Posts

Posted on

New Study Reveals Low Iodine Levels In Pregnancy Worsen IQ Loss From Fluoride

Pregnant Belly Ultrasound

A new study from Canada published this week in the journal Nutrients, found that pregnant women who had low iodine levels and elevated fluoride had boys who suffered an average IQ loss that was 58% greater than the already significant IQ loss from elevated fluoride alone [Goodman 2022].  Artificially fluoridated drinking water was the main source of the fluoride. The boys of women with low iodine levels lost, on average, 9.3 IQ points, while those of mothers with adequate iodine lost 5.9 IQ points, for every 1 mg/g increase in mother’s urine fluoride concentration.*  In previous work in the same group of pregnant mothers, drinking water fluoridated at 0.7 mg/L was associated with an increase of roughly 1 mg/g in urine fluoride [Till 2018].

23% of the Canadian women who took part in the new study were classified as having “low iodine”.  The iodine status of pregnant women in the USA is much worse than in Canada, with well over 50% currently meeting the criteria for “low iodine” used in this study [Watson 2020].

The authors point out that theirs was the first mother-child cohort study “to estimate the interplay between prenatal fluoride exposure and maternal iodine status in relation to child IQ”.  They also warned that “even mildly reduced iodine levels may have biological significance when interacting with fluoride.”

https://fluoridealert.org/content/new-study-low-iodine-in-pregnancy-worsens-iq-loss-from-fluoride/

Posted on

Chile becomes first country to pass neuro-rights law

Connected Brain

Chile became the first country in the world to protect neuro-rights after the Chamber of Deputies approved Wednesday an amendment to the Chilean Constitution. The bill is expected to be signed into law by their president soon.

The amendment to the Chilean Constitution aims at defining mental identity for the first time in history as a non-manipulable right to protect it against technological advancements in neurosciences and artificial intelligence. The bill sets out to protect the right to mental privacy, personal identity, the free will of thought, equitable access to technologies that increase human capacities, and protection against discrimination.

Guido Girardi, the opposition senator, said, The amendment to the Chilean Constitution “is the first law in the world on neuro-rights, and it is the first step in a legislative ecosystem that will regulate artificial intelligence and neuro-technologies. ”

The Chamber of Deputies said in a statement that “Chile’s law establishes that scientific and technological development must be at the service of people and that it will be carried out with respect for life and physical and mental integrity.”

https://www.jurist.org/news/2021/10/chile-becomes-first-country-to-pass-neuro-rights-law/

Posted on

LAW FIRM RELEASES BOMBSHELL LEGAL OPINION ON ALLEGED ILLEGAL CONTROL OF DOCTOR’S CONDUCT

A new legal opinion published by Julian Gillespie LLB, BJuris and Peter Fam LLB casts doubt over the legal basis of AHPRA’s 9 March 2021 “gag order”. The opinion is accompanied by the following cover letter (click here to skip to the full opinion):

This email raises several issues which are of concern to the Australian public and Health Professionals and, we hope, you. Also, the attached Legal Opinion contains the report of Dr Phillip Altman, makes available to you and your colleagues a cutting edge update on the COVID-19 vaccinations, and a comprehensive analysis of associated Adverse Events in Australia, which together raise serious implications for Australian Personal Injury and Medical Negligence law.

Contingent to a joint statement received from AHPRA and the National Boards on 9 March 2021[1], Australian Health Professionals numbering over 825,000 were essentially forbidden from publicly questioning the science underlying the emerging COVID-19 injectables, let alone questioning any government messaging urging Australians to be vaccinated because these products were deemed ‘safe and effective’. The effect of this unilateral action was to undermine professional independence. However well intentioned, this gagging by bureaucratic decree inserted AHPRA and the National Boards between the Clinician and their Patient, which resulted in a serious failure of evidenced-based information being shared by Health Professionals with patients, being information required for patients to be fully-informed, for the purpose of their providing legally acceptable Informed Consent to receiving Covid-19 injectables.

This failure in Informed Consent across Australia has now occurred millions of times in respect of the Covid-19 injectables.

To assist you to understand the causes leading to these concerning signals, we provide to you the comprehensive and up-to-date report of Dr Phillip Altman annexed to the Opinion. By way of background, Dr Altman’s report has been used in modified formats to assist the Courts in Australia and New Zealand to understand the scientific evidence behind the COVID-19 injectables. It is proving to be the long-awaited body of work needed by the Judicial, Medical and Scientific communities of Australia, to bring clarity by critical scientific appraisal during these controversial times of COVID-19.

https://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/barrister-releases-bombshell-legal-opinion-on-alleged-illegal-control-of-doctors-conduct/

Posted on

Spygate Docs and Trump’s RICO Lawsuit: Exploring the Real Reasons Behind FBI Raid

Merrick Garland

Following the FBI’s raid of the residence of former President Donald Trump, there’s been much speculation about the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) motivation. Was it done to prevent Trump from running again in 2024, or was the raid related to documents and evidence surrounding the Jan. 6 commission?

While these factors may have had some bearing on the FBI’s raid, some entirely different, and potentially larger, factors may be at play.

It’s likely that the FBI’s raid was driven by intelligence community fears over information that was contained within those documents relating to the Russiagate hoax.

The DOJ’s coordinated FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago was likely related to the potential unsealing and public presentation of this information—particularly in relation to Trump’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) suit against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee, and former FBI officials such as former Director James Comey, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, former agent Peter Strzok, and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page—and his amended RICO suit, which added more defendants.

As new information has come to light, we’ve gained increased confidence and feel even more strongly regarding this theory. The vast breadth and scope of the search warrant alone have bolstered this theory. But that’s far from being the only reason behind our belief.

