Was this Deceptive Trade? Paxton v. Moderna

Texas Legislature

Amid ongoing reports concerning the integrity of Big Pharma, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has announced that he plans to investigate companies’ potential manipulation and misrepresentation of Covid vaccine trial data.

Paxton’s investigation centers around Texas’s Deceptive Trade Practice Act according to his announcement to the New York Post. 

Under 17.46(b)(24) of the DPTA, Paxton must answer two questions to determine whether Big Pharma companies acted unlawfully.

1)   Did the company fail to disclose known information concerning its Covid vaccine?

2)   Was that failure intended to induce the public into getting the product?

Alex Berenson’s recent report on Moderna’s vaccine trials provides a case study that indicates affirmative answers to both questions.

The Case Against Moderna

Did Moderna fail to disclose known information concerning its Covid vaccine?

Last week, Berenson reported that Moderna “hid serious side effects” when it published its clinical trial results for the Covid vaccines.

Moderna opened its vaccine (“P201”) trials with 600 volunteers in May 2020 and published its results in February 2021.“No serious adverse effects were observed,” the company boasted at the top of the report. But that was a lie.

“In all, during the placebo-controlled phase of the trial… seven of the 400 healthy volunteers who received a two-shot regimen of Moderna’s vaccine suffered side effects,” Berenson writes. “The problems included a heart attack and two miscarriages. In comparison, the 200 people who received a placebo shot without any mRNA had no serious side effects.”

After the trial ended, more participants came forward with devastating results, including an additional miscarriage and several cardiovascular issues. In total, 14 volunteers reported serious side effects.

The company never issued a public statement disclosing the true results of the trial. As Berenson writes, “The company never updated the Vaccine paper with any of these reports. On December 30, 2022 the federal clinicaltrials.gov website quietly posted final safety data from P201, including all the serious adverse event reports.”

Moderna failed to disclose known information from the trials for 22 months. In the interim, the United States administered over 200 million doses of the Moderna mRNA vaccine while the true results remained concealed. Those 22 months were highly lucrative for the emerging pharmaceutical company.

Was that failure of disclosure tended to induce the public into getting the vaccines?

From the time of Moderna’s Covid vaccine trials in 2020 to the release of the true results at the end of 2022, the company’s revenue increased by over 2,000 percent.

In 2020, Moderna’s total revenue was $800 million. In 2021, Moderna published the “no serious adverse effects” paper, and the company’s revenue skyrocketed to $18.5 billion. Over 95 percent of that revenue came from the Covid vaccine.

In 2022, Moderna made $18.4 billion from the Covid vaccine alone. That year, CEO Stephane Bancel received a $926 million “golden parachute” – 15 percent more than the entire annual revenue of the company before the trial began.

When the true results came out at the end of 2022, it was too late. Millions of Americans had already received Moderna shots and been denied the right to learn the truth about the product they were taking.

Berenson’s report indicates that Paxton has a strong case against Moderna under the DPTA. The company concealed known adverse effects from the product that accounted for 95 percent of its revenue. Meanwhile, the most powerful forces in the country – including the White Housethe news media, and pharmaceutical companies – pushed Americans to get the product by insisting that it was “safe and effective.”

Would pregnant women have been less likely to receive the shots had they known that there was a greater chance of miscarriage? Would men have been less inclined to rush to a vaccine center had they known that the product increased their risk of death from cardiovascular complications? If not, then why would Moderna conceal the information for 22 months while it raked in $40 billion in revenue from Covid vaccines?

