Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Tsunami Of Regret!! “Millions Are Going To Die” “2.1 Billion Seriously Injured”!

Some snippets:
The 40 mechanisms of harm Sherri has identified fall into 4 classes:
1 Instant deaths (within 73 hours of the shots)
2 Spike protein induced damage
3 Autoimmune diseases
4 Other – cancers, miscarriages, third trimester deaths and others.

The CDC were recently forced to release data that they have over 18 MILLION adverse events yet to be entered into the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting database – over 800,000 hospitalizations!

Analysis of the adverse event reporting databases in the US and EU indicate that over 20,000,000 people world wide have already died from the COVID shots.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Tsunami Of Regret!! “Millions Are Going To Die” “2.1 Billion Seriously Injured”!!

The State Of Vaccination 1810

The State Of Vaccination 1810

(Tom: The lack of observational integrity and courage shows we have a long way to go before we can be considered a civilized society. Craven cowardice, vested self-interest and greed will need to be largely handled for us to live an optimal life as a group.)

Did you know that in 1810, just a few years (1798) after the vaccination fad took over the medical profession, Charles Maclean, MD, wrote a book On the State of Vaccination in 1810. In it, he commented how deaths from vaccination were suppressed because the vaccinators chose not to see the deaths, and others were afraid to say anything. Sound familiar?

“Very few deaths from cow-pox appear in the Bills of Mortality, owing to the means which have been used to suppress knowledge of them. Neither were deaths, diseases and failures transmitted in great abundance from the country, not because they did not happen, but because some practitioners were interested in not seeing them, and others who did see them were afraid of announcing what they knew.”

Charles Maclean, MD, On the State of Vaccination in 1810, p. 101.

Secret Docs Reveal Germany’s Public Health Agency Warned Lockdowns Cause More Harm Than Good

Merkel Masking

Following a long legal battle, Germany’s public health agency, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), has released the confidential protocols that show the RKI was aware that “lockdowns cause more harm than good” and evidence for “making masks mandatory was lacking.”

The RKI voiced concerns in 2020 that shutting down German society could lead to increased child mortality and other negative outcomes. The RKI experts also disagreed with the implementation of FFP2 face masks, saying there was a lack of data to support such a measure.

“Active communication would make sense in order to make clear why the RKI does not recommend this measure,” notes the minute regarding implementing FFP2 mask regulations. The agency even notes in the minutes that it would tell the public it did not support FFP2 mask regulations, but notably, the agency never did so despite mass protests against mandatory masks and other harsh measures.

The 2,500 pages of documents also contain a passage noting that experts warned that lockdowns could “do more harm than good,” with experts citing lockdowns in Africa and the negative outcomes seen there.

The documents have revealed that German politicians dramatized the situation, contrary to the opinions of experts. This was done presumably in order to implement coercive measures and restrict basic rights. There are now calls to release the rest of the documents, as more than a thousand passages are still redacted, representing a third of the total text dating from meeting notes from the “crisis unit” taken between February 2020 and April 2021.

The release of the documents has sent shockwaves through Germany and led even left-wing parties, such as the Greens, to call for a “comprehensive review” of coronavirus policy. Other parties, like the Alternative for Germany (AfD), are calling for more action, including a commission investigation.

Politicians are urging the RKI to lift the redactions and make all findings available to the public, and further court proceedings are pending. In the meantime, debate continues to rage, with the #RKIFiles tag on X already generating 45,000 posts.

An example of just a couple of posts shows the anger many Germans still feel towards the coronavirus-era policies put in place.

“The Bavarian state government tortured children with masks until spring 2022 — even in physical education classes. Not because there was scientific evidence for it, but because Markus Söder liked the role of coronavirus hardliner. #RKIFiles,” wrote one X user.

Another showed video of police brutalizing protesters demonstrating against Covid-19 measures, writing:

“It’s good that the RKI protocols are included in the broader discussion! But there can be no such thing as cheap forgiveness. With the coronavirus, 2/3 of Germans became massively aggressive against 1/3. The handcuffs must click on the main criminals.”

