Australian Flu Stats 2009-2020

Australian Flu Stats 2009-2020

I wonder why the flu numbers in June 2020 were .37 of a percent of what they were 12 months ago? Could it be that they are counting flu cases as COVID-19 cases to scare us all? Nah, couldn’t be that. Our government wouldn’t do that. How would the government benefit from a population so scared they would do anything the government told them to do? A government that would steamroller through parliament unpopular legislation during a lockdown, suspend the right to protest against the government, imprison whistleblowers and raid journalists’ homes and offices, seize evidence, seal from public scrutiny for 99 years charges of child abuse by government ministers et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

https://www.immunisationcoalition.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/20Jul-Aust-Flu-Stats-2020.pdf

Down Another Fork In The Rabbit Hole

Craig Roy writes: Time for a sinister Rabbit Hole that has been in the making for years.

A lot of you have followed me down many Rabbit Holes but nothing will prepare you for this one.

We are going to cover a lot of different information to get through this Rabbit Hole and most of the information you will probably know already. I am not going to go into detail on each topic or supply lots of links and data because it will distract from the connections and the final conclusion.

I will cover enough for you to understand the connections and to be able consider the conclusion. If there is something you don’t know or understand I would ask you to go and look at some of the readably available information and then come back to this.

The only thing that cannot be proven is the conclusion I will draw at the end.

We are going to go into some information and details that have two opposing sides and there is a lot of debate about the different sides. For the sake of this article I am going to ask you to park your opinions and views to the side until the end because I will show that both sides now have to come together or we will be in big trouble.

I am going to start with the one that has to opposing sides and lots of controversy and that is Vaccines.

Whether you are pro-vaccines or anti-vaccines it no longer matters you need to come together and we will discuss both sides in a second. Firstly we need to talk about the new RNA vaccines that Bill Gates and others have been working on for over 10 years. If you do not know what these are they are a new type of vaccines that re-writes your DNA to give you the immunity. There is lots of information from Robert Kennedy Jr on this subject.

To all Pro-Vaxxers you are currently Ok with vaccines as they are and you will be aware that all medications carry risk. Not always will the risk apply to you but when it does you can stop taking that vaccine and look at getting treatment if you do happen to have a negative reaction. So all is good in your world for now.

We all have unique DNA and no one’s DNA is the same yet the new RNA vaccines is going to re-write your unique DNA into something else that is supposed to give you immunity like your current vaccines.

I ask you the following:

If all our DNA’s are unique how can one method be safe for all when you use RNA vaccine to change every single persons unique DNA?

If something goes wrong how do you undo the permanent change to your DNA?

How long before all vaccines are made this way?

How many of these altering DNA vaccines can you take before you are no longer you? I will answer this one later.

Now Anti-Vaxxers you are sitting there thinking this is all good we will end up with more people changing to Anti-Vaxxers. You may be right but if you do not support Pro-Vaxxers I believe that this vaccine will become a reality and once it is being used I ask you the following questions.

Yes it may come in as voluntary but how long before they make it mandatory?

How does the RNA coding going to change your DNA?

Will this mechanism used to alter your DNA be there forever? If it is there forever will it continue to modify DNA?

We already know that when we kiss, make love, have a blood transfusion organ transplant just to name a few we get DNA from somebody else. At present this is not an issue. But if this other person or you have had the DNA altering vaccine will it now alter your DNA anyway because we have introduced a method to alter DNA that was not there before?

What happens when 2 Pro-Vaxxers decide to have a child? We now have 3 elements to deal with, the parents DNA and the altered Vaccine DNA. How much of that child is going to be the parents and how much is going to be altered by the vaccine into something else?

Now this same question can be applied to a Pro-Vaxxer falling in love with an Anti-Vaxxer.

So the Ant-Vaxxers says no problem I will only go out with Anti-Vaxxers. You forgot that love is blind. Secondly if what I am saying is true even if vaccines are voluntary and remain this way how long before this has infected everyone anyway.

I know some of you are already thinking that this is pretty bad and you are shocked and horrified at what you have just read. Wait it gets worse.

