Tamiflu Label

Tamiflu_Label
So why in heaven’s name would anyone in their right mind take it? Because if the biggest single cause of death is iatragenic illness (caused by doctors), and you blindly accept a doctor’s advice without doing your homework you are clearly NOT in your right mind.

How Did We Lose Nutrition From Our Food Supply? – A Timeline

 

Activity Prime Purpose
In the beginning…
Each individual or family unit foraged and/or
hunted for food
Survival
Then
Families coalesced into small communities
to do better at the hunter/gatherer game
Division of Labour
More Assured Survival
Over time
We specialised (some gathered, some farmed,
some hunted) and traded
Division of Labour
More Assured Survival
Wider Variety of Foods
This developed further
Larger and more risky trading required capital
and risk sharing so corporations were born
Wider Variety of Foods
Profit
Which led to
Larger corporations gaining control of seed
strains, grazing and farming lands and
adopting strategies that maximise yield rather
than nutrition
Profit
And we now have
Very large corporations in control of food
distribution, manufacture, marketing and
retailing, growing low nutrient crops with
artificail fertilisers, pesticides and
herbicides in a way that is destructive to
our health, preparing foods with toxins and
sugar that destroy our health, promoting
destructive additives and ingredients as
healthy when they are far from it.
Larger Profits

 

Collectives, specialisation, trading and risk sharing are not necessarily bad developments. If you had ethical people involved all along the line there are advantages to grouping, specialisation, trade and economies of scale. It is when you introduce the prority of profit over the quality of the product produced that you have the problems we have today.

This needs to change. Every dollar you spend props up the current system and degrades your and others’ health or contributes to building a better system.
Please choose wisely.

Red Face After Drinking? A Dead Giveaway of Alcohol’s Damaging Effects

red-asian
It doesn’t happen to everyone, but for some people, going out and having drinks results in a deeply flushed face. Why? Because their bodies are not fully able to process the alcohol they consume, so an alcohol-related chemical called acetaldehyde builds up in their bodies. It’s the acetaldehyde that triggers the flushed face.
http://www.narconon.org/blog/red-face-after-drinking-a-dead-giveaway-of-alcohols-damaging-effects.html

New Findings Show Avoiding GMOs Improves Health

My new peer-reviewed piece (summarized below) may be the most important article I’ve ever written. It redefines how we think and speak about genetically modified organisms (GMOs), Roundup®, and organic diets. I know it does for me. Survey results reveal that 3,256 people reported improvements in 28 health conditions after reducing their GMO intake. Many conditions were “nearly” or “completely” recovered.
https://responsibletechnology.org/michelle-perro-interview/
https://responsibletechnology.org/irtnew/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Summary-Improved-Health-by-Eliminating-GMOs-by-Jeffrey-Smith.pdf

New Study Links Cellphone Radiation to Tumors in Male Rats

Cell_Phone_Hot_Spot
A new report from the U.S. government is likely to create further debate regarding whether or not cellphones and other mobile devices pose a cancer risk to humans. According to a draft report from researchers the United States National Toxicology Program (NTP), male rats exposed to high levels of radiation similar to that emitted by cellphones developed tumors in the tissue surrounding their hearts. The report also found that female rats and mice exposed to the same amount of radiation did not develop tumors. Reuters first reported on the release of the preliminary report.

To be clear, this is not the first time studies examining the dangers of radiofrequency devices such as cellphones and microwaves have caused controversy. Studies in both Australia and India have found that men who use their cellphones most often had lower sperm counts than those who used cellphones less often. In addition, in 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified radiofrequency radiation emitted by cellphones as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.”

https://www.activistpost.com/2018/02/new-study-links-cellphone-radiation-to-tumors-in-male-rats.html