Month: May 2021

Hippocratic Oath 400 BC

First, do no harm.

Magna Carta June 15 1215

is famous around the world as the foundation stone of constitutional and parliamentary government.

39 No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.

Any fine, reduction in capacity to conduct business, move freely or any other restriction of rights without a trial by a jury of his peers violates the freedoms granted by Magna Carta.

~~~~~~~~~~

The Australian Constitution

The Australian Constitution has properly been described as ‘the birth certificate of a nation’. It also provides the basic rules for the government of Australia.

Indeed, the Constitution is the fundamental law of Australia binding everybody including the Commonwealth Parliament and the Parliament of each State. Accordingly, even an Act passed by a Parliament is invalid if it is contrary to the Constitution.
https://ausconstitution.peo.gov.au/

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – SECT 51
In 1946, directly after World War II, the Australian Constitution was expanded by the addition of Section 51.

Legislative powers of the Parliament

The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:

Section 51
(xxiiiA) the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances;
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s51.html

Perhaps with the very recent memory of the medical atrocities commited by the German Nazis, and in the same flavour as the Nuremberg Code, formulated a mere 3 years later, the rights of hte Federal Government were specifically restricted regarding the enforcement of medical and dental services.

Here is an informative video on the subject.

Constitutional Guarantee, and Section 51.23a of the Australian Constitution, featuring Darren Dixon

Remember Sction 51.23a of the Australian Constitution.

No form of medical procedure may be forced upon you without your consent.

Constitutional Guarantee, and Section 51.23a of the Australian Constitution, featuring Darren Dixon

~~~~~~~~~~

The Geneva Convention 1949

In addition to the incorrect tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself violates Article 32 of the Geneva Convention.

Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not required for the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited.

According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a serious breach of the Convention.

~~~~~~~~~~

The Nuremberg Code 1949

The “experimental” COVID shot violates all 10 Nuremberg codes – which carry the death penalty for those who try to break these international laws.

1) Provides immunity to the virus

This is a “leaky” gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims that they reduce the symptoms, but double-vaccinated are now 60% of patients who need ER or ICU with covid infections.

2) Protects the recipients from getting the virus

This gene therapy does not provide immunity and the double vaccine can still catch and spread the virus.

3) Reduces deaths due to viral infection

This gene therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-vaccinated people infected with Covid have also died.

4) Reduces the circulation of the virus

This gene therapy still allows the virus to spread because it gives zero immunity to the virus.

5) Reduces the transmission of the virus

This gene therapy still allows transmission of the virus because it does not confer immunity to the virus.

The following violations of the Nuremberg Code apply:

Nuremberg Code # 1: Voluntary consent is important

No person should be forced to take a medical experiment without informed consent.

Many media, political and non-medical people urge people to take the injection.

They do not provide information about the negative effects or dangers of this gene therapy. All you hear from them is – “safe and effective” and “the benefits outweigh the risks.”

Countries use blockades, coercion and threats to force people to take this vaccine or are banned from participating in free society under the mandate of a vaccine pass or Green Pass.

During the Nuremberg trials, the media were also prosecuted and members were killed for lying to the public, along with many of the doctors and Nazis found guilty of crimes against humanity.

Nuremberg Code # 2: Yields with fruitful results that cannot be produced by other means

As mentioned above, gene therapy does not meet the criteria for a vaccine and does not offer immunity to the virus. There are other medical treatments that give fruitful results against Covid, such as Ivermectin, vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc and strengthened immune system for flu and colds.

Nuremberg Code # 3: Basic experiments as a result of animal experiments and natural history disease

This gene therapy skipped animal experiments and went directly to human experiments.

In mRNA research used by Pfizer – a candidate study on mRNA with rhesus macaques monkeys using BNT162b2 mRNA and in that study all monkeys developed pneumonia but the researchers considered the risk low because these were young healthy monkeys from 2-4 years of age.

Israel has used Pfizer and the International Court of Justice has accepted a requirement that 80% of recipients with pneumonia should be injected with this gene therapy.

Despite this alarming development, Pfizer continued to develop its mRNA for Covid, without animal testing.

Nuremberg Code # 4: Avoid all unnecessary suffering and injury

Since the launch of the experiment and listed under the CDC VAERS reporting system, over 4,000 deaths and 50,000 vaccine injuries have been reported in the United States. In the EU, more than 7,000 deaths and 365,000 vaccine injuries have been reported. This is a serious violation of this code.

Nuremberg Code # 5: No experiment should be performed if there is reason to believe that injury or death will occur

See No. 4, based on fact-based medical data, this gene therapy causes death and injury. Previous research on mRNA also shows several risks that have been ignored for this current experimental gene experiment. A 2002 study of SARS-CoV-1 nail proteins showed that they cause inflammation, immunopathology, blood clots and inhibit Angiotensin 2 expression. This experiment forces the body to produce this nail protein that inherits all these risks.

Nuremberg Code # 6: The risk should never exceed the benefit

Covid-19 has a recovery rate of 98-99%. Vaccine damage, death, and adverse side effects of mRNA gene therapy far outweigh this risk.

The use of “leaky” vaccines was banned for agricultural use by the US and the EU due to the Marek Chicken study which shows “hot viruses” and variants appear… make the disease even more deadly.

Nevertheless, this has been ignored for human use by the CDC aware that the risk of new, more deadly variants arises from leaky vaccinations. The CDC is fully aware that the use of leaky vaccines facilitates the emergence of hotter (more deadly) strains. Yet they have ignored this when it comes to humans

Nuremberg Code # 7: Preparations must be made for even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death

No preparations were made. This gene therapy skipped animal experiments. The pharmaceutical companies’ own clinical phase 3 studies will not end until 2022/2023. These vaccines were approved in an emergency

Use only action to force on a misinformed public. They are NOT FDA approved.

Nuremberg Code # 8: Experiments must be carried out by scientifically qualified persons

Politicians, the media and actors who claim that this is a safe and effective vaccine are not qualified. Propaganda is not medical science.

Many stores such as Walmart & drive-through vaccine centers are not qualified to administer experimental medical gene therapies to the uninformed public.

Nuremberg Code # 9: Everyone must have the freedom to end the experiment at any time

Despite the call from over 85,000 doctors, nurses, virologists and epidemiologists – the experiment does not end. In fact, there are currently many attempts to change laws to enforce vaccine compliance.

This includes mandatory and mandatory vaccinations. Experimental “sprayers” are planned every six months without using the growing number of deaths and injuries already caused by this experiment.

These update images will be administered without any clinical trials. Hopefully, this new Nuremberg trial will put an end to this crime against humanity.

Nuremberg Code # 10: The researcher must terminate the experiment at any time if there is a probable cause for injury or death

It is clear from statistical reporting data that this experiment leads to death and injury. But not all politicians, pharmaceutical companies and so-called experts make any attempt to stop this gene therapy experiment from harming a misinformed public.

Legal proceedings are progressing, evidence has been gathered and a large growing group of experts is sounding the alarm.