Suing vaccine makers is notoriously difficult by design. Alone among private producers, they are indemnified against nearly all harm thanks to government privilege. That makes them mostly off-limits for legal liability from vaccine injuries. Eliminate that provision and the companies would not likely even be in business at all, which tells you all you need to know. However, deceptive claims are a separate issue. Finally we might have here a perfectly crafted legal position to hold these run-amuk companies accountable.

https://brownstone.org/articles/was-this-deceptive-trade-paxton-v-moderna/

New analysis shows statins have “minimal” benefits

Dr Robert Malone writes: My friend and colleague, Dr. Maryanne Demasi has been studying the use of statins for years. She just had her meta analysis published in “JAMA Internal Medicine.” This is an extremely important paper.
The paper’s meta-analysis/review of “21 statin trials involving 143,532 participants, using similar criteria to the CTT, and found no consistent relationship between lowering LDL-C with statins and death, heart attack or stroke.”
There you have it folks.
This paper was published in March, 2023 and main stream media has yet to report on these results.
Could it be that the media receiving billions of dollars from big pharma in revenue for advertising statin drugs has anything to do with that?

New analysis shows statins have “minimal” benefits

By Maryanne Demasi, PhD

The public health mantra about cholesterol has always been “the lower, the better.”

This has been reflected in expert guidelines which have called on doctors to aggressively lower their patient’s ‘bad’ LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) with statin drugs to prevent heart disease.

However, our new analysis published in JAMA Internal Medicine (paywalled) challenges that notion.

Over the years, influential researchers such as the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) at Oxford University, have monopolised the scientific debate on statins.

They have stated that for every 1mmol/L reduction in LDL-C, there is a 21% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular events.

But there are three problems with the various CTT analyses:

1. The CTT researchers have acquired all the individual patient data (raw data) from published trials and will not share them with other researchers, thus preventing independent replication of their results. For this reason, our study used published trial data only.

2. The CTT promotes the view that statins can reduce “cardiovascular events” which is a composite endpoint with inherent problems. It combines objective outcomes such as death, heart attack and stroke (hard endpoints), together with subjective outcomes such as hospital admissions or revascularisations (soft endpoints). The soft endpoints are often based on a doctor’s ‘judgement call’ and therefore subject to bias. In some analyses, these can make up the majority of events so they can skew the overall result towards benefits for the less serious cardiovascular outcomes. To avoid this, we restricted our analysis to hard endpoints only (death, heart attack and stroke), making it less prone to bias.

3. The CTT and public health authorities often promote the benefits of statins in terms of a relative risk reduction (RRR), rather than an absolute risk reduction (ARR). The RRR is a more impressive statistic (demonstrated below) and can mislead the patient into believe the benefits are larger than they are. Therefore, our study reported both the RRR and ARR of statins on cardiovascular outcomes.

What did our analysis find?

We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 statin trials involving 143,532 participants, using similar criteria to the CTT, and found no consistent relationship between lowering LDL-C with statins and death, heart attack or stroke.

Statins are very effective at lowering LDL-C, but in some trials, that did not necessarily translate into a meaningful benefit for the patient.

This contradicts the prevailing view, promoted by the CTT, that there is a strong “linear” relationship between lowering LDL-C and cardiovascular outcomes from statin therapy.

Our analysis also highlighted the significant difference in the relative risk reduction (RRR) and absolute risk reduction (ARR) of statin therapy on death, heart attack and stroke.

For example, if your baseline risk of having a heart attack is 2% and taking a drug reduces that risk to 1%, then in relative terms you halved your risk (50% RRR) which sounds impressive, but in absolute terms, you have only reduced your risk by 1% (ARR).

Our analysis showed that trial participants taking a statin for an average of 4.4 years, showed a 29% RRR in heart attacks, but the ARR was only 1.3%.

If this is not effectively communicated to a patient, can they make a fully informed decision about their treatment?

It may also influence their calculated benefit:harm ratio if the patient is experiencing debilitating effects from the medication.

The graph shows just how deceptive it can be when patients are only told about the benefits of statins in terms of RRR (light blue bars) without the ARR (dark blue bars).

Reporting RRR without baseline risk has been described by experts in risk communication as “the first sin against transparent reporting”.

Selectively reporting the RRR is likely to lead individuals to overestimate the benefit of the drug, it can increases people’s willingness to receive a treatment, advise treatment, and pay to prevent the risk compared with ARR or other methods for communicating risk.

