him “Who are you, Vadim Zeland?” he gives the same answer every time: “I’m no one special.” Wemoral

No photographs. No interviews. No stage appearances. No social media presence. Just books — released quietly into the world — and then silence.

He has said: “My biography cannot and should not be of any interest. To transmit this knowledge without personal distortions, I really ought to be nobody. Just an empty vessel.” Wemoral

This is either profound humility or masterful mystique. Possibly both.

What is known about him is this: before the collapse of the Soviet Union, he did research in quantum physics. Afterward, he worked in computer technology. Then, in the early 2000s, he began writing. Wemoral

The books came out in Russia starting around 2004. They spread first through word of mouth — friend telling friend, stranger telling stranger on early internet forums. No advertising. No celebrity endorsements. No famous face attached.

Just readers saying, quietly, to anyone who would listen: “Something about this is different. Try it.”

The series is called Reality Transurfing. And the central idea — stripped of its more contested theoretical packaging — goes like this:

Most people approach what they want in life the wrong way. They strain toward it. They obsess. They assign it enormous importance. They pour so much desperate energy into wanting something that the wanting itself becomes the obstacle. Like gripping water in a clenched fist: the harder you squeeze, the faster it escapes.

Zeland’s proposal is a fundamental shift in approach.

Stop making your goals so desperately important. Choose what you want clearly, calmly, with quiet confidence — as if you are selecting something from a menu rather than clawing toward it. Align your inner state with the version of yourself who already has the thing you’re reaching for. Stop straining. Start moving.

He frames this through the language of quantum physics and parallel possibilities — describing reality as a vast field of branching variants, and your life as something you navigate by shifting your inner frequency rather than forcing external outcomes.

Here is where honest reporting matters: physicists and scientists have consistently pointed out that Zeland’s use of quantum physics terminology does not accurately represent how quantum mechanics actually works. Quantum effects operate at subatomic scales — they do not function the way self-help writers often describe them. This is a legitimate and important criticism that serious readers of Transurfing should know. All That’s Interesting

Zeland himself, to his credit, has acknowledged this. He says the theoretical model is a framework — a way of thinking — not a scientific claim. He has stated clearly: “The use of the techniques is not dependent on the acceptance of his theoretical model.” You don’t have to believe the physics framing. You just have to try the practices. ABC News

And the practices — stripped of the cosmological scaffolding — are recognizable.

Reduce the anxious importance you attach to outcomes. Listen to what you actually want rather than what you think you should want. Stop being swept along by other people’s ideas of success. Move toward your goals from a place of calm intention rather than desperate striving.

These ideas appear in Buddhist philosophy. In Stoicism. In modern cognitive behavioral therapy. In various contemplative traditions going back centuries. Zeland acknowledges the overlaps openly and without defensiveness.

What he brought to them was a specific, practical, systematic framework — written in plain language by someone who described himself as an ordinary person who had, by his own admission, spent most of his life doing everything wrong.

“All my life I had practiced anti-Transurfing,” he once said. “I had done everything just the wrong way. A clever man learns from other people’s mistakes, but a fool always learns from his own ones. In this sense I had been a headstrong fool.” NBC News

There is something disarming about that. No guru claiming enlightenment. No teacher presenting himself as someone who arrived. Just a man who made a mess of his life, figured some things out, and wrote them down.

The books spread. Slowly at first, then faster. Online communities formed — in Russian, then in English, then in dozens of languages — where ordinary people shared their experiences with the practices. The testimonials that fill these communities are anecdotal and unverified. They cannot be taken as scientific evidence.

But they keep coming. Year after year, in community after community, the same kinds of reports appear: a goal pursued desperately for years suddenly moved forward when the desperate pursuit stopped. A relationship that had been stuck shifted when the straining stopped. Opportunities arrived when the grasping relaxed.

Whether these outcomes have anything to do with Zeland’s framework, or whether they reflect the well-documented psychological effects of reducing anxiety and obsessive thinking — effects that mainstream psychology also supports — is genuinely impossible to know from testimonials alone.