~~~~~~~~~~

The Universal Declartion on Medical Bioethics and Human Rights

Another basic document is the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
From https://en.unesco.org/themes/ethics-science-and-technology/bioethicsand-human-rights I quote: “States have a special responsibility not only with respect to bioethical reflection but also in the drafting of any legislation that may follow. In the field of bioethics, whilst many States have framed laws and regulations aimed at protecting human dignity and human rights and freedoms, many other countries wish to establish benchmarks and sometimes lack the means to do so.”
The full text of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (available at: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.phpURL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html) contains the following:

Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

At ANY time these preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical interventions are mandated, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights is being violated!

At ANY time people are coerced or disadvantaged by not agreeing to a preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights is being violated!

A mask is a preventative medical intervention.
A COVID test is a diagnostic medical intervention.
Social distancing is a preventative medical intervention.
Lockdowns are a preventative medical intervention.
Border closures are a preventative medical intervention.
A vaccination is a preventative medical intervention.
The administration of a drug or chemotherapy is a therapeutic medical intervention.

~~~~~~~~~~

The United Nations Declaration on Human Rights

Most governments have signed the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights.
These 30 Human Rights were expressly crafted to prevent tyranny. Two principles therein are freedom of thought and expression.

Human Rights Video #18: Freedom of Thought

Human Rights Video #19: Freedom of Expression

Despite this the Australian Federal government bars medical professionals from speaking truth if it does not align with their official stance. This is a direct violation of a doctor’s human rights let alone their professional obligation to do what they observe to be best for their patient per the Hippocratic Oath.

Despite this the Queensland government has barred the use of drugs proven overseas the be highly efficacious at preventing death from COVID-19.

~~~~~~~~~~

The Declaration of Helsinki

Preamble
1. The World Medical Association (WMA) has developed the Declaration of Helsinki as a statement of ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, including research on identifiable human material and data.

The Declaration is intended to be read as a whole and each of its constituent paragraphs should be applied with consideration of all other relevant paragraphs.

2. Consistent with the mandate of the WMA, the Declaration is addressed primarily to physicians. The WMA encourages others who are involved in medical research involving human subjects to adopt these principles.

