The landmark federal trial pitting FAN and others against the US EPA over water fluoridation came to a dramatic turning point Wednesday. FAN has argued that fluoride’s ability to impact the mental development of both the fetal and infant brain posed an unacceptable risk to millions of Americans (and others) drinking fluoridated public water supplies. The dramatic moment came when, after both sides had completed their summary statements, the federal judge surprised everyone by recognizing the key plank in the plaintiffs’ case and undermining the key argument in the EPA’s case.
The judge said:
So much has changed since the petition was filed…two significant series of studies – respective cohort studies – which everybody agrees is the best methodology. Everybody agrees that these were rigorous studies and everybody agrees that these studies would be part of the best available scientific evidence.
The EPA appears to have applied a standard of causation, which from my read of TSCA is not accurate. It’s not a proper allocation. It’s not the proper standard.
In short, after 20 years of work by FAN and its supporters, and 70+ years of campaigning by opponents of fluoridation since its inception, Wednesday felt like a moment in time where the validity of our objections was finally recognized on a world stage.
According to FAN director Paul Connett, PhD, “While this is not a final victory for FAN it indicates a path forward to achieve that final victory. Needless to say we are very excited about this outcome. We had our 7 days in court. We had some of the best experts in the world testify on our behalf and our lawyers, especially Michael, were brilliant in presenting our case. Here now is the day in more detail. The invisible science is now visible and the voiceless have been heard. It’s official, it’s in the record, and no one can take that away.”
Read the article here: https://www.tampabay.com/news/education/2019/12/10/floridas-flawed-baker-act-rips-thousands-of-kids-from-school
Them, if you live in Florida, sign the petition here:
https://www.change.org/p/6-year-old-florida-girl-traumatized-after-being-involuntarily-sent-to-mental-health-facility
A Missouri appeals court on Tuesday ordered Johnson & Johnson and a subsidiary to pay $2.1 billion in damages to women who blamed their ovarian cancers on the company’s talcum products, including its iconic baby powder.
The decision slashed by more than half a record award of $4.69 billion in compensatory and punitive damages to the women, which was made in July 2018.
Johnson & Johnson still faces thousands of lawsuits from consumers who claim its talcum products were contaminated with asbestos that caused cancer. The company announced last month that it would stop selling baby powder made from talc in North America, though it would continue to market the product elsewhere in the world.
“A reasonable inference from all this evidence is that, motivated by profits, defendants disregarded the safety of consumers,” the court said.
(Tom: So they are going to stop selling it in litigious US but still harm women in the rest of the world? Boycott this company and it’s products. They are as unethical as the pHarma giants. Hang on, aren’t they in line to make the vaccine for COVID-19?)1
Patient health and safety is at stake. A review of the clinical literature concluded that bioidentical hormones are associated with lower risks, including the risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease, and are more effective than synthetic or animal-derived hormones. On the other hand, studies have consistently demonstrated that synthetic hormones are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Synthetic and animal-derived hormones have also been shown to produce negative cardiovascular effects and to negate the cardio-protective effects of estrogen.
Zach Bush has done some brilliant research to explain exactly why this particular virus has caused what it has, why we contributed to the lethality of it by poisons, toxins and maltreatment, and, even more importantly, how to reverse our present vulnerability.
A really must watch presentation!
You cannot fail to be more optimistic after listening to this!
Adjuvants are used in vaccines to activate the immune system. They are toxicants (i.e. poisons) included in the vaccine against which the body attempts to protect itself. During this heightened immune response, the body also creates antibodies against the vaccine antigen (the dead or attenuated virus, for example) that it would normally ignore.
But these adjuvants create a series of non-specific effects or NSEs; the specific effect is the creation of antibodies against the antigen. A more colloquial term for NSEs is “side-effects.”
One primary NSE is the creation of antibodies against the vaccine recipient’s own human tissue. In other words, the body starts to attack itself. The US currently has approximately 50 million people experiencing autoimmune reactions and autoimmunity is especially prevalent in women [1]. The US population is also one of the most vaccinated populations on the planet.
This just-published paper discusses one of “immunology’s dirty little secrets,” that including a poison is required for many vaccines to work [2] (btw, there are other secrets [3]).
Amazingly, doctors and public health officials deny that one of the primary NSEs of vaccines is an autoimmune reaction. Moreover, they have no official reason for the autoimmune epidemic—but vaccines, they say, have nothing to do with it.
Those following the science know that this is false. Every vaccine increases the chance of the body attacking itself such that “polyautoimmunity” is now common. If one is experiencing autoimmunity, it is actually more likely to have multiple autoimmune conditions than just one. That’s how bad the autoimmune epidemic has become.
This case study discusses a 34-year-old researcher who mistakenly injected himself with Freund’s adjuvant and experienced multiple autoimmune reactions: arthritis [4], serositis [5], and epididymitis [6]. Note that arthritis is listed on some vaccine product inserts as a risk of the injection.
The syndrome for this is called ASIA—autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
In my view, it is not a question of whether vaccine adjuvants are contributing to the autoimmune epidemic; it’s merely a matter of quantifying how much is its contribution, which is difficult to do because public health authorities deny that vaccines can cause these issues so as not to scare the population and thus risk vaccination rates declining.
