Raw science actually supports Antivaxxers: vaccines utterly DESTROY cellular immunity

Vaccines Needle Set

(Read this. It helps explain why people who get measles suffer less cancer!)

The myth that vaccines work is attributed to observations of mammals who recovered from infections with microorganisms that obtained natural immunity from future viruses. Although these observations seem to support vaccinations, raw science reveals that vaccines actually destroy cellular immunity.

T-cells are responsible for cell-mediated immunity, whereas B-cells are responsible for humoral immunity (antibodies). Whenever T- and B-cells are activated by a molecule capable of inducing an immune response known as an antigen, some of these cells become memory cells. As a result, the next time an individual is exposed to the same antigen, the immune system can destroy it quickly.

This is known as immunity, which gave birth to the belief that if a foreign antigen is injected into someone, then that person is immune from future infections of the same kind. What vaccine proponents fail to recognize is that the respiratory tract of any mammal has Immunoglobulin A (IgA), which plays an essential role in the mucous membrane or mucosa.

Understanding the reciprocal nature of B-cells and T-cells
Circumnavigating around the mucosal part of the immune system with vaccines causes damage to the immune system itself. Consequently, the immune systems fails to eliminate bacteria and viruses from the body. The virus or bacteria continues to evolve as the body is bombarded by environmental pollutants that attack the immune system. In other words, vaccines utterly destroy cellular immunity.

The way in which the immune system is corrupted can be understood when one recognizes the reciprocal relationship between B- and T-Cells. When B-cells are stimulated, T-cells are hindered, and vice versa. Vaccines trigger B-cell to secrete antibodies, thereby suppressing T-cells.

https://www.vaccines.news/2016-02-25-raw-science-actually-supports-antivaxxers-vaccines-utterly-destroy-cellular-immunity.html

PEDIATRICIANS CALL GENDER IDEOLOGY WHAT IT IS: CHILD ABUSE

PEDIATRICIANS CALL GENDER IDEOLOGY WHAT IT IS: CHILD ABUSE

This is a very good read. My observation is that most people are confused enough already! Kids more so! No need to introduce more lies and false data into the mix. Our job as parents, adults and role models is to show kids a stable, certain environment where natural laws are known, observable and phenomenon can be predicted. This give a child certainty. And I read the most important thing you can do for a person is to increase their certainty! This gender selection does nothing to increase certainty and everything to reduce it. Therefore as well as being unnatural and a lie, it is destructive.

New Immunotherapy Treatment Removes All Tumors In Woman With Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer

T-Cells_Amid_Blood_Cells

Research published 4 June 2018 in Nature Medicine by scientists at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has described a new immunotherapy approach, which led to a complete disappearance of tumors in a woman with advanced metastatic breast cancer who only had months to live.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/victoriaforster/2018/06/04/new-immunotherapy-treatment-removes-all-tumors-in-woman-with-advanced-metastatic-breast-cancer/amp/

Wild Idea Number Three

Wild Idea Number Three

Here’s a Wild idea: number three

Part of the agreement is a recognition that no government may sign any agreement that binds its people to it forever and that any such a treaty must be reviewed, say, every five years and voted upon by the people in a referendum. That way we can put an end to some bozo in government signing some daft treaty that creates problems for every future generation of the country.

We draw up a Code of Conduct for Governments. This is a new idea all by itself, I think. We have codes of conduct and standards of behaviour for people but we really, really need to have one for governments as well. The behaviour of many governments, by any rational decent standards, is often a total disgrace. If a person behaved the way many a government behaves, we’d lock the bastard up sand throw away the key!

This operates as a sort of moral code by which each government abides. It would, for example, include precepts such as (see above) not signing treaties that are binding in perpetuity upon people who are not even born let alone never voted on it.

The Code would also include common sense precepts such as NO arbitrary arrest or incarceration of ANYONE for ANY reason without a fair, impartial hearing in a court of law and then only based upon criminal ACTIONS that cause harm (murder, rape, arson etc etc) and NOT expressing an opinion, being a bit weird and so forth.