General Principles
3. The Declaration of Geneva of the WMA binds the physician with the words, “The health of my patient will be my first consideration,” and the International Code of Medical Ethics declares that, “A physician shall act in the patient’s best interest when providing medical care.”

4. It is the duty of the physician to promote and safeguard the health, well-being and rights of patients, including those who are involved in medical research. The physician’s knowledge and conscience are dedicated to the fulfilment of this duty.

5. Medical progress is based on research that ultimately must include studies involving human subjects.

6. The primary purpose of medical research involving human subjects is to understand the causes, development and effects of diseases and improve preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions (methods, procedures and treatments). Even the best proven interventions must be evaluated continually through research for their safety, effectiveness, efficiency, accessibility and quality.

A) The COVID shot is an experimental gene therapy, the risks and dangers of which are not being fully explained to the recipients.

B) An experimental gene therapy is neither the best nor a proven medical intervention when Ivermection has an 89% success rate of curing of those infected with COVID-19 and Hydroxychloroquine has a similar or better outstandingly successful result according to treating doctors.

~~~~~~~~~~

Background to the new Nuremberg Trials 2021:

A large team of more than 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, has initiated legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO and the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.

Fuellmich and his team present the incorrect PCR test and the order for doctors to describe any comorbidity death as a Covid death – as fraud.

The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% inaccurate at 35 cycles. All PCR tests monitored by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC acknowledges that tests over 28 cycles are not allowed for a positive reliable result.

This invalidates over 90% of the alleged Covid cases / “infections” detected by the use of this incorrect test.

On Sunday the 16th May I spent a couple of hours on the phone to two mothers concerned about the their children getting the COVID shot. I told them all the best data I had come across was on my blog, do a search and read the articles.

I thought about that then I realised I post so much it was like throwing them a life jacket and expecting them to swim to the side the the boat and haul themselves up.

So I spent a couple of hours and pulled this together. Please feel free to use it as you see fit with anyone not 100% convinced that the jab would be one of the worst things they could do to their body.

If you have an article or video you think should be here, let me know.

The next article I post, COVID-19 – The Legalities, will hopefully arm you with sufficient understanding of your legal rights to help you out of any coercion or enforcement of unwanted medical interventions or treatments.

~~~~~~~~~~

The mRNA Backstory

No mRNA vaccine has ever made it to market. Earlier attempts did not even pass testing.

There have been many attempts to make viral vaccines in the past that ended in utter failure, which is why we did not have a coronavirus vaccine in 2020. In the 1960s, scientists attempted to make an RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) vaccine for infants. In that study,21 they skipped animal trials because they weren’t necessary back then.

In the end, the vaccinated infants got much sicker than the unvaccinated infants when exposed to the virus in nature, with 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization, and two of them died.22

After 2000, scientists made many attempts to create coronavirus vaccines. For the past 20 years, all ended in failure because the animals in the clinical trials got very sick and many died, just like the children in the 1960s. You can read a summary of this history/science here.23 Or, if you want to read the individual studies you can check out these links:

In 2004, attempted vaccine produced hepatitis in ferrets.24
In 2005, mice25 and civets26 became sick and more susceptible to coronaviruses after being vaccinated.
In 2012, the ferrets27 became sick and died. And in this study28 mice and ferrets developed lung disease.
In 2016, this study29 also produce lung disease in mice.
The typical pattern in the studies mentioned above is that the children and the animals produced beautiful antibody responses after being vaccinated. The manufacturers thought they hit the jackpot. The problem came when the children and animals were exposed to the wild version of the virus.

When that happened, an unexplained phenomenon30 called antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), also known as vaccine enhanced disease31 (VED), occurred where the immune system produced a “cytokine storm”32 (i.e., overwhelmingly attacked the body), and the children/animals died. Here’s the lingering issue.

The vaccine makers have no data to suggest their rushed vaccines have overcome that problem. In other words, never before has any attempt to make a coronavirus vaccine been successful, nor has the gene-therapy technology that is mRNA “vaccines” been safely brought to market but, hey, since they had billions of dollars33 in government funding, I’m sure they figured that out. Except they don’t know if they have.