The man himself does not claim to know the answer. He says only: try it. Watch what happens.

He remains hidden. No empire. No disciples gathered around a guru. No course selling for thousands. Just the books, just the ideas, just the quiet persistence of millions of ordinary readers who found something useful and passed it on.

Twenty years after the first book appeared in Russia, the conversation continues — in forums and reading groups and comment threads across dozens of languages — between people who have never met and likely never will, connected only by a set of ideas released into the world by a man who insists he is nobody.

Maybe the framework describes something true about reality. Maybe it found a modern language for ancient wisdom. Maybe the practices work for entirely different reasons than the author describes. Maybe the answer is some mixture of all three.

What is true is this: the ideas ask something genuinely difficult of the people who try them. Not to want less. Not to care less. But to hold what they want lightly — with intention rather than desperation, with direction rather than strain.

In a world that constantly tells you to want harder, push harder, force harder — that particular message is quiet and strange and surprisingly hard to find.

Which may be exactly why, twenty years later, people are still passing it along.

“Want what you want. Want it lightly. See what slides toward you.”

he Widows’ Street – a film by Klaus Scheidsteger

By Stop Smart Meters Australia on June 9, 2026

Dr Monika Kraut

This 30-minute documentary dramatically brings to life the significance of a study and resulting scientific paper – dubbed the ATHEM-3 project – which provides clear evidence that living near mobile phone towers causes cell damage.

The film shows how the impact of Dr Monika Kraut’s own personal story, told at an important telecommunications congress in 2019 centred around the debate on the introduction of 5G technology, triggered a ground-breaking study. The resulting research project brought together an inter-disciplinary team of leading international experts.

A meticulous investigation of two comparable groups of people in Germany, one of which was exposed to relatively low radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) and one of which was exposed to relatively high RF-EMF from nearby mobile phone base stations, was instigated. Chromosomal aberrations were significantly increased for the residents with higher exposure to RF-EMF.

The project’s findings provided an explanation as to why, in the years following the erection of a telecommunications tower beside Dr Kraut’s quiet street, so many people in her neighbourhood had epileptic seizures. Why so many of them had cancer.

As explained by Dr Wilhelm Mosgoeller in the documentary, the damage we see is exactly the same as for ionising radiation. In biology it makes no sense at all to differentiate between ionising and non-ionising radiation. The cell doesn’t know if it is being damaged by non-ionising or ionising radiation! All types of radiation can transform healthy cells into cancer cells or damage genetic material.

The Widows’ Street premiered on 30 April 2026 in Switzerland. It deserves to be seen widely. SSMA hopes that those in Australia who are responsible for protecting the population from EMF damage – and who have continued to abrogate their responsibilities – take special note.

You can watch the English version of The Widows’ Street via the following link:
https://odysee.com/$/embed/@timetowakeup:69/Die-Witwenstra%C3%9Fe-english-version-HD_2-:7

The 2024 paper, Evaluation of oxidative stress and genetic instability among residents near mobile phone base stations in Germany, which was an outcome of the project, can be accessed at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651324005621?via%3Dihub

The Ebola Scare – The Brownstone Institute

We barely finished the Hantavirus scare before Ebola arrived on the scene, along with fears that it will spread far and wide.

It’s a real virus and a wicked killer, to be sure. There is also zero chance that it can mutate into a pandemic. Why? It has a higher case fatality rate, one that actually limits its spread. A spreadable virus cannot kill its host. Only unsuccessful viruses do that.

That’s how the logic of these pathogens operates. There is a tradeoff between severity and prevalence. Incubation rates can adjust that dynamic somewhat but Ebola shows fast symptoms, which is why it is usually contained. That also makes contact tracing easier.

These days every infection that gets media attention generates public fear of both the medical and political response. What if they attempt another lockdown-until-vaccinate plot? We might swear not to comply but what if we are debanked, censored, and shamed?

