A film dealing with the relative size of things in the universe and the effect of adding another zero.
https://www.flixxy.com/science-education-universe-documentary.htm
A Young Girl Confronted by a Man in a Public Toilet
What if your daughter’s or sister’s safety in female-only spaces were compromised by a legal loophole? What if your young daughter had to get undressed in front of a man every time she went to get changed?
In a shocking recent court ruling, a biological male accessed a women-only app in Australia. This sets a precedent allowing biological males into spaces reserved for females.
By prioritising gender identity over biological sex, the ruling threatens women’s privacy, safety, and rights. Access to female-only areas, intended to ensure privacy, is now jeopardised. This legal decision could lead to further precedents, worsening the erosion of women’s rights.
We need legislation to stop this now.
Without immediate action, women’s shelters and services might be forced to admit biological males. This endangers vulnerable women.
We must act fast to prevent further normalisation of these changes. The ruling has already gained considerable public attention.
The Tickle v. Giggle case has raised critical arguments about women’s rights and the ruling sets dangerous legal precedents.
Women’s spaces like bathrooms and shelters exist for privacy from men. Legal rulings must not force them open to males.
We must reaffirm that biological sex determines access to women’s spaces. Women fought for these protections; we cannot let them be undone.
Protecting children from predators and preventing gender confusion in children is essential. Children must not be subject to an ideology that leaves them open to abuse.
The Tickle v Giggle ruling endangers vulnerable women. Allowing radical changes like these cause irrrperable harms, with women and children most at risk. Our petition demands legislative change to protect women’s rights and protect children.
Join us in this crucial fight!
Why would leaders hear us out? Because women’s rights enjoy broad public support and the safety of women in private spaces is paramount.
Decision-makers value legal clarity where clear laws, rooted in biological realities, prevent manipulation by subjective identities.
Tickle v Giggle is no joke! It enforces the right for a biological man to define himself as a woman and be admitted to female-only spaces, while opening the door to the redefinition and erasure of women.
Public safety concerns capture attention. Real risks affect women and children, particularly in intimate spaces and leaders know, now more than ever, that the public is watching.
Grassroots movements like ours sway politicians, while mass mobilisation through petitions can drive political change and preserve women’s protection.
If we can defeat the ruling, we can help ensure women-only spaces remain secure, upholding rights in sports, healthcare, and privacy surrounding female-only spaces.
Winning will also inspire global resistance to radical gender ideology.
We must act with urgency to counter a potential loss of crucial protections for women and families.
Taking action right now is essential.
We cannot afford to let this precedent undermine women’s rights further.
Thanks for all you do,
Caroline Farrow and the team at CitizenGO
P.S. Please share this petition widely after signing. Every signature matters to preserve our rights and values.
Click here to sign the petition now!
The Magnetic North Pole Is Moving Faster And Faster
Here’s the point: Could this year’s increasingly bizarre solar activity (with its astonishing, historic, worldwide aurorae and its weakening magnetic field), combined with the North Pole’s sprinting-speed geomagnetic excursion, be scaring the Establishment into considering previously unthinkable possibilities or, Heaven help us, the potential for a natural catastrophe not caused by cows burping?
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/a-red-storm-sunday-december-15-2024
Inconvenient History of Salk Inactivated Polio Vaccine
In 1954, a woman called Bernice Eddy was a lab scientist at NIH performing safety tests for the Polio vaccines. Salk’s inactivated polio vaccine was a killed-virus vaccine to be used in a massive national vaccination program. After testing the vaccines on monkeys, she and her team discovered that the vaccine contained residual LIVE polio virus, resulting in the monkeys showing polio-like symptoms and paralysis. These findings pointed to a flawed vaccine manufacturing process. Eddy reported her findings, and she was immediately dismissed from the polio research and given what we today call “whistleblower treatment.”
The flawed vaccine and associated flawed manufacturing process were licensed for public use. 120,000 polio vaccine doses containing an improperly inactivated version of the live polio virus were manufactured and produced. Of children who received the vaccine, 40,000 developed abortive poliomyelitis, 51 developed paralytic poliomyelitis—and of these, five children died from polio. The exposures led to an epidemic of polio in the families and communities of the affected children, resulting in the death of 5 children and 113 others paralyzed.
https://www.malone.news/p/inconvenient-history-of-salk-inactivated
I’ve got great news. We’ve stopped genetically engineered salmon.
By “we”, I mean our precious anti-GMO movement, including all of you who participated in signing petitions, spreading the word, and choosing non-GMO organic food.