Virologist reacts to report

Virologist Klaus Stöhr, once the WHO pandemic commissioner, said the revealed protocols once again show that the “risk assessment was not based on data.” According to Stöhr, “his hair stood on end when it came to (Germany’s) pandemic plan.”

Stöhr also commented on the fact that the RKI protocols uncovered that experts were telling the government that there is little data to support widespread mask adoption for the public.

“And the fact that what was known about FFP2 masks was completely ignored is just two small building blocks.” There was “a lot more data available where it was seen that the work was not based on evidence,” he said.

The scientist referred to “curfews, border closures, 2G/3G (areas restricted based on vaccination status), and the side effects of lockdowns” as further examples of this. Stöhr noted that “these are all things that were known – including that the vaccines could not halt the spread of the virus.” He said that the vaccines could not end the pandemic, and it was “clear from the beginning that the vaccine couldn’t do that.”

He is now calling for a commission or review process to avoid the mistakes made by the government during the Covid-19 era in the future.

Virologist Hendrik Streeck, who was appointed to the RKI expert council, also stated: “I’m very surprised that entire pages about vaccinations, for example, were blacked out,” he said to Welt. “And I wonder what it says, why the public shouldn’t see it.”

Lauterbach in panic mode?

Federal Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (SPD) reacted with horror to the findings in the report. As federal health minister during a significant portion of the pandemic, he has often been the top target of criticism from those opposed to Germany’s Covid-19 policies.

“Enlightenment is good, but we must not allow conspiracy theories to arise on social media through the interference of foreign governments,” he wrote on the X platform. Why he referred to “foreign governments” remained unclear, but when cornered, left-wing politicians often resort to claims of “foreign interference” and “Russia.”

Despite calls for a review of policy, Lauterbach is desperate to avoid this outcome and is also openly rejecting a commission, as the AfD and BSW parties are calling for.

Lauterbach claims this would only benefit “a small group of politicians, but also people who perhaps represent radical ideas in other areas.” He claims they would use the findings “to politicize against the state.”

Some from the Greens also resorted to claims of “foreign influence” following the release of the RKI protocols.

Green health politician Janosch Dahmen, one of the most aggressive supporters of extreme Covid-19 policies, said: “It seems to me that the virulent spread of such untruthful rumors is also the result of the influence of foreign intelligence services on our society against the background of Russia’s war against Ukraine, to further divide and render politics incapable of action.”

The AfD, FDP and BSW want an investigation

The AfD, Free Democrats and BSW parties all want a more thorough investigation than a simple “review.”

“The public has a right to know what really happened back then,” said the health policy spokesman for the AfD parliamentary group, Martin Sichert, regarding the redactions still in the report. He appealed to the other parliamentary groups: “Take a look at the protocols of the RKI crisis team and set up a coronavirus investigation committee with us.”

Even the FDP, which is in a governing coalition with the ruling government, is calling for a more thorough investigation. FDP vice-president Wolfgang Kubicki announced that he would “work to ensure that the entire basis for decision-making at this time becomes public.” He also said it is becoming increasingly clear “that the Robert Koch Institute for Health Policy served as a scientific façade for former Minister Jens Spahn and probably also Karl Lauterbach.”

Some Greens are conciliatory

Some left-wing politicians believe some kind of review is necessary to improve “social cohesion.”

“It would be good for social cohesion if there were a review of coronavirus policy with a little distance,” said the Green parliamentary group’s legal policy spokesperson, Helge Limburg, to Welt newspaper. “This could be a commission of inquiry, a commission of experts, or another form of debate that signals to people: We are not simply brushing aside the drastic measures of that time.”

Health and budget politician Paula Piechotta said: “Almost exactly four years after the first pandemic measures were introduced in Germany, it is now overdue to address the mistakes of pandemic policy in a wide range of areas, from health and education to financial policy, in a transparent and timely manner for everyone.”