In short, how powerful are the combined forces of media, public health officials, and governments? Is there anything we can do to stop them?

For all the world, it feels these days like someone is up to something. The World Health Organization never misses a chance to spread fear. The role of Brownstone Institute is to do the opposite: spread calm through logic, experience, and the actual science instead of the counterfeit form.

From a Brownstone Newsletter

It was only a few months ago that White House moles were telling Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to shut up about vaccines. It’s bad politics to have doubts, they said, citing polls.

We had our suspicions and conducted our own poll. It demonstrated supermajorities opposed to vaccine mandates and for culling the childhood schedule. Not only that: public opinion is extremely intense on this subject. After the Covid mandates, people aren’t having it anymore.

Months went by and the plotters lost the plot. Their fake polls that diverted a national agenda – one shared by Trump, RFK, and many appointees – were exposed. Sure enough, last Friday, the Trump administration attempted a damage reversal with a new Executive Order.

This EO calls for trimming the schedule and pushing informed choice over coercion. Did this make national news? Not at all. It’s not been published in any major newspaper other than Epoch Times. You know why: these legacy media sources are backed by pharmaceutical advertising dollars.

The game is obvious to us all now. What’s fascinating is to watch – and participate in – the collapse of a paradigm. They pushed too hard and the consensus completely cracked. Now the only goal of industry is to hang on as long as possible and hope that we all forget.

But there will be no forgetting. No matter how many phony baloney disease panics they throw at us, we’ll never comply. The lies have become unbearably obvious.

The Trump administration is now working hard to recapture lost momentum, with full knowledge that the issue is not going away.

Alpha Lipoic Acid and Acetyl L-Carnitine

Alpha Lipoic Acid and Acetyl L-Carnitine

(Tom: Just one reason I have both in my daily routine and my DNA/Heart/Mitochondria Blend.)

Over 6 million Americans have Alzheimer’s disease and 20 million suffer from peripheral neuropathy, both conditions sharing brain mitochondrial dysfunction and nerve cellular energy failure as primary mechanisms that alpha lipoic acid and acetyl L-carnitine address through the most clinically validated natural neuroprotective combination in aging research. Alpha lipoic acid and acetyl L-carnitine together represent the specific nutritional combination that Dr. Bruce Ames’ landmark research identified as reversing brain mitochondrial decay in aging subjects, making it one of the few natural compounds with human clinical evidence for genuine cognitive aging reversal. Most Americans take separate brain supplements without discovering the specific combination that together addresses both mitochondrial oxidative damage and neural fatty acid transport in the comprehensive manner that aging brain restoration requires.

Alpha lipoic acid serves as both a mitochondrial cofactor for pyruvate dehydrogenase and a universal antioxidant that recycles vitamins C and E, glutathione, and CoQ10 simultaneously. Research from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences confirmed ALA with acetyl L-carnitine reverses brain mitochondrial decay by 44% and improves cognitive function measurably in aging subjects through combined antioxidant and metabolic mechanisms naturally.

Study finds acetyl L-carnitine transports long-chain fatty acids into mitochondria for ATP production while simultaneously increasing acetylcholine synthesis through its acetyl group donation to choline acetyltransferase. Evidence suggests combining ALA’s antioxidant protection with ALCAR’s mitochondrial fuel provision and acetylcholine enhancement creates comprehensive brain aging reversal naturally.

Research confirmed alpha lipoic acid and acetyl L-carnitine together power brain mitochondria 44%, reverse cognitive aging, and restore nerve function naturally.

Educational Purpose Only. Consult your doctor before changing your health routine.

Death of the Middle Class: Billionaire vs Entrepreneur DEBATE – Daniel Priestley v Nick Hanauer

Nick and Dan Interviewed Why is the economy collapsing? Nick Hanauer and Daniel Priestley debate the wealth divide, why wages should be double what they are, what AI is doing to your job, and whether capitalism can still fix itself!

