Sins Against Children

At long last, media censorship of the scientific debate during the covid-19 pandemic has become undeniable. Censoring portrayed an illusion of consensus and intimidated scientifically valid disagreement. Policymakers and citizens were deceived by those suffocating scientific data and perspectives on risk, mitigation effectiveness, biological immunity, lockdowns, and especially the impacts of covid and the policies themselves on children.

Perhaps censorship explains why the standard recommendations fifteen years prior to this pandemic remain unknown to the public. Henderson’s 2006 classic review clearly stated two related, but separate, conclusions: lockdowns were not effective, and lockdowns were extremely harmful, including: “Closing schools for longer periods (greater than ten to fourteen days at the beginning of an epidemic) in hopes of mitigating the epidemic by decreasing contacts among students is not warranted”; “There are no historical observations or scientific studies that support the confinement by quarantine of groups of possibly infected people for extended periods”; and “The negative consequences of large-scale quarantine are so extreme . . . that this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration.”

All honest leaders, all individuals with integrity, should acknowledge that people were directly damaged and even died from the censorship of truth.

https://newcriterion.com/print/post/12993

MD Speaks Out: Here’s How Vaccine Pseudoscience Destroys Our Children

Jim Meehan MD

“You cannot be pro-science and be pro-vaccine. Vaccine science is pseudoscience. Vaccine science is tobacco science 2.0. Vaccine science is full of fraud, corruption, and deception. The industries, agencies, and people that promote vaccine pseudoscience as justification for unjustifiable subversion of human rights must confront the reality that they have gone too far. Their desperate attempts to coerce and mandate vaccines betrays the illegitimacy of their science. Time to bring an end to this intolerable attempt to have their way with our children. It is time to form the line across which they will not pass. We are our children’s last line of defense.

“I became an ex-vaxxer and vaccine skeptic because as a physician, scientist, and former editor of a medical journal I can clearly see the fraudulent research methodologies, lack of placebo controls, and ridiculously short adverse event observation periods, for exactly what they are – the deceptive techniques of criminal corporations that care nothing about public health and everything about corporate earnings.”

“No physician or scientist that bothers to look below the surface of the vaccine research, understands the limitations of the weak research methodologies being employed,…can support [vax science]. Unfortunately, few look below the surface. Most only read the headlines and conclusions of journal articles, never realizing how they are being progressively deceived and indoctrinated by misrepresentations and marketing messages that have nothing to do with real science.”

https://stopmandatoryvaccination.substack.com/p/md-speaks-out-heres-how-vaccine-pseudoscience

Will 2023 be a “Tsunami of Regret”? Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Predicts the Worst is Yet to Come with the Fallout from the COVID Shots

Drs Ruby and Tenpenny

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is someone whose work we have featured here at Health Impact News for the past 11 years. She is a doctor of Osteopathy, and has been a fierce vaccine critic for decades now. Sherri is not one of these talking head medical doctors who have risen to fame since the experimental COVID bioweapon shots were introduced at the end of 2020, simply because they have taken a political stand against some the criminal aspects of the COVID shots. Most of these new talking head doctors and other “experts” still promote all the other toxic and dangerous vaccines that the CDC recommends, and many of them also still recommend the COVID shots for certain age groups, while not recommending them for others. Some of these new “experts,” have even publicly admitted they were fooled by the propaganda, and initially took a COVID shot before realizing how bad they were. Dr. Jane Ruby’s recent interview with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny provides great information. Dr. Tenpenny is a true expert on this topic, having understood the dangers of vaccines long before the COVID-19 bioweapon shot appeared. She is not new to this topic, and so I highly recommend watching this video as they summarize where we are today with the COVID-19 shots, and what is likely coming in the future as we head into 2023. Dr. Tenpenny believes we are just at the beginning of the wave of deaths and disabilities that are going to result in people who have taken the COVID-19 shots.

https://campaigns.healthimpactnews.com/email/view/63ac489775e1a629273077

CDC Principles to Avoid Wrong-Speak

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has come out with a guide for how we are all to speak and write. This can be found on the website titled, “Preferred Terms for Select Population Groups & Communities.” It is clear that this list is being read and distributed broadly – from medical institutions, hospitals, scientific communications, doctor’s offices, schools and universities, as well as other US Government agencies and institutes.

According to the CDC, we are no longer to use the word “smoker,” as it might offend those who smoke.

Yet, here are images from the CDC website – using the word “smoker”. In fact, they even have a registered trademark for the phase: Tips From Former Smokers®

So, please folks – don’t do like the CDC. The proper term is “people who smoke.” We wouldn’t want to offend smokers…

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/cdc-principles-to-avoid-wrong-speak

Rules Of War

Rules Of War

The WEF trained leaders in our governments would not be guilty of using these factors in waging war against their own people to forward the stated population reduction agenda of those behind the WEF to solve a sham climate crisis. Don’t be ridiculous!

When You Realize

When You Realize

What we commonly call reality is a composite or agreed upon reality. At the most reductionist level, you and I are only doing what we are doing because we are not choosing to do something else. For instance if you and I decided this society was so far gone it was doomed and we needed to gather people and create a new one, we would be doing that and creating a new paradigm, a la Buckminster Fuller. (Don’t try to alter the current paradigm, create a new one.)