Tom's Blog on Life

By “we”, I mean our precious anti-GMO movement, including all of you who participated in signing petitions, spreading the word, and choosing non-GMO organic food.

One of the driving forces that caused AquaBounty, the salmon maker, to shut its doors this week, was consumer power. Supermarkets and restaurants refused to buy their product. This proves a beautiful principle IRT has championed for two decades: Consumers are at the top of the food chain.

https://api.neonemails.com/emails/content/G-pcHaJl97cQJfTybP7b3BKXxydP4UxUz1yA1APdFqQ=

In a landmark decision, the court has ruled in favor of Dr. William Bay, marking a significant win for those questioning mainstream COVID Vaccine narratives. This comes after a lengthy legal battle against the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) and the Medical Board of Australia, who unjustly suspended Dr. Bay’s registration as a general practitioner because he spoke out against the COVID vaccines.

I shared a clip of Dr. William Bay from a few years ago when he boldly spoke out against experimental mRNA gene therapy, often mislabeled as “vaccines,” to a group of uncomfortable indoctrinated doctors at a medical conference. You can view the original clip in this thread (Point Number 8) or read the entire transcript to see how the pharmaceutical industry subtly “indoctrinates” doctors.

Dr. Bay, known for his outspoken views on COVID-19 experimental vaccines, faced severe consequences, including a medical license suspension. However, the court found that the suspension decision was marred by bias and procedural unfairness. It’s a clear call to joy for the medical-truth community that has long advocated for transparency and fairness in healthcare regulations.

In his statement following the judgment, Dr. Bay did not hold back: “So, if I wasn’t clear before AHPRA, let me be very clear now. The vaccines are bad. The vaccines are no good. And people should be afforded the right to informed consent to choose these so-called vaccines.” His reinstatement means he can openly criticize vaccines without fear, a bold move that sets a precedent for other practitioners who wish to express their concerns freely.

The comprehensive ruling by Justice Bradley not only reinstates Dr. Bay’s medical license but also holds AHPRA accountable for the legal costs incurred throughout the proceedings. Dr. Bay is now free to practice medicine once again, which includes the ability to prescribe treatments like Ivermectin, a controversial but crucial option in his toolkit.

The ruling declared that decisions made by AHPRA and the Board were invalid, thus freeing Dr. Bay from the unjust limitations placed on his medical practice. The court pointed out several flaws, including a lack of evidence supporting any claims of misconduct and a failure to provide Dr. Bay a fair chance to defend himself. This legal validation suggests that AHPRA and the Board might have acted more out of political motivation than genuine public safety concerns.

For Dr. Bay, this isn’t just about regaining his right to practice medicine—it’s a triumph of his voice against bureaucratic overreach and a testimony to standing firm on one’s beliefs. And for the wider community, this verdict is a hopeful pointer to the necessity for accountability and fairness in the regulation of medical professionals.

Given the court’s findings, Dr. Bay should consider pursuing legal action for damages against AHPRA for the loss of income and potential harm to his reputation during this prolonged suspension. The court’s decision implicitly supports the view that he was unfairly treated, opening the door for further legal redress and, perhaps, compensation for the unwarranted impact on his career.

This verdict shines a light on the critical importance of rights to a fair hearing and underscores the role of rigorous judicial oversight to prevent the misuse of regulatory power.

Congratulations to Dr. Bay on this vindication—his case serves as a powerful reminder that justice, although sometimes delayed, is indeed achievable!

SOURCE TO FULL COURT JUDGEMENT:  https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/caselaw/qsc/2024/315/pdf

https://www.aussie17.com/p/breaking-news-vindication-for-dr

Participants then took two different tests to check their cognitive function. Researchers found that people with lower levels of magnesium and calcium performed worse on both cognitive tests than people with normal levels. People with normal calcium levels but low levels of magnesium also scored worse than those with normal levels of both nutrients. Those with normal magnesium levels and low calcium levels did not test as poorly.