Nick Hanauer is a venture capitalist and serial entrepreneur, the first non-family investor in Amazon, and host of the Pitchfork Economics podcast. Daniel Priestley is an award-winning entrepreneur, business coach and best-selling author of 7 books, including ’Lifestyle Business Playbook’.

Watch the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLBsHXNEwAU

Susan Kuhnhausen

Susan Kuhnhausen

One hour before a hitman attacked her with a claw hammer, Susan Kuhnhausen sat in a hair salon reading a poem in Oprah magazine.

“I will not die an unlived life,” it began. “I will not live in fear.”

She had no idea how prophetic those words would become.

On the evening of September 6, 2006, the 51-year-old emergency room nurse finished her shift at Providence Portland Medical Center and stopped at Perfect Look salon on East Burnside Street. She mentioned to her stylist that she was going through a tough divorce—her husband Mike had finally moved out after nearly 18 years of marriage.

An hour later, Susan drove home to her blue Cape Cod in southeast Portland’s Montavilla neighborhood. In the mudroom, she found a note from Mike by the microwave.

“Sue, haven’t been sleeping. Had to get away—Went to the beach.”

She walked toward her bedroom. It was strangely dark. Had she forgotten to open the curtains that morning?

Then a man stepped out from behind the door.

He was 59 years old, with long hair tucked into a tan baseball cap pulled low over his eyes. He wore yellow rubber gloves. In his hands was a red and black claw hammer.

He swung.

The first blow caught Susan on the left temple. For most people, the sight of an intruder with a weapon would have meant one thing: run.

But Susan wasn’t most people.

For nearly 30 years, she had worked in the emergency room. She had helped crack open patients’ chests to perform heart massages. She had disarmed violent, injured men. She had administered IVs to people thrashing from drug withdrawal. And every nurse at Providence trained regularly in self-defense—learning how to slip out of headlocks, how to take someone down, how to survive.

As the man came at her, Susan did something counterintuitive. Instead of retreating, she rushed toward him. She knew from training that a hammer swing has less force at close range. She slammed her body against his, pushing him against the wall.

He spoke the only words she would hear him say that night.

“You’re strong.”

In that moment, Susan knew. This was no burglar. He hadn’t asked where her money was. He hadn’t asked about a safe. He was there to kill her.

“It became quickly clear that his intent was murder,” she later said. “And I fought.”

Susan tackled him. She wrestled the hammer away. She hit him in the head—three times, maybe four—with the claw end. Her father had been a carpenter. He always told her a hammer could be used for self-defense. The claw end worked best.

But the man grabbed the hammer back. Susan reached for his throat and squeezed. His face turned red, then purple, then a darker purple with a blue tinge.

“WHO SENT YOU HERE?” she screamed.

He said nothing.

She let go, thinking he was done. She tried to run. But as she fled into the hallway, he caught her from behind. He spun her around and punched her in the face, splitting her lip. She fell to the floor.

He stood over her with the hammer raised.

“I looked at the floor,” Susan remembered, “and I thought, I’m going to die today.”

She doesn’t know how she did what came next. Somehow, she pulled him down to the floor with her. She bit him—on the arm, on the thigh—hoping that if he killed her, at least her teeth marks would link him to her death.

Then she threw her leg over his body, climbed on top of him, and hooked her left arm around his neck.

“TELL ME WHO SENT YOU HERE AND I WILL CALL YOU A FUCKING AMBULANCE!” she yelled in his face.

He growled at her.

Susan leaned forward and squeezed harder. His face changed color again. He tried to flip her, but her years of training held. She pressed down until he stopped moving.

The fight had lasted approximately 15 minutes.

Susan grabbed the hammer and ran to her neighbor’s house. The neighbor called 911.

“We have an intruder in the house next door. The intruder was in the bedroom with a hammer. The woman who lives there thinks she may have strangled him. He was down when she left.”

“Does she need an ambulance?”

“No, she’s a nurse. She says call an ambulance for the guy. He may be dead.”