Our analysis combined all statin trials, as well as separated them on the basis of primary prevention (low risk) and secondary prevention (high risk) trials.

The maximum benefit of a statin over the trial period was achieved in people whose risk of heart attack was already very high (secondary prevention); i.e. there was a 2.2% ARR in heart attacks and a 0.9% ARR in deaths in high risk patients.

Remembering too, the vast majority of these trials were sponsored by statin manufacturers, as well as written, designed and analysed by researchers with ties to statin manufacturers.

Some have argued that the benefits may seem minimal in the first few years, but that the benefits may continue to accumulate over the life of the patient – often overlooking that the harms may also accumulate.

Bottom line:

  • JAMA Internal Medicine has published our new systematic review and meta-analysis on 21 statin trials involving 143,532 participants.
  • Despite the widespread view promoted by public health, our new study found no consistent relationship between lowering LDL-C and death, heart attack or stroke, following statin therapy.
  • Doctors are not effectively and transparently communicating cardiovascular risk to their patients, thereby not allowing informed decision-making.
  • We concluded that the benefits of statins were minimal, and most of the trial participants who took statins, derived no clinical benefit.

Do you know why California hasn’t found any deaths linked to the COVID vaccines?

The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) hasn’t investigated any link between the COVID vaccines and death. That’s a violation of California law to look the other way.

Peter Baldridge, former Assistant Chief Counsel of the CDPH, expressly brought this violation to the attention of the head of the department. As you might expect, the CDPH ignored him and did absolutely nothing.

We have proof of this.

Since the California government is not doing it’s job in following the law, I will be filing a writ of mandamus to compel the CDPH to do their job. The California court should also award me attorney fees.

In addition, Mr. Baldridge and I have both made a FOIA request to see the death-vax records; something that no state or world government has ever produced.

One way or another, the truth will be exposed soon for all to see.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-you-know-why-california-hasnt

Treating Minds

Treating Minds

Psychiatry is so destructive it should be banned. Unfortunately, criminals tend to support one another so it is well financed by the government. We need to change that. Shine the light on their criminal conduct where you can, and remember, behind every bad condition will be found a psychiatrist.

In 1947 the then president of the World Federation of Mental Health, Brock Chisholm, said, “The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong are the belated objectives of nearly all Psychotherapy.”

Chisholm further stated that if they were to be successful they needed to infiltrate the professions to introduce their ideas (more correctly called “insanities”) there.

This year is the 76th anniversary of his speech. Looking around at the average intelligence level, morality, ethics and consequent problems with crime, drugs, sexual perversions etc. I’d say the psychiatrists were remarkably successful!

If we as parents and teachers do not instill in our children respect for one another, tolerance for differences, that there is right and wrong, the difference between right and wrong, that actions have consequences and that regardless of what has happened in the past one has the ultimate responsibility for the actions one takes in the present, then we are, by our neglect, cocreating a society where psychiatry’s evil intentions are widely manifest, as is happening at present.

Psychiatry Is NOT Your Friend!

Psychiatry Is NOT Your Friend!

The Collapse Of Civilization

The Collapse Of Civilization

And this to help you move forward:
To Your Success

To Your Success

Psychedelics by Karen Hadley

This is a warning for parents and employers. I’ve just spent several hours researching psychedelic drugs and it is now difficult to find anything negative about these drugs. The media and scientific organizations are singing the praises of psychedelics used for mental health, increased productivity, PTSD, etc. The volume of positive news has overwhelmed the negative information about the dangers of these drugs. Do a Google search for “psychedelic benefits” and you’ll find 2.6 million results. The trend is use of small doses of psychedelics to boost creativity and productivity. This is what your kids and your employees are going to hear about on the grapevine. They are not going to hear about the risks and harm done by drugs like LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, PCP, ketamine and others. Going back 50+ years, I’ve used some of these drugs and I can assure you that any “enlightenment” or “improvement” is fraudulent and does not compare in any way with a true increase in awareness or ability. You won’t hear this from the media, however. Two states have already legalized psychedelics, and several cities have, as well. At the conference I just attended, an expert in workplace drug detection predicted that psychedelics will be the next wave in the workplace. All these media articles, all these “scientific” studies are paving the way to further legalization efforts, I am sure. Help me hold the fort! Educate yourself so you can educate your kids! I also suggest that larger companies check with their attorneys about setting strict policies about drug use at work and drug testing for employees.

