Category: Inspiration

Posted on

Famous Failures

Famous Failures
So you tried and failed?
GOOD!
You’re on the road to success!
It’s a trying road, a testing road, a challenging road.
But doing things that matter is what matters.
Those who mind that you tried and failed don’t matter.
Those who matter don’t mind that you tried and failed.
What matters is that you matter.
Greatly.
Because you have no limits to your beingness.
When you are being your true, native self you are far greater than anybody ever permitted to to believe.
When you assume that viewpoint you will contemplate vast action and vast results.
It also matters that you are doing things that matter.
Because what you do matters.
Even more greatly than who you are.
So next time you are feeling REALLY good, grab some paper and write down what major matter you are going to address, what product you would like to accomplish.
Then work out what actions it will take to get the result you desire.
Envision the result and take action.
You want to change things?
Decide the product you want and take action to attain it.
You want to feel better?
Decide the product you want and take action to attain it.
Only action leads to a product.
You and I want the product of a better society.
The freedom from oppression.
Well, to get that product we need to take bigger action than has been taken.
We need to get more people aboard.
In whatever capacity they wish to contribute.
If you cannot yet contemplate leading the charge in an area, find a group with whose product you agree and put your shoulder to their wheel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLYECIjmnQs

Posted on

Peer Review Conflict Of Interest

Peer Review Conflict Of Interest

“Peer review is a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works.” Richard Smith, past editor of the BMJ and chief executive of the BMJ Publishing Group for 13 years.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/014107680609900414

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published. or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” Marcia Angell, former Editor-in-Chief of the NEJM.

Just this week there was a study published that proved the more Covid shots you got the more likely you were to get Covid. The study was requested to be retracted although there was no valid reason given for it to be retracted. It just did not support the narrative that vaccines were “safe and effective”, the lie that is in the process of killing millions.

Stories of research funding bodies and journal peer reviewers rejecting proposed qualitative methods or study findings due to “bias” are not uncommon. Usually, I find this relates to a perception by peer reviewers that the way data have/will be collected or analyzed is too closely aligned with the personal agenda of the researcher (s).
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1609406917748992

 

Direct observation (when a mother observes that her baby died within 24 hours of receiving vaccinations) is scorned in favour of “peer-reviewed” and “double-blind” clinical trials by the denizens of scientific and clinical laboratories..
Well, I learned a year ago of a surveyor in the UK who found out that a huge percentage of researchers ADMITTED skewing results in favour of their research sponsor.
Here’s another reason why we should be just as leery of the authoritarian edicts from the “science” brigade as we are their scorned “anecdotal evidence”.