“Yes, with these vaccines your child will not get a self-clearing temporary infection of the measles but may get multiple autoimmune reactions that may cause extensive suffering and early death” is a conversation they don’t want to have with parents. Thus, those medical professionals who know about ASIA lie and deny it. Many other medical professionals are poorly trained and thus don’t even know vaccines are a major contributor to the autoimmunity epidemic.
Immunologist’s Little Dirty Secret Finger: A Case Report of Polyautoimmunity Following an Accidental Self-injection of Complete Freund’s Adjuvant
https://www.ima.org.il/MedicineIMAJ/viewarticle.aspx?year=2020&month=06&page=393
[1] “According to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Women’s Health, autoimmune disease and disorders ranked #1 in a top ten list of most popular health topics requested by callers to the National Women’s Health Information Center.
https://www.aarda.org/news-information/statistics
[2] Unraveling “the immunologist’s dirty little secret”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780120884032500022
[3] Immunology’s dirty little secret
https://www.nature.com/articles/laban.1310.pdf?proof=true
[4] arthritis: “Actually, “arthritis” is not a single disease; it is an informal way of referring to joint pain or joint disease. There are more than 100 types of arthritis and related conditions. People of all ages, sexes and races can and do have arthritis, and it is the leading cause of disability in America. More than 50 million adults and 300,000 children have some type of arthritis. It is most common among women and occurs more frequently as people get older.”
[5] serositis: “The organs of your chest and abdomen are lined with thin layers of tissue called serous membranes. They have two layers: one connected to the organ and the other connected to the inside of your body cavity.
Between the two layers, there’s a thin film of serous fluid that allows your organs to move smoothly within your body. For example, your lungs can expand when you take a deep breath without being damaged by friction.
Serositis occurs when your serous membranes are inflamed. This makes it hard for your organs to smoothly slide around in your body, causing pain and other symptoms.”
[6] “Epididymitis (ep-ih-did-uh-MY-tis) is an inflammation of the coiled tube (epididymis) at the back of the testicle that stores and carries sperm. Males of any age can get epididymitis.”
(OMNS June 22, 2020) If we act on the data showing that it is highly probable that vitamin D can save lives, we could fix this pandemic in a month, for perhaps $2 per person. There would be no significant adverse effects. If we wait for “evidence” that vitamin D mitigates the impact of COVID-19, thousands more will die. If we could arrange to give everyone vitamin D, and it failed to protect them, so what? The risk from not acting is much greater than the risk from acting. Dosage is important and generally misunderstood.
Two countries have acted on this already: Egypt and Slovenia. Why can’t we?
The Orthomolecular Medicine News Service has been publicizing the importance of vitamins D and C, and the minerals zinc and magnesium, in this pandemic since January [1]. I have been writing about Vitamin D and sunlight for over 30 years [2], and it has never been more relevant.
If you caught the COVID19 virus right now, having a good vitamin D status (from already having taken a supplement) would
Reduce your risk of the disease becoming severe by 90%
Reduce your risk of dying by 96%
This is not “proven” or “evidence-based” until we have done controlled trials comparing it to placebo. Any volunteers for that? But the data, already strong, has been pouring in since the start of the pandemic. Here’s the data for the two statements above.
Recent studies have suggested in discussion that more than 4000 IU per day of vitamin D3 may carry a risk of harm, citing the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition report of 2016 which set the recommended Upper Level (UL) intakes of 50mcg/2000IU per day. [10] That report says; “Excessive vitamin D intakes have, however, been shown to have toxic effects (Vieth, 2006)”. [10] However this is misleading, as the Vieth paper [11] states: “Published reports suggest toxicity may occur with 25(OH)D concentrations beyond 500 nmol/L.” This leaves a wide margin of safety.
(Tom: I watched a video presentation on vitamin D3 given by the world’s most ecperienced researcher who said 50,000 IU a day of D3 produces NO toxicity. Personally I would add some K2 to minimise hardening of the arteries.)
The 3 papers mentioned above [3-5] show that a vitamin D3 blood level of at least 75 nmol/L (30 ng/ml) is needed for protection against COVID-19. Government recommendations for vitamin D intake – 400 IU/day for the UK and 600 IU/day for the USA (800 IU for >70 years) and the EU – are based primarily on bone health. This is woefully inadequate in the pandemic context. An adult will need to take 4000 IU/day of vitamin D3 for 3 months to reliably achieve a 75 nmol/L level [12]. Persons of color may need twice as much [13]. These doses can reduce the risk of infection, but are not for treatment of an acute viral infection. And since vitamin D is fat-soluble and its level in the body rises slowly, for those with a deficiency, taking a initial dose of 5-fold the normal dose (20,000 IU/day) for 2 weeks can help to raise the level up to an adequate level to lower infection risk.
This is the most comprehensive presentation I have seen on the dangers of vaccines made in aborted human fetal cells. The MMR and chicken pox vaccines are both made with human fetal cells. Also some polio vaccines are.
This researcher gives the technical reason why these vaccines can and are contributing to an increase in cancer and autoimmune diseases, even i nthe small amounts that are in vaccines, contrary to the claims made by the pHarma companies and their apologists, like Paul Offit.
It is worthy of note that the take off point for the steep increase in autism rates is date coincident with the introduction of human fetal cell DNA into vaccines.