On Electricity and Radiation

“A year ago, I was leading a normal, full, active life with no idea of the damage my mobile phone was doing to me. On July 1, 2022, I cancelled my mobile phone service (“cell phone” in the U.S) and turned off the wireless function on my computer as well as the modem. I made these changes at the request of my respected ally and colleague, Arthur Firstenberg. In order to work together I had to experience, first-hand, the shedding of wireless technology, and I had to be willing to “be the change”. It seemed extreme at the time, and as readers may recall, I even cried over the matter before making my final decision. But ten months into this experiment my life is different, and better.

When people ask me if I regret having given up my cell phone, my answer is unequivocally “No”. I don’t miss texting on a phone. I don’t miss GPS. I don’t miss reading news that some news aggregator selected for me. I don’t miss QR codes for this, that and everything else. I do not regret ridding myself of having a cell phone and I would not go back to having one.

I generally feel better… a lot better! Before the wireless purge I was waking up five-six times a night, walking to the bathroom only to urinate minimally and returning to bed; sometimes falling back to sleep, sometimes not. In the weaning off process, I began sleeping better and I now sleep deeply every night and wake up maybe once a night. I also had had chronic stomach aches in the early morning for ten years. Doctors ruled out acid reflux, ulcers, etc. The stomach aches are now gone, entirely. I had frequent nightmares, and I often had headaches upon waking. Those are all gone as well. I wake up happy now instead of lethargic and depressed. Who knew?

My energy level changed noticeably after giving up my phone. I went from long days surrounded by wireless technology which rendered me exhausted, to equally long workdays ending still healthy feeling and still energetic. Now I easily move from the end of the workday to getting on my bicycle or hiking boots and going, rather than languishing due to low energy. This is the primary reason I will not go back to wireless phone or wireless computer. My life, my living is that much better now. I haven’t needed acupuncture for several months. My prana is better. My chi is stronger.

Other things I have noticed: my hair is growing in healthier and I have noticed more new hair growth along my hairline. In my cell phone using days I lost a lot of hair. There was a one-year period, 2016-2017, when I engaged in a lot of high-stress work and carried two cell phones at the time. I lost about one third of the hair on my head during that period and my hair greyed at a rate faster than I had previously seen. At the time I believed that it was simply stress which caused my hair loss. Now, I see it differently. I believe it was the result of having two cellphones near me and in operation at nearly all times. Two cellphones in close proximity produce a tremendous amount of toxic, I call them “slow death”, microwaves, though in truth, for many people they are “fast death” microwaves; those causing cardiac events, for instance. My body reacted to all the radiation. My cells coped, but poorly. I am experiencing a recovery now. My weight has normalized, which would be expected if my cells are now functioning better.

Once I began weaning myself off the cellphone, prior to shutting off my service altogether, I only powered it on rarely. When I began that process, I noticed that when I looked at the screen while powering on the phone, I felt quick and sharp pains in my face. They were subtle, but obvious, something like invisible low-pain darts hitting my face. I had never before felt these pains. I only felt them when I used the phone and only very briefly. I took that as a warning and further reason to get rid of the phone. I have not felt those pains again since except when the Bluetooth was accidentally turned back on in my computer for a few weeks — a few weeks during which my vision deteriorated for no reason that I could fathom until I realized the Bluetooth was on. I turned it off immediately and make sure that it is off every morning when I boot up.

