From Ross Walter Nutritionist & Naturopath
Australia’s medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), holds 2 databases for the reporting of adverse events on medicines or vaccines. One is their internal database for the initial reports, then after 3 months to allow for their investigations into the reported cases, the data is de-identified and a summary of the data is made public in their Database of Adverse Event Notifications or DAENs database. The DAENs data is available online for public searching as needed.
I searched the DAENs database for all reported adverse events on all vaccines going back to the start of their data in 1971. I did not include the reported events for the CV-19 shots as I wanted to compare the number of reported adverse events and deaths of other vaccines to the current ones.
What I found was shocking… Especially when compared to the statistics of the current adverse events, and the fact that these results are only based on 3 months of CV-19 reports, with the data of the other 3 months of their use not being available yet.
My findings are here:
Adverse events for non-CV-19 vaccines reported to TGA (1971-2021) – 18,080
Reported deaths for non-CV-19 vaccines (1971-2021) – 57
Adverse events for CV-19 vaccines reported to TGA (2021) – 43,811
Reported deaths for CV-19 vaccines (2021) – 407
Or in short, the current CV-19 vaccines in approximately 6 months (but only 3 months of TGA data on the CV-19 shots) since being introduced have caused:
– Approx 2.5x times as many adverse events from the CV-19 shots compared to ALL other vaccines combined over the past 50 YEARS
– Over 7x times as many deaths from the CV-19 shots compared to ALL other vaccines combined over the past 50 YEARS. 7 TIMES MORE in just 3 months of TGA data.
On an annual basis, the CV-19 shots have caused a 2800% increase in deaths compared to all other shots combined over the last 50 years of vaccines.
Does this really seem safe to you?
Dr Scott Atlas Quotes
Pfizer’s Confidential Government Contract Reveals Jaw-Dropping Terms
Ehdan Biber, an information-security expert, discovered a Pfizer confidential government contract on an Albanian website that is so heavily biased that it literally converts governments into agents of Pfizer. Biber wrote that Ivermectin, an anti-parasite medicine that has been used successfully in several countries against COVID, was suppressed because the Pfizer contract requires that, even if a drug is found to treat COVID-19 effectively, the contract to continue buying products from Pfizer cannot be voided. The contract requires governments to commit to paying for the products even if they are not shipped on time, and no products may be returned. Governments must acknowledge that the effectiveness and potential adverse effects and injuries are unknown. The contract is written to supersede any local law of the state. It stipulates that the “‘Purchaser (meaning the government) hereby agrees to indemnify, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS Pfizer, BioNTech (and) their Affiliates…from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses…’ The contract says that there is no limit to the immunity from prosecution bestowed upon Pfizer even if the company commits fraud. Finally, if the purchasing government fails to enforce these defenses on behalf of Pfizer, a court in New York has the authority and capacity to take the physical assets of that country and transfer them to Pfizer. One of the most stunning clauses stipulates: “If there are any laws or regulations in your country under which Pfizer could be prosecuted, you agree to CHANGE THE LAW OR REGULATION to close that off.”
https://needtoknow.news/2021/08/pfizers-confidential-contract-reveals-the-companys-jaw-dropping-terms
COVID Jab Stats In Teens
In more honest times that many deaths would be enough to halt a vaccine rollout from taking place.
Every Bite You Take
Man walks into a restaurant…
“Hello.”
“Hi, table for one, please.”
“Sure, and your name.”
“Little.”
“Great. And can you show your vaccination card?”
“I could… …can you tell me who my server will be?”
“Um, looks like Brad will be your server tonight.”
“Great. Can you show me Brad’s vaccination card?”
“Um…”
“And also, can you provide me with proof that Brad is not a carrier of HIV, Hepatitis A or B, or any other communicable diseases?”
“Um…”
“Also, I would prefer not to be served by someone who is on or uses recreational drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, meth, fentanyl, etc, so if you could provide me with Brad’s most recent tox screen, that would be great.”
“Um… Let me get the manager for you.”
“That would be great, thanks.”
An ICU nurse imparts vital COVID data
https://www.instagram.com/p/CSaR9AYp5li/
Koch’s 4 postulates apparently cannot be applied to a virus
I just saw a post: Just keep proving the truth and the lies will eventually lose.
Here’s my contribution to that effort!
https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/Truth_Dispels_COVID_Lies.pdf
Click on it or cut and past the address into a new browser window.