21 Nature October 16, 2020
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-020-00462-y#Sec11
22 Nature October 16, 2020
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-020-00462-y#Sec11
23 Frontiers in Microbiology December 5, 2018
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02991/full
24 J Virol. 2004 Nov; 78(22): 12672–12676
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC525089/
25 Nature January 10, 2005
https://www.nature.com/news/2005/050110/full/050110-3.html#ref-CR1
26 PNAS January 18, 2005
https://www.pnas.org/content/102/3/797
27 PLoS One. 2012; 7(4): e35421
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/
28 PLoS One. 2012; 7(4): e35421
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/
29 Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics June 7, 2016
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2016.1177688?scroll=top&needAccess=true
30 Science February 13, 2004
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/303/5660/944.abstract
31 The Defender December 10, 2020

Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trial Shows Alarming Evidence of Pathogenic Priming in Older Adults

32 The Defender February 19, 2021

Are We on the Verge of a ‘Super-Epidemic’ of Autoimmune Diseases?

33 CDC April 6, 2021
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p0407-covid-19-vaccine-programs.html

~~~~~~~~~~

The Rush

Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a coronavirus vaccine now would be ‘colossally stupid’

Vaccine experts are warning the federal government against rushing out a coronavirus vaccine before testing has shown it’s both safe and effective. Decades of history show why they’re right.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/01/health/eua-coronavirus-vaccine-history/index.html

57 Top Scientists And Doctors Release Shocking Study On COVID Vaccines And Demand Immediate Stop to ALL Vaccinations

Since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak, the race for testing new platforms designed to confer immunity against SARS-CoV-2, has been rampant and unprecedented, leading to emergency authorization of various vaccines. Despite progress on early multidrug therapy for COVID-19 patients, the current mandate is to immunize the world population as quickly as possible. The lack of thorough testing in animals prior to clinical trials, and authorization based on safety data generated during trials that lasted less than 3.5 months, raise questions regarding the safety of these vaccines. The recently identified role of SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein Spike for inducing endothelial damage characteristic of COVID-19, even in absence of infection, is extremely relevant given that most of the authorized vaccines induce the production of Spike glycoprotein in the recipients. Given the high rate of occurrence of adverse effects, and the wide range of types of adverse effects that have been reported to date, as well as the potential for vaccine-driven disease enhancement, Th2-immunopathology, autoimmunity, and immune evasion, there is a need for a better understanding of the benefits and risks of mass vaccination, particularly in the groups that were excluded in the clinical trials. Despite calls for caution, the risks of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been minimized or ignored by health organizations and government authorities. We appeal to the need for a pluralistic dialogue in the context of health policies, emphasizing critical questions that require urgent answers if we wish to avoid a global erosion of public confidence in science and public health.

https://en-volve.com/2021/05/08/57-top-scientists-and-doctors-release-shocking-study-on-covid-vaccines-and-demand-immediate-stop-to-all-vaccinations/

~~~~~~~~~~

The Fraud

Camgridge Dictionary says: “a substance containing a virus or bacterium in a form that is not harmful, given to a person or animal to prevent them from getting the disease that the virus or bacterium causes”

The COVID jab does not contain a live or attenuated form of the COVID-19 virus, it does not confer immunity and does not prevent transmission, by the manufacturers’ own statements and, based on the number of adverse events and deaths, it is harmful. Despite lack of medical or media coverage of the latter.

A person about to receive a medical procedure is entitled to do so by giving fully informed consent. This is impossible for anyone to grant when the governments of the world and the media are doing everything they can to hide the efficacy of non-vaccine treatments and suppressing, denying or downplaying the deaths and injuries caused by COVID shots.

~~~~~~~~~~

The Risk Reduction

In risk estimation, knowing the absolute risk reduction (the number that actually matters the most) is crucial.

The Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population.

Absolute Risk Reduction:
1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford
1·2% for the Moderna–NIH
1·2% for the J&J
0·93% for the Gamaleya
0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines

If your risk of getting a certain disease is reduced by only about 1%, is the vaccine worth it?

From the Lancet article: “Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 90% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines. However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.”

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext

~~~~~~~~~~

The Harm and Suffering

Executive Summary:

According to the manufacturer’s own documents, the various COVID jabs do not confer immunity, do not prevent transmission and can result in those receiving the jab to infect those with whom they come into contact, by breathing the same air or by contact.

Tens of thousands of people have reported altered (early, prolonged or heavier bleeding or uterine lining shedding) as a result of coming into contact with people who have received the COVID jab. Facebook deleted one group that had 25,000 members.

The US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System and the EU equivalent are seeing a massive spike in reported deaths and injuries since the start of the COVID jab rollout. For instance the US VAERS recorded more deaths in the first 4 months of the COVID jab rollout than in the previous 15 years combined.

