Autism, Aluminium and Vaccines

To start with, a very basic glossary for some of those biochemical words:
• A pro-inflammatory cell is a type of signalling cell that is secreted from immune cells and macrophages (garbage collector cells – see below), and certain other cell types that promote inflammation.
• A macrophage can be thought of as the garbage man of the immune system, eating up foreign substances, cell debris, etc.
• A monocyte is a type of white blood cell, of which one form is a ‘macrophage’ which can influence the process of immunity.
• An adjuvant is a substance which enhances the body’s immune response to an antigen.
• An antigen is a toxin or other foreign substance which induces an immune response in the body, especially the production of antibodies.
• An antibody is a blood protein produced in response to and counteracting a specific antigen.
A friend writes:
Whilst I’m going to make no effort to put my wobbly academic hat on and do more than simply excerpt a couple of paragraphs from this article you’ll likely find it of interest if the correlation between Autism and Aluminium from Vaccines piques your curiosity
This is taken from the j.b.handley blog entitled
International scientists have found autism’s cause. What will Americans do?
Five clear, replicable, and related discoveries explaining how autism is triggered have formed an undeniably clear picture of autism’s causation, and possibly ways to alleviate the symptoms, too.
STAFFORDSHIRE, England —In early December 2017, Dr. Chris Exley of Keele University in England and his colleagues published a paper that for the first time looked at the brain tissue of subjects with autism to determine the level of aluminum (note: they spell “aluminum” as “aluminium” in the United Kingdom) found within their brain tissue. For anyone trying to convince the world that “the science is settled and vaccines don’t cause autism,” the study’s findings are deeply contradictory to that statement. In a blog post written by Professor Exley on the day his study was published, he explained the ground-breaking results:
“…while the aluminium content of each of the 5 brains [of people with autism] was shockingly high it was the location of the aluminium in the brain tissue which served as the standout observation…The new evidence strongly suggests that aluminium is entering the brain in ASD [autism spectrum disorders] via (certain cells called) pro-inflammatory cells (a type of signalling cell – see bottom of post) which have become loaded up with aluminium in the blood and/or lymph, much as has been demonstrated for monocytes (a type of white blood cell – again see below if you need more info) at injection sites for vaccines including aluminium adjuvants (see below).”
Dr. Exley’s quote includes a reference to “monocytes at injection sites” and the fact that the interaction between these monocytes and aluminum has been demonstrated in previous published science.
Reference is also made to a ‘macrophage.’ Dr Exley writes, “A macrophage can be thought of as the garbage man of the immune system, eating up foreign substances, cell debris, etc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . macrophages appear to be playing a critical and devastating role in triggering autism, serving to escort aluminum injected from a vaccine directly into the brain, where it can disrupt brain development and trigger autism.”
Handley continues, “Dr Exley’s study — ’Aluminium in brain tissue and autism’ — is the final piece of a puzzle that first started to come together in 2004, and picked up steam since 2010, that has dramatically furthered the scientific understanding of exactly how a vaccine can trigger autism. This timeline is critical to recognize, because the Vaccine Court in the United States dismissed the vaccine-autism hypothesis in 2009, long before most of what I’m about to explain even existed. Science is a continuum, an emergence of truth through many different studies that often have to be pieced together before the picture becomes clear. And, scientific progress can sometimes move slowly until that moment when an emerging truth presents itself in such a way that it can no longer be denied. In my opinion, Dr Exley’s study provided the only data missing from an airtight explanation of what happened to my son and so many other children.
