And there have been NO safety tests done on the vaccines being administered to pregnant women. In fact according to statistics they substantially increase the risk of miscarriage!
Organic Food Consumption Lowers Overall Cancer Risks in Large-Scale Study of French Adults
The results are in on one of the first, large-scale studies on organic food consumption and cancer risks and they are significant and encouraging. It is widely recognized we need to do much more in preventing cancer, as opposed to treating it, and this study suggests that organic food may be an important piece of the puzzle.
A team of French government scientists analyzed 68,946 citizens in the NutriNet-Santé cohort. Individuals were surveyed to determine if those who ate more organic foods had lower cancer rates. Their new journal article, published online by JAMA Internal Medicine this week (that’s the prestigious journal put out by the American Medical Association), reports their key findings: people consuming organic food most regularly had 25% lower overall cancer risk compared to the group of people reporting very little or no consumption of organic food.
The differences were substantial and highly statistically significant – “participants with the highest frequency of organic food consumption had a 25% lower risk of being diagnosed as having cancer during follow-up compared with those with the lowest frequency” (Hemler et al., 2018). Significant differences in cancer rates were found for Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (as much as a 86% reduction!) and postmenopausal breast cancer, even after accounting for factors like socioeconomic status and exercise habits (Baudry et al., 2018).
Organic producers are extremely limited on what products they can use for pest control, resulting in lower residues of synthetic chemicals. To see this for yourself, check out our Dietary Risk Index which quantifies residue amounts in organic and conventional fruits, vegetables, and grains.
An invited commentary on the organic food-cancer paper appears in the same issue of JAMA Internal Medicine. In the piece by Hemler et al. (2018) entitled “Organic Foods for Cancer Prevention — Worth the Investment?” the authors first highlight the “probable human carcinogen” classification of the three widely used pesticides (diazinon, malathion, glyphosate), including by far the world’s most heavily applied pesticide (glyphosate) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). They then note all three pesticides have been linked to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and also acknowledge widespread exposure in the general population through mostly dietary sources.
Scientist Jailed After Discovering Deadly Virus Delivered Through Vaccines
Dr. Judy A. Mikovits, PhD, was thrown in prison after she refused to discredit her own research that led to the discovery that deadly retroviruses have been transmitted to 25 million Americans through vaccines.
Vaccine Injury Compensation Up 400%
Since this article was published total payouts for illness and death attributable to vaccines have exceeded 4 billion dollars. That despite a widespread ignorance of the vaccine injury reporting facility and denial by many front line medical personnel that vaccine injury is real. So much so that estimates put reports at 1 percent of actual incidents.
US Vax Court Sees 400% Spike in Vaccine Injuries, Flu Shot Wins Top Honors for Biggest Payout
Children Cannot Bounce Off The Walls…
Still Using Non-Stick Cookware?
THERE’S A NEW reason to be concerned about toxic chemicals used in nonstick pans, waterproof products, and firefighting foam: PFOA and PFOS impair male reproductive health, according to a study released in early November.
Researchers have already documented that PFOA and PFOS, two compounds in a class known as PFAS, reduce the fertility of male mice, rats, and rabbits. The new study, published by the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, shows that young men exposed to the chemicals have a range of problems with their reproductive systems — and also lays out, for the first time, how these chemicals interfere with hormones inside the cell.
The research was conducted in Veneto, Italy, one of several areas of the world where industrial use of PFAS has caused drinking water contamination and led to the chemicals accumulating in people’s blood. The mid-Ohio Valley, where a DuPont plant released the chemicals into the Ohio River, is another.
The researchers compared male high school students who had been exposed to high levels of PFOA and PFOS in Veneto to young men who hadn’t been exposed and found that those in the exposed group had shorter penises, lower sperm counts, lower sperm mobility, and a reduction in “anogenital distance,” a measure that scientists see as a marker of reproductive health. The percentage of normally shaped sperm in the exposed group was just over half that in the control group.
The chemicals “have a substantial impact on human male health as they directly interfere with hormonal pathways potentially leading to male infertility,” the scientists concluded in the article, which was peer reviewed and published on November 6.
After observing the abnormalities in the young men, whose average age was 18, the researchers probed further to see how the chemicals might be affecting their reproductive development. Experiments they conducted in the laboratory show that PFOA and PFOS can bind with testosterone receptors inside the cell and disrupt the normal function of the hormone.
“The structures of testosterone and PFAS are very, very similar,” said Andrea Di Nisio, a biologist at the University of Padova and one of the paper’s 12 authors. “And we said, ‘They look the same, so maybe PFAS act like testosterone in the cell.’ And they did.”
The study was small, comparing just 212 exposed young men with 171 controls in this part of northern Italy. Yet with communities around the world regularly discovering that their water is contaminated with PFAS chemicals, the research has international implications for people who have been exposed to the contaminants over the past decades.
“As the first report on water contamination of PFCs goes back to 1977, the magnitude of the problem is alarming as it affects an entire generation of young individuals, from 1978 onwards,” the researchers wrote.
Indeed, the study suggests one possible answer to a phenomenon that’s been puzzling researchers for the past few years: a disturbing global decline in sperm counts. Over the past four decades, sperm counts in the U.S., Australia, Europe, and New Zealand have fallen more than 50 percent, according to a 2017 study conducted by researchers at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine and Hebrew University School of Public Health. The worldwide trend is largely seen as a mystery, though there is a growing recognition that environmental contaminants play a role.
“We have several other candidates” in addition to PFOS and PFOA, said Pete Myers, the founder and chief scientist of Environmental Health Sciences, who has written about the harms other chemicals, particularly the plastic additives phthalates and BPA, pose to men’s reproductive health. “The difference with these two PFAS chemicals is that they’re vastly more persistent.” PFOS and PFOA can stay in the human body for years and persist in the environment indefinitely.
