Pfizer’s Clinical Trial papers prove COVID Vaccines destroy the Immune System

Covid Vax Destroys Immune System

I have discovered some extremely concerning findings in the Pfizer Phase I-II-III clinical trial data. The Sepsis death rate in the 21,926 double vaccinated group of the Pfizer Phase III Clinical trial was twenty-one times higher than normal, and the Cardiovascular death rate was two times higher than normal. 

This strongly indicates that the Pfizer Covid-19 injection does in fact cause a new form of ‘acquired immunodeficiency syndrome’, as has been suggested by a mountain of data available from the UK Health Security Agency, because sepsis is caused by failure of the immune system.

Sepsis/Septicemia results from immune system failure to defeat a microbial (viral yeast or bacterial) infection…

…Now we turn to the double vaccinated cardiovascular and sepsis rates and we see (52.9% and 23.5% death rates) compared to the general population (and the unvaccinated) who suffer only (26.3% and 1.1% or 25.3% and 0%).

And there is the toxicity of the Pfizer vaccination laid bare. It weakens the immune system to the point where people succumb to microbial infections and die at 21 times the normal rate in the first 6 months after vaccination.

When you combine these figures with the weekly 5% immune response degradation catalogued by the UKHSA from Weeks 35-41 , you start to see a picture that suggests the vaccinated are developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

Immune System Change Bar Chart

However you look at this, the numbers flag up two major concerns which these days have plenty of other statistical, mass media, clinical and anecdotal evidence to support.

These findings absolutely necessitate further investigation specific to immune system degradation and cardiovascular inflammation. But Pfizer un-blinded the placebo group and permitted them to get vaccinated at the end of the 6 month trial period. So it is difficult to see how we can get any more data from Pfizer.

To be frank we are lucky to have the death data they have so far provided. Let us face facts. There are no long-term clinical trials ongoing into the safety of these vaccines. Quite the reverse in fact. For one can argue that the purpose of the Pfizer lobbied vaccine mandates is to eradicate any unvaccinated control group from existence in order to prevent a proper evaluation of vaccine side effects over the medium term.

Further evidence also exists confirming Covid vaccines destroy the immune system, in the form of an admission by the CDC in response to a Freedom of Information Request.

The CDC states that they have no record of a person with natural immunity becoming reinfected and transmitting the virus to anybody.

Whereas the UKHSA had 450,992 records of people with double vaccine immunity who became infected with Covid between October and November 2021 alone.

So it’s quite clear the Covid-19 vaccines prevent people from reaching full natural immunity by damaging and degrading their immune systems?

https://expose-news.com/2022/11/07/pfizer-trial-proves-covid-vaccine-decimates-immune-system/

Scientists suspect Covid Vaccines contain Graphene & Nanotech that is damaging the Immune System & causing Cancer

Covid Vaccines Damage The Immune System

What is in the Pfizer vaccines?

Recently, Dr David Nixon, a Brisbane GP, decided to find out, putting droplets of vaccine and the blood of vaccinated patients under a dark-field microscope.


The following was first published in the Australian version of The Spectator. A mainstream news magazine that has decided to suddenly publish what The Expose has been trying to tell the world over the past year…

By Rebecca Weisser

That’s a more radical decision than it might sound. According to Sasha Latypova, a scientist with 25 years of experience in clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies, the contract between Pfizer and the US government prohibits independent researchers from studying the vaccines. They claim it would ‘divert’ these precious resources away from their intended use fulfilling an ‘urgent’ need.

Is that true in Australia? Who knows? All the Commonwealth Department of Health has said about its contract with Pfizer is that it is commercial-in-confidence.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration performs tests on all Covid vaccines for composition and strength, purity and integrity, identity and endotoxins, but it provides scant details other than the batch numbers tested and whether they passed. (Spoiler alert: they did.)

In the US, the Centers for Disease Control specifically states that all Covid-19 vaccines are free from ‘metals, such as iron, nickel, cobalt, lithium, and rare earth alloys’ and ‘manufactured products such as micro-electronics, electrodes, carbon nanotubes, and nanowire semiconductors’.