Her party colleague, Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck, also said a review of the coronavirus era was necessary but was short on specifics.

“We should now initiate a phase in which we reflect on the difficult pandemic period with all its effects,” he told the Bild newspaper. The German government at the time had to make far-reaching decisions quickly in an unprecedented situation during the pandemic.

“Certainly mistakes were made, but it would also have been a mistake not to make a decision,” he continued. “I think we should have the courage to learn the lessons, review processes, and evaluate the impact.”

In retrospect, it is fair to ask “whether the advisory bodies for politicians really covered the diversity of perspectives in science,” said Green MP Dieter Janecek. “For example, some encroachments on fundamental rights were certainly questionable: Unvaccinated people were not allowed into restaurants or swimming pools, even though it was already clear that the vaccine did not prevent transmission. Children and young people were unduly disadvantaged.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/secret-docs-reveal-germanys-public-health-agency-warned-lockdowns-cause-more-harm-good

Brain Technology Link

Brain Technology Link

The article states: More and more we are hearing about technologies that will not just interact with us but the intent it to make them PART OF US, and while many will champion this as an advancement, the opportunities for tyrants and other criminals to hack into and even control or kill people via this technology is very concerning. Yet, with all the warmongering taking place in the District of Criminals today, this is at the forefront of warfare, as well as times of so-called peace.

But I can see more problems than that. The more one understands about the mind (as a function distinct from the physical brain) the more troubling one finds this development.

Speaking purely for myself, there’s many a negative or destructive thought from my Reactive mind has crossed my Analytical mind that I would have zero intention of actioning.

The more civilized we become the more when censor the non-optimum and only allow the creative and constructive to be voiced and acted on.

How is the technology supposed to know the difference between between random or “no intent to act on” thoughts and deliberate intentions?

I can just imagine a private being given an order with which he has a severe disagreement and responding with the thought, “That Sergeant needs a bullet to the head!”, something he would never do. What response will that elicit from the software?

In battle you want instant responses from software that is supposed to speed responses to ensure your survival. However in the above situation, an instantaneous response is going to land our private in deep doggy do-do.

https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/weaponizing-reality-the-dawn-of-neurowarfare/

How to Prevent Muscle Loss With Aging (Sarcopenia) With Dr. Gabrielle Lyon

A great video with a ton of valuable content. Some takeaways:

“…the wider the waist line in mid-life the lower the brain volume…”

“…they didn’t have the physical or mental capacity to follow through…”

“…it is more important to build muscle than it it is to burn fat…”

“…the skeletal muscle is really the organ of longevity…”

“…it regulates everything about our metabolism. It is the primary utilizer of glucose…”

“…skeletal muscle is the amino acid reservoir…”

“…the more skeletal muscle mass the individual has, the higher their survivability…”

“…you have to prepare your body to withstand the storms of life…”

“…there are physiological changes that occur to skeletal muscle as we age and this is called anabolic resistance, And this happens to everybody. What this means is that the muscle becomes less efficient at utilizing protein. In essence skeletal muscle is a nutrition sensing organ… …It is malleable tissue, an endocrine organ which has components and responsibilities in the immune system… …its ability to sense nutrients, particularly protein, decreases as we age. So we must account for this if we are going to change.”

“…If we want the trajectory of our aging to improve and be exceptional, we have to modify the way that we train and the way that we ate in our 20s to account…”

“…the evidence is very clear that we need more protein as we age, not less… …the RDA of .8 grams per kilogram (per day of body weight), the evidence suggests we should be doubling that anywhere from 1.6 to 1.8 grams per kilogram… …so essentially older muscle becomes as efficient as younger muscle.”

“You can’t out-exercise a bad diet but you can’t out-diet no exercise.”

“Resistance exercise has a much bigger impact than nutrition.”

