Category: Vaccines

Statement from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on vaccines. He points out that chronic childhood ailments surged in 1989, shortly after the quantity of vaccines recommended for children skyrocketed. My son had his first couple of vaccines and then I quit so he wasn’t part of this surge, thank heavens. RFK, Jr. said:
“This is a chronic disease epidemic. I have six kids. I had eleven brothers and sisters. I had over fifty cousins. I didn’t know a single person with a peanut allergy. Why do my kids all have food allergies? Because they were born after 1989. If you were born prior to 1989 your chance of having a chronic disease, according to HHS, is 12.8%. If you were born after 1989 your chance of having a chronic disease is 54%. What are they? They’re the neurodevelopmental diseases; ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, tourette syndrome, ASD/autism. The autoimmune diseases; guillain barre, multiple sclerosis, juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis. The anaphylactic diseases; food allergies, rhinitis, asthma, eczema. All of these exploded in 1989. Congress order the EPA to do a study to find out what year the disease #epidemic started, and the EPA did that study. They said it started in 1989. There’s lots of culprits, many new things. We have cell phones, PFOA [toxic industrial chemicals], ultrasound, glyphosate [RoundUp] etc. Our kids are swimming around in a toxic soup. We’re not saying all of those illnesses came from vaccines. But there is no intervention that is so exquisitely and precisely timed as what happened when we went in 1989 and changed the vaccine schedule, and raised the levels of aluminum and mercury – tripling and quadrupling them – and went from the three vaccines I had [as a child], to the 72 that my kids had, and the 75 that kids will have next year.”

By August 2021, the best data in the world from Israel (“the laboratory for Covid vaccines”) clearly showed that the Pfizer vaccine was not stopping or even reducing infections.

Further, by Aug 21 the science clearly showed that the vaccine did not stop transmission – something Pfizer admitted they did not even test for.

And the data was screaming that the vaccines weren’t safe as had been advertised.

And yet while those like myself that were trying to sound the alarm over the evidence faced abuse, vilification & censorship and were being slandered by fanatics as “anti-Vaxers” – with the media cheer-squads backing them, the likes of Premier Berejiklian & Dan Andrews were enforcing vaccine mandates upon Tradies.

And only now is it leaked out to the media, that a 21 year-old NSW tradie was left permanently blind after being injected in Sept 2021

And as this being for “rare” – the Australian DAEN database – which due to under-reporting is likely only to record the tip off the ice-berg – has 5,718 reports of Eye Disorders including 106 reports of Blindless following injection with a Covid vaccines.

How many of these 106 now blinded Australians would have line-up to be injected if people trying to the truth were not censored & vilified ?

And although no amount of money can ever compensate a 21 year-old for permanent blindness -that doesn’t mean that Berejiklian, Andrews & others that ignored the evidence & ignored the science, making such catastrophic mistakes, should be able to get off free without being held accountable.

The World Health Organization (WHO) AND the United Nations (U.N.) are in the midst of attempting unprecedented global takeovers of public health that will change our future if we do not join together and stop them.

Right now, the WHO is amending the International Health Regulations (IHR) and drafting a “Pandemic Treaty,” aka WHO CA+. These documents create the legal framework for the WHO to declare public health emergencies at will and then manage global public health in response.

It also gives the WHO authority over pandemic preparedness, which includes extensive surveillance of people and animals to identify outbreaks early and allows the WHO to act as the single authority for infectious disease mitigation, prevention and treatment protocols for anything they deem a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).

In other words, the WHO would become “the world’s doctor, medical czar,” control the public health narrative and censor opposing viewpoints.

Simultaneous actions by the U.N. are underway, with it recently announcing it is seeking the power to manage global emergencies.

Join us in resisting this global pandemic response by signing the Health Freedom Bill of Rights below. Sign to let the WHO and the U.N. know that we are paying attention and will not comply with this consolidation of power at the hands of global unelected leaders.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community-forum/health-freedom-bill-of-rights/

Amid ongoing reports concerning the integrity of Big Pharma, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has announced that he plans to investigate companies’ potential manipulation and misrepresentation of Covid vaccine trial data.