Notably, this list does not include graphene oxide which has been widely investigated for biomedical applications. Some researchers sing its praises, its ‘ultra-high drug-loading efficiency due to the wide surface area’, its exceptional ‘chemical and mechanical constancy, sublime conductivity and excellent biocompatibility’. But there’s a catch. ‘The toxic effect of graphene oxide on living cells and organs’ is ‘a limiting factor’ on its use in the medicine.

So is there graphene oxide in the Pfizer shots? What Nixon found, and filmed, is bizarre to say the least. Inside a droplet of vaccine are strange mechanical structures. They seem motionless at first but when Nixon used time-lapse photography to condense 48 hours of footage into two minutes, it showed what appear to be mechanical arms assembling and disassembling glowing rectangular structures that look like circuitry and micro chips. These are not ‘manufactured products’ in the CDC’s words because they construct and deconstruct themselves but the formation of the crystals seems to be stimulated by electromagnetic radiation and stops when the slide with the vaccine is shielded by a Faraday bag. Nixon’s findings are similar to those of teams in New Zealand, Germany, Spain and South Korea.

An Italian group led by Riccardo Benzi Cipelli analysed the blood of over 1,000 people, one month after they were vaccinated, who had been referred for tests because they had experienced side effects. They ranged in age from 15 to 85 and had had between one and three doses. More than 94 per cent had abnormal readings, deformed red blood cells, reduced in counts and clumped around luminescent foreign objects which also attracted clusters of fibrin. Some of the foreign objects dotted the blood like a starry night, some self-assembled into crystalline structures and others into spindly branches and tubes.

The Italians think the objects are metallic particles and say they resemble ‘graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds’. They believe the damaged blood is contributing to post-vaccine coagulation disorders, which in turn contribute to increased malignancies, while graphene-family materials are associated with oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammation and damage to those parts of the immune system that suppress tumours.

The artificial mRNA concoction which is ‘cloaked’ from the recipient’s immune system is also likely to reduce the recipients immune function, increasing the likelihood of new or recurring tumours.

Nixon has shared his findings with Wendy Hoy, professor of medicine at the University of Queensland who has called on the Australian government and its health authorities to explain the apparent spontaneous formation of chips and circuitry in mRNA vaccines when left at room temperature, and the abnormal objects that can be seen in the blood of vaccinated people. Hoy thinks that these are ‘undoubtedly contributing to poor oxygen delivery to tissues and clotting events, including heart attacks and strokes’ and asks why there is no systematic autopsy investigation of deaths to investigate the role of the vaccine in Australia’s dramatic rise in mortality.

According to the latest data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, excess mortality was over 17 per cent in July. It is similarly elevated in other highly vaccinated populations.

In Germany, excess mortality in people over 60 increased by 174 per cent between 20 September 2021, when 85 per cent of people over 60 were fully vaccinated, and October 2022.

In the UK, there have been more excess deaths in the last three months than at any time during the pandemic or indeed since 2010. In the most recent week, excess mortality in England was 16 per cent.

In the US, excess mortality in people aged 25 to 44, and in those aged 75 to 84, is 18 per cent, and it is 15 per cent in those aged 65 to 74.

The situation is all the more alarming because there should be fewer deaths now, since so many people died earlier in the pandemic. There has also been a dramatic rise in people with disabilities.

As for Covid, in Australia, vaccine efficacy appears to be negative, judging by the statistics in NSW which are far from perfect but the best in Australia. They show that 88 per cent of people who died were vaccinated even though they made up only 85.5 per cent of the population. They also showed that the unvaccinated made up only 0.15 per cent of people in hospital with Covid and only 1.1 per cent of people in ICU.

Why is this? Almost certainly, because the unvaccinated who die of Covid in NSW are frail and elderly with multiple comorbidities, living in aged care or palliative care or at home, and don’t go to hospital. Why weren’t they vaccinated? Probably because they or their doctors feared it would kill them.