We have just been talking about DNA so let’s bring this topic up and discuss as it applies to this Rabbit Hole. Have you ever had a DNA test done? It does not matter for what it could have been for a medical reason, to learn about your family tree, to be convicted or acquitted from a crime, for a job application, paternity test and so on.

Since DNA sequencing has been available what has happened to all those DNA sequences? You got your results but you lost them. What do you do? You contact the company that did the test and you get another copy. So this means that these companies have a DNA library that has you details and a copy of your DNA which is yours as a sovereign right of being born.

Wow it boggles my mind at how much data this would be and it costs them money to store all this information. Do you believe they are spending money to keep this information if it did not have a value to them?

Hello to all the GM (Genetically Modified) Food people. My first question is why aren’t all the people who oppose GM Foods all over this and screaming from the highest mountain tops? The people who are against GM foods are against them in the main part for health reasons and the risk that GM food could have on your health and the health of the environment.

Now here is an injection that will directly modify your DNA, the thing you have been actively working to stop and prevent from happening to you, yet there is silence.

It does not matter if you are a Pro-Vaxxer or Anti-Vaxxer if you are against GM foods you should have joined forces already and be fighting this vaccine with everything you have as it is going to modify your DNA the exact thing you are fighting to prevent.

Since all the CV19 mayhem started what has been the biggest thing that has been pushed by everyone? Testing, Testing, And Testing. Once again it does not matter if you think this is good or bad, it does not matter how accurate you believe the testing is or is not, it does not matter if you think testing should be volentery or mandatory.

What you have to ask yourself is what is the difference between CV19 testing and DNA Testing? Why are they using such a long swab? Early DNA testing used this type of swab and then change to a simple saliva swab test.

How can you be sure that the test you have sent in with your details is only being tested for CV19 and not for sequencing your DNA?

All these CV19 test are being done on a lot of people who would have no reason otherwise to get a DNA test done. Where does this information end up? In the DNA library?

Some of you by now are probably guessing where this is heading and others are not sure but stick with this as there is more for all of you and the conclusion is a doozy.

The Strawman is a topic that not a lot of people know about but it is important for this discussion. The briefest version is that when you are born they create your Birth certificate so they can trade you using Admiralty Law. This is done with smoke and mirrors. You have Birth Rights under the Magna Carta and Common law to defend those rights.

This is a complex subject probably too complex to even attempt to summarize into a couple of sentences but I do not want to get bogged down on this subject. If you know nothing do yourself a favor have a look. If you do know and can summarise it better than me love to see that in the comments. For this discussion all you need to know or acknowledge is that the system has been trading you without your knowledge and making money from you.

Next we need to discuss DNA patents and law. There has been many cases on this and Monsanto has been one of the big companies doing this. Once again I am going to attempt to keep this complex subject very very simple. If you change or modify DNA and make it uniquely different from the original you can apply for a patent. Once the patent is granted you have law that will defend your ownership of that patent.

So what you say! What has that to do with anything? Before I answer this question lets time travel to the future for a second and let’s tell a little story.

In this future this DNA modifying vaccine is a reality and you head of to your doctor to get vaccinated. You go into the docs and he/she says “Just before I give you the vaccine I need to take a swab sample for testing to check if the vaccine has worked. We will then give you the vaccine and in 2 weeks (this time cold be anything and will be the time it takes for the DNA modifying vaccine to work) and we will do another free swab sample to confirm the vaccine has worked.”

The first swab will be to get a record of your birth DNA the second swab will be for your modified DNA. Without you knowing the company applies for a patent on you modified DNA. You laughing say “NO they cannot do this!” but it will be granted as they have been doing this for years already. Just look at Corn and all the law suits over this or the patent on pigs that has been granted and the battles over that one.

And now for that conclusion.

If this vaccine becomes a reality I believe that they will use your modified DNA to take out a patent which then nullifies your birth DNA. This then gives them unrestricted legal control of you.

So you say fine I will just get my DNA restored back to its original state. Even if this could be done there are a number of problems.

If you attempt this you are creating fraud against the company that owns your modified DNA.

If you do not get it back to exactly the same as they have on record then you will have failed.

We already know that modifying DNA is difficult and tricky how would you propose that you would have the accuracy to get it back to exactly the same?

