Flu Shot Data

The ingredients in vaccines compromise your body’s immune system. Do your homework before you accept any vaccine for you or your loved ones. Here is a starting point: https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=3835

Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory by David Crowe

Preamble
There is considerable scientific evidence that these diseases do not just have non-infectious co-factors, but that they are environmental in nature, not infectious.

In fact, with viruses, it is possible to question their very existence.

The book “The Infectious Myth” will investigate provide the scientific evidence that the normally accepted infectious cause is not, in fact, valid and, in will identify more plausible environmental causes.

From: https://theinfectiousmyth.com/index2.php

Specifics
The COVID-19 scare that emanated from Wuhan, China in December of 2019 is an epidemic of testing, as the graph below with test statistics from Austria shows.

There is no proof that a virus is being detected by the test and, while there should be, there is absolutely no concern about whether there are a significant number of false positives on the test. What is being published in medical journals is not science, every paper has the goal of enhancing the panic by interpreting the data only in ways that benefit the viral theory, even when the data is confusing or contradictory.

In other words, the medical papers are propaganda.

  1. Virus Existence
    Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with influenza or pneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is believed to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are believed to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this:
    “we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood”

But, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41 cases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, “41 patients… confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV.”

Another paper quietly admitted that:
“our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates”

Koch’s postulates, first stated by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the late 1800s, are simple logic, and can be stated as:
• Purify the pathogen (e.g. virus) from many cases with a particular illness.
• Expose susceptible animals (obviously not humans) to the pathogen.
• Verify that the same illness is produced.
• Some add that you should also re-purify the pathogen, just to be sure that it really is creating the illness.

Famous virologist Thomas Rivers stated in a 1936 speech, “It is obvious that Koch’s postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases”.

That was a long time ago, but the problem continues. And Rivers’ guidance was considered important enough to be cited by papers claiming (falsely) that Koch’s Postulates had been met during the SARS era (2003). None of the papers referenced in this article have even attempted to purify the virus. And the word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it
means nothing (e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is ‘isolation’).

There is lots of evidence that the virus is not as transmissible as is being implied. You can read the examples and more at:

https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf

Trust The Science

“Trust The Science” Really Means –> Listen To Doctors & Scientists Pushed By Politicians, And Ignore The Doctors & Scientists That Disagree

Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory by David Crowe

(David passed away on July 12th, 2020.)

Preamble
There is considerable scientific evidence that these diseases do not just have non-infectious co-factors, but that they are environmental in nature, not infectious.

In fact, with viruses, it is possible to question their very existence.

The book “The Infectious Myth” will investigate provide the scientific evidence that the normally accepted infectious cause is not, in fact, valid and, in will identify more plausible environmental causes.

From: https://theinfectiousmyth.com/index2.php

Specifics
The COVID-19 scare that emanated from Wuhan, China in December of 2019 is an epidemic of testing, as the graph below with test statistics from Austria shows.

There is no proof that a virus is being detected by the test and, while there should be, there is absolutely no concern about whether there are a significant number of false positives on the test. What is being published in medical journals is not science, every paper has the goal of enhancing the panic by interpreting the data only in ways that benefit the viral theory, even when the data is confusing or contradictory.

In other words, the medical papers are propaganda.

  1. Virus Existence
    Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with influenza or pneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is believed to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are believed to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this:
    “we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood”

But, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41 cases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, “41 patients… confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV.”

Another paper quietly admitted that:
“our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates”

Koch’s postulates, first stated by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the late 1800s, are simple logic, and can be stated as:
• Purify the pathogen (e.g. virus) from many cases with a particular illness.
• Expose susceptible animals (obviously not humans) to the pathogen.
• Verify that the same illness is produced.
• Some add that you should also re-purify the pathogen, just to be sure that it really is creating the illness.

Famous virologist Thomas Rivers stated in a 1936 speech, “It is obvious that Koch’s postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases”.

That was a long time ago, but the problem continues. And Rivers’ guidance was considered important enough to be cited by papers claiming (falsely) that Koch’s Postulates had been met during the SARS era (2003). None of the papers referenced in this article have even attempted to purify the virus. And the word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it
means nothing (e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is ‘isolation’).

There is lots of evidence that the virus is not as transmissible as is being implied. You can read the examples and more at:

https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf

Coffee Can Cause or Contribute To

I am sometimes asked for my thoughts on coffee. Since I have never drunk it I do not have valid first-hand experience but this comes from a personal trainer who loves the stuff!

One commenter added: Too much caffeine is bad for the nervous system and those trying to heal a leaking gut need to avoid it totally until their gut is healed! Caffeine can irritate a “leaky gut” or inflamed gut!

Coffee Can Cause or Contribute To

Lockdown Questions

Lockdown Questions

I fully endorse the strategy of allowing the vulnerable to protect themselves and the able to be free to live their lives without suppression.

Sweet Advice from Maria Sabina

Maria Sabina

Sweet advice from Maria Sabina, Mexican curandera (medicine woman) and poet.

“Cure yourself with the light of the sun and the rays of the moon. With the sound of the river and the waterfall.

With the swaying of the sea and the fluttering of birds.

Heal yourself with mint, with neem and eucalyptus.

Sweeten yourself with lavender, rosemary, and chamomile.

Hug yourself with the cocoa bean and a touch of cinnamon.

Put love in tea instead of sugar, and take it looking at the stars.

Heal yourself with the kisses that the wind gives you and the hugs of the rain.

Get strong with bare feet on the ground and with everything that is born from it.

Get smarter every day by listening to your intuition, looking at the world with the eye of your forehead.

Jump, dance, sing, so that you live happier.

Heal yourself, with beautiful love, and always remember… YOU are the medicine.”

Truth to Power – Could COVID-19 Have Escaped from a Lab?

Alina Chan

(Tom: This is a great read about a scientist-turned-detective with a level of ethics that matches her competence in biology. Well worth the read! Executive summary: The seafood-market theory, which Chinese health officials and the World Health Organization espoused in the early days of the pandemic, was wrong. The virus was lab engineered.)

“There’s long been a sense that if the public and politicians really knew about the dangerous pathogen research being conducted in many laboratories, they’d be outraged. Denying the possibility of a catastrophic incident like this, then, could be seen as a form of career preservation [for scientists]. ‘For the substantial subset of virologists who perform gain-of-function research,’ Richard Ebright, a Rutgers microbiologist and another founding member of the Cambridge Working Group, told me, ‘avoiding restrictions on research funding, avoiding implementation of appropriate biosafety standards, and avoiding implementation of appropriate research oversight are powerful motivators. Antonio Regalado, biomedicine editor of MIT Technology Review, put it more bluntly. If it turned out COVID-19 came from a lab, he tweeted, ‘it would shatter the scientific edifice top to bottom.’”

https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2020/09/09/alina-chan-broad-institute-coronavirus/

Finish reading: