Plague Of Fear 2020 – Disturbing Scenario Addendum

Two Minutes To Midnight Clock

I share this with reservations. It is not uplifting or inspiring but one person’s perception of what has passed and what is likely. The most constructiuve thing I can recommend to you is that you continue to improve your nutrition and lifestyle routine so you stay as healthy as possible and your immune system is in top condition to defeat pathogens.

https://hive.blog/news/@francesleader/plague-of-fear-2020-disturbing-scenario-addendum

Canola Increases Weight and Reduces Memory

Erasing Memory

Canola Increases Weight and Reduces Memory

Canola oil is appealing because it is less expensive than other vegetable oils, it is advertised as being healthy, and promoted by the heart foundation.
In this study the mice received either regular chow or a chow diet supplemented with canola oil for 6 months. At this time point we found that chronic exposure to the canola-rich diet resulted in a significant increase in body weight and impairments in their working memory together with decrease levels of post-synaptic density protein-95, a marker of synaptic integrity, and an increase in the ratio of insoluble Aß 42/40.

They reported their findings do not support a beneficial effect of chronic canola oil consumption on two important aspects of AD pathophysiology which includes memory impairments as well as synaptic integrity.
Today canola oil is the third largest vegetable oil by volume after palm and soybean oil worldwide, and in the United States is one of the most widely used oil for human consumption second only to soybean oil. While many studies have investigated the relationship between olive oil with disease incidence, mortality and biomarkers for diseases, studies with canola oil are mainly focused only to biomarkers. Limited and not conclusive scientific evidence would suggest some benefit for canola oil consumption, but results from studies implementing diets containing canola oil in experimental animal models have provided us with conflicting data. On the other hand, studies have consistently demonstrated a beneficial effect of olive oil in different mouse models of neurodegeneration. By contrast, no data are available on the effect that canola oil consumption may have on any of these models and the development of AD.

The authors had previously used the same mouse model in an investigation of olive oil and found the opposite to canola. Alzheimer mice fed a diet enriched with extra-virgin olive oil had reduced levels of amyloid plaques and phosphorylated tau and experienced memory improvement. In support of this the Mediterranean diet which is rich in olive oil is associated with a reduced risk of developing mild cognitive impairment and AD, and a reduced risk of progressing from mild cognitive impairment to AD among its many health benefits.
Rapeseed oil (known also as canola oil) has emerged as a potential substitute for olive oil since has a similar monounsaturated fatty acids content to that of olive oil and an overall favorable fatty acid profile. As result, in recent years the consumption of canola oil has significantly increased in non-Mediterranean countries, due to the lower cost compared with olive oil and the perception that it shares the health benefits of the olive oil.

https://drdingle.com/canola-oil-harms-the-brain-and-helps-put-on-weight/

The Contagion Myth

Tommy Wells writes:

Just ordered this book… …my background thoughts before I get it/read it.

I think we’ve been tricked. I think RNA viruses get their genes from the living cells of their hosts. It’s all derived from the genome of the individual via a recombination of DNA elements. In fact, that may be one of the main purposes of viruses: to act as a producer of variation. The human genome, massive and genius as it is, does not have the capacity to store all the information for dealing with all of the trillions of potential biological threats out there, so some have hypothesized that viruses may be a mechanism to reshuffle or unleash cryptic information within. (https://evoinfo.org/papers/auxilary/borger3.pdf)
So basically, getting sick may all be in-house. I know some of you are familiar with the Pasteur vs Bechamp debate; Pasteur believed germs (an outside cause) were responsible for disease, where Bechamp believed that disease was a consequence of cellular terrain (an internal cause).

The same basic concept was debated years later in regards to evolution between Darwin, who believed adaptation was a population phenomenon, caused by natural selection (an outside force which eliminated the genetically unfit) and Lamarck, who believed adaptation was an internal event that created fitness within individuals via endogenous mechanisms. Over the decades, it is clear that Darwin was wrong, as individuals have a huge toolbox of adaptive mechanisms within that are highly regulated and can crank out helpful traits both during development and later, all throughout life. Epigenetics, Horizontal gene transfer, mutation and a host of other endogenous mechanisms seem to miraculously spring into action to help their hosts survive when they are stressed or challenged by the environment. The Darwinians have been forced over the decades, begrudgingly to accept these mechanisms, as all of them are highly regulated and contradictory to Darwin’s claim that adaptation was an external force (natural selection).

