Category: Vaccines

Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have
1. Known the vaccines don’t work
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies
Documents obtained by Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, from the Neural Dynamics Research Group in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia reveal that vaccine manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies and health authorities have known about multiple dangers associated with vaccines but chose to withhold them from the public. This is scientific fraud, and suggests that this practice continues till this day.
The documents were obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI), who advise the Secretaries of State for Health in the UK about diseases preventable through immunizations.
Documents reveal that the JCVI made “continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners.
The author, Dr Lucija Tomljenovic writes:
Here I present the documentation which appears to show that the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence as will be explained. As a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics (i.e., Helsinki Declaration and the International Code of Medical Ethics) [2] but also, their own Code of Practice.
Dr Lucija Tomljenovic continues:
The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at which such controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted in the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and disturbing lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from the text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release under the FOI section at the JCVI website (for example, JCVI CSM/DH (Committee on the Safety of Medicines/Department of Health) Joint Committee on Adverse Reactions Minutes 1986-1992).
In summary, the transcripts of the JCVI/DH meetings from the period from 1983 to 2010 appear to show that:
1) Instead of reacting appropriately by re-examining existing vaccination policies when safety concerns over specific vaccines were identified by their own investigations, the JCVI either a) took no action, b) skewed or selectively removed unfavourable safety data from public reports and c) made intensive efforts to reassure both the public and the authorities in the safety of respective vaccines;
2) Significantly restricted contraindication to vaccination criteria in order to increase vaccination rates despite outstanding and unresolved safety issues;
3) On multiple occasions requested from vaccine manufacturers to make specific amendments to their data sheets, when these were in conflict with JCVI’s official advices on immunisations;
4) Persistently relied on methodologically dubious studies, while dismissing independent research, to promote vaccine policies;
5) Persistently and categorically downplayed safety concerns while over-inflating vaccine benefits;
6) Promoted and elaborated a plan for introducing new vaccines of questionable efficacy and safety into the routine pediatric schedule, on the assumption that the licenses would eventually be granted;
7) Actively discouraged research on vaccine safety issues;
8) Deliberately took advantage of parents’ trust and lack of relevant knowledge on vaccinations in order to promote a scientifically unsupported immunisation program which could put certain children at risk of severe long-term neurological damage;
Notably, all of these actions appear to violate the JCVI’s own Code of Practice.

https:/tlat.net/BSEM-2011.pdf

Yeah, Insanity reigns!

Why should we trust them about vaccines?
From Mike Stephenson (I’m sure he won’t mind my sharing)
1.3 million people went to U.S. emergency rooms in 2014 due to adverse prescription drug effects. Of these 124,000 died (about 10%). That means 1 in 2500 Americans died as a result of taking a prescription drug in a 12-month period. That’s almost one 9/11 event per week, all year long.
More than half of all Americans regularly take a prescription medication and each of these take four prescriptions on average.
I found the aforementioned data in the September issue of Consumer Reports which came in today’s mail. They cited the CDC and the FDA as sources.
Seems like a wild violation of the Hippocratic Oath of “First do no harm.”
I wonder how many people have been rushed to ERs due to adverse reactions from vitamins and nutritional supplements? According to Mercola.com, in 2010 there were 60 billion doses of nutritional supplements and ZERO deaths! Dr. Mercola cited the U.S. National Poison Data System’s annual report.
A telling tale!
And the TGA here in Australia want to restrict complimentary medicines?
Sounding more and more like monopolistic practices to me.
Does not appear to have anything to do with protecting the public.

That couldn’t be true of the pharmaceutical industry and government could it?
You bet your child’s life it could!

Meet Dr. Judy Mikovits, a passionate research molecular biologist and biochemist; wrongfully jailed with her career destroyed forever because she dared to publish findings unacceptable to vested interests.
Judy Mikovits’ revelations around tainted vaccines and contaminated blood have caused shockwaves that resulted in the censoring and suppression of her work, and smearing of her character. Tonight, we look to discover why.
https://globalfreedommovement.org/drugs-disease-and-deception-a-medical-whistleblowers-tale-with-judy-mikovits-phd

If one is lucky then one can play Russian Roulette five times in a row with no harm…

Recently I saw a video that went through each of the medical texts a doctor is required to read and exposed how little they included about vaccines. These meme, while very damning, also appears to be spot on the money.

I didn’t distribute a drug called Factor VIII in the 1980’s tainted with the HIV virus intentionally, infecting and killing thousands of people around the world……

Bayer did that.

I didn’t experiment with the flu vaccine and expose mental patients and prisoners in Michigan to the pandemic virus in 1942……

Jonas Salk and the U.S. Government did that.

I didn’t launch a drug called Vioxx in 1999 while knowing that it increased the risk of fatal heart attacks and strokes before it even hit the market. This drug was responsible for at least 55,000 deaths in America……

Merck did that.

I wasn’t involved in the forced sterilization of immigrants, people of color, poor people,unmarried mothers, the disabled and the mentally ill that spanned 32 States in the first half of the 20th century…

The U.S. Government was.

I wasn’t behind the illegal clinical trial of the drug Trozan in Nigeria in the 1990’s during a meningitis epidemic that left 11 children dead. The Nigerian Government did not authorize this trial and was without parental consent.

Pfizer was.

It wasn’t me that told African American males that they were being treated for “bad blood” after luring them in with free meals, free physicals and free burial insurance. Some of the men had syphilis,others were given the deadly venereal disease.The study was later discovered to be an experiment of syphilis left untreated…

Again, it was the U.S. Government.

I certainly did not publish a flawed study and misled doctors into prescribing the dangerous antidepressant Paxil to children and had the public thinking that it was safe.

That was GlaxoSmithKline.

I was not involved in the 1956-58 U.S. Army experiment involving dropping hundreds of thousands of specially bred mosquitoes to see if they could be used as biological weapons, specifically, yellow fever.
I’ll say it one more time, the U.S. Government was.

Not one of the aforementioned examples here are conspiracy theory, they are actual and verifiable.

We are led to believe these types of things no longer occur, we cannot entrust the pharmaceutical industry through government enforcement to have our best interests in mind.

I did not plant doubt in my mind, their actions did. Their desire to control everything in their sights made me this way.