A wide variety of researchers and medical experts predict a large number of adverse effect from the COVID jabs. Reproductive issues, infertility, neurodegenerative diseases, increased risk of cancer, heightened immune response to subsequent infections leading to cytokine storms and death.

~~~~~~~~~~

The New mRNA COVID Vaccines Inject an Operating System into Your Body – Not a Conspiracy Theory, Moderna Admits It

Moderna, the manufacturer of one of the COVID mRNA vaccines that has currently been issued emergency use authorization, has actually published on their website that this is true: the mRNA vaccine injects an “operating system” into your body that they call “The Software of Life.”

This a totally new experiment.

Pfizer admits that SHEDDING can occur and non-jabbed can be exposed by INHALATION or SKIN CONTACT!!:

https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=32814

https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

The Top 10 Ways The COVID Shot Will Affect You

https://www.bitchute.com/video/fhhNpDM9Ahwf/

WARNING: A COMING COVID CATASTROPHE
World renown vaccine specialist, Geert Vanden Bossche PhD, gave a groundbreaking interview this week risking his reputation and his career by bravely speaking out against administration of Covid19 vaccines. In what may be one of the most important stories ever covered by The Highwire, the vaccine developer shared his extreme concerns about these vaccines in particular and why we may be on track to creating a global immunity catastrophe.
https://www.brighteon.com/af3a6b4f-429e-4c9d-89b2-c8ea112c524f

URGENT! 5 Doctors Agree that COVID-19 Injections are Bioweapons and Discuss What to do About It:

URGENT! 5 Doctors Agree that COVID-19 Injections are Bioweapons and Discuss What to do About It

Leading Toxicologist Issues Warning To CDC — Halt COVID Vaccines Before They ‘Sterilize An Entire Generation’

Leading Toxicologist Issues Warning To CDC — Halt COVID Vaccines Before They ‘Sterilize An Entire Generation’

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-vaccines-must-be-halted-immediately-renowned-toxicologist-tells-cdc

VAERS Covid Deaths

According to data publish by the US VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System), over 4,100 Americans died during the first few months of the release of the shot. According to the European Medicines Agency over 10,000 Europeans have died and over 400,000 have been injured to May 14 2021.

So in the US, about 30 people a day are reportedly dying after receiving a COVID shot. Most who follow VAERS (and according to a study of it commissioned by the CDC) somewhere between 1-10% of adverse events are reported on VAERS for a variety of reasons.

VAERS Covid Deaths To 20210423

Scientists at Sloan Kettering discover mRNA inactivates tumor-suppressing proteins, meaning it can promote cancer

There’s a secret layer of information in your cells called messenger RNA, that’s located between DNA and proteins, that serves as a critical link. Now, in a medical shocker to the whole world of vaccine philosophy, scientists at Sloan Kettering found that mRNA itself carries cancer CAUSING changes – changes that genetic tests don’t even analyze, flying completely under the radar of oncologists across the globe.

https://www.newstarget.com/2021-03-02-scientists-discover-mrna-inactivates-tumor-suppressing-proteins.html

Science Journals Support Claim that Pfizer Covid Vaccine May Cause Deadly Neurodegenerative Disease

A recent article published in the scientific journal Microbiology and Infectious Diseases makes the claim that the mRNA Pfizer Covid vaccine may contain prions which cause deadly neurodegenerative disease, sometimes called “Creutzfeldt-Jakob” or “Mad Cow” disease. The article, titled “COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease,” was published in January of 2021 and has been studiously ignored by major media, which has focused its efforts on encouraging individuals to take the jab.

The paper was authored by J. Bart Classen, MD and analyzed the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, stating that:

The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations.

The paper goes on to state that “The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.”

In other words, the Pfizer mRNA vaccine may have the capability of turning brains to mush.

Far from prompting any pause or calls for re-evaluation of the Pfizer vaccine, the media has largely ignored the paper. A few of the more notorious “fact check” websites have pronounced that the conclusions of this study are false.

https://www.activistpost.com/2021/05/science-journals-support-claim-that-pfizer-covid-vaccine-may-cause-deadly-neurodegenerative-disease.html

Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease

COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/

Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies…

…ADE is an immunological phenomenon first described in 1964 (Hawkes et al., 1964). In that publication Hawkes described a set of experiments in which cultures of flavivirus were incubated with avian sera containing high titers of antibodies against those viruses. The unexpected finding was that, with increasingly high dilutions of the antibody-containing sera, cell infectivity was enhanced. Lack of an explanation for how this could happen is likely responsible for its being largely ignored for almost 20 years (Morens et al., 1994).Multiple pathways have been proposed through which antibodies both directly and indirectly participate in the neutralization of infections (Lu et al., 2018b). ADE is a special case of what can happen when low, non-neutralizing levels of either specific or cross-reactive antibodies against a virus are present at the time of infection. These antibodies might be present due to prior exposure to the virus, exposure to a related virus, or due to prior vaccination against the virus. Upon reinfection, antibodies in insufficient numbers to neutralize the virus nevertheless bind to the virus. These antibodies then dock at the Fc receptor on cell surfaces, facilitating viral entry into the cell and subsequently enhancing the infectivity of the virus (Wan et. al.,2020)

