You’re In The Middle Of A Robbery
That Is Why Tyranny Happens
Cowardice. An inability to confront and a lack of courage.
Treat and Cure Ear Infections with Supplements, Natural Medicine, Diet Changes and Natural Health
This informative 14-page eBook is a very in-depth overview of how and why children develop ear infections and what you can do to implement an ear infection treatment program.
https://stopmandatoryvaccination.substack.com/p/treat-and-cure-ear-infections-with
Sign the Health Freedom Bill of Rights
The World Health Organization (WHO) AND the United Nations (U.N.) are in the midst of attempting unprecedented global takeovers of public health that will change our future if we do not join together and stop them.
Right now, the WHO is amending the International Health Regulations (IHR) and drafting a “Pandemic Treaty,” aka WHO CA+. These documents create the legal framework for the WHO to declare public health emergencies at will and then manage global public health in response.
It also gives the WHO authority over pandemic preparedness, which includes extensive surveillance of people and animals to identify outbreaks early and allows the WHO to act as the single authority for infectious disease mitigation, prevention and treatment protocols for anything they deem a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).
In other words, the WHO would become “the world’s doctor, medical czar,” control the public health narrative and censor opposing viewpoints.
Simultaneous actions by the U.N. are underway, with it recently announcing it is seeking the power to manage global emergencies.
Join us in resisting this global pandemic response by signing the Health Freedom Bill of Rights below. Sign to let the WHO and the U.N. know that we are paying attention and will not comply with this consolidation of power at the hands of global unelected leaders.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community-forum/health-freedom-bill-of-rights/
Was this Deceptive Trade? Paxton v. Moderna
Amid ongoing reports concerning the integrity of Big Pharma, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has announced that he plans to investigate companies’ potential manipulation and misrepresentation of Covid vaccine trial data.
Paxton’s investigation centers around Texas’s Deceptive Trade Practice Act according to his announcement to the New York Post.
Under 17.46(b)(24) of the DPTA, Paxton must answer two questions to determine whether Big Pharma companies acted unlawfully.
1) Did the company fail to disclose known information concerning its Covid vaccine?
2) Was that failure intended to induce the public into getting the product?
Alex Berenson’s recent report on Moderna’s vaccine trials provides a case study that indicates affirmative answers to both questions.
The Case Against Moderna
Did Moderna fail to disclose known information concerning its Covid vaccine?
Last week, Berenson reported that Moderna “hid serious side effects” when it published its clinical trial results for the Covid vaccines.
Moderna opened its vaccine (“P201”) trials with 600 volunteers in May 2020 and published its results in February 2021.“No serious adverse effects were observed,” the company boasted at the top of the report. But that was a lie.
“In all, during the placebo-controlled phase of the trial… seven of the 400 healthy volunteers who received a two-shot regimen of Moderna’s vaccine suffered side effects,” Berenson writes. “The problems included a heart attack and two miscarriages. In comparison, the 200 people who received a placebo shot without any mRNA had no serious side effects.”
After the trial ended, more participants came forward with devastating results, including an additional miscarriage and several cardiovascular issues. In total, 14 volunteers reported serious side effects.
The company never issued a public statement disclosing the true results of the trial. As Berenson writes, “The company never updated the Vaccine paper with any of these reports. On December 30, 2022 the federal clinicaltrials.gov website quietly posted final safety data from P201, including all the serious adverse event reports.”
Moderna failed to disclose known information from the trials for 22 months. In the interim, the United States administered over 200 million doses of the Moderna mRNA vaccine while the true results remained concealed. Those 22 months were highly lucrative for the emerging pharmaceutical company.
Was that failure of disclosure tended to induce the public into getting the vaccines?
From the time of Moderna’s Covid vaccine trials in 2020 to the release of the true results at the end of 2022, the company’s revenue increased by over 2,000 percent.
In 2020, Moderna’s total revenue was $800 million. In 2021, Moderna published the “no serious adverse effects” paper, and the company’s revenue skyrocketed to $18.5 billion. Over 95 percent of that revenue came from the Covid vaccine.
In 2022, Moderna made $18.4 billion from the Covid vaccine alone. That year, CEO Stephane Bancel received a $926 million “golden parachute” – 15 percent more than the entire annual revenue of the company before the trial began.
When the true results came out at the end of 2022, it was too late. Millions of Americans had already received Moderna shots and been denied the right to learn the truth about the product they were taking.
Berenson’s report indicates that Paxton has a strong case against Moderna under the DPTA. The company concealed known adverse effects from the product that accounted for 95 percent of its revenue. Meanwhile, the most powerful forces in the country – including the White House, the news media, and pharmaceutical companies – pushed Americans to get the product by insisting that it was “safe and effective.”
Would pregnant women have been less likely to receive the shots had they known that there was a greater chance of miscarriage? Would men have been less inclined to rush to a vaccine center had they known that the product increased their risk of death from cardiovascular complications? If not, then why would Moderna conceal the information for 22 months while it raked in $40 billion in revenue from Covid vaccines?
