Category: Vaccines

The CDC silently updated their numbers late August to show that only 6% of all coronavirus deaths were completely due to the coronavirus alone. The rest of the deaths pinned to the China coronavirus are attributed to individuals who had other serious issues going on.

The data from Europe shows that the number of cases has little correlation to the number of deaths. This is why the narrative is reporting cases and ignoring deaths.

Let’s face it – at this moment in time anyone who is pushing for more lockdowns and other abuses on our personal rights is either evil or terribly misinformed.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm

One of my Healthelicious clients sent me this regarding the new COVID vaccines that alter our DNA. I thought it well worth sharing with you…

Hi Tom, thanks for forwarding your newsletters, I hope you take a break from it every now and then.

We’ve met a couple of times at your market stall during various expos over the years and talked about issues relating to general practice of medical procedures on healthy people.

Here we are, 2020, with a little more transparency than usual but still along way from where we need to be for safety of said medical procedures on healthy people.

I have a background in design engineering of systems for a large financial institution. Over a 20 year period I gained a substantial understanding of IT systems and management of risk implementing those systems with Change Management infrastructure.

A Change as it is labelled usually has several departments to approve before implementation. If it does not have a roll back procedure (used if something breaks to restore back to original state) it is considered high risk and in practice is avoided if possible due to potential high impact.

In other words, if going forward with a Change that does not have a roll back procedure, be 100% sure as far as is practible by testing on a replica system. Testing is to establish that a Change does what is intended and will not break anything in the process.

The latest medical procedures still in experimental phase involve a Change to the human cell system that operate much like a factory with DNA the programming language.

I consider these latest medical procedures to be high risk and potentially high impact as I have yet to see to see any equivalent roll back procedure.

I suppose we could imagine a DNA software simulation run for each individual that might solve the problem of testing prior to administering one of these procedures. This doesn’t exist to my knowledge and I suppose there would need to be robust checking mechanisms to be able to trust such an AI system.

So without an individual testing regime, we’re back to engineering basics, consent provided only with a safe roll back procedure.

Best regards,
David

Last week I must have been asked 20 times about the new COVID vaccines. Here are my thoughts. Please pass this informatiion onto many as you can. People need to have fully informed consent when it comes to injecting foreign genetic material into their bodies.

1. The COVID vaccines are mRNA vaccines. mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine. We have no idea if it will be effective or safe.

2. Traditional vaccine simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction. The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.

3. The mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction. So, in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.

4. These new vaccines are additionally contaminated with aluminum, mercury, and possibly formaldehyde. The manufacturers have not yet disclosed what other toxins they contain.

5. Since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely. That is why the flu vaccine changes every year. Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper.

6. Absolutely no long term safety studies will have been done to ensure that any of these vaccines don’t cause the cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines. If you ever wanted to be guinea pig for Big Pharma, now is your golden opportunity.

7. Many experts question whether the mRNA technology is ready for prime time. In November 2020, Dr. Peter Jay Hotez said of the new mRNA vaccines, “I worry about innovation at the expense of practicality because they [the mRNA vaccines] are weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.” Dr. Hotez is Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he is also Director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development.

8. Michal Linial, PhD is a Professor of Biochemistry. Because of her research and forecasts on COVID-19, Dr. Linial has been widely quoted in the media. She recently stated, “I won’t be taking it [the mRNA vaccine] immediately – probably not for at least the coming year. We have to wait and see whether it really works. We will have a safety profile for only a certain number of months, so if there is a long-term effect after two years, we cannot know.”

9. In November 2020, The Washington Post reported on hesitancy among healthcare professionals in the United States to the mRNA vaccines, citing surveys which reported that: “some did not want to be in the first round, so they could wait and see if there are potential side effects”, and that “doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic”.

10. Since the death rate from COVID resumed to the normal flu death rate way back in early September, the pandemic has been over since then. Therefore, at this point in time no vaccine is needed. The current scare tactics regarding “escalating cases” is based on a PCR test that because it exceeds 34 amplifications has a 100% false positive rate unless it is performed between the 3rd and 5th day after the first day of symptoms. It is therefor 100% inaccurate in people with no symptoms. This is well established in the scientific literature. See the attachment (False Positive PCR testing is up to 100%!) for more information on this. If you go to the CDC site (file:///C:/Users/docto/AppData/Local/Temp/cdc_97230_DS1.pdf ), you can see that the weekly death rates in the US are now lower than they normally are during an average flu season.

