Tom's Blog on Life and Livingness
Dr Tenpenny observes, “We have to be mindful of the fact that while the Corona Virus is dominating the global headlines, Autism is not going away. It’s simply the epidemic that the CDC, PHARMA, the AAP & the Media have decided to be silent on.”
Because vaccinations do not have a certain and predictable outcome (they confer immunity to some but not others, some get sick with the illness they are designed to prevent, some get Guillain-Barre, many suffer autoimmune disease and other side effects and some die as a reaction to the vaccine) they are therefore an experiment and are covered by this code.
It’s official. We received our proof of delivery of the cease and desist documents to the Prime Minister and Aged Care Minister yesterday. Today, the Health Minister will be served the same document.
The Government are officially on notice now and are compelled to respond to our questions and statements in writing within 28 days from the 12th May 2020.
Our group has had huge success with a cease and desist for the 5G tower in Mullumbimby. More exciting news on this to come soon.
We are getting there, guys.
It’s a massive move and one that will finally make the government answer to their stupid claims.
Below are the photos of the notarised documents, meaning they carry the weight of the court and are a legal document which can NOT be ignored.
Effectively it means no one is allowed to force you to vaccinate while this is in play and until we have resolved the issue which could take a month or two.
But our legal team are ready to go all the way now.
When it ends up in court, we’re ready and this will be the end of all forced vaccines in the country.
Biggest move yet!
Share this far and wide and let everyone know they CAN’T be forced to be vaccinated now that they are on notice.
If anyone tries, show them this post and the photos and template of the cease and desist.
Medical Freedom Australia.
My message here is very simple.You must watch this and get everyone you know to watch it.
https://go2.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/docuseries/roundtable-2/
We need to educate ourselves.
I have 40 questions for you…if you can’t answer them, your doctors should, but how many Drs can actually tell you?
ANSWERS:
Copied and shared – please feel free to keep sharing far and wide.
After reading the insert would you still go ahead and have the flu vax?
(Tom: with up to only 50 percent effectiveness and a chance at Guillain-Barre? How could I pass up that chance? EASILY!)
After reading the insert would you still go ahead and have the flu vax?
Me: “May I please have the package insert for the flu vaccine?”
Rite-Aid Pharmacist: “Why?”
Me: “So I can read it.”
P: “Which one?”
Me: “The one advertised with the little banners on every aisle.”
P: “I will print you the information sheet.”
Me: “No, that’s not the same thing.”
P: “What do you want to know? I can tell you.”
Me: “I would just like to read the whole thing before I consider getting one…side effects, contraindications, effectiveness, ingredients like mercury.”
P: “I don’t think I have any. Let me check. (checks) Sorry, I can’t give you one until the box is empty, because it has to stay in the box. And there isn’t any thimerisol in the single dose flu shot any more. I can print you the information sheet.”
Pharmacy co-worker with big smile at me: “Hi, I found one.” (hands insert to me)
Here are some things in the insert not on the store’s sheet:
With love to those who read this far. Please share.
Australian doctor on the FLU vaccine:
“Are GPs wasting their time with the flu vaccination program?
Professor Chris Del Mar — GP, Cochrane reviewer and one of Australia’s best known public health academics — believes Australia’s flu vaccination program, a key component of GP care, is ineffectual and a waste of GPs’ time.
In this edited extract from a speech delivered to the GPDU conference on the Gold Coast last week, he explains his reasoning.
I was actually asked to give a rant, so I’ve been working up some froth in my mouth.
But it’s also an opportunity for me to put up this idea: that public health is overselling the influenza vaccine.
We as GPs are at the front line tasked with promoting the vaccine to our patients. I want to discuss some data that makes me question this approach.
Influenza is a threat, and we should worry about it. A hundred years ago, roughly 50 million people died worldwide from this virus. It was the first modern pandemic.
I am not antivax in general, but the influenza vaccine has got intrinsic disadvantages compared to other vaccines: it is needed every year; it’s not a life-long vaccine as with most other viruses because of the way the virus itself changes, because it changes its protein structure every year – we have to guess what the next seasonal virus will look like to produce each year’s vaccine.