ADE is believed to underlie the more severe dengue fever often observed in those with previous exposure (Beltramello et al., 2010), and might also play a role in more severe disease among those previously vaccinated against the disease…

…International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research2(1), May 10, 2021 Page | 414In an extended correspondence published in Nature Biotechnology, Eroshenko et. al. offer a comprehensive review of evidence suggesting that ADE could become manifest with any vaccinations employed against SARS-CoV-2…

…Given evidence only partially reviewed here, there is sufficient reason to suspect that antibodies to the spike protein will contribute to ADE provoked by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, which may manifest as either acute or chronic autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. We have noted above that it is not possible to distinguish an ADE manifestation of disease from a true, non-ADE viral infection. In this light it is important to recognize that, when diseases and deaths occur shortly after vaccination with an mRNA vaccine, it can never be definitively determined, even with a full investigation, that the vaccine reaction was not a proximal cause…

…Pathogenic priming is a concept that is similar in outcome to ADE, but different in the underlying mechanism. We discuss it here as a unique mechanism through which the mRNA vaccines could provoke associated pathologies.

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23

A recent article published in the scientific journal Microbiology and Infectious Diseases makes the claim that the mRNA Pfizer Covid vaccine may contain prions which cause deadly neurodegenerative disease, sometimes called “Creutzfeldt-Jakob” or “Mad Cow” disease. The article, titled “COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease,” was published in January of 2021 and has been studiously ignored by major media, which has focused its efforts on encouraging individuals to take the jab.

The paper was authored by J. Bart Classen, MD and analyzed the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, stating that:

The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations.

The paper goes on to state that “The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.”

In other words, the Pfizer mRNA vaccine may have the capability of turning brains to mush.

Far from prompting any pause or calls for re-evaluation of the Pfizer vaccine, the media has largely ignored the paper. A few of the more notorious “fact check” websites have pronounced that the conclusions of this study are false.

https://www.activistpost.com/2021/05/science-journals-support-claim-that-pfizer-covid-vaccine-may-cause-deadly-neurodegenerative-disease.html

About 30 people a day are reportedly dying after receiving a COVID shot. Most who follow VAERS (and according to a study of it commissioned by the CDC) less than 1-10% of adverse events are reported on VAERS for a variety of reasons.

 

Someone has done a lot of work to connect those dots and putting them into a tree of Evil was a bright idea! I am impressed!

Just in case you are thinking that label may be a bit over the top, did you know that in 1976, the U.S. government vaccinated 45 million people with a vaccine for the swine flu. Fifty-three people reportedly died after getting that shot. The U.S. government immediately halted the vaccination program. Authorities decided it was too risky, it wasn’t worth it.

Contrast that with what is happening now. This time, our health authorities have reserved their energy for anyone who dares to question vaccines. by Tetyana Obokhansych

Do you know haw many deaths have been reported to the US VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) just since the COVID shot was released? Over 4,100. (Over 8,000 in Europe.) More than the previous 15 years combined. That is a lot of coincidences! In fact, one might be forgiven for thinking there was some link. And they are still pushing it!

Lifesitenews is reporting that renowned toxicologist — Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D — warned a meeting of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) — which had convened last month to discuss blood disorders linked to the Johnson & Johnson vaccine — that these vaccines “must be halted immediately” over the permanent damage they cause to women’s reproductive health:

Dr. Lindsay, who holds a doctorate from the University of Texas and has more than three decades of scientific experience, cited potential blood clot, fertility, and immune issues related to the jabs. Her full testimony can be found on YouTube, with a transcript here.

“In the mid-1990s, I aided the development of a temporary human contraceptive vaccine which ended up causing unintended autoimmune ovarian destruction and sterility in animal test models, despite efforts against this and sequence analyses that did not predict this,” Lindsay told ACIP.