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/home-family-pets/are-you-missing-these-key-minerals-study-links-deficiency-to-cognitive-decline/

According to existing scientific evidence, choosing natural, side effect-free herbal formulas to treat acute ear infection and pain over synthetic antibiotics with questionable therapeutic efficacy is a reasonable and well-founded option.

Acute otitis media (ear infection) is very common in children and usually accompanied by ear pain, fever and irritability. Although it is believed that 80% of the otitis cases resolve spontaneously without any treatment, the standard medical approach relies on the prescription of antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs.

An independent review by the Cochrane Collaboration reports that antibiotic treatment for acute otitis is prescribed in 98% of cases in USA and Australia but only 38% in Netherlands. According to the latest guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the first line antibiotic treatment is based on moderate or broad spectrum drugs, such as amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin, while NSAIDs and paracetamol (Tylenol) are recommended for pain management. However, there is scientific evidence challenging not only the use of antibiotics, but the very necessity to use synthetic drugs to treat infection and ear pain.

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/health-healing/natural-ear-infection-alternatives-to-antibiotics-proven-safer-and-more-effective/

•The therapeutic actions of DMSO make it well suited to treat challenging conditions throughout the body, including many of the internal organs.

•In this article, we will examine how DMSO protects organs from injury (e.g., poisoning or blood loss) and some of the specific diseases DMSO has been proven to treat.

•These include: heart attacks, liver cirrhosis, gallstones, ARDS, lung damage from inhaling smoke, pulmonary fibrosis, pancreatitis, diabetes, nephritis, kidney stones, polycystic kidney disease, cystitis, epididymitis, genital pain, prostatitis, urethral syndrome, enlarged prostates, tubal infertility, endometrial inflammation, and fibrosis.

•This article will review DMSO treatment protocols for those conditions (along with non-DMSO approaches we utilize for them) and provide general DMSO information for those looking to use DMSO for their own health.

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/climate-ecology/how-dimethyl-sulfoxide-dmso-protects-and-heals-the-internal-organs/

• A recent study of 27,670 participants found that ultraprocessed foods increase mortality risk, especially in women
• Higher ultraprocessed food consumption was linked to poor cholesterol profiles, showing reduced HDL (good cholesterol) and increased VLDL (bad cholesterol), particularly in older women
• Studies found people consuming most ultraprocessed foods had 11% higher cardiovascular disease risk, 16% higher coronary heart disease risk and 4% higher stroke risk
• Research identified 25 adverse health outcomes from ultraprocessed food consumption, including respiratory diseases, kidney problems, mental health issues, and diabetes among adults and children
• Linoleic acid (LA) in seed oils, a common ingredient in ultraprocessed foods, is particularly harmful; ideally, reduce your intake to 5 grams a day or less

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/food-cooking/frequent-ultraprocessed-food-consumption-raises-mortality-risks-especially-in-women/

A friend sent me an article: Just found this article while looking at sweetener information and was quite surprised at the far reaching effect refined sugar has on our bodies. I always knew refined sugar wasn’t good for us but this article goes beyond what I knew and is very thorough.

GLYCEMIC INDEX

Sugar	Glycemic Index
Refined White Sugar	80
Sugar Cane Juice	43
Processed Honey	75
Raw Honey	30
High Fructose Corn Syrup	87
Fructose: Natural, found in fruit	20
Coconut Sugar	40
Maple Syrup	54

https://organicallymade.com/the-problem-with-granulated-white-sugar/

Chicken soup is good for the soul, they say. And as a homespun remedy for everything that might ail you during winter, there are few things as deliciously soothing.

But could such a broth be more than just a cold comfort? According to the latest scientific study, the answer is yes.

Research in the American Journal of Therapeutics showed that a compound found in chicken soup – carnosine – helped the body’s immune system to fight the early stages of flu.

But the authors warned this benefit ended as soon as the soup was excreted by the body, so that means you may need to have a fairly constant supply.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2252167/Souper-broth-An-old-wives-tale-No-chicken-soup-really-CAN-fight-cold-say-scientists.html