The immediate effects from wireless are not noticed by most of us who have become accustomed to the damage microwave radiation is doing to us. Decreased health and vitality — and increased diseases and demand for medications — is thought of as “normal”. When I was carrying two cell phones I did not “feel” the effects they were having on my body. I didn’t “feel” my mitochondria. I didn’t “feel” cell death. I didn’t relate the deterioration of my body to my use of devices. But that is what was happening. I was aging myself prematurely, unknowingly.

Before I cancelled my service, I spent two months deeply researching the effects of electromagnetic radiation on living beings. I read peer-reviewed studies, books, reports from scientists around the world, and more. I found references to thousands of such studies, both recent and dating back decades. I read Arthur’s book, The Invisible Rainbow, and the compelling history of the dangers of wireless technology as well as electricity, and their deadly effect on living organisms.

I am reminded in this moment that two of the most intelligent, and youthful “senior” (they don’t seem senior) people I know do not own a cellphone and swore them off years and years ago. This cannot be an accident. These are the only other two adults I personally know at the time of this writing who do not own a cell phone, aside from the many kind folks who have contacted me via the Cellular Phone Task Force. They are exceptionally “alive” people.

A few weeks ago I discovered that a dear friend was living in a home riddled with RF radiation. This friend and I watch out for each other. He is almost 80 years of age and was formerly enthusiastic about tech and a big consumer of it. I believed that he had checked his home thoroughly with an RF meter last year and that his home was relatively safe. Just to be sure, I thought I better check.

I was shocked to see my RF meter flashing red, meaning “evacuate the area at once”, in his bedroom and in his office where he spends roughly three quarters of his life. The source of the incredibly high levels of radiation? Three cordless phones distributed around the home, a printer with a built-in wireless/Bluetooth connection, a modem which was mistakenly believed to have had the wireless function turned off, a state-of-the-art desktop PC which even though plugged into the Ethernet with the WiFi turned off was emitting like crazy because the Bluetooth was on. He and his three cats were bathed in radiation in their own home, which reminds me to point out that radiation from home devices, and associated illnesses and extinctions, are becoming more insidious, not less, still.

His wife died from complications (a fall) from advanced Parkinson’s disease. There was never an explanation given by any doctor for what caused the progressive Parkinson’s leading to her death. She was heavily irradiated in her home, which was the above scenario, plus two additional cell phones, and two additional PCs using wireless. She could not overcome the dense radiation in her home, where she also worked and taught piano. My friend, a man with obviously strong genes, was barely overcoming it; sleeping with a CPAP machine for sleep apnea while living in the midst of off-the-charts radiation. He was moving around his life in something of a zombie state. I witnessed it. This is when I met him. He often had trouble initiating walking, though he was perfectly able to walk. Often, I observe this semi-zombified state in people around me.

Even his indoor cats seemed neurotic, with patches of hair loss and various acting out of the norm. I look forward to seeing them improve now that the radiation is being brought to below “need to evacuate” levels after 20+ years of increasing radiation. They will all enjoy drastic improvements.

Another experience which reinforced my certainty about what wireless technology is doing to the world was my trip to the COP 27 in Egypt last November, where the entire grounds of the convention center were heavily irradiated at all times. My RF meter flashed red in every nook and cranny of the convention center where numerous cell towers lorded overhead disguised as palm trees. The out-of-doors was equally irradiated and essentially everywhere every person was on a cell phone at almost all times, partly because no conference information was made available on paper, not even maps of the intricate multi-facility conference grounds. It was estimated that over 40,000 people were present.

