Category: Vaccines

Here is your first port of call on your research journey, what the doctor is supposed to tell you about the vaccine risks.

As posted by a FB friend, Carlie Marie, who is a nurse:

Being a nurse we are programmed to believe the sales pitch: Vaccines are safe, effective, and save lives.

Our careers are run on blind faith only being taught how to be assertive, overcome objections, and basically medically bully anyone who doesn’t want us to tick off our boxes that come in pre printed care plans.

It was a much too slow of an evolution for me. In 1998, I had been working with newborns. Injecting them with Hep B when the head of NICU said to stop. The mercury was binding in the brains maiming and killing. I injected babies in less than 24 hours of life every single shift.

Two years later my own newborn son was injected with my consent after being told there was no mercury. That it was changed to thimerosal and safe. LIES.

After a few too many beautiful dead babies I left that unit and went to work the Hemodialysis unit that was based in the same hospital. There I learned, not many got immunity and if they did it was short lived. I realized we were injecting every new baby 3 times with mercury and aluminum 3 times by 6 months of age with ZERO risk factors and no effectiveness.

Then I realized gardasil was bad when my daughter was injected and THEN warned of the sudden, severe, neurological side effect of losing consciousness. When I wanted to tear that nurse apart for not telling us that or giving us the sales sheet with that on it before the injection I took to the internet.

I still believed all were okay except those two. On blind faith and through indoctrination, ofcourse. After all, I was a seasoned nurse.

Then when the pediatrician went insane on me with misinformation that my late in life surprise son would be dead soon after learning to crawl due to me refusing Hep B I realized the doctors didn’t know shit about them.

That is when my earth tilted on it’s access. I went to the clinic after hours, using my keys to collect actual package inserts for every single common vaccine. They are always in the prep stations trash unopened with an intact seal.

The content in black and white was horrifying!

I have since spent countless hours researching and looking back on life and career with ugly dots being connected. I have been screaming the truth from the rooftops these last three years.

I only hope I can be forgiven for what I accepted into my own body repeatedly as an adult nurse being titre tested for immunity and perpetrated on people throughout my nursing career.

An FDA presentation from the FDA website. Shocking because the FDA doesn’t ever publicly talk about potential adverse events from vaccines. Also, this presentation exposes how *WE* are trial participants. They will give the vaccine to millions (?) and watch to see how we react. We aren’t talking about a little soreness here. Adverse events they are concerned about run the gamut from an allergic reaction to miscarriages to lifelong autoimmune disease to seizures to death.

Is it time to have a truthful discussion on CV19, fatality rates, treatments, natural supplementation, and how to protect the most at-risk?

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

The linked presentation available is, in my opinion, a must watch.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CIQ1J16A_9X/

(Tom: Don’t talk to the brain damaged from the last rushed vaccine about whether or not to get this one!)

Peter Todd, a lawyer who represented many of the claimants, told the Sunday Times: “There has never been a case like this before. The victims of this vaccine have an incurable and lifelong condition and will require extensive medication.”

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/brain-damaged-uk-victims-swine-flu-vaccine-get-60-million-compensation-1438572

Remarkably, zero of the 561 unvaccinated patients in the study had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to 0.063% of the (partially and fully) vaccinated. The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling. Our results give agency to calls for research conducted by individuals who are independent of any funding sources related to the vaccine industry. While the low rates of developmental disorders prevented sufficiently powered hypothesis testing, it is notable that the overall rate of autism spectrum disorder (0.84%) in the cohort is half that of the US national rate (1.69%). The practice-wide rate of ADHD was roughly half of the national rate. The data indicate that unvaccinated children in the practice are not unhealthier than the vaccinated and indeed the overall results may indicate that the unvaccinated pediatric patients in this practice are healthier overall than the vaccinated.

Vaccines are widely regarded as safe and effective within the medical community and are an integral part of the current American medical system. While the benefits of vaccination have been estimated in numerous studies, negative and nonspecific impact of vaccines on human health have not been well studied. Most recently, it has been determined [1,2] that variation exists in individual responses to vaccines, that differences exist in the safety profile of live and inactivated vaccines, and that simultaneous administration of live and inactivated vaccines may be associated with poor outcomes. Studies have not been published that report on the total outcomes from vaccinations, or the increase or decrease in total infections in vaccinated individuals.

A few independent (non-CDC) studies do exist that have compared outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. A small survey study of 415 families with homeschooled children by Mawson et al., 2017 [9] that compared vaccinated with completely unvaccinated children reported increased risk of many diagnoses among the vaccinated children including (condition, fold-increase): allergic rhinitis (30.1), learning disabilities (5.2), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (4.2), autism (4.2), neurodevelopmental disorders (3.7), eczema (2.9), and chronic illness (2.4). The increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders appeared to be higher in cases of preterm births. A study from Germany (Schmitz et al., 2011) [10] reported no increases in adverse outcomes other than atopy.

We performed a retrospective analysis spanning ten years of pediatric practice focused on patients with variable vaccination born into a practice, presenting a unique opportunity to study the effects of variable vaccination on outcomes. The average total incidence of billed office visits per outcome related to the outcomes were compared across groups (Relative Incidence of Office Visit (RIOV)). RIOV is shown to be more powerful than odds ratio of diagnoses. Full cohort, cumulative incidence analyses, matched for days of care, and matched for family history analyses were conducted across quantiles of vaccine uptake. Increased office visits related to many diagnoses were robust to days-of-care-matched analyses, family history, gender block, age block, and false discovery risk. Many outcomes had high RIOV odds ratios after matching for days-of-care (e.g., anemia (6.334), asthma (3.496), allergic rhinitis (6.479), and sinusitis (3.529), all significant under the Z-test). Developmental disorders were determined to be difficult to study due to extremely low prevalence in the practice, potentially attributable to high rates of vaccine cessation upon adverse events and family history of autoimmunity.

http://ipaknowledge.org/ipak-vaxxed-v-unvaxxed-study.php