Tom's Blog on Life and Livingness
https://sharegpt.com/c/wHXkpkp
I thought to verify it so signed up and asked the same preliminary parameter and got these answers. I thought to ask the same question as Ian Freeman posed it and received a different answer:
OK, enough playing, I think we’ll agree to disagree. I have newsletters to send and it is time to get back to the kitchen. I have nutrition bars, chocolate and bread to make and vitamins to mix.
It is official. Up is down and down is up!
Nutrient profiling systems (NPS) aim to discriminate the healthfulness of foods for front-of-package labelling, warning labels, taxation, company ratings and more. Existing NPS often assess relatively few nutrients and ingredients, use inconsistent criteria across food categories and have not incorporated the newest science. Here, we developed and validated an NPS, the Food Compass, to incorporate a broader range of food characteristics, attributes and uniform scoring principles. We scored 54 attributes across 9 health-relevant domains: nutrient ratios, vitamins, minerals, food ingredients, additives, processing, specific lipids, fibre and protein, and phytochemicals. The domain scores were summed into a final Food Compass Score (FCS) ranging from 1 (least healthy) to 100 (most healthy) for all foods and beverages. Content validity was confirmed by assessing nutrients, food ingredients and other characteristics of public health concern; face validity was confirmed by assessing the FCS for 8,032 foods and beverages reported in NHANES/FNDDS 2015–16; and convergent and discriminant validity was confirmed from comparisons with the NOVA food processing classification, the Health Star Rating and the Nutri-Score. The FCS differentiated food categories and food items well, with mean ± s.d. ranging from 17.1 ± 17.2 for savoury snacks and sweet desserts to 81.6 ± 16.0 for legumes, nuts and seeds. In many food categories, the FCS provided important discrimination of specific foods and beverages as compared with NOVA, the Health Star Rating or the Nutri-Score. On the basis of demonstrated content, convergent and discriminant validity, the Food Compass provides an NPS scoring a broader range of attributes and domains than previous systems with uniform and transparent principles. This publicly available tool will help guide consumer choice, research, food policy, industry reformulations and mission-focused investment decisions.
Mark Steele talks about the effects to the body of the Graphene Oxide in the jabs couple with 5G technology.
The Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/qHXTgYC5b1xw/
This page has most of the text of the video as well as some valuable additional data: https://www.europereloaded.com/mark-steele-on-5g-nanotechnology-weapons-in-c19-shots-use-of-heavy-metals-as-weapons-systems/
Someone has looked at successive pieces of legislation the US has passed or agreed to that has allowed the current situation to develop. How Pfizer can avoid liability as the Covid Jab was a pilot project not requiring testing for safety or efficacy.
He might have been very wrong on other things but he got this one 100% correct!
Steve Kirsch writes on Twitter: Miscarriage and fetal death rates up by 43 sigma since vaccines rolled out. But hey, it could be something else. So I asked Dr. Thorp: have you looked at the rate differential of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed women. Answer: “I’m not allowed to look.” Reason: They don’t want to know.
I have a new “That Defines Me” meme. Except the swear jar looks underpopulated. Working on improving both but still a ways to go… …a work in progress, that’s what I am!