11. The other reason you don’t need a vaccine for COVID-19 is that substantial herd immunity has already taken place in the United States. This is the primary reason for the end of the pandemic.

12. Unfortunately, you cannot completely trust what you hear from the media. They have consistently got it wrong for the past year. Since they are all supported by Big Pharma and the other entities selling the COVID vaccines, they are not going to be fully forthcoming when it comes to mRNA vaccines. Every statement I have made here is fully backed by published scientific references.

13. I would be very interested to see verification that Bill and Melinda Gates with their entire family including grandchildren, Joe Biden and President Trump and their entire families, and Anthony Fauci and his entire family all get the vaccine.

14. Anyone who after reading all this still wants to get injected with the mRNA vaccine, should at the very least have their blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies. There is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized.

Here’s my bottom line: I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine. That would be safer and more effective. I have had a number of COVID positive flu cases this year. Some were old and had health concerns. Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C. Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there isn’t one.

Yours Always,

Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD

CNN beginning to pre-indoctrinate people not to be surprised if death occurs within a day or two of vaccination.

“We would not at all be surprised to see, coincidentally, vaccination happening and then having someone pass away a short time after they receive a vaccine, not because it has anything to do with the vaccination but just because that’s the place where people at the end of their lives reside,” Moore said.

“One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility. That would be something we would expect, as a normal occurrence, because people die frequently in nursing homes.”

(Tom: George Orwell predicted the double speak so brilliantly! They got the vaccine then died but the vaccine didn’t do it, they were going to die anyway.)

“There’s a question about the direct benefit of the vaccine, if given to people who live in those facilities, because we haven’t studied how well it works in that group yet.”

It’s this uncertainty that led Talbot to vote no.

“I have spent my career studying vaccines in older adults. And we have traditionally tried a vaccine in a young healthy population and then hoped it works in our frail older adults,” she told the committee ahead of her vote. “And so we enter this realm of ‘we hope it works, and we hope it’s safe,’ and that concerns me on many levels.”

(Tom: The illogics of this rollout beggar belief.)
“Right now, we just don’t have the data to know how well the vaccines will work in these folks, and so we’re going to need to be cautious at first because we know they are by far the most vulnerable to severe illness and death from Covid. We’re going to play it really carefully until we know for sure that these vaccines will really be effective at protecting them,” Moore said.

(Tom: The vaccine has not been tested in a group of elderly people to see if it increases mortality yet they are rolling it out to everyone straight away. Yep, that’s cautious all right!)

“Moore said not to expect a change in policy out of the gate.”

(Tom: So, despite not having been tested on the elederly and rolling it out to everyone, they will not quickly assess the statistics to determine ramifications! Smacks head. This level of stupidity is absolutely astounding!)

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/04/health/coronavirus-vaccine-acip-nursing-homes-question/index.html

My guess is it won’t take that long. If four trial participants suffered Bell’s Palsey…

Oh there’s some fun going down on LinkedIn I wanted to share with you.

The image was what I saw. This was my tuppence ha’penny worth.

Are we talking about the same Pfizer that is indemnified for any harm the vaccine causes? Please explain to me how they have a lot to lose?

The same Pfizer, the ‘Covid’ vaccine-maker Pfizer who have been fined $4,747,652,947 for various violations since 2000. Yep, just who you would trust with your life and your children’s lives.

The same family of virii (Coronavirus) for which a previous vaccine was abandoned as the animals on which it was tested developed hyper-responses to other subsequent infections due to a vaccine generated overly activated immune system?

And is this the same vaccine that has been rushed through the testing process with animal safety test regarded as not necessary due to the urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic?

The same COVID-19 pandemic which it now turns out has a similar survival rate the the normal seasonal flu?

Please explain to me how Preston is being irresponsible?

Here is your first port of call on your research journey, what the doctor is supposed to tell you about the vaccine risks.