“I strongly feel that all the gene therapy [COVID-19] vaccines must be halted immediately due to safety concerns on several fronts,” she said. Dr. Lindsay warned that the vaccines could hinder production of syncytin, a crucial protein for fertility and pregnancy, and negatively impact pregnancy outcomes as a result.

“First, there is a credible reason to believe that the COVID vaccines will cross-react with the syncytin and reproductive proteins in sperm, ova, and placenta, leading to impaired fertility and impaired reproductive and gestational outcomes,” she argued.

“Respected virologist Dr. Bill Gallaher, Ph.D., made excellent arguments as to why you would expect cross reaction due to beta sheet conformation similarities between spike proteins and syncytin-1 and syncytin-2,” Lindsay said.

“I have yet to see a single immunological study which disproves this. Despite the fact that it would literally take the manufacturers a single day to do these syncytin studies to ascertain this. It’s been over a year since the assertions were first made that this could occur.”

“We have seen 100 pregnancy losses reported in VAERS,” the vaccine injury tracking system of the U.S. government, as of April 9, Dr. Lindsay continued. “And there have been reports of impaired spermatogenesis and placental findings from both the natural infection, vaccinated, and syncytin knockout animal models that have similar placental pathology, implicating a syncytin-mediated role in these outcomes.”

Lindsay also pointed to reports of irregular menstrual cycles following COVID-19 shots. “We simply cannot put these [coronavirus vaccines] in our children who are at .002% risk for COVID mortality if infected, or any more of the child-bearing age population, without thoroughly investigating this matter,” she said.

Otherwise, “we could potentially sterilize an entire generation.” “Speculation that this will not occur and a few anecdotal reports of pregnancies within the trial are not sufficient proof that this is not impacting on a population-wide scale,” Lindsay said.

Dr. Lindsay noted that “all of the [COVID vaccine] gene therapies are causing” blood clots, as well. “This is not isolated to one manufacturer, and this is not isolated to one age group.”

“We are seeing coagulopathy deaths in healthy young adults with no secondary comorbidities. There have been 795 reports related to blood clotting disorders as of April 9th in the VAERS reporting system, 338 of these being due to thrombocytopenia,” she added.

“There are forward and backward mechanistic principles for why this is happening. The natural infection is known to cause coagulopathy due to the spike protein. All gene therapy vaccines direct the body to make the spike protein,” she said. Lindsay cited a paper published in the Journal of Hematology & Oncology in 2020, which showed that infusing spike proteins led to blood disorders in mice.

“Spike protein incubated with human blood in vitro also caused blood clot development which was resistant to fibrinolysis” — a process that stops the growth of clots. “The spike protein is causing thrombocytic events, which cannot be resolved through natural means,” she said. “And all vaccines must be halted in the hope that they can be reformulated to guard against this adverse effect.”

Lindsay’s comments were cut off at the ACIP meeting before she could mention her third concern, though that final point has been published on the website of Dr. Jennifer Margulis.

“Third, there is strong evidence for immune escape, and that inoculation under pandemic pressure with these leaky vaccines is driving the creation of more lethal mutants that are both newly infecting a younger age demographic, and causing more COVID-related deaths across the population than would have occurred without intervention,” Lindsay said.

“We have enough evidence now to see a clear correlation with increased COVID deaths and the vaccine campaigns,” she continued. “This is not a coincidence. It is an unfortunate unintended effect of the vaccines.”

Her conclusion: “We must halt all COVID vaccine administration immediately, before we create a true pandemic that we cannot reign in.”

Dr. Lindsay is correct about everything except that these serious side effects from the vaccines are “unintended” — for the last 20 years, researchers have known how dangerous these mRNA and adenovirus vaccines are — which is why they have never hit the market before now under “emergency” approval.

We reported last summer that the media were already planting stories warning the public that COVID could cause sterility in both men and women — to cover up what they already knew was one of the intended consequences of the coming vaccines.

Also last summer, we warned that the “experts” were already insisting that pregnant women be “first in line” to receive the experimental COVID vaccines — despite the fact that to make this recommendation went against all known medical safety protocols.

Clearly, the vaccine manufacturers — and the CDC and FDA — all knew that these COVID vaccines would act as abortificants and sterilizing gene therapies — which is exactly why they promoted them to pregnant women.

Since we began reporting on this fake pandemic well over a year ago, we have consistently warned that the so-called COVID virus and its alleged “mutant strains” would be blamed for the intended side effects of the deadly vaccines.

The public face of this “pandemic” has been Bill Gates — a self-admitted eugenicist and advocate of massive world depopulation — just as his father did.

Don’t let his carefully selected “gentle” pastel cashmere sweaters fool you — the man is an advocate of industrial-scale mass murder never seen before in the history of the world.

Leading Toxicologist Issues Warning To CDC — Halt COVID Vaccines Before They ‘Sterilize An Entire Generation’