Suing vaccine makers is notoriously difficult by design. Alone among private producers, they are indemnified against nearly all harm thanks to government privilege. That makes them mostly off-limits for legal liability from vaccine injuries. Eliminate that provision and the companies would not likely even be in business at all, which tells you all you need to know. However, deceptive claims are a separate issue. Finally we might have here a perfectly crafted legal position to hold these run-amuk companies accountable.
https://brownstone.org/articles/was-this-deceptive-trade-paxton-v-moderna/
New analysis shows statins have “minimal” benefits
New analysis shows statins have “minimal” benefitsBy Maryanne Demasi, PhD The public health mantra about cholesterol has always been “the lower, the better.” This has been reflected in expert guidelines which have called on doctors to aggressively lower their patient’s ‘bad’ LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) with statin drugs to prevent heart disease. However, our new analysis published in JAMA Internal Medicine (paywalled) challenges that notion. Over the years, influential researchers such as the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) at Oxford University, have monopolised the scientific debate on statins. They have stated that for every 1mmol/L reduction in LDL-C, there is a 21% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular events. But there are three problems with the various CTT analyses: 1. The CTT researchers have acquired all the individual patient data (raw data) from published trials and will not share them with other researchers, thus preventing independent replication of their results. For this reason, our study used published trial data only. 2. The CTT promotes the view that statins can reduce “cardiovascular events” which is a composite endpoint with inherent problems. It combines objective outcomes such as death, heart attack and stroke (hard endpoints), together with subjective outcomes such as hospital admissions or revascularisations (soft endpoints). The soft endpoints are often based on a doctor’s ‘judgement call’ and therefore subject to bias. In some analyses, these can make up the majority of events so they can skew the overall result towards benefits for the less serious cardiovascular outcomes. To avoid this, we restricted our analysis to hard endpoints only (death, heart attack and stroke), making it less prone to bias. 3. The CTT and public health authorities often promote the benefits of statins in terms of a relative risk reduction (RRR), rather than an absolute risk reduction (ARR). The RRR is a more impressive statistic (demonstrated below) and can mislead the patient into believe the benefits are larger than they are. Therefore, our study reported both the RRR and ARR of statins on cardiovascular outcomes. What did our analysis find?We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 statin trials involving 143,532 participants, using similar criteria to the CTT, and found no consistent relationship between lowering LDL-C with statins and death, heart attack or stroke. Statins are very effective at lowering LDL-C, but in some trials, that did not necessarily translate into a meaningful benefit for the patient. This contradicts the prevailing view, promoted by the CTT, that there is a strong “linear” relationship between lowering LDL-C and cardiovascular outcomes from statin therapy. Our analysis also highlighted the significant difference in the relative risk reduction (RRR) and absolute risk reduction (ARR) of statin therapy on death, heart attack and stroke. For example, if your baseline risk of having a heart attack is 2% and taking a drug reduces that risk to 1%, then in relative terms you halved your risk (50% RRR) which sounds impressive, but in absolute terms, you have only reduced your risk by 1% (ARR). Our analysis showed that trial participants taking a statin for an average of 4.4 years, showed a 29% RRR in heart attacks, but the ARR was only 1.3%. If this is not effectively communicated to a patient, can they make a fully informed decision about their treatment? It may also influence their calculated benefit:harm ratio if the patient is experiencing debilitating effects from the medication. The graph shows just how deceptive it can be when patients are only told about the benefits of statins in terms of RRR (light blue bars) without the ARR (dark blue bars). Reporting RRR without baseline risk has been described by experts in risk communication as “the first sin against transparent reporting”. Selectively reporting the RRR is likely to lead individuals to overestimate the benefit of the drug, it can increases people’s willingness to receive a treatment, advise treatment, and pay to prevent the risk compared with ARR or other methods for communicating risk. Our analysis combined all statin trials, as well as separated them on the basis of primary prevention (low risk) and secondary prevention (high risk) trials. The maximum benefit of a statin over the trial period was achieved in people whose risk of heart attack was already very high (secondary prevention); i.e. there was a 2.2% ARR in heart attacks and a 0.9% ARR in deaths in high risk patients. Remembering too, the vast majority of these trials were sponsored by statin manufacturers, as well as written, designed and analysed by researchers with ties to statin manufacturers. Some have argued that the benefits may seem minimal in the first few years, but that the benefits may continue to accumulate over the life of the patient – often overlooking that the harms may also accumulate. Bottom line:
|
GMO Crop Truths
Do you know why California hasn’t found any deaths linked to the COVID vaccines?
The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) hasn’t investigated any link between the COVID vaccines and death. That’s a violation of California law to look the other way.
Peter Baldridge, former Assistant Chief Counsel of the CDPH, expressly brought this violation to the attention of the head of the department. As you might expect, the CDPH ignored him and did absolutely nothing.
We have proof of this.
Since the California government is not doing it’s job in following the law, I will be filing a writ of mandamus to compel the CDPH to do their job. The California court should also award me attorney fees.
In addition, Mr. Baldridge and I have both made a FOIA request to see the death-vax records; something that no state or world government has ever produced.
One way or another, the truth will be exposed soon for all to see.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-you-know-why-california-hasnt
Treating Minds
Psychiatry is so destructive it should be banned. Unfortunately, criminals tend to support one another so it is well financed by the government. We need to change that. Shine the light on their criminal conduct where you can, and remember, behind every bad condition will be found a psychiatrist.
In 1947 the then president of the World Federation of Mental Health, Brock Chisholm, said, “The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong are the belated objectives of nearly all Psychotherapy.”
Chisholm further stated that if they were to be successful they needed to infiltrate the professions to introduce their ideas (more correctly called “insanities”) there.
This year is the 76th anniversary of his speech. Looking around at the average intelligence level, morality, ethics and consequent problems with crime, drugs, sexual perversions etc. I’d say the psychiatrists were remarkably successful!
If we as parents and teachers do not instill in our children respect for one another, tolerance for differences, that there is right and wrong, the difference between right and wrong, that actions have consequences and that regardless of what has happened in the past one has the ultimate responsibility for the actions one takes in the present, then we are, by our neglect, cocreating a society where psychiatry’s evil intentions are widely manifest, as is happening at present.
Psychiatry Is NOT Your Friend!
The Collapse Of Civilization
And this to help you move forward:
To Your Success