AMA Hid Efficacy Of HCQ

AMA Hid Efficacy Of HCQ

The fact that the fact checkers report the AMA not rescinding their original guidance on HCQ proves that the AMA are as complicit as the elected officials, they would prefer to see us dead rather than use what many front line doctors have proven to be an effective prophylactic and treatment. One African country, where HCQ is eaten like candy as defense against malaria, had ONE death from COVID until they started vaccinating. Of course the deaths skyrocketed after they started jabbing people with what immunologists are more widely now correctly calling the spike protein – a toxin.

But of course, if you have an effective prophylactic and treatment, you cannot get emergency use authorisation for an untested, untrialled (what is fraudulently called a) vaccine, now can you. So that which does not fit the agenda (goes against profits) has to be suppressed. No matter how many people die in the process.

A bit like collateral damage casualties in a war.

Dr Stephanie Seneff On Spike Protein In Vax

Dr Stephanie Seneff On Spike Protein In Vax

“In short, the conclusion is we made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now. We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen. We never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin; a pathogenic protein. By v-nating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin. For some people it will get into circulation, and when that happens it can cause damage, especially in the cardiovascular system.” — Dr. Bryam Bridle Ph.D, immunologist

My body has an immune system.

It is not a failed experiment.

I acknowledge that if I abuse my body, malnourish or poison it, then my immune system will not work as well.

So I exercise it, I properly nourish it, I ingest and expose it to as few toxins as possible.

When I look at all the harm done by man in his conceit that he can improve on the original design, I’ll stick with my original design and forgo the genetic modifications on offer thank you.

The Jab Will Not

The Jab Will Not

It is not a vaccine, by definition. It neither confers immunity nor stops transmission, by the maker’s own words. According to this latest from the manufacturer, it does not even reduce the severity of symptoms.

According to a panel of 5 highly qualified medical professionals, https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=32745, this jab is a bioweapon that has 20 documented ways of harming human systems. Please do your homework before supporting this bioweapon an any way, shape or form!

The more who take it, the more will die from it. That is already documented by the various government’s own statistics. Nearly 5,000 in the US (VAERS) and pushing 10,000 in Europe.

https://subsplash.com/churchofgladtidings/lb/mi/+kn37nbr

A conversation from Chris Potts

Had a call from the NHS again today, asking if I’d like to book an appointment for a thingy. Only the second call I’ve had in fairness. Different caller this time, so once I again I took them through the same procedure as I did with the previous call. Which was…

NHS.. Hello Mr Potts, I’m calling to see if you would like to make an appointment for a C thing. You can make an appointment with your Dr or local Pharmacy.

ME.. Hello, would you like to talk through the relevant stages, so I can make an informed choice as to whether I’d like to accept your offer of a thingy, or respectfully decline your offer.

NHS.. short pause, What stages are you referring too Mr Potts?.

ME.. Well, firstly are you going to explain to me, that the things in question are experimental technologies, and by agreeing to have one, I’ll be taking part in a phase four clinical trial that runs until January 2023.

NHS.. Sorry Mr Potts, I don’t have information like that to give you. as I’m not aware of any clinical trials taking place.

ME.. OK, could you please give me a full list of the ingredients of the particular thing, I’d be taking, so I can check to see if I’m allergic to any of them, and avoid the possibility of a reaction.

NHS.. Sorry Mr Potts, I can’t give you that information, as I don’t know which brand of thingy you’d be offered.

ME.. OK, then perhaps you could give me a list of alternative treatments that are available, that don’t involve invasive procedures like thingys, and have a proven record of safety and efficacy?

NHS.. Again I’m sorry Mr Potts I don’t have any information of that kind at hand, regarding alternative treatments.
At this point I pointed out to the guy that, the three questions I asked him, make up the core principles of gaining INFORMED CONSENT, before any medical procedure can be carried out. and that those principals are protected under international law. I also pointed out, he was perfectly within his rights to call and ask me if I’d like to make an appointment, but in doing so he should have gone through those three stages with me first, as required by law when asking anyone to under go a medical procedure.

In fairness to him guys, he was reasonable about the whole thing, and obviously logged me as “offered but declined,” in a short conversation we had before the call was ended, he said “I take it you’ve looked into this topic then Mr Potts,” I replied “I have indeed my friend, thoroughly.” The impression I got, was that I’d raised his curiosity level a notch, especially the first part about this thingy roll out being a phase four clinical trial, I truly believe he genuinely had no idea this was the case.

As I pointed out many times before, we do still have legally protected rights to decline the thing. Once you know your rights, and the legal procedures health care providers must follow by law to gain your INFORMED CONSENT, no amount of threats or coercion can change the fact, that without providing the answers to the three questions I asked, any consent I gave, would not legally be deemed informed and would therefore be invalid. I can’t stress that enough to you guys, know your rights and use them. You’d be surprised how quickly even the most persistent callers back off, once they realise the person on the other end of the phone is no mug LOL.

Great questions to ask before you consider the thingy.

Victoria’s Lockdown

Brent N Cam posted:

A guy walks in to a Melbourne bar – he’s just back from India, does 14 days quarantine in Adelaide, passes that and wanders the streets of Adelaide then flys to Melbourne AND THEN the virus that was on him all that time suddenly appears and starts spreading, and causes the complete lockdown of 6.5 million people for at least 7 days.

No one else in Adelaide quarantine or working there gets it, no one else in Adelaide anywhere gets it and no one else on the plane gets it.

But he gets to his home in Melbourne and SHAZAM, it takes off and shuts the whole state down.

And all this happens days before the State of Emergency runs out in Victoria.

And the reason for a lockdown, according to the govt, is that not enough people are “jabbed”.

But they get to extend the State of Emergency because of this sudden and mysterious outbreak that only happened AFTER the guy left quarantine and flew to Melbourne and mixed amongst his family.

And the people of Victoria rush out in unprecedented numbers to join the global human testing and trial of the jab currently being marketed by govt as a ‘ennicav’ – even though it’s not actually a ‘ennicav’ and even with possible long term ramifications not being known for a long time, of course.

And no one questions it.

Extra-Ordinary.