Sharm El-Sheikh is a modern tourist town where landlines are nowhere an option. The condominium complex where I stayed had wireless connections throughout and my housemates of course had their cell phones. Due to being heavily irradiated, I did not sleep for four nights upon my arrival and was subsequently placed in hospital, very depleted, where I required IV fluids and sedatives. Interestingly, the doctor’s four different sedatives did not work, which I can only attribute to the extremely high level of radiation at the hospital, because normally I am highly sensitive to medication. Again, the “evacuate at once” red flashing light on my RF meter. With some chagrin, when my legs began involuntarily spasming I left the hospital AMA (against medical advice), much to the physician’s displeasure. I did my best to smooth things over and finally slept on the fifth night at the condominium thanks to my kind housemate’s Melatonin and a space in the bedroom I identified with lower radiation.

There was a near total absence of birds at this the southernmost tip of the Sinai Peninsula, even though it was migration season. I saw a few flocks fly past out on the Red Sea, but not more than a dozen birds on shore and inland during the two weeks I was visiting. Birds simply are few there, despite plentiful palm trees and flowering shrubs. There was an unsettling quiet all around. Fortunately, a plentiful array of tropical fish still inhabit the sea there.

It was a tremendous relief to get back to the safety of my home where I resumed my journey to health and vitality again.

I gave up my cell phone and wireless service for a number of reasons, three of those being:
the preservation of my life and health, and that of my pets
the preservation of the creatures that keep this planet, my garden, and the refuges where I hike, lively, abundant and habitable
and concern for the survival of all species.

Removing radiation in the home is like shaking off a debilitating disease. It has made for the restoration of a more beautiful and graceful life, one I thought I had simply lost. I am again feeling well and sleeping well. I am no longer damaging brain cells, destroying my blood brain barrier, or endangering my mitochondria; all things which compromise our wellbeing and what is needed for longevity and happiness.

In addition to being healthier, I am also freer now. My living is less interrupted by alerts and rings, many of which, in retrospect were superfluous. My friends and colleagues still matter to me every bit as much as they did before. Perhaps they matter more as my life has simplified. My time with them today is richer and feels better because I feel better. My social life improved qualitatively. I care for my friends and associates near and far and I sense they still care for me equally. Not carrying a cell phone has not changed that reality nor my ability to access life and love.

Having detached from the news aggregator which I previously used frequently on my phone has also improved my life. The news aggregator was informative, yes, but heavily propagandized like most news today; essentially an echo chamber endlessly looping propaganda at me. I am glad to be free of that. I am no longer bombarded by upsetting and intrusive hyped news all day long. I pick up news here and there. I am less propagandized. I feel less propagandized, and freer.

Desperately, my colleagues and I want the extinction of species to stop. I am thrilled by the birds and insects that make this planet productive. I have already envisioned a planet with the numbers of birds and insects returned. It is suspected that radiation is responsible for “half or more” of the species lost in the Seventh Mass Extinction which is ongoing. My garden is visited by relatively few birds and even fewer butterflies; just a few moth species. I saw some juvenile praying mantises last spring but never saw a single adult. Even worms are few. Climate change, pesticides and deforestation are factors, but radiation is a larger, more destructive factor, not smaller. Most of the world is downplaying, ignoring and even suppressing the destructive role of radiation as regards extinction.
Thanks to insights from the researcher Diana Kordas on the Greek island of Samos, I have come to understand that while I make choices around my personal use of deadly wireless technology, beyond my little bubble are all the creatures who have no say in a matter which is about life and death. Quite possibly their entire species are being irradiated to extinction by man-made wireless technology. I have a choice; they do not. Like on Samos, there are distressingly few signs of living animal creatures in my local mountains. There are increasingly fewer places to which they can escape from cell towers, cell phones and the like, and in many instances, no place at all. Hence extinction.

Tonight is a cool spring night in the high desert of the southwest U.S. It is quiet outside. The city where I live is not a typical bustling wealthy American city and I suspect most people are at home, perhaps at rest. Home, generally the place to which we go for safety and warmth. I wonder, as we are nestled here in our respective retreats, “Is home a place of safety anymore? Has home become as dangerous or more than the streets of a high-crime city?”. Consider nearly every home and public place in developed countries and beyond has at least one modem emitting deadly EMFs day and night, and one or more cell phones. Add to that a smart meter (wireless utility meters affixed to homes), perhaps a baby monitor, and all other sorts of other wireless gadgets.