That is obviously going to be hopeless for a pandemic, which by definition is a virus that changed so much we’ve got no immunological defence to it. When we’ll need the vaccine most, it’s going to be least effective.
But more than that, the influenza vaccine simply is not very effective.
Data from a recently updated trio of Cochrane reviews (references provided below) shows the effect of influenza vaccine in randomised trials.
It reduced the risk ratio of getting influenza confirmed by the laboratory quite optimistically, down to 0.4.
That means less than half the number of people vaccinated ended up getting laboratory-confirmed influenza.
But if you look at the difference in absolute rate differences, you see that 23 cases per thousand gets reduced by nine cases per thousand.
That’s around a 1% difference. This is because true influenza is actually quite rare a disease for us individually, roughly once every decade.
Influenza is swamped by “influenza-like” illness.
Beyond that, the vaccine’s efficacy has not been tested well enough for serious effects – like hospitalisations, and pneumonia. There are too few randomised controlled trials with this outcome. People keep relying on observational studies, and increasingly, on surrogate outcomes.
For us as GPs who care for people with influenza-like illness, the flu, there is a very, very small difference in terms of the protection offered from the influenza vaccine.
You then have to think about the real interest in the flu vaccine from a public health perspective.
It is not simply whether or not people get the flu; it’s whether they get really sick from it.
And if you look at the Cochrane data for time off work and school there is no statistical difference in all the trials that have been done.
For hospital admission, there is a tiny difference – and it is not significant.
So it can’t be demonstrated from randomised trials that you keep people out of hospitals by vaccinating. Similarly for other serious consequences such as pneumonia – which is what killed so many people 100 years ago – you don’t see any difference there either.
And death as an outcome? Ditto. You can’t show any difference.
On the other side of the coin, that is the harms from the vaccine; well, it can give you a fever. In children, we’ve estimated informally, with an infectious diseases colleague of mine, Professor Peter Collignon, that about one in 100 children who are vaccinated probably have a febrile convulsion by extrapolating the data, as well as other more mild adverse effects as well.
There have even been the occasional deaths following the influenza vaccine, most particularly in children – one in WA and one in Queensland.
So there is some definite adverse effect from using the vaccine.
But mostly the problem with influenza vaccination is the huge amount of effort involved.
Our practice spends a lot of time sending out reminders, queuing people up, getting the vaccines ready, figuring out who’s eligible and who has to pay.
It’s quite a lot of churn to get people vaccinated.
There’s other issues as well.
Based on purely observational data, the best protection from serious illness, particularly in a pandemic situation, may be having had wild flu before.
That could explain why in the two little pandemics we have had recently – Swine flu and Bird flu – the people who we thought were going to get creamed by this, such as the elderly in nursing homes, were actually fine.
Similarly, it also looks as if the efficacy of the vaccine wears off in just a few months, from other observational data.
Instead, unexpectedly odd groups in society were affected – people who were obese, women who were pregnant, people with asthma.
The next question is, well if we’re not going to promote the flu vaccine, is there anything else we should do instead?
Neuraminidase Inhibitors?
We know it may or may not help individuals with symptoms, but from a public health response, they were hopeless.
So what about hygiene and handwashing?
There’s very good data to show at reducing acute respiratory infections by washing your hands and wearing a mask. Maybe we should be promoting much more of that.
I feel obliged to explain to my patients the controversy around influenza vaccines and let them know that I haven’t had it myself, thus saving myself 20 bucks.
What’s going to change this?
I think it’s people like us GPs who are likely to challenge [the attitudes towards the vaccine]. It’s not the people who do the systematic reviews. If we GPs say, ‘it looks to us that the emperor’s got no clothes on’, then maybe people will take this issue more seriously.”
This is GREAT news! More uneducated people will be exposed to the fact that there is another side to the story! Those who are capable of looking will see reason and truth and we will have many more evangelists for truth and health! Woo Hoo!
Coronavirus Is Manufactured!
It Is NOT Dangerous to the Majority!
It Is Preventable With Vitamins.
It Is Curable With Hydroxychloroquine!
The Lockdowns And Social Distancing Are Unnecessary!
(Video link no longer valid.)
The Nazis killed a lot of people by forcing medical procedures without consent. I’d rather that not happen again.