WHO, EU announce partnership creating ‘global system’ of digital vaccine passports

Do Not Panic - Organize

The World Health Organization and the European Union announced their collaboration on global digital vaccine passports at a joint press conference in Geneva on June 5.
“In June 2023, WHO will take up the European Union (EU) system of digital COVID-19 certification to establish a global system that will help facilitate global mobility and protect citizens across the world from on-going and future health threats, including pandemics,” the WHO press release states.

Splenda Harms Your DNA

Damaged DNA

A new study on sucralose—a popular sugar-free sweetener that was put through 110 safety studies before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it in 1998—finds the popular ingredient has toxicities that regulatory agencies must consider.

New health and safety findings revealed in the study show sucralose, sometimes sold under the brand name Splenda, is “genotoxic,” meaning it breaks up DNA. That’s on top of other condemning evidence revealed in the study published May 29 in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Years of independent research into sucralose have dismantled many of the original claims made in its food additive permit.

How sucralose can damage DNA is a metabolic process. When the sweetener is digested, it forms a metabolite called sucralose-6-acetate. But the product itself has also been found to contain trace amounts of this chemical compound. Taken together, the results of this study and previous research implicate sucralose in a range of detrimental health issues.

“This is not acceptable. We can’t have genotoxic compounds in our food supply,” Susan Schiffman, corresponding author of the study, told The Epoch Times. “I think if it was presented to the FDA today, they would not approve it. The original claims made to the FDA just aren’t true. I don’t know how they missed it.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/researchers-discover-toxic-sweetener-damages-dna_5307637.html

Why We Should Reject WHO’s Power Grab

Ventilator Kills

Within weeks of the pandemic outbreak, it had become apparent that the standard practice of putting COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation was a death sentence; 76.4% of COVID-19 patients (aged 18 to 65) in New York City who were placed on ventilators died. Among patients over age 65 who were vented, the mortality rate was 97.2%
The recommendation to place COVID patients on mechanical ventilation as a first-line response came from the World Health Organization, which allegedly based its guidance on experiences and recommendations from doctors in China. But venting COVID patients wasn’t recommended because it increased survival. It was to protect health care workers by isolating the virus inside the vent machine
Data suggest around 10,000 patients died with COVID in NYC hospitals after being put on ventilators in spring 2020. Other metropolitan areas also saw massive spikes in deaths among younger individuals who were at low risk of dying from COVID. It’s possible many of these deaths were the result of being placed on mechanical ventilation
The WHO must be held accountable for its unethical recommendation to sacrifice suspected COVID patients by using ventilation as an infection mitigation strategy — especially considering they’re now trying to get unilateral power and authority to make pandemic decisions without local input
Showing how the WHO’s recommendation to put patients on mechanical ventilation resulted in needless death among people who weren’t at great risk of dying from COVID is perhaps one of the most powerful talking points a country can use to argue for independence and rejection of the WHO’s pandemic treaty

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/06/07/covid-death-coverup.aspx

Organising and Organisations

Psychiatric Undermining

As I lay in bed prior to starting my exercises I looked at the situation in the US (and the rest of the world) and realised the key element in any group endeavour that is missing on the side of the good guys is organisation.

Those who seek destruction have taken over the institutions of society, education, politics, judiciary, law enforcement, banking, commerce etc. and the good guys have no way to take back control of those institutions or comparable organisations to replace them.

I have previously remarked that reading all that is going on gives me the feeling that those who sat ringside watching the destruction of the Roman Empire must have had in the next to last days of Rome.

I take heart from the many good people doing things to help others but there needs to bar far more of it and on a much larger scale and that requires organisation. LOTS of organisation and I do not see that happening at present.

And if the good guys who want to maintain and improve this civilization can’t or won’t organise for its continued existence as effectively as the bad guys are organising its destruction then we best get busy organising a replacement civilization as a matter of urgency.

A quote popped up in Facebook this morning that I posted 7 years ago:

The price of freedom: constant alertness; constant willingness to fight back.

If you want more specifics on the origins of the rapid decline in this civilization, read this: https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=44351