The Battle Is Real
The demon was identified and published in a book very widely read and applied at the time. Unfortunately the wide distribution of a science of the mind that held promise of freeing man from unseen shackles clashed with the goals of the would-be enslavers of man, so the author and his work were heavily vilified by those would-be enslavers.
Implanted deeply within man is not just the suppression of the desire to find out what brought us here and what keeps us from manifesting our full potential but an aversion to learning the truth. (You may have bumped into this.) Unfortunately this aversion to learning the truth aligns perfectly with the goal of entrapment. For you cannot entrap a being who has knowledge of traps and who knows how to extricate himself from them.
Every unexplained body pain, every self-doubt, every negative thought, every strange picture that enters your head has a known source that can, and should be, eradicated.
If you would like to know more about their source and perhaps free yourself from the chains of the past, watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0C-bgNTzMj8
After watching that, if you would like to know more, call me.
Quote of the Day
“In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.” – Galileo Galilei, Astronomer (1564 – 1642)
Galileo was an Italian astronomer, physicist and engineer, sometimes described as a polymath. His championing of the earth revolving around the sun was met with opposition from within the Catholic Church and from some astronomers. The matter was investigated by the Roman Inquisition in 1615, which concluded that his opinions contradicted accepted Biblical interpretations.
(Tom: My personal opinion is that Galileo’s quote should be emblazoned in letter of fire 6 inches high in the inside of every forehead before that forehead enters a school ground.)
Katharine Ross and Sam Elliott
During the filming of “The Legacy” in 1978, Sam Elliott found himself quietly falling for his co-star Katharine Ross. Elliott, with his deep voice and rugged charm, was already a figure of intrigue on set, but it was Ross’s grace and intelligence that captured him entirely. They spent long hours together between takes, learning each other’s rhythms and building a connection that neither had anticipated. Yet, both instinctively understood that their blossoming romance needed protection from the prying eyes of the press.
In a later interview with “Vanity Fair,” Elliott revealed, “We were building something fragile. It was too new and too precious to have other people’s opinions weighing on it.” The vulnerability in his voice reflected how much those early days meant to him. For Ross, who had already experienced the harsh glare of public attention during her earlier marriages and career peaks like “The Graduate,” the need for privacy felt even more vital. She had seen too many romances wilt under the magnifying glass of Hollywood.
Their time on “The Legacy” served as a rare bubble of intimacy. On set, they maintained professionalism, careful not to fuel any gossip. Behind the scenes, quiet dinners and long conversations deepened their bond. Elliott admired Ross’s subtlety, the way she listened more than she spoke, and how she carried herself with effortless dignity. He once said in a “Parade” magazine feature, “She had this elegance about her that could stop you in your tracks. I knew early on that she was unlike anyone I had ever met.”
Ross, in turn, found herself drawn to Elliott’s authenticity. In an interview years later with “Closer Weekly,” she recalled, “Sam never tried to impress anyone. He was who he was, whether cameras were rolling or not. That kind of honesty is rare in our world.” Their connection grew steadily, shielded by a mutual understanding that true intimacy required sacred ground, far removed from flashing cameras and magazine headlines.
Friends close to the couple later shared that there was an unspoken code between Ross and Elliott during those first few months. One crew member from “The Legacy” commented anonymously to “People” magazine, “You could feel something between them, but they were careful. It was like watching two people pass notes in class—silent but obvious if you looked closely enough.”
When Elliott reflected on those early days, he often emphasized the importance of patience. He believed that the slow pace at which their relationship developed made it stronger. In a 2015 interview with “The New York Times,” he said, “There is a beauty in waiting, in letting love grow in the quiet moments instead of blasting it out to the world before it’s ready.” It was a philosophy that guided them both as they navigated a romance that was at once exhilarating and terrifying.
Their bond deepened long after “The Legacy” wrapped, proving that their caution had been well-placed. Elliott once jokingly noted that winning Ross’s heart felt like winning an Oscar he never got to accept on stage. “She was the prize. Nothing else mattered once I had her,” he told “Vanity Fair,” his voice thick with emotion.