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-vaccines-must-be-halted-immediately-renowned-toxicologist-tells-cdc

I am on a Facebook group for Australian Focus Group for adverse reactions to the MRNA Covid19 Vaccine.

In response to a question aboout the flu shot from a person who posted about her 89 year old mum who dropped dead within a week of the flu shot, Rae posted:

For what it’s worth – our friend Amanda used to be a nurse in the ADF (Australian Army). She’s originally from Canada. In 2005, she saw a huge number of ADF personnel “crash” after having their annual flu shot. She researched the batch, and told her brother back in Canada to not have that year’s flu-shot, he ignored her, had his shot that year, almost died.

I have worked in State Govt (Australia) since 2001, where flu vaccines were “pushed” every year. I hate needles, so I always said “no thanks” to the flu shot being offered. But being curious, I kept track of those who had the shot, and those who didn’t, and then who got sick, and who didn’t. I did this until I stopped working for State Govt in 2014 – THAT’S 13 YEARS of “anecdotal” tracking.

Every year, 50% of those who got the flu shot, still got the flu bad enough to be off work for a few days. 50% of those who didn’t get the flu shot, got the flu bad enough to be off work for a few days. My observations for 13 years were that no matter whether you got the annual Flu-shot, or not – you had a 50/50 chance of getting the flu bad enough to have some time off work.

I did notice that flu-shot, or no flu-shot, people who did not take responsibility for their health, by eating well, exercising, practicing good hygiene when flu was going around, etc. got sick, whether they had the flu shot or not – their being sick seemed to me more down to how well they took care of their health during flu season, not whether they had a flu-shot. It seemed to me that it made no difference whether they got the flu-shot or not…… Those people who did look after their health, were less likely to get sick. This was of interest to me especially when I was rostering for a QHealth facility, where it was my job to call in Casual Staff to cover permanent staff who were sick during Flu season. That’s my 2 cents worth on Flu shots – I have never had one – N-E-V-E-R and will never have one, C19 or Influenza, NO JAB FOR ME. Based on my 13 years observing those who did and didn’t have a Flu-shot where I worked, the annual Flu-shots seemed to make little difference – overall – shot or no shot – all people in my workplace had a 50/50 chance of getting flu. Hating needles myself, I just kept my workspace clean, took vitamins, ate well, exercised, mega-dosed on Vitamin C when flu was going around, and never got sick. NO JAB FOR ME, EVER!

I thanked her for her input and she replied:

Thanks Tom, here’s some more interesting anecdotal information. In my last admin role in the Mental Health system, the nature of our office set-up meant that I could hear every word from the mouth of every drug-rep that got their foot in the door, to do a “Drug Lunch” [this is where the Pharma rep brings along Pizzas for a lunch-session on whatever anti-psychotic or mental health related drug they were trying to get our clinicians to request the Psychs to prescribe].

During that time, my own hubby was unfortunately prescribed some of the drugs I used to hear the Drug-Reps spruiking. It made me sick to hear these Reps assuring our clinicians of limited or “no side effects” of many of these drugs. One of which my own husband was trying to get off, because we had done our research and downloaded the 54 page Product Information Statements available from the Drug Manufacturer and found that all the wierd things that started happening to him after starting on these “medications” were actually listed as side effects within these 54 pages, and one of the side-effects was DEATH.

That was the beginning of the end of us trusting anything our GP or a drug company rep said, and it was also the point at which I realised I could no longer work in the Mental “Health” system – me doing a good job, just enabled the system to do a good job of making the client’s lives worse.

One of the standardly prescribed anti-psychotic drugs has a side effect of Osteoporosis. This was something my husband began to experience a year into his journey with that particular drug, and the reason we started our own research.

At the same time, we had a young patient on the same meds, who kept breaking one of his ankles, eventually he had to have the damaged section removed because it just kept breaking. The clinicians eventually realised he had osteoporosis and couldn’t understand why, given his age and lifestyle. After doing all the research (me just a “dumb ol’ Admin person”) I tried to tell the Doctor it was probably a side effect of the meds he was on.

They wouldn’t believe me of course, I am not a clinician. I told them to look it up themselves and check the side effects of his meds.

The Medical system is training doctors to treat everything with “Medicine”, not diet, not exercise, drugs is all they have… …so don’t be too hard on all the doctors and nurses telling people they should “trust the science” and have the “vaccine” they are being told it’s a “vaccine”, and in their minds, they understand how vaccines work, so why wouldn’t these mRNA “vaccines” be as safe and effective as a traditional vaccine? They are not being told about side effects, and most of them don’t have time to research this themselves, until something bad happens to them. Those who do know, are being threatened if they go public. Cheers, Rae