The question is, how many others is it killing too? Until health authorities tell us what’s in the shots, we won’t know.

https://expose-news.com/2022/11/05/covid-vaccines-graphene-nano-cancer/

 

Climate Change Explained

Climate Change Explained

If you are inclined to do so homework the MSM won’t show you, go to tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog and search Climate Change topic. Some eye opening data from eminent scientists all the way to the Climate Gate scandal of doctored data.

Serene Teffaha explains our rights, the corruption and the law

Serene Teffaha a lawyer explains our rights, the corruption and the law when it comes to compulsory medications. How to say no to your employer who is demanding you to get one. How employers can say no to government and don’t push their employees to get a jab. And much more. Watch this video from 1:05:50 to get right to the subjects mentioned above.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQucrkt9Crw

Why Are We Failing In Science Ethics?

(Snaffled from a friend on FB.)

When I was a middle school science teacher all of the life science texts available to us included a “Lab Manual.” Without fail, every lab manual from major science text publishers walked teachers and students through how to follow a recipe to reword a weak hypothesis, how to follow a poorly written experiment that never accounted for all of the variables, and then how to write vague conclusion built on conjecture from a rubric that told the student how to regurgitate unsupported science verbatim in order to get the most points for the assignment.

As a teacher, I was aware that none of our classroom experiments taught my students how to ask hard questions or how to consider known and unknown variables, or how to isolate those variables. I had a gut feeling that I was really not teaching anything but how to follow the leader. I wrote my own cognitive dissonance off by assuming that these were the in-depth studies that my students would take on later, in more advanced biology classrooms.

As it turns out, biology students by and large never experience any more advanced labs that require them to test the foundational experiments upon which modern biology and medical science are built.

Rockefeller was an incredibly clever bastard.

A Word About Fats…

From my book  https://www.howtolivethehealthiestlife.com

Fats and Oils

The writer and social critic H.L. Mencken once wrote, “For every complicated problem there is a solution that is simple, direct, understandable and wrong.”

Lie: A high fat diet is bad for you, cutting back on fats will help you lose weight and reduce risk of cardiovascular disease.

Truth: Healthy fats are essential, a reduced carbohydrate intake will lose fat easier than a reduced fat intake.

Truth: “In Framingham, Massachusetts, the more saturated fat one ate, the more cholesterol one ate, the more calories one ate, the lower people’s serum cholesterol… we found that the people who ate the most saturated fat weighed the least and were the most physically active.” (William Castelli, director of The Framingham Study).

Truth: “The diet-heart hypothesis had been repeatedly shown to be wrong, and yet, for complicated reasons of pride, profit and prejudice, the hypothesis continues to be exploited by scientists, fund raising enterprises, food companies and even governmental agencies. The public is being deceived by the greatest health scam of the century.” (George Mann, MD, renowned researcher).

Truth: More Americans die each year from too little fat than die from breast cancer. An estimated 40,000 US women die each year from breast cancer and according to a recent Harvard study, 72,000-96,000 people a year are dying from too little omega 3 fatty acids in their diets.

The facts proclaim loudly that “low fat” is a scam/con/lie. It began with a Russian study in 1908 that fed protein-rich animal foods to rabbits who developed arterial plaques and cardiovascular disease. Researchers then found the same results with chickens, pigs, goats and guinea pigs.

All of these animals are herbivores that evolved eating nothing but plants. They are clearly not designed to eat meat. When fed meat and fat they get sick. That makes perfect sense. That data was then inappropriately extrapolated to humans.

The “fat is bad” lie really began to pick up traction with a 1976 Senate report, titled “Dietary Goals for the United States”. It was written by a journalist with no background in health, who was advised by a Harvard nutritionist who viewed dietary fat as the nutritional equivalent of smoking cigarettes. Very quickly taken up by many health organisations was the simple, if untrue, mantra, “eating fat makes you fat” and they promoted that a low fat diet was the way to prevent disease.

It was thoroughly debunked by 4 independent studies in the early 80’s which found that men on low or high fat diets had no change in weight or coronary risk. Dr. Walter Willett of Harvard is considered by many to be the dean of nutrition and health studies. He states, “the percentage of calories from fat in a diet has not been related to any important health outcome.”