Police arrived to find the intruder dead in the hallway. His name was Edward Dalton Haffey. He had a long criminal record—including a 1994 conviction for arranging the murder of his ex-girlfriend, for which he served nine years in prison.

At first, investigators thought Haffey was a burglar who had picked the wrong house. But Susan knew better. She had suspected from the moment he said “You’re strong” that someone had sent him.

In Haffey’s backpack, police found a day planner. On the week of September 4, two days before the attack, someone had written: “Call Mike. Get letter.”

Inside a folder was a phone number. It belonged to Mike Kuhnhausen.

Further investigation revealed that Mike had hired Haffey—who once worked as a custodian at an adult video store Mike managed—for $50,000 to kill Susan. Mike had wanted her dead so he could inherit their $300,000 house. He knew she had removed him from her life insurance policy, but he figured the house was still worth the gamble.

On the day of the attack, Mike had driven to the Oregon coast and checked into the Lincoln City Inn, establishing an alibi. The day after learning Susan had survived, he bought a .357 Magnum revolver at a pawn shop. Then he wrote a suicide note: “All I ever wanted was to be loved and every time I had it—I fucked it up.”

Police arrested him on September 13. He denied everything at first.

But the evidence was overwhelming. Haffey wasn’t the first person Mike had approached about killing Susan. He had solicited three others before finding a man desperate enough to say yes.

In August 2007, Mike pleaded guilty to soliciting aggravated murder. At his sentencing hearing, Susan was allowed to address him directly. She held up photographs of her own bloodied face.

“You told police that you found out I was okay,” she said. “Do I look okay?”

Then she delivered a message she had prepared.

“You were willing for me to share your small, miserable life until death we did part—the sooner the better, as it turned out.”

She paused.

I am damaged by what you have done to me. I am damaged. But I am not destroyed.”

Mike was sentenced to 10 years in prison.

Susan sued him for $1 million in civil court—not because she needed the money, but because she wanted to make sure he couldn’t afford to hire another hitman when he got out. The jury awarded her $1,053,783.

She never had to worry. In June 2014, three months before his scheduled release, Mike Kuhnhausen died of cancer in prison.

Susan had already changed her name to Susan Walters. She moved to a new house. She practiced at the shooting range. She lived with what she called “two life sentences”—the trauma of knowing her husband had tried to have her killed, and the weight of having taken another man’s life.

“I don’t know that you ever get over having killed another human being,” she said. “I’ve always said I don’t take any pride in what I did. But I also feel no shame.”

Her boss at the hospital offered her a different way to see it.

“They are not calling you a hero because you killed a man,” she told Susan. “They are calling you a hero because they want to believe that, given the same circumstances, they could do what you did.”

Today, Susan Walters is a victim advocate in Portland. She helped create Case Companion, a free website that allows crime victims to track their offenders’ court dates, sentencing, and release information. She has worked with WomenStrength and GirlStrength programs, teaching others what she learned the hard way.

“If you can’t run and you can’t hide,” she says, “you have to fight.”

“I didn’t choose my attacker’s death for him. I chose my life.

Maria Andrejczyk

Maria Andrejczyk

In August 2021, a woman stood on an Olympic podium in Tokyo with tears in her eyes and a silver medal hanging around her neck.

For most athletes, that moment would be the greatest achievement of their lives.

For Maria Andrejczyk, it was only the beginning of a much bigger story.

Maria was born in Poland and dedicated her life to athletics, specializing in the javelin throw. Like countless Olympic athletes, she spent years training through pain, exhaustion, injuries, and disappointment. Every meter thrown was earned through sacrifice.

At the 2016 Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro, she came heartbreakingly close to winning a medal. Maria finished fourth, missing the podium by just two centimeters.

Two centimeters.

The distance was so small that it haunted her. Years of preparation had ended with no medal and no place on the podium.

Then life became even harder.

Only months after the Rio Olympics, doctors discovered a bone cancer tumor in her shoulder. It was devastating news.

The shoulder affected by cancer was the same shoulder she used to throw a javelin.