When it comes to viruses, it may be that they are just one of the ingenious tools we have in our genetic toolbox that help us survive environmental assaults (internal and external). And sure enough viruses are even known to be agents of morphological change; they can alter body color, the formation of wings in flies, etc. The Rous Sarcoma virus is a tumor virus that affects many animals and is known to pick up segments of cell RNAs into their genomes. Specifically the c-src transcript is taken up from the host and used as an oncogene. Many other cancers acquire viral RNA transcripts and are understood to be encoded by the host’s genome: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/rous-sarcoma-virus

If you’ve read my posts about cancer before, you may know that I believe tumors are defense mechanisms put into place to help isolate/sequester what would otherwise be runaway toxicity and associated inflammation…tumors, though they have a bad rap, actually help keep the tissues alive in hypoxic regions so that large portions of the body don’t die, experience necrosis and waste away (cachexia). It makes sense that certain viruses, which are very sensitive to hypoxia, may actually be involved in this whole process and act as a trigger for tumor formation. And sure enough, tumors are teeming with viruses, all of which most certainly originated in the host genome via recombination.

Influenza viruses are known to trigger a release of accumulated biofilm, (https://mbio.asm.org/content/7/4/e01235-16) which is what I think this COVID virus is doing. Biofilms in the lungs and many other places harbor toxic carcinogens and heavy metals, and viruses may actually be a detoxification agent that triggers the release of pent up toxicity, which may help a person avoid serious health conditions down the line.

Ultimately though, I think viruses are biological effects, not causes of disease..symptoms arise, not from the virus, but from our own immune system, which is attempting to detoxify the body from pent-up poisons. I’m sure this will be a good book.

Air Filters

Some interesting data from a person selling indoor air filters:

Here’s a wild fact. The air inside your home is 3-5 times more polluted than the air outside. And in some cases it can be up to 100 times more polluted… Crazy right?!

Outdoor air pollution from automobiles, factories, or wildfires is an obvious threat in some areas, but indoor air pollution is a seriously underestimated problem no matter where you live, because we spend most of our time indoors.

Clean air is essential for health and to help prevent respiratory illness, pulmonary problems, certain types of cancer, and to reduce the toxic load on your body.

5 Charts That Show Sweden’s Strategy Worked. The Lockdowns Failed

Sweden An Update

Government officials in Sweden announced this week that the government expects to maintain its mild restrictions on gatherings “for at least another year” to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.

Unlike most other European countries and nations around the world, Sweden declined to initiate a nationwide lockdown or mask mandates, opting instead for a policy that restricted large gatherings and relied on social responsibility to slow transmission of the virus.

For months, Sweden was criticized for its decision to forego an economic lockdown.

“Sweden becomes an example of how not to handle COVID-19,” CBS declared in its headline in a July article.

Sweden had become a “cautionary tale,” the New York Times declared the same month.

“They are leading us to catastrophe,” The Guardian warned in March.

Dozens of similar examples can be found. With every passing week, however, it’s becoming more clear that Sweden got the virus right. For starters, Swedish officials point out that even if lockdowns did save lives, they cannot long be endured.

“The measures that are being taken in Europe are not sustainable, we’re trying to find a level that is steady and that keeps the spread down. We can’t get rid of it, but we can keep it down at a reasonable level,” Johan Carlson, the director general of Sweden’s public health agency, said in an interview with public broadcaster SVT on Sunday.

It’s also worth pointing out that Sweden has avoided some of the economic carnage of its European neighbours experienced by implementing harsh lockdowns. In August, the BBC pointed out that Sweden’s economy experienced much less damage during the pandemic.

Both of these facts help explain why Sweden has not witnessed the widespread social unrest other nations have seen.

“A certain fatigue is setting in, this has been going on for a number of months,” Carlson admitted. “But we are not seeing anger or aggression, we’re not seeing the same reactions as in Europe.”

This should come as no surprise. Life in Sweden is still relatively normal. People never stopped going to restaurants and bars, pools or parks. Schools and places of business remained open. Hence, the mass protests, violence, and spikes of mental health deterioration, drug overddoses, and suicide nations around the world have witnessed in 2020 have been notably absent in Sweden.

Perhaps most importantly, Sweden’s “lighter touch” seems to have tamed COVID-19. While many European countries that implemented lockdowns are witnessing a resurgence of the virus, Sweden’s cases and deaths remain a stark contrast to other European nations.

https://fee.org/articles/5-charts-that-show-sweden-s-strategy-worked-the-lockdowns-failed/

Bill Gates’ Global Agenda and How We Can Resist His War on Life

We stand at a precipice of extinction. Will we allow our humanity as living, conscious, intelligent, autonomous beings to be extinguished by a greed machine that does not know limits and is unable to put a break on its colonisation and destruction? Or will we stop the machine and defend our humanity, freedom, and autonomy to protect life on earth?

Why Are So Many People Sad?

Why Are So Many People Sad?

There is a lot of truth in this. The easiest thing to to to start feeling better is to go for a walk and look at things. After that, the next easiest is to start eating more healthy foods. Just a fish oil capsule a day is a good start. Almost anyone can add that to their diet.