In protecting their young love from external pressures, Katharine Ross and Sam Elliott gave themselves the gift of a foundation built on trust and quiet understanding. They were not interested in spectacle; they were invested in building something real, something that could stand the test of time.
Their story remains a reminder that sometimes, the most beautiful romances are the ones shielded from the noise, nurtured in silence, and cherished away from the spotlight.
Quote of the Day
“Act as if what you do makes a difference. It does.” – William James, Philosopher (1842 – 1910)
Three Voice Harmony
49 seconds of audio gold! If these three don’t get picked up and offered a contract quickly there is something seriously wrong in the cosmos!
Click to view the video:
Quote of the Day
“The key to success is going to bed a little smarter each day.” – Warren Buffett, Investor (born 1930)
Princely Giving
In late 2011, Prince Rogers Nelson walked into Capitol Guitars, a modest music store in St. Paul, Minnesota. Dressed in dark shades and an overcoat, he browsed quietly, barely speaking. The staff recognized him instantly but chose to respect his silence. He pointed at a few guitars, asked about the tonal difference between maple and mahogany, and then paused when the owner mentioned a recent conversation with a local teacher. The teacher had said that students at Anwatin Middle School in Minneapolis were losing access to their music program due to severe budget cuts.
Prince nodded slightly and left without purchasing anything.
Three days later, a delivery truck arrived at Capitol Guitars. Prince had returned but not to shop. Instead, he gave the owner a handwritten list and a simple instruction: “Everything on this list, pack it and deliver it to Anwatin.” The list included guitars, drum sets, violins, keyboards, amps, microphones, and recording equipment. When the owner asked if the instruments should be marked with a donor name or message, Prince replied, “No names. No credit. Just send love.”
The delivery created confusion at the school. Teachers and administrators at Anwatin Middle School had no advance notice, and the delivery slip listed only a phone number that led to a private voicemail. Music teacher Kenneth Simms opened the shipment, stunned by the quality and quantity of the instruments. He assumed it was a mistake. It took several days of asking around and comparing handwriting on the note that came with the shipment before a staff member connected it to Prince, who had visited the store days earlier.
When a friend later asked him about it, Prince said, “That’s between me and the kids. Not for headlines.” He declined to make any public statement or appear at the school. According to Minneapolis-based journalist Jon Bream from “Star Tribune”, even the school district wasn’t formally notified. They only learned about the donor’s identity after teachers pieced the story together.
Those close to Prince knew his silent generosity wasn’t a one-time impulse. During his early years growing up on the north side of Minneapolis, he often spoke about the importance of music education. His mother, Mattie Shaw, was a jazz singer and heavily involved in the local music scene. Prince once said in a 1999 interview with “Ebony”, “If I hadn’t had access to a piano when I was seven, I don’t know who I would’ve become. Music wasn’t a hobby, it was a lifeline.”
Former bandmate Sheila E. recalled in her 2014 memoir “The Beat of My Own Drum” how Prince frequently funded youth centers and music camps without telling anyone. “He believed in giving kids a chance to create,” she wrote. “He didn’t want applause. He wanted them to play.”
At Anwatin, the new instruments transformed the energy of the school. Simms recalled how students began coming to class early just to practice. A hallway that once echoed with silence after the final bell now hummed with guitar riffs, drumbeats, and laughter. “We didn’t just get instruments,” Simms told “MinnPost” in 2012, “we got hope.”
Store owner Alan Geller, who kept the receipt from Prince’s bulk order tucked in his office drawer, shared later that the musician didn’t even ask for a discount. “He said, ‘Charge full price. They deserve the best.’”
For Prince, who had often used his wealth to quietly support causes tied to youth empowerment, the act wasn’t about visibility. His friend Van Jones later commented during an interview with “CNN”, “He believed that if you help a kid find their rhythm, they might avoid chaos. He never needed a stage for that.”
