Tom's Blog on Life and Livingness
Karen Hadley writes: Carl Sagan describes the problem with modern education. I never lost my curiosity. My eclectic curiosity can make me a little random or non-sequitur at times but that’s okay with me. Being this way makes me a much better writer because if I want to, I can get curious about almost anything. And that curiosity triggers study, understanding, development of a viewpoint and then the ability to write about that topic.
Feel free to circulate or use for your self
Dear Mr Joyce,
I am very concerned as a long term Qantas flier, a long term advocate of Qantas and health researcher over your claims to have a “Vaccine Passport”. Clearly you have received some poor information not based on the science and have made a very rash and potentially damaging and dangerous decision.
Firstly, this vaccine has been pushed and rushed at “Warp Speed”, without proper or long-term testing, and the high risks to the public that such a rushed medication carries. The vaccine touted for use is an RNA (genetically) based vaccine, something that has never ever been released to the public before. It is experimental. The medium and long-term effects of this gene-altering vaccine on our bodies is completely unknown.
Secondly, the vaccine does not stop people from carrying the disease nor does it stop the spread. It is designed to stop a person catching the illness. Despite 50 years of flu vaccine it still goes around every year as do all respiratory viruses and they mutate as this virus is already doing and it continues to go around. A person who has multiple vaccines for Covid 19 can still carry the virus and in fact get sick and die from the virus. Let me make it plainer. A substantial body of research has shown that having health professionals vaccinated did not under any circumstances alter the course or spread of the flu virus.
Thirdly, the vast majority of the claims about the effectiveness of the vaccines are both embellished and using statistics that you are unfamiliar with. According to comments published in the British Medical Journal last week (see the link below) the vaccine is not very effective. While the information from Pfizer’s looks impressive when you do the real numbers the absolute risk reduction for an individual is only about 0.4% (0.0043-0.0004=0.0039). The Number Needed To Vaccinate (NNTV) = 256 (1/0.0039), which means that to prevent just 1 Covid-19 case 256 individuals must get the vaccine; the other 255 individuals derive no benefit, but are subject to vaccine adverse effects. And this is to do with cases not even death. It will be even less effective for death. Probably around 1 in 4000 like the flu vaccine. These are facts in the scientific journals which I can provide any time and in fact publish them regularly on my social media groups.
Finally, catching the illness is not the problem it is the major health conditions that occur in a relatively small group in our society that is most susceptible that is the problem. After reviewing hundreds of papers the most susceptible group, other than those which severe medical conditions, are those over 75 with, according to the US Centre For Disease Control, 2.5 comorbidities. That is the elderly who are already very sick and who in most cases are not going to be flying anyway. That is why the majority of deaths in Australia and around the world have ben in elderly care (not a good word) facilities. For the vast majority of the population it is a mild illness with fewer complications than the annual flu. This is substantiated in the studies and multiple health professionals including an official statement by the Chief Health Officer of NSW Dr Kerry Chant that this is “a mild illness”.
On a logistic note will the passport be for the current version of the Covid 19 virus or the last years virus which effectively is what the flu vaccine is? You will need multiple passports for each travel people do.
While Australia is currently free from Covid 19 the vaccine will not prevent the spread once the borders open to international travel. This is well recognised in the scientific and health community.
Clearly you have just relied on very poor information and made a very damaging and dangerous comment. I would suggest before this goes any further you consult the science. I have reviewed hundreds of studies on the topic and derive no gain or support from my information. Unlike the people selling you your information I am happy to provide you with free unadulterated independent information, which by the way is supported by a large portion of the community that you think you are protecting.
I have no doubt that you made your comment with the best intentions. You just relied on very poor information. In the best interest of Qantas and Australians I seriously suggest you review your situation and make a public retraction very soon.
Peter Dingle PhD
Here is a link you can follow https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4347/rr-4
Covid-19 vaccine candidate is unimpressive: NNTV is around 256
It is not enough to merely agree on this. We, every single one of us, needs to make our voice herard if we are to retain our freedoms!
