Month: January 2024

Posted on

Wheat: 200 Clinically Confirmed Reasons Not To Eat It

Moldy Loaf

One of our many interests here at GreenMedInfo.com is to identify “Problem Substances,” which is why we have created an index by that name with 698 subjects listed from A-Z. If you navigate to WHEAT under the “W’s” you will find a list under “Advanced Topics” with 230 health conditions and/or adverse health effects associated with wheat consumption, all of which were determined solely through research in peer-reviewed and published medical journals indexed on MEDLINE.

https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/200-clinically-confirmed-reasons-not-eat-wheat1

Posted on

mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccines inevitably lead to genetic, but also immunological disorders!

mRNA Jabs Harm

Jessica continues to impress me as a formidable scientist and highly intelligent thinker. Her substacks are the only ones I still read. Recently, I read her following contribution:

In light of DNA discovered in commercial vials as per the precautionary principle… (substack.com)

I completely agree with Jessica. These bastards cannot get away with simply doing some proper cleaning-up and QC on the end product. As she states correctly: “The problems associated with the modified mRNA COVID-19 injectable products is not only a problem of DNA contamination. This is yet an additional problem associated with the modified mRNA products”. Of course, there is the toxicity of the LNPs too, but there is another huge, immunological concern. All the immunological and molecular epidemiology data collected from populations that are vaccinated with mRNA-based C-19 vaccines clearly indicate that these vaccines lead to immune refocusing. This is because mRNA-based C-19 vaccines generate low-affinity antibodies against spike (S) protein that is expressed on the surface of transfected host cells* (this is something which clearly does not occur during natural infection of host cells with SARS-CoV-2 as I extensively explain in my book: “The inescapable immune escape pandemic”). Induction of low-affinity Abs towards a foreign Ag that is expressed on the surface of the body’s own cells (outside of antigen-presenting molecules!) inevitably triggers immune pathology (e.g., Ab-dependent and complement-dependent cell cytotoxicity; ADCC and CDCC). Because these low affinity Abs mask the immunodominant domains on S protein, they force the immune system to concentrate on other – more conserved – antigenic domains. However, as the latter are immune subdominant (i.e., have lower intrinsic immunogenicity), the elicited (cross-neutralizing) Abs rapidly reach suboptimal concentrations. Large-scale presence of suboptimal concentrations of neutralizing Abs generates population-level immune selection pressure, which drives immune escape. In other words, even the ‘cleanest’ mRNA-based C-19 vaccines will always promote immune pathology and drive disastrous viral immune escape. As a seasoned vaccinologist, I am therefore of the opinion that no mRNA-based injectable product should ever be used for immunization purposes. After all, the purpose of vaccines is to generate immune protection and not to induce immune pathology or enhance disease! (FIRST, DO NO HARM!).

https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/mrna-based-covid-19-vaccines-inevitably-lead-to-genetic-but-also-immunological-disorders

Posted on

Antarctic Ice Gains Greater Than Losses – More Proof ‘Climate Change’ Is A Scam

Antarctic Ice Changes

A new NASA study on the Antarctic Ice Sheet says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

The study analyzed changes in the surface height of the Antarctic ice sheet measured by radar altimeters on two European Space Agency European Remote Sensing (ERS) satellites, spanning from 1992 to 2001, and by the laser altimeter on NASA’s Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) from 2003 to 2008.

The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.

According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic Ice Sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to present. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.

“We’re essentially in agreement with other studies that show an increase in ice discharge in the Antarctic Peninsula and the Thwaites and Pine Island region of West Antarctica,” said Jay Zwally, a glaciologist with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and lead author of the study, which was published on Oct. 30 in the Journal of Glaciology. “Our main disagreement is for East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica — there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas.” Zwally added that his team “measured small height changes over large areas, as well as the large changes observed over smaller areas.”

Scientists calculate how much the Antarctic Ice Sheet is growing or shrinking from the changes in surface height that are measured by the satellite altimeters. In locations where the amount of new snowfall accumulating on an ice sheet is not equal to the ice flow downward and outward to the ocean, the surface height changes and the Antarctic Ice Sheet mass grows or shrinks.

https://www.antarcticajournal.com/antarctic-ice-sheet-mass-gains-greater-than-losses/

Posted on

The Tucker Carlson Encounter: Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein

Is the lesson of the Covid disaster that we should give its architects more power? Bret Weinstein on the WHO’s plans for you.

“The WHO is now revising the structures that allowed the dissidents to upend the narrative and they are looking for a rematch, I think.

“What they want are the measures that would have allowed them to silence the podcasters, to mandate various things internationally in a way that would prevent the emergence of a control group, that would allow us to see harms clearly.

“That’s the reason I think people, as much as they want to move on from thinking about Covid, maybe stop thinking about Covid but do start thinking about what has taken place with respect to medicine, with respect to public health, with respect to pharma and ask yourself the question,
“Given what you know now, would you want to relive a pandemic like the Covid pandemic without the tools that allowed you to ultimately in the end see clearly that it didn’t make sense to take another one of these shots or to have your kids take them.”

https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-bret-weinstein/