The donation never became a national headline. There were no photo ops or ceremonies. But in a city where music had once saved a young boy from the streets, it was returned, quietly, to the next generation. Prince gave them music when theirs had been taken away and never asked for anything in return.
The Pace Of Change
In 1927, Professor Thomas Parnell wanted to show his physics students a simple truth:
Some things that look solid… aren’t.
So, he began an experiment that would outlive him—and most of his students.
He poured a thick, black substance called pitch into a glass funnel. It looked like a rock. But pitch is a liquid—just an incredibly slow one.
He waited three years for it to settle. Then, in 1930, he cut the tip of the funnel.
And waited.
It took eight years for the first drop to fall.
And every drop since has taken about a decade to follow.
To date, only nine drops have fallen. That’s it.
It’s called the Pitch Drop Experiment, and it’s still going today at the University of Queensland in Australia.
It holds the Guinness World Record for the longest-running laboratory experiment in history. And it’s taught us that pitch is 230 billion times thicker than water.
Scientists tried filming the eighth drop with a webcam.
The camera glitched. The drop fell… unseen.
Even now, the setup remains—quiet, undramatic, but still moving.
And maybe that’s the point.
That in a world of instant everything, there’s beauty in patience.
That science isn’t always explosions—it’s also the hush of time passing.
And that even the slowest things… still move.
(Tom: This is particularly relevant to how we maintain our bodies and the speed at which we age them. Most changes, constructive or destructive, occur so slowly that in this age of 15 minutes of fame most people do not pause long enough to contemplate the long term consequences of their actions.
And what is a criminal? A person who does not predict the consequences of or take responsibility for their actions.
Am I saying that I have been criminally irresponsible for some of my past actions? Tough pill to swallow, but yes, I am.
I continue to assess my planned actions and modify them to improve outcomes.
This last week I have added some weight training and a rest day to my exercise regime and started eating even less in order to lose the next lot of weight to take me to my target level of fitness.
What are you changing this week?)
The Way Things Work
(Tom: The principle here is deeper than just liberal or conservative. It is that one should not steal what rightfully belongs to one who has more generated from their own production to donate to one who has less.
Rewarding non-production increases non-production.
Penalizing production reduces production.
You get what you reward.
Certainly their are injustices and inequalities that any right minded person would wish remedied but they are best handled by raising the competence and production of those less endowed rather than by a constant flow of charity which evolves them into slaves.)
A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be very liberal, and among other liberal ideals, was very much in favor of higher taxes to support more government programs, in other words redistribution of wealth.
She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch conservative, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that she had participated in, and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.
One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes on the rich and the need for more government programs. The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to be the truth and she indicated so to her father. He responded by asking how she was doing in school.
Taken aback, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was taking a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left her no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn’t even have time for a boyfriend, and didn’t really have many college friends because she spent all her time studying.
Her father listened and then asked, “How is your friend Audrey doing?”
She replied, “Audrey is barely getting by. All she takes are easy classes, she never studies and she barely has a 2.0 GPA. She is so popular on campus; college for her is a blast. She’s always invited to all the parties and lots of times she doesn’t even show up for classes because she’s too hung over.”
Her father asked his daughter, “Why don’t you go to the Dean’s office and ask him to deduct 1.0 off your GPA and give it to your friend who only has a 2.0. That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution of GPA.”
The daughter, visibly shocked by her father’s suggestion, angrily fired back, “That’s a crazy idea, how would that be fair! I’ve worked really hard for my grades! I’ve invested a lot of time, and a lot of hard work! Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!”
The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently, “Welcome to the conservative side of the fence.”
If you ever wondered what side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!
If a conservative doesn’t like guns, he doesn’t buy one.
If a liberal doesn’t like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat.
If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him..
If a conservative doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels. Liberals demand that those they don’t like be shut down.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church. A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and Jesus silenced.
If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.. A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.
If a conservative reads this, he’ll post it. A liberal will delete it because he’s “offended.”