The exposures to all of these environmental pollutants can have a cumulative effect, according to Myers. “Having PFOA and PFOS in there with phthalates and BPA, it adds up,” he said.
PFOA and PFOS have been linked to numerous other health problems, including reduced immune function, obesity, kidney cancer, testicular cancer, and increased cholesterol levels.
For the reproductive effects seen in Veneto, at least part of the harm likely occurred before the young men were born, according to Di Nisio, who has begun to think about how to prevent future developmental exposures to PFAS.
“We’re left with the question of how to remove PFAS from blood,” said Di Nisio. Because the chemicals are transferred from mothers to babies during pregnancy, “we have to find a way to eliminate them.” If we don’t, he said, the ongoing chemical exposures will set up even more boys for what may be a lifetime of reproductive difficulties.
Not Nuturing
Could not agree more strongly with this than I do.
How Many Ways Can You Mess Up A Society?
Let me count the ways. (Make sure to read the last two paragraphs at the end of the list.)
Psychiatric Infiltration of Key Professions to Eradicate the Concepts of Good and Evil, Right and Wrong
Watered Down Education Creating Dumbed Down Population
Individuals Not or Mis-Educated in Ethics and Morals
The Above Three Leading to the Present Insanity of Multiple Gendering
Psychiatric Infiltration of the Clergy Leading to Widespread Pedophilia
Conditioning People to Be Easily Offended Rather Than Strong with Integrity
Greedy Corporations Driven Only by Profit Destroying Personal Freedom and the Environment
A Powerful Military/Industrial Complex
Wars and Political Destabiisation For Economic Gain/Political Control
Corporate Political Donations Leading to a Corporatocracy
A Controlled Government Structure, Bought and Blackmailed That Does Not Adhere to the Constitution
Mad Men in Power Seeking to Enforce a One World Government Slave State
Suppression of Clean/Renewable Energy Sources by Vested Interests
Fracking For Gas Poisoning Water Supplies
Widespread Pollution of Land, Air and Water
Psyche Drugs Incapacitating Individuals
Recreational Drugs Used as an “Escape” from Pain or Reality Leading to “Wooden” People
Medicines and Toxins in Drinking Water Supply
Banning Hemp Growing (Which leads to increased requirement of farmed trees which results in
Deforestation and Wildlife Habitat Destruction for Inefficient Cropping
The Killing of Wildlife to the Point of Extinction for Sport/Unproven Medicinal Treatments
Widespread Use of Bee-Killing Herbicides
Geoengineering Polluting the Atmosphere with Toxic Chemtrails
Poisoning the Water With Fluoride
Polluting the Land and Sea with Industrial Waste
Polluting the Land and Sea with Oil Spillages
Allowing Plastic Buildup to Pollute the Sea
Spraying Toxic Pestcides on Food and Land
Creating Nutritionless (sometimes even plastic) Food
Toxic GMOs In Food Chain
Food Additives Allowed That Are Toxins
Poisonous Vaccines Debilitating a Generation
Non-Nutrtionally Trained Doctors
A Medcal System More Interested in Maintaining Power and Control than Healing Patients
Symptom Suppressing Drugs That Don’t Heal
A Non-Independent Media That Shills for Vested Interests and Acts as a Merchant of Chaos to Promote Bad News to Keep the Public in Fear
Corporate Corruption of “Science” and Research
Corporate and Governmental Suppression of Whistleblowers
Judicial System Operating As A Law Unto Themselves and Denying Justice
Attacking the Fundamental Building Block of Society – the Family
Attacking the Main Proponents of Morality – Religion
Denying Man’s True Nature as a Spiritual Being
Concealed and Condoned Pedophelia in High Places
Now before you go down in the mouth about how bad it all is, there are a great many people of good will working on solutions to the above. What you can do on an individual basis is to sit down with this list and identify at least one action you can take on a personal level to fully or partially counter the negative effects of each of the above on you. Once you have done that you might like to identify actions you can take that will more broadly counter the negative effects of the above on self and others or at least forward the spread of truth and sanity about them to those you love and beyond.
Having written this list and looking back on it, I cannot help but be struck by how many of the above would be defused or eradicated by the increased intelligence, awareness and ethic level of the individuals in society. As awareness is increased by losing the upset one has on things that have negatively impacted one in the past, and as going for a walk and looking at things extroverts one’s attention and recovers attention units from where they are stuck in the past, the very simplest and easiest thing you can do is go for a daily walk and look at things until you feel brighter.
Your Choice – Smile Or Cry
Evidence is UNDENIABLE: Smart meters cause massive changes to the heart
An expert in smart meter microwave transmission power has published new research showing that, contrary to the official government narrative, the radiation emitted from smart meters directly interferes with normal heart function.
To come to this conclusion, Warren Woodward connected himself to an EKG monitor while lying near an Elster smart meter, which was connected to a high-frequency analyzer that measures microwave frequencies.
As it alternated between normal readings of 00.1 and 00.2, a monitor display showed that Woodward’s heart patterns were normal and symmetrical. But during times when it spiked to 139.3 – this being the time when the smart meter initiated data transmissions – Woodward’s EKG pattern changed dramatically in response.
In other words, when the smart meter was not sending high amounts of power, Woodward’s EKG readings were normal and natural. But when it kicked into higher output mode, the changes were “massive.”
Brief periods of alteration to normal heart rhythm aren’t much to worry about. But when these irregularities are ongoing, the heart can end up working too hard, resulting in fatigued cardiac function.