On Sunday the 16th May I spent a couple of hours on the phone to two mothers concerned about the their children getting the COVID shot. I told them all the best data I had come across was on my blog, do a search and read the articles.
I thought about that then I realised I post so much it was like throwing them a life jacket and expecting them to swim to the side the the boat and haul themselves up.
So I spent a couple of hours and pulled this together. Please feel free to use it as you see fit with anyone not 100% convinced that the jab would be one of the worst things they could do to their body.
If you have an article or video you think should be here, let me know.
The next article I post, COVID-19 – The Legalities, will hopefully arm you with sufficient understanding of your legal rights to help you out of any coercion or enforcement of unwanted medical interventions or treatments.
The mRNA Backstory
No mRNA vaccine has ever made it to market. Earlier attempts did not even pass testing.
There have been many attempts to make viral vaccines in the past that ended in utter failure, which is why we did not have a coronavirus vaccine in 2020. In the 1960s, scientists attempted to make an RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) vaccine for infants. In that study,21 they skipped animal trials because they weren’t necessary back then.
In the end, the vaccinated infants got much sicker than the unvaccinated infants when exposed to the virus in nature, with 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization, and two of them died.22
After 2000, scientists made many attempts to create coronavirus vaccines. For the past 20 years, all ended in failure because the animals in the clinical trials got very sick and many died, just like the children in the 1960s. You can read a summary of this history/science here.23 Or, if you want to read the individual studies you can check out these links:
In 2004, attempted vaccine produced hepatitis in ferrets.24
In 2005, mice25 and civets26 became sick and more susceptible to coronaviruses after being vaccinated.
In 2012, the ferrets27 became sick and died. And in this study28 mice and ferrets developed lung disease.
In 2016, this study29 also produce lung disease in mice.
The typical pattern in the studies mentioned above is that the children and the animals produced beautiful antibody responses after being vaccinated. The manufacturers thought they hit the jackpot. The problem came when the children and animals were exposed to the wild version of the virus.
When that happened, an unexplained phenomenon30 called antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), also known as vaccine enhanced disease31 (VED), occurred where the immune system produced a “cytokine storm”32 (i.e., overwhelmingly attacked the body), and the children/animals died. Here’s the lingering issue.
The vaccine makers have no data to suggest their rushed vaccines have overcome that problem. In other words, never before has any attempt to make a coronavirus vaccine been successful, nor has the gene-therapy technology that is mRNA “vaccines” been safely brought to market but, hey, since they had billions of dollars33 in government funding, I’m sure they figured that out. Except they don’t know if they have.
21 Nature October 16, 2020
22 Nature October 16, 2020
23 Frontiers in Microbiology December 5, 2018
24 J Virol. 2004 Nov; 78(22): 12672–12676
25 Nature January 10, 2005
26 PNAS January 18, 2005
27 PLoS One. 2012; 7(4): e35421
28 PLoS One. 2012; 7(4): e35421
29 Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics June 7, 2016
30 Science February 13, 2004
31 The Defender December 10, 2020
32 The Defender February 19, 2021
33 CDC April 6, 2021
Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a coronavirus vaccine now would be ‘colossally stupid’
Vaccine experts are warning the federal government against rushing out a coronavirus vaccine before testing has shown it’s both safe and effective. Decades of history show why they’re right.