An Aug. 17 Newsweek article included some remarkable statements from two sources within the Intelligence Community (IC).

One of these sources noted that “agents went into Trump’s residence on the pretext that they were seeking all government documents … but the true target was this private stash” of documents amassed by Trump, “which Justice Department officials feared Trump might weaponize.” The second source claimed that although the FBI supposedly “collected everything that rightfully belonged to the U.S. government,” the true target of the DOJ-led FBI raid was “these documents that Trump had been collecting since early in his administration.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/spygate-docs-and-trumps-rico-lawsuit-exploring-the-real-reasons-behind-the-fbi-raid_4676237.html

Posted on

Dr. Clare Craig Exposes How Pfizer Twisted Their Clinical Trial Data for Young Children

Dr. Clare Craig Exposes Pfizer Fraud

  • The trial recruited 4,526 children aged six months to four years old. 3,000 of these children did not make it to the end of the trial. Why was there this drop off?
  • There were six children aged two to four who had severe covid in the vaccine group but only one in the placebo group. So on that basis, the likelihood that this vaccine is actually causing severe covid is higher than the likelihood that it isn’t.
  • The only child who was hospitalized in the trial for a fever and a seizure was vaccinated.
  • In the three week period, after the first vaccine dose, thirty-four of the vaccinated children got covid and only thirteen in the placebo group which worked out as a 30% increased chance of catching covid in that three week period if you were vaccinated.
  • They ignored that data and then there was an eight week gap between the second dose and the third dose where again, children were getting plenty of covid in the vaccine arm. They ignored that data.
  • There was then several weeks after the third dose which they also ignored, which meant that in the end they had ignored 97% of the covid that occurred during the trial and they compared three children in the vaccine arm who had covid with seven in the placebo arm and they said that this showed the vaccine was effective.
  • The children who would have been placebo, the control group, were followed up for an average of six weeks and then unblinded and given the vaccine. That’s your safety control gone forever.
  • Emergency Use Authorization is meant for a situation where there’s a risk of serious injury or death. Children under five are not at risk of serious injury or death from covid.https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/bombshell-dr-clare-craig-exposes
Posted on

Fauci To Retire After Outed As Performing Gain-of-Function on the Spanish Flu

Fauci To Retire

Yes, that is right, Fauci and crew are now actively performing gain-of-function (GoF) work and infecting primates with the Spanish Flu. For those of you that are unaware, GoF does not have a single agreed upon definition but, as it relates here, is essentially the modification of the Spanish Flu virus to make “more functional.” In this case, as with COVID, I have little doubt the GoF supporters will argue that this is not GoF but the article actually notes that this disease was created in canine kidneys with supplemental bovine serum.

https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/fauci-is-now-performing-gain-of-function

Posted on

Herbicide Free Campus Becomes Re:wild Your Campus

A newsletter I received this morning. Progress is being made in many directions!
To our Herbicide Free Campus Community,
I want to share some incredibly exciting news with you all that will shape the future of our organization and movement.
Ever since HFC was born, our goal was to one day become an official partner of a larger organization to guarantee continuity and stability in the long term. Originally, my fellow co-founder Bridget and I took this campaign beyond Berkeley in a leap of faith, compelled to expand this movement in light of the Johnson v. Monsanto trial, first throughout California and then across the United States.
It was not my intention to create my own nonprofit, but after reaching out to my network to explore the possibility of becoming a program of a larger organization, it was clear that I first had to take the issue of pesticide use on school grounds into my own hands. Without a notable track record of success to prove myself or the mission worthy of being taken on by an established group, the only option was to start my own organization.
It’s been four years since we expanded the campaign on our own, and after raising money, working tirelessly, building an incredible team, and mentoring dozens of students, I can now proudly say that our small but scrappy team has truly started a movement. We are recognized nationally and have earned the respect of the prominent organizations I had first emailed when this vision was only an idea in 2018.
This is where the exciting news comes in. Starting September 1, 2022, Herbicide-Free Campus will become a fiscally sponsored project of Re:wild, an environmental nonprofit that seeks to protect and restore biodiversity through the “re-wilding” of outdoor space. Herbicide-Free Campus will rebrand as Re:wild Your Campus, a project of Re:wild.
Earth Island Institute was our original fiscal sponsor and provided critical support when we were a nascent operation. We are so grateful for their assistance in getting us to this moment.
Our transition to Re:wild is the culmination of many months of thoughtful conversations and careful consideration. Re:wild Your Campus will promote biodiversity and climate resilience through transforming college campuses to become regenerative ecosystems. Being part of a global organization that works directly with activists on the ground will help us expand our reach while staying true to our deepest aspiration — empowering the next generation of leaders to eliminate herbicides and decolonize aesthetics to create safer spaces for us all.
To the HFC family, which is every single one of you on this list: Your support means the world. We are so incredibly thankful for you all helping us get to this point. Hopefully, the world will be a bit wilder and safer because of the work that we have all done together. Now let’s build on that and take this further than we ever imagined possible!
Please take a moment to check out our new website and please consider supporting us in this new chapter of growth. If you are not yet following us on social media, we welcome you to check us out there too, you can find us on Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook and TikTok. Keep your eye out for future emails from Re:wild Your Campus, campus@rewild.org!
Mackenzie Feldman
Project Director, Re:wild Your Campus (formerly known as Herbicide-Free Campus)
“We are cultivating a new paradigm in land management that shines importance on soil health, human health, biodiversity, and native plants. With students as leaders, groundskeepers as land stewards, and campuses as examples for the world to follow, we see universities as the starting point for our movement.” – Mackenzie Feldman