Email the Qantas CEO at: alanjoyce@qantas.com.au
Post on the facebook fan page at facebook.com/Qantas
Message Qantas support at: https://www.qantas.com/au/en/support/contact-us/customer-care-feedback-form.html?int_cam=contact-us-feedback
This is about the level of scientific credibility that should be assigned to it. Nah, on second thoughts, idol worship does not harm your children anywhere near as much as vaccines do.
If you do not believe this whole COVID response is a complete and utter plandemic/scam, please read again the text in this image and the previous article: http://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=30703
(Tom: Further proof that the whole COVID-19 response is a planned control operation.)
According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”
From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.
She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States.
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.
These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.
https://web.archive.org/web/20201126223119/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19
This from the group MPs and Councillors Shame and Scandal.
The government’s hoax is now thoroughly exposed. For the few people left who still think despite all the evidence that they can afford to trust anything the compulsive liars masquerading as our government tell them here is a handy list of questions to bear in mind the next time BJ goes on telly and lies to your face
“If you still think Covid is very dangerous then ask yourself these questions;
Why are GP’s not isolating? dying?
Why are frontline staff not isolating? dying?
Why are police officers not isolating? dying?
Why are soldiers not isolating? dying?
Why are bus drivers not isolating? dying?
Why are most hospitals empty?
Why are testing centres empty?
Why is it that 96% of people testing positive are mask wearers?
Why is it bacterial pneumonia is on the rise because of mask wearing? Yet it’s kept hush hush.
Why is it that large conglomerates can stay open whilst small businesses of the same industry are bullied into shutting?
Why is it that the biggest censorship campaign is now in force?
Why is it that the ‘Great Reset’ is being openly advertised yet people still deny it?
Why is it that in Wuhan people were dropping dead in the streets yet it’s happening nowhere else?
Why is it that our police force has undergone a huge militarisation?
Why has police brutality skyrocketed?
Why are the fact-check websites funded by the same elites that are funding the media for pro covid propaganda?
Why is Google blacklisting well documented science that disproves all this pro covid science?
Why is Google blacklisting anything that questions the narrative?
If this virus was so deadly then why;
Would you need a test to tell you that you’ve got it?
Why are graveyards and crematoriums not overflowing?
Why are hospitals not overwhelmed to the point of everything else is fully cancelled?
Why are people not dropping dead like in Wuhan?
Why do you need an app to tell you to isolate?
Why has China gone back to ‘normal’ without a vaccine?
Why has Covid-19 never been isolated?
“Hell on earth is looking in the mirror and wondering what could have been.”
Qantas CEO (member of social elite World Economic Forum) makes Australia/Qantas the test case for against no jab no travel. What we allow to happen here today will become the norm across the world, Qantas owned/linked companies e.g. Jet Star, Coles and Kmart next. If you like freedom of choice with regards to medication, and have loved ones overseas and interstate, work now to retain your freedom or start saying your goodbyes now.
Despite your stance on vaccines, let’s all agree that we deserve the right to choose what we put in our bodies, and that our personal freedoms, along with health and politics wont be dictated by corporations (especially over a virus with a 99.97% ‘survival’ rate, yes even in Italy and USA, with 90 being the average age of death.
TIME TO FLOOD Qantas with your comments – the time is now. Go onto their FB page, Alan Joyce’s FB page, email Qantas etc etc. Do not wait until this is implemented as it is so much harder to ‘undo’ these things.
This below is from a Qantas employee.
I have some intel on the Qantas mandate for vaccinations but I can’t comment as I’ll surely lose my job. Qantas was visited by Jane Hanlon some weeks ago. She is one of the most satanic public servants I know. She’s on the Covid Advisory Board. Basically she gave Qantas an ultimatum, get all employees and passengers in masks and require vaccination certificates for O/S travel and we will allow you to resume international operations. Masks became mandatory for employees within 5 days of her visit, cloth masks are being made and we are told we will need to wear them as a ‘uniform item’ for 2 years. Vaccines for employees are going to be part of new work agreement and passenger vaccine Certs to travel by midway through next year. The only way around this is to be very vocal and write into the company expressing your non consent for travel vaccination. I’ve been with this company for over 30 years and I can tell you boycotting them after the fact won’t help. but I have seen many proposed changes fall over when customers wrote in and expressed their concerns. They want customers and they will listen, especially as they are vulnerable right now. But it must be now, not later! Share this widely!