My house is a haven and I am safer here, as are my pets. I fear for their well-being but know that they are protected here, at least. Even my dear neighbor’s new cat has chosen my home, which measures as far safer than the home where he is meant to be living. At least I can provide a haven for these few and for myself. I am much relieved that my pets are more safe, not less in my home.

A month after my return from Egypt, the subject line for one of the world’s most circulated newspapers, a popular U.S. publication, read: “The Morning: a happier new year, develop stronger relationships in 2023”. The first paragraph: “For over 80 years, researchers at Harvard have studied what makes for a good life. They found one surefire, scientifically proven predictor of happiness: developing warmer relationships.” The publication went on to say, “What emerged is that a crucial element of happiness is relationships.” One might question, what about those of us who have highly developed, ongoing warm relationships and relative happiness? What would be the challenge for us in 2023?

I am a big fan of warm relationships. If I am going to fry I would prefer to do so in the arms of a beloved. But let’s be clear, in the current dire state of what we, the living beings on Earth, are faced with, love is not enough. Warm relationships cannot reverse utter cell destruction and death from radiation. We here at the Cellular Phone Task Force will be much more optimistic on January 1 of next year if a headline were to read, “The Morning: a happier new year, cell towers being removed worldwide in 2024 as cell phone ownership declines and world leaders declare microwave radiation destroying the health of all species”.

There is no lasting happiness without health, according to the ancient medical system of Ayurveda. And health is becoming more and more elusive on this planet as every day a web of deadly radiation more densely blankets our planet; our home, Earth. There are scientists studying the effects of electromagnetic fields and radiation who predict humanity will only survive two more years on the planet due to radiation. There are many more scientists flagrantly ignoring this possibility altogether.

It is not unreasonable to conclude that in this current world of destructive microwave radiation “safety” is no longer a reality anywhere. I have relatively low electromagnetic frequencies in my home because of the precautions I have taken and I have walls built of mud bricks, which helps. But my home is not entirely safe and won’t be as long as wireless technology dominates and destroys our planet. We at the Cellular Phone Task Force encourage you and your families to join us by “being the change”.

Here is a short list of our top reasons to ditch your cell phone and other wireless devices:
Protect your health and happiness, including your brain, and minimize your need for medical intervention.
Protect your children’s happiness and their development, especially their brains.
Preserve your youth.
Protect your pets.
Protect your surroundings and gardens; pollinators, soils, plants, neighbors, wildlife.
Preserve species from extinction.
Preserve life on the planet.

Kathleen Burke is the executive assistant to Arthur Firstenberg, celebrated American scientist, anti-wireless activist, and author of the internationally acclaimed The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (AGB Press 2017; Chelsea Green Publishing 2020) published in ten languages, as well as Microwaving Our Planet: The Environmental Impact of the Wireless Revolution (Cellular Phone Task Force 1996 and 1997) and president of the Cellular Phone Task Force. She authored the paper “How to Break Up with Your Cell Phone” (Cellular Phone Task Force 2022).

Kathleen is a gardener, hiker, and practitioner of Ayurveda in the US desert Southwest where she resides. She holds a certificate in Ayurvedic Medicine from the Ayurvedic Institute, Dr. Vasant Lad, BAMS. For reasons of personal health and the environment, Kathleen permanently gave up her mobile phone and ended her use of wireless devices in June, 2022 and has never regretted it. She can be reached at kathleenmariaburke@yahoo.com.

Post Jab Increase In Retinal Vascular Occlusion

Post Jab Increase In Retinal Vascular Occlusion

Post Jab Increase In Retinal Vascular Occlusion

April 13, 2021 I posted here https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=32377 that Stephanie Seneff had identified at least 10 different ways the Covid injectables harmed human systems. I later amended that article to her updated count of 40 different human systems the injectables harmed.