57 Top Scientists And Doctors Release Shocking Study On COVID Vaccines And Demand Immediate Stop to ALL Vaccinations
Since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak, the race for testing new platforms designed to confer immunity against SARS-CoV-2, has been rampant and unprecedented, leading to emergency authorization of various vaccines. Despite progress on early multidrug therapy for COVID-19 patients, the current mandate is to immunize the world population as quickly as possible. The lack of thorough testing in animals prior to clinical trials, and authorization based on safety data generated during trials that lasted less than 3.5 months, raise questions regarding the safety of these vaccines. The recently identified role of SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein Spike for inducing endothelial damage characteristic of COVID-19, even in absence of infection, is extremely relevant given that most of the authorized vaccines induce the production of Spike glycoprotein in the recipients. Given the high rate of occurrence of adverse effects, and the wide range of types of adverse effects that have been reported to date, as well as the potential for vaccine-driven disease enhancement, Th2-immunopathology, autoimmunity, and immune evasion, there is a need for a better understanding of the benefits and risks of mass vaccination, particularly in the groups that were excluded in the clinical trials. Despite calls for caution, the risks of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been minimized or ignored by health organizations and government authorities. We appeal to the need for a pluralistic dialogue in the context of health policies, emphasizing critical questions that require urgent answers if we wish to avoid a global erosion of public confidence in science and public health.
Camgridge Dictionary says: “a substance containing a virus or bacterium in a form that is not harmful, given to a person or animal to prevent them from getting the disease that the virus or bacterium causes”
The COVID jab does not contain a live or attenuated form of the COVID-19 virus, it does not confer immunity and does not prevent transmission, by the manufacturers’ own statements and, based on the number of adverse events and deaths, it is harmful. Despite lack of medical or media coverage of the latter.
A person about to receive a medical procedure is entitled to do so by giving fully informed consent. This is impossible for anyone to grant when the governments of the world and the media are doing everything they can to hide the efficacy of non-vaccine treatments and suppressing, denying or downplaying the deaths and injuries caused by COVID shots.
The Risk Reduction
In risk estimation, knowing the absolute risk reduction (the number that actually matters the most) is crucial.
The Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population.
Absolute Risk Reduction:
1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford
1·2% for the Moderna–NIH
1·2% for the J&J
0·93% for the Gamaleya
0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines
If your risk of getting a certain disease is reduced by only about 1%, is the vaccine worth it?
From the Lancet article: “Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 90% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines. However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.”
The Harm and Suffering
According to the manufacturer’s own documents, the various COVID jabs do not confer immunity, do not prevent transmission and can result in those receiving the jab to infect those with whom they come into contact, by breathing the same air or by contact.
Tens of thousands of people have reported altered (early, prolonged or heavier bleeding or uterine lining shedding) as a result of coming into contact with people who have received the COVID jab. Facebook deleted one group that had 25,000 members.
The US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System and the EU equivalent are seeing a massive spike in reported deaths and injuries since the start of the COVID jab rollout. For instance the US VAERS recorded more deaths in the first 4 months of the COVID jab rollout than in the previous 15 years combined.
A wide variety of researchers and medical experts predict a large number of adverse effect from the COVID jabs. Reproductive issues, infertility, neurodegenerative diseases, increased risk of cancer, heightened immune response to subsequent infections leading to cytokine storms and death.
The New mRNA COVID Vaccines Inject an Operating System into Your Body – Not a Conspiracy Theory, Moderna Admits It
Moderna, the manufacturer of one of the COVID mRNA vaccines that has currently been issued emergency use authorization, has actually published on their website that this is true: the mRNA vaccine injects an “operating system” into your body that they call “The Software of Life.”
This a totally new experiment.
Pfizer admits that SHEDDING can occur and non-jabbed can be exposed by INHALATION or SKIN CONTACT!!:
The Top 10 Ways The COVID Shot Will Affect You
WARNING: A COMING COVID CATASTROPHE
World renown vaccine specialist, Geert Vanden Bossche PhD, gave a groundbreaking interview this week risking his reputation and his career by bravely speaking out against administration of Covid19 vaccines. In what may be one of the most important stories ever covered by The Highwire, the vaccine developer shared his extreme concerns about these vaccines in particular and why we may be on track to creating a global immunity catastrophe.
URGENT! 5 Doctors Agree that COVID-19 Injections are Bioweapons and Discuss What to do About It:
Leading Toxicologist Issues Warning To CDC — Halt COVID Vaccines Before They ‘Sterilize An Entire Generation’
VAERS Covid Deaths
According to data publish by the US VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System), over 4,100 Americans died during the first few months of the release of the shot. According to the European Medicines Agency over 10,000 Europeans have died and over 400,000 have been injured to May 14 2021.