Paxton’s investigation centers around Texas’s Deceptive Trade Practice Act according to his announcement to the New York Post. 

Under 17.46(b)(24) of the DPTA, Paxton must answer two questions to determine whether Big Pharma companies acted unlawfully.

1)   Did the company fail to disclose known information concerning its Covid vaccine?

2)   Was that failure intended to induce the public into getting the product?

Alex Berenson’s recent report on Moderna’s vaccine trials provides a case study that indicates affirmative answers to both questions.

The Case Against Moderna

Did Moderna fail to disclose known information concerning its Covid vaccine?

Last week, Berenson reported that Moderna “hid serious side effects” when it published its clinical trial results for the Covid vaccines.

Moderna opened its vaccine (“P201”) trials with 600 volunteers in May 2020 and published its results in February 2021.“No serious adverse effects were observed,” the company boasted at the top of the report. But that was a lie.

“In all, during the placebo-controlled phase of the trial… seven of the 400 healthy volunteers who received a two-shot regimen of Moderna’s vaccine suffered side effects,” Berenson writes. “The problems included a heart attack and two miscarriages. In comparison, the 200 people who received a placebo shot without any mRNA had no serious side effects.”

After the trial ended, more participants came forward with devastating results, including an additional miscarriage and several cardiovascular issues. In total, 14 volunteers reported serious side effects.

The company never issued a public statement disclosing the true results of the trial. As Berenson writes, “The company never updated the Vaccine paper with any of these reports. On December 30, 2022 the federal clinicaltrials.gov website quietly posted final safety data from P201, including all the serious adverse event reports.”

Moderna failed to disclose known information from the trials for 22 months. In the interim, the United States administered over 200 million doses of the Moderna mRNA vaccine while the true results remained concealed. Those 22 months were highly lucrative for the emerging pharmaceutical company.

Was that failure of disclosure tended to induce the public into getting the vaccines?

From the time of Moderna’s Covid vaccine trials in 2020 to the release of the true results at the end of 2022, the company’s revenue increased by over 2,000 percent.

In 2020, Moderna’s total revenue was $800 million. In 2021, Moderna published the “no serious adverse effects” paper, and the company’s revenue skyrocketed to $18.5 billion. Over 95 percent of that revenue came from the Covid vaccine.

In 2022, Moderna made $18.4 billion from the Covid vaccine alone. That year, CEO Stephane Bancel received a $926 million “golden parachute” – 15 percent more than the entire annual revenue of the company before the trial began.

When the true results came out at the end of 2022, it was too late. Millions of Americans had already received Moderna shots and been denied the right to learn the truth about the product they were taking.

Berenson’s report indicates that Paxton has a strong case against Moderna under the DPTA. The company concealed known adverse effects from the product that accounted for 95 percent of its revenue. Meanwhile, the most powerful forces in the country – including the White House, the news media, and pharmaceutical companies – pushed Americans to get the product by insisting that it was “safe and effective.”

Would pregnant women have been less likely to receive the shots had they known that there was a greater chance of miscarriage? Would men have been less inclined to rush to a vaccine center had they known that the product increased their risk of death from cardiovascular complications? If not, then why would Moderna conceal the information for 22 months while it raked in $40 billion in revenue from Covid vaccines?

Suing vaccine makers is notoriously difficult by design. Alone among private producers, they are indemnified against nearly all harm thanks to government privilege. That makes them mostly off-limits for legal liability from vaccine injuries. Eliminate that provision and the companies would not likely even be in business at all, which tells you all you need to know. However, deceptive claims are a separate issue. Finally we might have here a perfectly crafted legal position to hold these run-amuk companies accountable.

https://brownstone.org/articles/was-this-deceptive-trade-paxton-v-moderna/