For Americans, the race to discover what’s causing all this autism will likely be won on foreign shores. As you’ll soon see, ALL of the science explaining how autism can be caused has come from other countries, even though a Caltech scientist (California Institute of Technology) pushed the first domino back in 2006.
Why is aluminum in vaccines at all?
Aluminum is a critical component of most vaccines given to children. It serves as an “adjuvant” meaning the aluminum serves to “wake up” the immune system, provoking the immune system to recognize the “antigen” within the vaccine for whatever disease the vaccine serves to protect against. The amount of aluminum in vaccines given to children skyrocketed beginning in the early 1990s for two reasons: 1). more vaccines were added to the children’s vaccine schedule and, 2). the vaccination rate for all vaccines given to children rose (from 50–60% of children vaccinated in the mid-1980s to over 90% today). A child in the mid-1980s would have received 1,250 micrograms of aluminum from their vaccines by their 18-month birthday if they were fully vaccinated. Today, that number is 4,925 micrograms, a near-quadrupling of total aluminum. You can read more about this in the excellent study published by Neil Miller entitled ‘Aluminium in Childhood Vaccines is Unsafe’. https://www.jpands.org/vol21no4/miller.pdf
Mystifyingly, aluminum has never experienced biological testing to consider its safety for being injected into babies, having been “grandfathered” into our modern safety standards. Canadian scientists Dr Chris Shaw and Dr Lucija Tomljenovic addressed this omission in a critical study they published in 2011 in Current Medicinal Chemistry titled, “Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?” They wrote:
“Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.”
Ground zero at Caltech
When Caltech scientist Dr. Paul Patterson passed away in 2014, I had little appreciation that he had triggered a chain of events over the course of his career that may now provide a clear and unambiguous explanation of how and why my son developed autism back in 2004. Knowing exactly how my son’s autism was caused is incredibly important to my wife and I, because the more information we have about causation, the more chance we have to do something about it, and perhaps recover my son from an affliction now impacting 1 in 36 American kids.
What you’re about to read is the product of more than two dozen very recent peer-reviewed published scientific studies, with really no original thought by me. I’m a businessman and a father, but what follows is a “grand theory of autism” so complete and well-supported that I think it deserves the attention of every member of the autism community. When the totality of this explanation became clear to me, not only did my jaw hit the floor, but I was immediately consumed with thoughts about how this clear explanation might impact the way we treat our son’s autism, and I hope it does the same for you and perhaps your doctor as well. What I’m certain of is that this “grand theory” needs to be heavily debated, and I hope by putting it in the public realm I help move it along that path.
(I’m indebted to an anonymous scientist who runs a website called Vaccine Papers, where many of these insights came from. I will quote VP throughout this piece, referring to VP as “VP.” I highly recommend you read the totality of his website, where the explanations are far more scientific than what you will read here.)
It shouldn’t be a surprise that all of this science has been published outside the United States. I’ve listened closely to the stories of American scientists wanting to study autism and complaining that any studies that are even remotely controversial are nearly impossible to fund or get approved.
Well, that’s just a part of it. There’s much more about the correlation between Aluminium and Vaccine caused Autism in the blog and linked websites. Please use the link at the top of the page if you want to delve deeper.

