Category: Health Tips

Abstract: Vaccination is a medical intervention that comes with a risk for some people. In the expression of infectious diseases, it is known that the pathogen alone does not cause disease: it is a combination of the pathogen, environment, and genetic factors that determines expression and severity of the disease in individuals. In 1960 Macfarlane Burnet, Nobel Prize laureate for immunology, stated that genetics, nutrition, psychological and environmental factors may play a more important role in resistance to disease than the assumed benefits of artificial immunity induced by vaccination. He considered that genetic deterioration of the population may be a consequence of universal mass vaccination and he postulated that in the long-term vaccination may be against the best interests of the state. The current belief that much of the burden of infectious diseases can be alleviated if every child, in every geographical location, has access to multiple vaccines, does not consider the influence of genetics and environment on the health of populations. The historical record shows that deaths and illnesses to infectious diseases fell due to public health reforms – and prior to the introduction of most vaccines. Since 1990 there has been a 5-fold increase in chronic illness in children in developed countries and an exponential increase in autism that correlates directly with the expansion of government vaccination programs. Many individuals are genetically predisposed to the chronic illnesses that are increasing in the population and since 1995 governments have not used mortality or morbidity to assess outcomes of vaccination programs.
Human health can be protected in government policies if the precautionary principle is used in the correct format that puts the onus of proof of harmlessness on the government and pharmaceutical industry, and not the general public. This has not been done in current vaccination programs and we cannot rule out the possibility that the increased use of vaccines is destroying the genetic fabric of society as MacFarlane Burnet postulated.

Wilyman, J. Misapplication of the Precautionary Principle has Misplaced the Burden of Proof of Vaccine Safety. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law Nov 2020 2:23-34.

https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_cb9f1c190ed547198bc085074466aaea.pdf

Pfizer’s new COVID-19 Vaccine for which it claims a 90 percent success rate (less than the survival rate for the actual virus ironically which is over 98 percent) also has some disturbing ingredients.

Children’s Health Defense explained in an August 6th article,

“mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG).”

CHD goes on to explain:

“The use of PEG in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis. Roughly seven in ten Americans may already be sensitized to PEG, which may result in reduced efficacy of the vaccine and an increase in adverse side effects. If a PEG-containing mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 gains FDA approval, the uptick in exposure to PEG will be unprecedented—and potentially disastrous. Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology but is more concerned with its bottom line.”

This is the reason why it must be kept at a temperature of -70 degrees. Colder that the Antarctic otherwise it is, in Pfizer’s own words, “ineffective.”

This is apart from the inclusion of foetus material from living animals, something that would be of concern to vegetarians and vegans not to mention various religious groups and philosophies.

CHD goes on to say, “LNPs “encapsulate the mRNA constructs to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake” and, additionally, rev up the immune system (a property that vaccine scientists tamely describe as LNPs’ “inherent adjuvant properties”)”

This is a polite way of saying that LNPs are adjuvants. This means they are designed to stimulate hyper-inflammatory responses in human beings in an effort to induce the creation of antibodies that allow the manufacturer to claim high “effectiveness” rates, despite those adjuvants causing severe adverse reactions (for which the company cannot be sued by the way). In fact according to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions. That means ALL. Not some. ALL

Be very careful what you inject into your body.

https://www.seetvnews.com/post/more-disturbing-news-on-covid-vaccines

Debi Leeper writes: “I spent time with one of Australia’s top lead cancer researchers. They said “it’s very well known vaccines cause cancers”.

There many other things that contribute to the development of cancers however when you look at the ingredients in those injectable products it is easy to see why.

Finish reading:

How to confuse / mislead people with statistics…

https://www.statisticshowto.com/calculate-relative-risk/