Please message Qantas right now, and every day until they concede, that we are not a communist country and they have no right to make totalitarian policies.
Here is where to post a comment:
https://www.facebook.com/Qantas/
https://www.qantas.com/au/en.html
Here is the CEO’s email address:
alanjoyce@qantas.com.au
Here is a petition to sign:
https://www.reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au/no-to-vaccine-yes-to-travel
And for an example, here is my email to Alan:
Dear Mr Joyce,
Unlike the 87% of people who it is estimated make decisions by feeling not thinking, I read broadly to get a variety of views on topics of my selection. One of those topics is COVID-19.
I would like to make an argument against the policy of requiring a vaccination prior to flying with Qantas.
1. Koch’s four laws determining the verifiable existence of a pathogen have never been satisfied with respect to the existence of SARS-CoV-2. I repeat, using one of the most basic tenets of immunology, that of identifying, isolating, propagating and infecting with a pathogen to prove its existence, the virus has not been proven to exist.
2. The survival rate from alleged COVID-19 infections (99.97%) is very similar to the survival rate from the normal flu (99.99%), so the government response to it is completely and insanely disproportional to the risk of death.
3. Many, not just one, but many protocols exist for the prevention from infection and treatment of COVID-19. These have been used by different groups of doctors, many reporting 100% success rate.
4. Mandated experimental medical treatments (which this rushed vaccine undoubtedly is) are in contravention of the Nuremberg Code http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/
5. The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights available at the UNESCO site: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html requires informed consent to medical procedures. Australia is a signatory to these codes/declarations so mandating an inadequately tested vaccine puts you and your organisation at risk of profound consequences if harm ensues.
6. The Australian Constitution prohibits compulsory medical procedures.
7. The vaccine makers are in no doubt as to the potential for harm as they have lobbied the government to indemnify them from liability for any injury caused to recipients of the vaccine.
8. Apparently A Current Affair conducted a survey on Instagram: Would you get a vaccine if you needed one to fly: and when I last saw it, 81% of people said No. Not very scientific because you don’t know how many of those are flyers and how many would fly Qantas, but I am one of the 81%. I fly and it has been with Qantas for decades.
9. It is improper to require a medical procedure as a prerequisite to a commercial transaction.
10. It is improper and just as discriminatory to select against a person because of their personal choice of medical treatment as it is to discriminate because of gender, race, religion, age, hair or eye colour, toenail length or brand of toothpaste they use.
If the government mandates that your airline insists I need to have a vaccine in order to fly, then I will NOT be flying with it ever again.
Do you personally understand what’s in this vaccine? If not, I suggest you appraise yourself promptly before you formulate company policy or recommendations that could put thousands at risk and will harm many.
Do you know how many of the trial participants had an adverse reaction to this vaccine? ALL OF THEM.
I do hope you reverse your decision because NO MEDICAL PROCEDURE SHOULD EVER BE A MATTER OF COERCION OR EXTORTION and that’s exactly what Qantas is doing.I understand the government might be holding a gun to your back on this matter but it is important enough to make a stand and be on the right side of history with this one.
If you have any questions on the above or would like further information please feel free to come back to me.
—
Warmest regards,
Tom Grimshaw
VERY GOOD NEWS! EFFECTIVE ACTION AGAINST PSYCHIATRIC DRUGGING OF MILITARY!
Finally, effective action against the psychs in the military who use their official position to ensnare soldiers into the psych drugs nightmare!! (Post of Oct. 30, 2020)
John Spagnola, worked on the bill to investigate the cause of suicides in the military for years. Finally he succeeded in a bill that passed the house and senate to prove that the pharmaceutical industry and their drugs, opoids, etc., were the cause of losing these good men.
Here is the letter from John:
Dear Friends,
THE NEXT AND FINAL STEP HAS NOW OCCURRED!
THE PRESIDENT HAS SIGNED THE VETERAN OVER-MEDICATION AND SUICIDE PREVENTION ACT INTO LAW!!!