So in the US, about 30 people a day are reportedly dying after receiving a COVID shot. Most who follow VAERS (and according to a study of it commissioned by the CDC) somewhere between 1-10% of adverse events are reported on VAERS for a variety of reasons.
Scientists at Sloan Kettering discover mRNA inactivates tumor-suppressing proteins, meaning it can promote cancer
There’s a secret layer of information in your cells called messenger RNA, that’s located between DNA and proteins, that serves as a critical link. Now, in a medical shocker to the whole world of vaccine philosophy, scientists at Sloan Kettering found that mRNA itself carries cancer CAUSING changes – changes that genetic tests don’t even analyze, flying completely under the radar of oncologists across the globe.
Science Journals Support Claim that Pfizer Covid Vaccine May Cause Deadly Neurodegenerative Disease
A recent article published in the scientific journal Microbiology and Infectious Diseases makes the claim that the mRNA Pfizer Covid vaccine may contain prions which cause deadly neurodegenerative disease, sometimes called “Creutzfeldt-Jakob” or “Mad Cow” disease. The article, titled “COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease,” was published in January of 2021 and has been studiously ignored by major media, which has focused its efforts on encouraging individuals to take the jab.
The paper was authored by J. Bart Classen, MD and analyzed the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, stating that:
The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations.
The paper goes on to state that “The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.”
In other words, the Pfizer mRNA vaccine may have the capability of turning brains to mush.
Far from prompting any pause or calls for re-evaluation of the Pfizer vaccine, the media has largely ignored the paper. A few of the more notorious “fact check” websites have pronounced that the conclusions of this study are false.
Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease
COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies…
…ADE is an immunological phenomenon first described in 1964 (Hawkes et al., 1964). In that publication Hawkes described a set of experiments in which cultures of flavivirus were incubated with avian sera containing high titers of antibodies against those viruses. The unexpected finding was that, with increasingly high dilutions of the antibody-containing sera, cell infectivity was enhanced. Lack of an explanation for how this could happen is likely responsible for its being largely ignored for almost 20 years (Morens et al., 1994).Multiple pathways have been proposed through which antibodies both directly and indirectly participate in the neutralization of infections (Lu et al., 2018b). ADE is a special case of what can happen when low, non-neutralizing levels of either specific or cross-reactive antibodies against a virus are present at the time of infection. These antibodies might be present due to prior exposure to the virus, exposure to a related virus, or due to prior vaccination against the virus. Upon reinfection, antibodies in insufficient numbers to neutralize the virus nevertheless bind to the virus. These antibodies then dock at the Fc receptor on cell surfaces, facilitating viral entry into the cell and subsequently enhancing the infectivity of the virus (Wan et. al.,2020)
ADE is believed to underlie the more severe dengue fever often observed in those with previous exposure (Beltramello et al., 2010), and might also play a role in more severe disease among those previously vaccinated against the disease…
…International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research2(1), May 10, 2021 Page | 414In an extended correspondence published in Nature Biotechnology, Eroshenko et. al. offer a comprehensive review of evidence suggesting that ADE could become manifest with any vaccinations employed against SARS-CoV-2…
…Given evidence only partially reviewed here, there is sufficient reason to suspect that antibodies to the spike protein will contribute to ADE provoked by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, which may manifest as either acute or chronic autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. We have noted above that it is not possible to distinguish an ADE manifestation of disease from a true, non-ADE viral infection. In this light it is important to recognize that, when diseases and deaths occur shortly after vaccination with an mRNA vaccine, it can never be definitively determined, even with a full investigation, that the vaccine reaction was not a proximal cause…
…Pathogenic priming is a concept that is similar in outcome to ADE, but different in the underlying mechanism. We discuss it here as a unique mechanism through which the mRNA vaccines could provoke associated pathologies.