Low fat is continuously promoted by Big Food because it is cheaper to replace with sugar the taste lost when they took out the fat. So we have blooming weight and diabetes problems from increasing consumption of high-fructose corn syrup or cane sugar rather than healthy coconut oil.

The rate of obesity in the US between the 1900’s and the 1960’s was stable at 12-14% of the population. Within 5 years of the “fat is bad” message hitting the press the obesity rate was 20%. Today it is over 25%! Two thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

Despite everything you’ve been told, all fats are not bad. There are good and bad fats. Good fats are an essential part of a proper diet, bad fats are deadly. The brain particularly needs fat in the diet.

Some good fats are fatty fish like wild salmon, grass fed meat fat, butter, lard, dripping, coconut oil, the oils in nuts, linseed and chia seeds.

Some bad fats are trans fats – hydrogenated vegetable oils, canola etc. and their replacement, intersterified fats. Oils are typically not very stable, they destabilise and go rancid quickly. To solidify them and extend the shelf life of commercial oils, processors add hydrogen. This makes them a trans fat. In a 26 year survey of 87,000 US women, of the group with an underlying coronary heart disease, those who ate the most trans fats were three times as likely to die of a cardiac arrest.

~~~~~~~~~~

When you consume these subpar fats, your cell walls also become subpar. Instead of being flexible and responsive to intercellular communication, cell walls become stiff and rigid. The more rigid the walls, the slower the cell functions and more vulnerable it becomes to inflammation…

Have you heard of blood group buddies?

Copied from the blood group buddies- looks interesting:

There is an unvaxxed blood transfusion database already up and running for about a month, now. It’s part of My-Medical-Choice.org, which is a service set up to protect from unwanted medical interventions when we’re admitted to hospital – the legal documents (a Living Will and a medical Power of Attorney) that come with membership protect you even if admitted to A&E unconscious or you are heavily sedated and can’t communicate.

The legal documents and your other useful medical information are stored on your private online profile page and can be accessed by emergency responders and A&E through a medical alert login system. The medical alert system notifies your emergency contact(s) that you are in hospital.

The My Medical Choice service includes the Safe Blood system, which is mainly about blood transfusions. Members can add up to 6 private donors on their personal profile page, and also use the national database of donors.

My Medical Choice was set up primarily to protect us in case of emergency – if we’re unconscious or unable to communicate or lack mental capacity for some reason. This is because, unless you have appointed a Medical Guardian (an emergency contact or next-of-kin isn’t enough, unfortunately) to ensure your wishes are followed by the NHS for rejecting certain medical procedures, doctors get to make the decisions. We’re even hearing of doctors ignoring family members who say they have Power of Attorney unless they can produce the document then and there as evidence. With My Medical Choice, you can store copies of your Living Will (known as an Advance Decision Notice) and your medical Power of Attorney (known as a Living Power of Attorney) on your online profile page, which the NHS can access.

Our legal documents come preloaded with the rejection of certain medical treatments and procedures of concern right now, such as blood and blood products (platelets, plasma, etc.), skin and bone grafts, stem cells, and things like vaccines and invasive tests (like the PCR test). We are now advising people to add the rejection of things like DNRs, the use of drugs like remdesivir and midazolam, and the use of ventilators.

In the Welcome Pack, members get some handy documents that help them discuss their healthcare decisions with their family, GP, etc., and a Dealing with NHS Gatekeepers help sheet that they can take with them to hospitals or GP surgeries. The one-page Dealing with NHS Gatekeepers document includes the relevant laws that protect you, as well as the questions you may need to ask NHS staff if they try and stop you accessing treatment or a loved one, and more.

We are also putting together a pack of templates that you can use for prearranged appointments and operations to stop issues before they arise, or to use to deal with NHS staff members that are breaking the law. The complimentary documents are not on the website, as we’ve kept that ’low key’, so that it’s not immediately obvious to government trolls what the purpose of the website is. In fact, to the casual observer, the website look like a medical alert system website.

We have put together a VERY comprehensive FAQs page, so if you would like to know in detail how the service works, then please browse through the various topics.

https://my-medical-choice.org/faq