Tom's Blog on Life and Livingness
A video well worth watching. Unfortunately the closing remark from the talking head, stating the long-term effects are unknown is a complete sham as we know the short term effects are deadly! Glyphosate even in concentrations as low as 5 parts per billion (ppb) causes health issues in rats so 1,000 ppb? It is an outrageous lie to calim that level is safe.
http://www.ktvu.com/news/study-weed-killer-found-in-oat-cereal-and-granola-bars
If you’re using Google’s Chrome browser or Mozilla’s Firefox browser, you’re being indoctrinated with censorship at the browser level.
Yes, even Mozilla has gone that way and will soon be blocking independent media websites.
The Alex Jones Show details alternative technology solutions that help free you from censorship and tyranny.
Alternatives to YouTube:
Bitchute.com
D.Tube
REAL.video
ugetube.com
GAB.ai
Alternatives to browsers:
(BEWARE: The Opera browser is owned by communist China)
Brave.com
Vivaldi.com
Alternatives to Facebook:
GAB.ai
Minds.com
trooth.globalfreedomemovement.com
worldtruth.mx
Alternative to Google News:
Censored.news
Search Engine:
duckduckgo.com
Ever since I was a child, I’ve always had a fear of someone under my bed at night. So, I went to a shrink and told him: “I’ve got problems. Every time I go to bed I think there’s somebody under it. I’m scared. I think I’m going crazy.”
“Just put yourself in my hands for one year,” said the shrink. “Come talk to me three times a week and we should be able to get rid of those fears.”
“How much do you charge?”
“$80 dollars per visit,” replied the doctor.
“I’ll sleep on it,” I said.
Six months later the doctor met me on the street and said, “Why didn’t you come to see me about those fears you were having?”
“Well, at $80 bucks a visit, three times a week for a year, is $12,480.00. A bartender cured me for $10.00. I was so happy to have saved all that money that I went and bought me a new pickup truck.”
With a bit of an attitude he said, “Is that so? And how, may I ask, did a bartender cure you?”
“He told me to cut the legs off the bed. Ain’t nobody under there now.”
Here’s what I call an explosive bombshell regarding the fact that Glyphosate in Roundup actually promotes existing cancers! And when you read my related post about the amount of glyphosate in common food products, all of a sudden Jack Lalanne’s “If man made it, don’t eat it!” sounds like some of the sounded advice ever uttered!
It was demonstrated during the trial that Johnson, after learning about his cancer, contacted Monsanto to ask if Roundup was safe. Despite internal emails showing Monsanto employees, including their chief medical director, were discussing how to handle Johnson, the company refused to contact him back. During the time period Monsanto ignored Johnson, Wisner explains, “It was during this time when he’s continuing to spray it [Roundup] that his cancer goes from something that’s sort of manageable, although it’s a problem…to a death sentence. And the evidence shows that when you apply glyphosate after a cancer has been initiated, it actually promotes it.”
It was arguably the amount and content of documents produced during the discover period of the recent Monsanto trial that swayed the jury to arrive at their “guilty on all counts” verdict. The trial represented the first time this evidence saw the light of day and it proved indefensible for Monsanto’s legal team as The Guardian wrote:
“Monsanto was undone by the words of its own scientists, the damning truth illuminated through the company’s emails, internal strategy reports and other communications.”
Kennedy commented on the gravity and sea change represented by the recent verdict and the groundswell of future legal action lining up by saying:
“Monsanto has been seen, up until this moment…as an untouchable corporation and nobody was able to sue it successfully in a way that really made it think about changing that corporate culture. Thanks to Brent, we now have them on the ropes.”
Monsanto’s next legal Roundup-cancer challenge comes on October 22 in their hometown of St. Louis. In the recent interview, Wisner reasserted his confidence on his legal position for upcoming litigation stating:
“What we have here is about ten percent…there are hundreds of other [discovery] documents way more damning than just these that show just absolute, definitive misconduct by Monsanto.”
https://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/bayer-monsanto-on-the-run-from-coming-tidal-wave-of-evidence-legal-action
A groundbreaking study shows the strong connection between Cell Phone towers and cancer. It’s one of many showing how electromagnetic radiation is harming human health at an exponential rate, and another example of industry trumps science.
Prominence-interpretation theory helps determine what shapes users’ perceptions of a web site’s credibility.
https://www.nngroup.com/articles/prominence-interpretation-theory/
In Brief
The Facts:
Geoengineering (weather modification) is hitting the mainstream hard as a potential response to climate change. Congressional hearings and more are all taking place, but there is evidence to suggest that spraying has already been happening.
Reflect On:
All of the evidence showing it’s been happening for a long time. Are they really spraying to combat climate change, or could there be some other reason these programs are taking place? The article goes into more detail.
Geoengineering is becoming a common term within the mainstream. We’ve covered the topic many times over the past 10 years. The last article we wrote on the topic was about a Harvard Professor explaining how spraying heavy metals in the sky could possibly kill or contribute to the deaths of tens of thousands of people every single year. Prior to that, we wrote about an experiment at MIT where they were going to spray toxic particles into the sky to reflect the sunlight away from Earth, and before that, we covered the then CIA director’s comments regarding his support for Geoengineering. This isn’t a new phenomenon. Discussions about it have been ongoing for a very long time, and there are dozens of examples to choose from when conveying this information to the public.
A Few Examples
Here’s a video of popular physicist Michio Kaku speaking on weather modification.
A United States government document printed at the request of the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in November of 1978 states:
In addition to specific research programs sponsored by Federal agencies, there are other functions related to weather modification which are performed in several places in the executive branch. Various federal advisory panels and committees and their staffs – established to conduct in-depth studies and prepare comprehensive reports, to provide advice or recommendations, or to coordinate Federal weather modification programs – have been housed and supported within executive departments, agencies, or offices.
A 1996 report conducted by top military personnel in the U.S, titled “Weather as a Force Multiplier; Owning the Weather in 2025,” reveals the supposed urgency to implement these programs:
In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.
There is enormous evidence to suggest that these programs have already been operational for years:
“In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.” – World Meteorological Association (source)
The question is, have they really been spraying to combat global warming? And if so, why didn’t they just tell us?
International Community Speaks Out
The international community has spoken out against weather modification. Several global politicians, like Hugo Chavez, have also accused the United States of using weather manipulation for warfare purposes, specifically referencing the Haiti Earthquake.
HRH Princess Basmah Bint Saud said geoengineering is the west’s “weapon of mass destruction.”
So, as you can see, this has been an issue for a while. Unfortunately, it’s doesn’t really become an ‘issue’ until it’s presented within the mainstream. Now, that’s exactly what’s happening.