One of the driving forces that caused AquaBounty, the salmon maker, to shut its doors this week, was consumer power. Supermarkets and restaurants refused to buy their product. This proves a beautiful principle IRT has championed for two decades: Consumers are at the top of the food chain.
https://api.neonemails.com/emails/content/G-pcHaJl97cQJfTybP7b3BKXxydP4UxUz1yA1APdFqQ=
The Hunt
Pass The Kindness Forward
When you perform an act of goodness, the person you touched will also perform one, and soon, everyone will be happily helping each other.
Breaking News: Vindication for Dr. William Bay as Supreme Court Reinstates Medical License!
In a landmark decision, the court has ruled in favor of Dr. William Bay, marking a significant win for those questioning mainstream COVID Vaccine narratives. This comes after a lengthy legal battle against the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) and the Medical Board of Australia, who unjustly suspended Dr. Bay’s registration as a general practitioner because he spoke out against the COVID vaccines.
I shared a clip of Dr. William Bay from a few years ago when he boldly spoke out against experimental mRNA gene therapy, often mislabeled as “vaccines,” to a group of uncomfortable indoctrinated doctors at a medical conference. You can view the original clip in this thread (Point Number 8) or read the entire transcript to see how the pharmaceutical industry subtly “indoctrinates” doctors.
Dr. Bay, known for his outspoken views on COVID-19 experimental vaccines, faced severe consequences, including a medical license suspension. However, the court found that the suspension decision was marred by bias and procedural unfairness. It’s a clear call to joy for the medical-truth community that has long advocated for transparency and fairness in healthcare regulations.
In his statement following the judgment, Dr. Bay did not hold back: “So, if I wasn’t clear before AHPRA, let me be very clear now. The vaccines are bad. The vaccines are no good. And people should be afforded the right to informed consent to choose these so-called vaccines.” His reinstatement means he can openly criticize vaccines without fear, a bold move that sets a precedent for other practitioners who wish to express their concerns freely.
The comprehensive ruling by Justice Bradley not only reinstates Dr. Bay’s medical license but also holds AHPRA accountable for the legal costs incurred throughout the proceedings. Dr. Bay is now free to practice medicine once again, which includes the ability to prescribe treatments like Ivermectin, a controversial but crucial option in his toolkit.
The ruling declared that decisions made by AHPRA and the Board were invalid, thus freeing Dr. Bay from the unjust limitations placed on his medical practice. The court pointed out several flaws, including a lack of evidence supporting any claims of misconduct and a failure to provide Dr. Bay a fair chance to defend himself. This legal validation suggests that AHPRA and the Board might have acted more out of political motivation than genuine public safety concerns.
For Dr. Bay, this isn’t just about regaining his right to practice medicine—it’s a triumph of his voice against bureaucratic overreach and a testimony to standing firm on one’s beliefs. And for the wider community, this verdict is a hopeful pointer to the necessity for accountability and fairness in the regulation of medical professionals.
Given the court’s findings, Dr. Bay should consider pursuing legal action for damages against AHPRA for the loss of income and potential harm to his reputation during this prolonged suspension. The court’s decision implicitly supports the view that he was unfairly treated, opening the door for further legal redress and, perhaps, compensation for the unwarranted impact on his career.
This verdict shines a light on the critical importance of rights to a fair hearing and underscores the role of rigorous judicial oversight to prevent the misuse of regulatory power.
Congratulations to Dr. Bay on this vindication—his case serves as a powerful reminder that justice, although sometimes delayed, is indeed achievable!
SOURCE TO FULL COURT JUDGEMENT: https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/caselaw/qsc/2024/315/pdf
Are you missing these key minerals? Study links deficiency to cognitive decline
Participants then took two different tests to check their cognitive function. Researchers found that people with lower levels of magnesium and calcium performed worse on both cognitive tests than people with normal levels. People with normal calcium levels but low levels of magnesium also scored worse than those with normal levels of both nutrients. Those with normal magnesium levels and low calcium levels did not test as poorly.
Natural ear infection alternatives to antibiotics proven safer and more effective
According to existing scientific evidence, choosing natural, side effect-free herbal formulas to treat acute ear infection and pain over synthetic antibiotics with questionable therapeutic efficacy is a reasonable and well-founded option.
Acute otitis media (ear infection) is very common in children and usually accompanied by ear pain, fever and irritability. Although it is believed that 80% of the otitis cases resolve spontaneously without any treatment, the standard medical approach relies on the prescription of antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs.
An independent review by the Cochrane Collaboration reports that antibiotic treatment for acute otitis is prescribed in 98% of cases in USA and Australia but only 38% in Netherlands. According to the latest guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the first line antibiotic treatment is based on moderate or broad spectrum drugs, such as amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin, while NSAIDs and paracetamol (Tylenol) are recommended for pain management. However, there is scientific evidence challenging not only the use of antibiotics, but the very necessity to use synthetic drugs to treat infection and ear pain.