Here is data on one of which you may not be aware.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00661-7

Update From My Brussels Talk At The EU Parliament by Jason Christoff

40 doctors, scientists and researchers all provided jaw dropping testimony at the EU Parliament this week on May 4th. This event was put on by The International COVID Summit in coordination with 5 prominent EU Parliament members. The goal of the day was to provide the cited research, documentation and data that proves that the entire COVID narrative was a complete fabrication and a prime example of what’s called 5th Generation Warfare. You can watch the entire day’s event if you wish right now, by clicking here. My talk is very short (as I designed it to be) and it begins at the 2 hour and 43-minute mark. They are also making separate video talks, for each speaker. I’ll delivery that page at a later date.

8 Things I Learned During My Trip To The EU Parliament

1. The fake wars, organized by the cabal, specifically to destroy the strong cultural base of EU nation states with forced migration…is very advanced in the city of Brussels. Most migration falls in this category today. This forced migration is part and parcel of the 5th Generation warfare model being used to destroy the cultural rigidity of conventional Anglo strong holds in the EU and around the world. Yes, unfortunately they’re not bringing in migrants for altruistic reasons.

2. The truth movement is under a very common form of mind control, which is common in most humans. That common mind control program is division and conflict. Here’s an example. David Martin (who spoke first at the EU Parliament) and most others there, believe whole heartedly in viruses. This triggers some people in the truth movement now to shut down and attack them. If you listen to David Martin’s speech, there is more than enough common ground (relating to the government being corrupt, trying to kill everyone, the need for freedom etc) to see that he’s on the front lines fighting in the right area, direction, vector etc. This division is spurring attacks from within now, simply because attack and conflict is a very prolific background mind control program littered throughout most media today. If freedom loving people can’t recognize the common ground here (that government is our collective enemy) the truth movement will continue to attack and eat itself from the inside. Mikki Willis talks about the truth movement going “self-destructive” in this video. Listen to David’s speech by clicking here. He’s the first speaker. Judge for yourself.

3. I learned that this injection is much worse than I’ve ever reported. What I heard directly from these 40 presenters had me uttering several WTF’s to myself, many times during their talks.

4. I learned that “SPIKE protein” (the protein that the injection ingredients trick the body into making) is actually a poison and that the makers of the shot list the SPIKE as toxic to human health. The people who made the shots also list that the mRNA platform (that does the tricking) isn’t approved for use on humans or animals. Yes, what was injected into billions of people isn’t approved for use on humans or animals because it has destroyed test animals, who were injected throughout prior decades.

5. So just to be clear, the ingredients in the shot vials trick the body into constantly making poisonous SPIKE, thus turning the body’s own systems into a poison production factory. Everyone’s cells produce different amounts of the toxic SPIKE, depending on the different loads injected into them or different loads of ingredients in their particular injection(s).

5. I learned that the mRNA platform, which tricks the body to produce toxic SPIKE, can also get the body to produce other dangerous proteins as well. That’s why other proteins WERE NEVER supposed to be in the shots (theortically) but they’ve found hundreds of other proteins in the shots. (because they’re designed to kill IMO) Those toxic proteins also then start getting produced en masse in the body and those proteins cause cancer, brain damage, infertility and hundreds of other diseases.

6.

7. I learned that the protein production mechanisms in the shot, designed to screw up how the body works on a cellular level, can cause brain proteins to “fold incorrectly” causing a slow/soft kill form of brain damage, dementia, Parkinsons etc. I believe I’m starting to see this in some of my friends who took the shot.

8. Almost everything I’ve talked about above (and tons more) were all known either before the shot was released on the public or within the first couple of months after roll out……yet the government and media continued to lie to the public because this is 5th Generation Warfare, and the public is actually marked as the enemy to be removed. (IMO)

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/fluoride-report-or-systematic-review-of-the-science-or-may-4-or-12-30pm-et/fluoride-report-systematic-review-of-the-science-may-4/