“It’s about exertion. It’s not about lifting heavy weights, it’s about exertion. It’s about going to fatigue and whether that’s 15 or 20 reps, depending on your age.”

“What are the biggest mindset blocks that you see in your practice that prevent people from reaching their optimal health?”

“…the number one thing is you must prepare for your weakness…. …You cannot be surprised by human behaviour and human predictability as humans. When you plan for your weakness and you’re not surprised by it, if you know, you get stressed or, you know, if you stay up late watching a Netflix show, you’re not going to go to the gym at that time you said, if you know when your daughter comes home or your son comes home, you’re not going to train. Typically you have behaviours that you repeat over and over again and they’re deeply predictable yet each time we’re shocked that it’s happening!

When you plan for that you can circumvent it. So you know that it is going to happen. You plan for it, your rehearse in your mind what’s going you’re going to do instead and you initiate the the things that need to happen to execute in a way to become the person you want to be. And really honour and understanding your weaknesses.

Everybody focuses on strengths. We’re into this very happy, you know, let’s all focus on our positivity and our strengths, and that’s a mistake. The strengths aren’t going to get you better. You’re already good at that. It’s really, really knowing where you fail and also being and having personal integrity. When you have a promise and you made the promise to yourself nothing is going to erode your confidence faster than breaking promises to yourself.”

“I am a private doctor to innovators, leaders and mavericks.”

Everybody has a narrative (potential excuse). (Hashimoto’s, over-weight, diabetic, menopause). Be very familiar with what your narrative is and learn how to mitigate it. I have CEOs, entrepreneurs and mavericks in my practice.

“No narrative. What do I have to do to execute the things? Everything else was noise and distraction.”

The three most important attributes of my top performers

Understanding your weaknesses and formulating a counter strategy.

Human behaviour is totally predictable. Don’t be surprised at human fallibility. Practice personal integrity.

Mitigating any form of narrative on your thinking.

Dr Gabrielle Lyon and Dr Morgan Nolte

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rkkqk5abCw

Why Gary Brecka Changed his Mind on Keto, Fasting, and 3 other things

Thomas De Lauer Interviews Gary Brecka

“In the life insurance industry… …we studied what makes people die… …If I was to boil that entire 22 year career down to a single sentence it would be that the presence of oxygen is the absence of disease… …If you look at why human beings are not living longer and happier lives it is modifiable risk factors… …The modifiable risk factors are entirely under our control and the masses are not getting the message because the messages coming from big pharma, from government, from food labelling that is intentionally meant to deceive you.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qed0D6RDdk

Whooping Cough Deaths Sweden Don’t Rise With No Jabs

Whooping Cough Deaths Sweden

Did you know In Sweden, examinations in 1978 showed that 84% of children who were verified to have pertussis had previously received three doses of vaccine. As a result, the whole-cell DTP vaccine was deemed ineffective. Combined with the concerns over its safety, the Swedish health ministry recommended discontinuation of the whooping cough vaccination in 1979. From 1979 to 1996 (17 years), there was no national vaccination program. However, notice that there isn’t any increase in deaths, which were close to zero before they began vaccinating in 1953.

These 3 Supplements Boost Your Heart Health

heart health supplements

  • An analysis of 884 randomized controlled trials including 27 micronutrients and 883,627 participants demonstrated that folic acid, coenzyme Q10 and omega-3 fatty acids could reduce heart disease mortality, heart attack and coronary heart disease events. 
  • Omega-3, folate and CoQ10 help support more than your heart, including reducing the risk of dementia, age-related cognitive decline and major depressive disorder, promoting DNA synthesis and red blood cell production, lowering blood pressure and decreasing brain shrinkage, to name a few.
  • While the study is encouraging, you can do more to protect your heart health, including getting adequate sleep, appropriate exercise, using a sauna and doing breathing exercises, taking care of your gums and avoiding lifestyle choices that damage heart health.

Continue: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/03/27/heart-health-supplements.aspx