Albanese Wants To Silence Your Voice

Albanese Wants To Silence Your Voice

Even while promoting the Voice, Albanese and his bunch of authoritarians have crafted duplicitous legislation to ban you from speaking unless it is authorised while excluding the government and media from any liability from lying.

Gob-smacking level of two-faced.

We need to STOP Labor’s dangerous new ‘disinformation’ laws.

Anthony Albanese does not want you to be able to speak out online in the lead-up to the referendum.

That’s why he’s bringing in laws that give big tech and the government the power to determine what truth is online.

Why Hide The Plan For A Treaty?

Shouldn’t Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the ‘yes’ campaign be proud of their promise of a treaty?

They’ve said often enough they’re going to implement the Uluru Statement “in full” after the referendum.

And that means a treaty and a “truth-telling” commission after the divisive Voice is cemented into the Constitution.

So why does Albo refuse to even say the word “treaty” these past few weeks?

What could they be hiding?

Well, just take a look at this document, which solves the mystery.

It’s the Uluru Statement … in full.

Is this what the PM and the ‘yes’ campaign have signed up for after this referendum?

“… a Treaty could include a proper say in decision-making, the establishment of a truth commission, reparations, a financial settlement (such as seeking a percentage of GDP), the resolution of land, water and resources issues, recognition of authority and customary law, and guarantees of respect for the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples.”

While redacted parts appeared in the Final Report of the Referendum Council1, which referred to them as “extracts from the Uluru Statement”, the entire document was released under Freedom of Information laws.

And reported by Sky News host Peta Credlin last week2.

This is how news.com.au told the story3:

Taxpayers may be forced to pay “reparations” to Indigenous Australians for “past, present and future criminal acts” under a proposed treaty, with suggestions that “a fixed percentage” of GDP be handed over through “rates, land tax and royalties”…

But what’s that got to do with the divisive Voice, you might ask!

The ‘yes’ campaigners will look you dead in the eye and – like the Prime Minister – swear the Voice has nothing to do with a treaty!

But that’s not what Thomas Mayo and Teela Reid, members of Albo’s referendum advisory group, were saying before the campaign.

Mayo tweeted that without a Voice, Australians are “much less likely to support what we may claim in a treaty (reparations, land back etc)”.

“A constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament will provide the political clout needed to enforce & protect treaties,” he wrote!

Teela Reid tweeted that “enshrining a First Nations Voice is paramount to enforcing treaty and holding the system to account”.

The ‘yes’ campaign’s leading spokesman Noel Pearson said the Voice was the “starting point before we can talk about a treaty”4.

So why does the Prime Minister keep saying this referendum has nothing to do with a treaty?

The truth is that the Voice is the first instalment of a package deal.

As Noel Pearson put it, the Voice is “the first door” and the “treaty door is the second door”5.

So don’t tell us that this referendum is not about a treaty!

Because if you say ‘yes’ to a Voice enshrined in the Constitution …

… you’re saying ‘yes’ to handing the activists “political clout” and opening the door to a costly and expensive treaty.

Yours in unity,

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price
on behalf of FAIR AUSTRALIA

 

Referendum Council, Final Report, June 30, 2017.

Sky News, ‘Sky News host Peta Credlin exposes Labor’s ‘lie’ on the Uluru Statement from the Heart under Freedom of Information Act’, August 3, 2023.

news.com.au, ‘“Land tax”: Secret document reveals demand for “percentage of GDP” under Indigenous Treaty’, August 4, 2023.

Judith Neilson Institute for Journalism and Ideas, ‘In Conversation: Noel Pearson and Paul Keating’, April 2, 2022.

The Australian, ‘Pearson pushes constitution-first line on indigenous treaty’, August 4, 2018.

 

Curious to learn reasons why you should Vote No in the Voice referendum?

Our Constitution Already Allows

DO YOU KNOW THAT WE ALREADY HAVE AN INDIGENOUS BODY THAT FULFILS WHAT SEEM TO BE THE AIMS OF “THE VOICE”?

IT’S CALLED THE COALITION OF PEAKS.

We already have an indigenous body that fulfils what seem to be the aims of the ‘voice’.
The Coalition of Peaks was established in 2020. Its aims and purposes are outlined on it’s web site
The Partnership Agreement – Coalition of Peaks

We are the Coalition of Peaks – a representative body of over 80 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community controlled peak organisations and members. We came together as an act of self-determination to be formal partners with Australian governments on Closing the Gap.

The Coalition of Peaks are accountable to our communities.
We have worked for our communities for a long time and are working to ensure the full involvement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in shared decision-making with Australian governments across the country to improve the life outcomes of our people.

The Coalition of Peaks together with all Australian governments and the Australian Local Government Association have signed the National Agreement on Closing the Gap (National Agreement). The National Agreement has been built around what Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people said is important to improve their lives.

It includes four Priority Reforms to change the way governments work, new government accountability measures and shared monitoring and implementation arrangements.
Could any YES supporter please tell us what the ‘voice’ will do that this body can or could not do?

Curious to learn reasons why you should Vote No in the Voice referendum?

Read more:

https://constitutionalequality.au/