Radiation and other things effect your DNA this also would have to be considered when you were trying to revert your DNA back to birth DNA.

I could go on with lots of other reasons that this is bad but this is the main one I put together.

I hope you made it to the end and have realized what I have realized.

My final question is:

What the hell are you going to do about this now you know?

I believe we have to get this to everyone and we all have to unite before it is too late.

Our petty differences are no longer the priority the only thing that matters is UNITY!

Craig Roy
Australian Patriot
WWG1WGA
WAAITT

Did The Polio Vaccine Reduce Polio?

So, let’s take a look at the data. Did the cases of polio decrease after the vaccine? Well, in fact, no. The chart to the left shows 5 states (MA, CT, NH, RI, VT) that were sampled show a whopping increase in polio after the vaccine ranging from 266% – 642%! –Neil Z Miller The Polio Vaccine: A Critical Assessment of its Arcane History, Efficacy, and Long-term Health-related Consequences, 2004 via US Government Statistics

In fact, according to CDC figures, every case of polio in U.S. since 1979 was caused by the polio vaccine or from foreigners bringing wild polio into the U.S. – CDC – Morbidity and Mortality Report, 1999

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N5ePF6XPR5LmLGTjiBMpD5JfFJAm6JYJ68OyV5GJySw/mobilebasic

Australian Data: Cancer Epidemic in Gardasil Girls

Australian Data: Cancer Epidemic in Gardasil Girls

The Australian government’s cancer data show the dramatic rise in cervical cancer in young girls vaccinated with Gardasil.

Government numbers show a 16% cancer increase in 25-year-olds, a 28% increase in 30-year-olds, several years post vaccination.

Merck markets Gardasil as a prophylactic against cervical cancers despite the company’s own pre-licensing studies that showed a 44.6% INCREASE in cervical cancers among girls exposed to HPV virus prior to vaccination (up to 30% may be exposed in the birth canal).

BOMBSHELL: Covid-19 infection rate may be 440% higher among children who received FLU SHOT while health “authorities” madly push more shots for the coming flu season.

A new study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases finds that children who received inactivated influenza vaccines were 440% more likely (relative risk: 4.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.31-14.8) to acquire infections of respiratory viral pathogens which are not influenza. With the aggressive push for influenza immunizations now under way, the medical establishment may be setting up children to be extremely vulnerable to coronavirus infections.

Titled, “Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine,” the study is found at this link at the National Library of Medicine:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404712/

The study finds that flu shots quite literally inactivate parts of the human immune system, rendering the child more vulnerable to coronavirus infections. “Being protected against influenza, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine recipients may lack temporary non-specific immunity that protected against other respiratory viruses,” the study authors write.

The study authors explain that the influenza vaccine works to prevent influenza virus infections, but at the same time it makes children more susceptible to other respiratory infections. Since the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for seasonal influenza is so low (around 0.024%, which is not a typo), and the Infection Fatality Rate of covid-19 infections is at least one order of magnitude higher, it raises the obvious question:

Would it save more lives of children to avoid administering flu shots this year and therefore reduce their vulnerability to covid-19, which has a far higher fatality rate?

The study, which was conducted in 2009, observed the outcomes of 115 children aged 6 – 16 years. The study also used a placebo group and found that placebo made “no statistically significant difference” in the risk of acute respiratory infection risk.

But children who received influenza vaccines had a much higher risk of respiratory infections.
Even more shockingly, the study also found no difference in the risk of seasonal influenza infections between those children who were vaccinated vs. those who weren’t. In other words, the influenza vaccine offered no protection against the flu, but it created increased vulnerability to other respiratory infections. (No benefits, just increased risks.) “There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of confirmed seasonal influenza infection between recipients of TIV or placebo,” the study explains.

You can see the increased number of respiratory infections in this chart. Note the “TIV” column means those children who were vaccinated with an influenza vaccine:

The conclusion is that influenza vaccines make children more susceptible to other respiratory viral infections. From the study, which took place more than a decade before the arrival of the covid-19 pandemic:

We identified a statistically significant increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infection among TIV recipients (Table 3), including significant increases in the risk of rhinovirus and coxsackie/echovirus infection, which were most frequently detected in March 2009, immediately after the peak in seasonal influenza activity in February 2009.