The same shoulder that carried her dreams.

Suddenly, her athletic career was no longer the biggest concern. Survival was.

Maria underwent treatment, surgery, and a difficult recovery. There were moments when nobody knew if she would ever compete again. Many athletes would have accepted retirement and focused on simply staying healthy.

But Maria refused to quit.

She fought through the pain. She fought through the uncertainty. She fought through every setback placed in front of her.

Years later, she returned to the Olympic stage.

At the Tokyo Olympics in 2021, Maria delivered the performance of her life. Her throw traveled 64.61 meters, earning her the silver medal.

It was more than a medal.

It was proof that she had survived cancer.

Proof that she had overcome disappointment.

Proof that she had come back stronger than anyone expected.

For most people, such a medal would become a treasured possession for life.

Maria kept it for only three months.

In November 2021, she came across the story of an eight-month-old Polish baby named Milosz Malysa.

The child was suffering from a severe heart defect and desperately needed life-saving surgery. The procedure was extremely expensive, and despite the efforts of his family and supporters, they still lacked a large portion of the money needed.

Time was running out.

Without the surgery, the baby’s future was uncertain.

Maria looked at the fundraising campaign and felt something inside her heart.

Then she looked at her Olympic silver medal.

The symbol of everything she had fought for.

The reward for years of sacrifice.

The proof of her greatest athletic achievement.

And she made an extraordinary decision.

Maria announced publicly that she would auction her Olympic silver medal to help save the baby’s life.

Many people were shocked.

Olympic medals are not ordinary objects. They represent decades of dedication, discipline, heartbreak, and triumph.

Athletes dream about them their entire lives.

Yet Maria was willing to give hers away for a child she had never met.

The story spread rapidly across Poland.

People were moved by her generosity.

The auction attracted enormous attention, and soon bids began to rise.

Eventually, the winning offer came from Zabka, one of Poland’s largest convenience store chains.

The company paid approximately 200,000 zloty, providing the exact amount still needed for Milosz’s surgery.

The fundraising goal was finally complete.

The child would receive treatment.

His life had been given another chance.

But the story was not over.

After purchasing the medal, Zabka made an announcement that stunned everyone.

The company revealed that while they had paid the full amount, they had no intention of keeping the medal.

Instead, they would return it to Maria.

They explained that her act of kindness had inspired the entire country and that the medal belonged with the woman who had earned it.

The money would still go to save the child.

The medal would still remain with Maria.

For a moment, it seemed almost unbelievable.

By giving away her greatest achievement, she had somehow managed to keep it.

Not because she demanded it.

Not because she expected it.

But because her selflessness inspired others to respond with generosity of their own.

Soon afterward, Milosz underwent successful surgery.

Photos later showed a smiling child recovering and growing stronger.

A life had been saved.

Maria’s story spread around the world.

People celebrated her not only as an athlete but as a person whose compassion mattered more than any sporting result.

Yet Maria remained humble.

She insisted she was not a hero.

She simply believed that helping someone in need was more important than holding onto a piece of silver.

But what made her decision remarkable was exactly what she was willing to sacrifice.

The medal represented years of work.

It represented surviving cancer.

It represented proving doubters wrong.

It represented one of the proudest moments of her life.

And she was prepared to give it all away for someone else’s future.

That is what made the gesture unforgettable.

Maria eventually returned to training and competition, continuing to pursue excellence in athletics.

Her silver medal sits with her today, returned by the company that recognized its true value.

But the medal means something different now.

It is no longer simply a symbol of sporting success.

It is a reminder of compassion.

A reminder that the greatest victories are not always measured in distance, points, or trophies.

Sometimes they are measured in lives changed.

And the world was reminded that true greatness is not defined by what we achieve for ourselves.

It is defined by what we are willing to give for others.

Maria Andrejczyk threw a javelin 64.61 meters and became an Olympic silver medalist.

Then she showed the world that the most powerful thing she possessed was never the medal around her neck.

It was the heart inside her chest.