I helped write The Veteran Overmedication and Suicide Prevention Act.
It was then sponsored and introduced by US Senator Dan Sullivan of Alaska.
I worked with the Senate to have this modified bill attached to The Commander John Scott Hannon Veterans Mental Health Care Improvement Act (S 785).
S 785 then passed the US Senate Veterans Affairs Committee a couple of months ago.
On 5 August 2020, S 785 passed the US Senate!
On 23 September 2020, the same bill passed the US House of Representatives!!
On 17 October 2020, I am pleased to report, that the US President made it official and it is now passed into law!
Section 204 of S 785 re investigating Veteran Suicides and Medications states: ” …to evaluate the effects of opioids and benzodiazepine on all-cause mortality of veterans, including suicide, regardless of whether information relating to such deaths has been reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”
Benzodiazepine is psychiatric drug also known as an Anti Anxiety Drug. They have been of great concern to both the Military and the Veterans Administration, and especially the Veterans Service Organizations.
To the best of my knowledge, there has never been a bill that caused a federal investigation into a psychiatric medication and its potential link to Veteran Suicides.
The next step is for The National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine to do this investigation!
Thanks to so many that have assisted me through my journey!
Warm Regards,
John Spagnola
President/CEO
DC Strategic Solutions
O: 727-446-0200
F: 727-446-0116
C: 727-224-0700
Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons committee in Ottawa, CEO of a large private medical laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta and Chairman of a Medical Biotechnology company SELLING THE COVID-19 TEST:
“There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians. This is the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspected public. There is absolutely nothing that can be done to contain this virus. This is nothing more than a bad flu season. It’s politics playing medicine and that’s a very dangerous game.
There is no action needed….Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence whatsoever they are even effective. It is utterly ridiculous seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people walking around like lemmings obeying without any evidence. Social distancing is also useless…..
Positive testing results do NOT indicate clinical infection. It is simply driving public hysteria and ALL testing should STOP immediately….using the province’s own statistics the risk of death under 65 is 1 in 300,000. The scale of the response is utterly ridiculous…all kinds of business closures, suicides …. you’re being led down the garden path.”
This is a good article on improving your diet to reduce the odds of suffering cancer. As you will see in the comments, someone slagged off at Sherry for treating only the nutrition aspect in her blog. I replied:
David, you are correct in that there are other factors involved in whether or not a person gets cancer and if Sherry had the time and space and if she were writing a book on the subject then I am sure she would do it justice. (For instance Dr Rashid Buttar said on a presentation I watched that every person with cancer who comes to see him has had a major emotional trauma in their life and one for one they do not recover unless and until the trauma is addressed and handled.)
Sherry does not hold herself out to be any more than a person vitally interested in the subject health and nutrition and helping us in that area. As such she is talking to her topic and interest, not covering the whole gamut of data on cancer.
I know how extensive is the subject as I have over 60 pages of data on cancer in my book on How To Live The Healthiest Life and I feel I haven’t even scratched the surface of the topic.
This blog post is not a chapter let alone a book, Sherry is not writing a treatise on cancer, she is exposing a single (arguably THE most important) element that most do not know or apply in their thinking or eating. As such it is valuable data and an element over which nearly everyone has a great deal more immediate control than most other factors, like air pollution for instance. Sure, you can move to a less polluted location but nowhere near as easily or immediately as ceasing to eat junk food.
And sure, if she were writing defensively to prevent any criticism of her work she could have added a disclaimer to the effect that this is a short blog post on one of many aspects of cancer and to please research the subject fully to get a complete understanding of it.
I have seen others quote the WHO as having said 95% of cancer is preventable by diet and lifestyle. (I did a search on the WHO web site but did not find the quote.)
Bottom line, as I quote Adelle Davis in my book, “As I see it, every day you do one of two things: build health or produce disease in yourself.”
IMHO the thoughts you allow to populate your thinking processes and the food you eat are the two most critical elements in maintaining good health.
Focus on those two and you will have done a huge step more than most on improving your chances for a long, healthy and happy life.
https://www.holisticblends.com/blogs/holistic-blends-blog/want-to-prevent-cancer-start-here