The study authors point out that the influenza vaccine, “could increase influenza immunity at the expense of reduced immunity to noninfluenza respiratory viruses, by some unknown biological mechanism,” although they also state more research is needed because some of the self-reporting of symptoms may have introduced “artifacts” which could sway the numbers. Nevertheless, the study authors also state that this phenomenon of “viral interference” is well known:

Participants who received TIV would have been protected against influenza in February 2009 but then would not have had heightened nonspecific immunity in the following weeks… The phenomenon of virus interference has been well known in virology for >60 years [24–27]. Ecological studies have reported phenomena potentially explained by viral interference [3–11]… Interference in respiratory and gastrointestinal infections has been reported after receipt of live oral poliovirus vaccine [29–32].

Those who push flu shots may be worsening the coronavirus pandemic

The upshot of this research is that those who are pushing flu shots for children may in fact be worsening the coronavirus pandemic, creating “perfect storm” conditions for children to become carriers of the Wuhan coronavirus that causes covid-19.

This is consistent with the fact that we now know the medical establishment has acted to deliberately worsen covid-19 fatalities by, for example, conspiring the destroy the credibility of hydroxychloroquine, working to maximize fatalities in order to reap a windfall of profits from the coronavirus vaccine.

Yes, the medical and science establishment quite literally arranges for more people to die in order to keep the coronavirus fear alive, resulting in more demand for high-profit vaccines.

As always, it’s all about the money. As Gary Heavin recently wrote in a warning to America, Big Pharma operatives are “accessories to murder.”

The Great COVID-19 Deception … and What You Need to Know to SURVIVE

Today we feature a contributed article by Gary Heavin, who has been intimately involved in working with doctors …

How does Big Pharma have so much control over the dissemination of this information or should I say propaganda? Well, the same answer pops up again, money. Big Pharma gave $2 billion dollars during the last election cycle to US politicians. Big AG, the military/security complex and big oil each gave only a paltry $1.0 billion dollars to buy the votes of our political leadership.

The MSM counts Big Pharma’s advertising revenue at up to 80% of their income. The internet’s “masters of the universe” also kowtow to Big Pharma’s influence and advertising dollars by censoring anyone who tries to tell the American people the truth about Covid 19.

It certainly appears that anyone who is complicit in this Great Deception, a deception that is designed to kill and terrify enough people to ultimately beg for an experimental vaccine, well, these people would be accessories to murder.

Flu shots are being hyped to suppress immune systems and create an explosion in coronavirus infections
Flu shots, it seems, are one more way the medical establishment can literally murder children and adults, creating widespread vulnerability to the coronavirus pandemic which will no doubt surge back this Fall as flu shots work to suppress the immune systems of millions.

Recognize that the people pushing flu shots are medical murderers, and many are deliberately trying to kill as many people as possible to create demand for the high-profit coronavirus vaccines that are about to be unleashed on America, probably before the end of this year.

It’s the perfect crime: Manufacture vaccines that suppress the immune system right in the middle of a pandemic, causing more infections and deaths, leading to more calls for mandatory vaccines. The drug companies will cash in to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars while innocent children and adults all across America needlessly suffer and die.

As usual, it’s all about the money, and the vaccine / drug cartels are murderous, criminal regimes that twisted science (Dr. Fauci?) to maximize profits at any cost.

Studies Report Rapid Loss of COVID-19 Antibodies

The results, while preliminary, suggest that survivors of SARS-CoV-2 infection may be susceptible to reinfection within weeks or months.

(Tom: Now this is really interesting. It makes it a tough sell for the vaccine makers because the basic premise of a vaccine is that it stimulates the immune system to create antibodies that are supposed to prevent you from becoming ill or infected by the pathogen. [According to some researchers that theory has limited to no validity as they have found people who do not get sick but do not have the antibodies. How does that work?] So if the vaccine precipitated anitbodies wear out in mere months, what to do? Get a shot every three months? Or preserve and protect your health and build your immune system so it can defend against all pathogens? Me, I’m for option two thanks!)

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/studies-report-rapid-loss-of-covid-19-antibodies-67650