COVID Vaccine – Your Rights

1. According to the Nuremberg Code, experimental medical procedures administered without informed consent is a war crime. This COVID vaccine is unequivocally an experimental medical procedure. (One could argue every vaccine is an experiment as you cannot predict in advance who will be harmed and who will not be harmed by any given vaccine.)

2. United Nations Universal Declaration On Bioethics and Human Rights (http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html)

Article 6 – Consent

1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

Now read that paragraph again.

Any government corporation or agency operating in disagreement with that is violating your human rights.

It is unethical and irresponsible for any person, corporation, government agency, department or official to apply any force, incentive or disincentive/penalty to another person with the intent of altering the medical treatment that person opts to undertake for themselves or their family.

The trouble right now is too few people know their rights and are willing and able to stand up for them. If we are to defeat tyranny, this situation needs to be quickly rectified!

Be informed. Inform others. YOU HAVE RIGHTS!

Please share widely.

So Why Do This?

So Why Do This?

So, this is the data according to what I have read. Please do not take it as gospel for knowledge is not data it is certainty. And if you do your own homework you will be a lot more certain than if you take my word for it. Most of the below points have been the subject of one of the blog posts you can browse at tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog

The COVID-19 vaccine was rushed to marked with no animal test phase
A previous Coronavirus vaccine was abanded as it was responsible for a large increase in vaccinated animal deaths following subsequent exposure to infections in the wild (the vaccine hypersensitised their immune system)
The present flu vaccine has a similar but less dramatic effect
The COVID-19 vaccine won’t stop you getting COVID-19
The COVID-19 vaccine won’t stop you transmitting COVID-19 to others
The COVID-19 vaccine has a potential for harm (very high if you have allergies, so much so that resucitation equipment is being recommended for availabilty in UK vaccination sites)
The COVID vaccine utilises a novel delivery mechanism using a known toxin
The COVID vaccine will alter your DNA, your genetic blueprint (and if you have been following the subject of GMOs you will know of the unpredicted and disastrous consequences playing out in that field!)
The magnitude and severity of harm cannot be predicted with any accuracy
You cannot sue the manufacturer for any harm done by the COVID-19 vaccine

So for the maker it’s a gravy train ride to the bank, for the recipient it seems to be a minimal upside with anything up to a fatal down side for this and future generations.

So, this is the data according to what I have read. Please do not take it as gospel for knowledge is not data it is certainty. And if you do your own homework you will be a lot more certain than if you take my word for it. Most of the below points have been the subject of one of the blog posts you can browse at tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog

The COVID-19 vaccine was rushed to marked with no animal test phase
A previous Coronavirus vaccine was abanded as it was responsible for a large increase in vaccinated animal deaths following subsequent exposure to infections in the wild (the vaccine hypersensitised their immune system)
The present flu vaccine has a similar but less dramatic effect
The COVID-19 vaccine won’t stop you getting COVID-19
The COVID-19 vaccine won’t stop you transmitting COVID-19 to others
The COVID-19 vaccine has a potential for harm (very high if you have allergies, so much so that resucitation equipment is being recommended for availabilty in UK vaccination sites)
The COVID vaccine utilises a novel delivery mechanism using a known toxin
The COVID vaccine will alter your DNA, your genetic blueprint (and if you have been following the subject of GMOs you will know of the unpredicted and disastrous consequences playing out in that field!)
The magnitude and severity of harm cannot be predicted with any accuracy
You cannot sue the manufacturer for any harm done by the COVID-19 vaccine

So for the maker it’s a gravy train ride to the bank, for the recipient it seems to be a minimal upside with anything up to a fatal down side for this and future generations.

The only reason to take it would appear to be because without it you will not be allowed to do certain things. In other words a forced/coerced experimental medical treatment. This contravenes the Nuremberg Code, the United Nations Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights and the Australian Constitution)

That being the case it sounds to me like we need to get this data out to every man, woman and child as the many thousands of sane doctors and scientists alone protesting this insanity will not stop this politicised forced medication, only a groundswell of support from people with enough courage and integrity to say “No”.

So please share this data!

COVID Vaccine – Your Rights

1. According to the Nuremberg Code, experimental medical procedures administered without informed consent is a war crime. This COVID vaccine is unequivocally an experimental medical procedure. (One could argue every vaccine is an experiment as you cannot predict in advance who will be harmed and who will not be harmed by any given vaccine.)

2. United Nations Universal Declaration On Bioethics and Human Rights (http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html)

Article 6 – Consent

1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

Now read that paragraph again.

Any government corporation or agency operating in disagreement with that is violating your human rights.

The trouble right now is too few people know their rights and are willing and able to stand up for them. If we are to defeat tyranny, this situation needs to be quickly rectified!

In Vaccines We Trust:

In Vaccines We Trust:

There is an old propaganda line, Repeat a lie often enough and it will be believed.

Well, they are ramping up the lie factory to warp speed as more people are becoming more aware on the subject!

Let’s talk about trust for a moment. Trust requires honesty, transparency and integrity. Three ingredients sorely missing from Pfizer’s character and deeds.

How can you possibly trust a vaccine maker who is a convicted felon that has paid over $3 BILLION in fines in the last 20 years for illegal activities, lying about the efficacy of their products, off-label marketing and bribing doctors? You can’t!

How can you trust a vaccine maker who won’t tell you what is in their vaccine? You can’t!

How can you trust a vaccine that has been rushed to market and skipped animal trials? You can’t!

How can you trust a safety study where they only take really healthy people into the study, do not test the effect of the vaccine on sick or immunocompromised people? You can’t!

How can you trust a vaccine safety study where only the results from a selected 8,000 of the 40,000 participants were taken into account? You can’t!

How can you trust a vaccine safety study where any adverse reaction in less than 2% (800 people) of the 40,000 participants went unreported? You can’t!

How can you trust a vaccine maker that says they are studying the results of the safety study now and will release the results in TWO YEARS TIME? You can’t!

DO NOT BUY THEIR PROPAGANDA! THEY ARE BANKING (LITERALLY) ON YOU BEING UNINFORMED AND COMPLIANT.

CDC Quietly Updated COVID-19 Numbers – Only 9,210 Americans Died From COVID-19 Alone – Rest Had Different Other Serious Illnesses

CDC Sign

The CDC silently updated their numbers late August to show that only 6% of all coronavirus deaths were completely due to the coronavirus alone. The rest of the deaths pinned to the China coronavirus are attributed to individuals who had other serious issues going on.

The data from Europe shows that the number of cases has little correlation to the number of deaths. This is why the narrative is reporting cases and ignoring deaths.

Let’s face it – at this moment in time anyone who is pushing for more lockdowns and other abuses on our personal rights is either evil or terribly misinformed.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm

Safety Concern With COVID-19 Vaccine – No Possibility of Rollback

One of my Healthelicious clients sent me this regarding the new COVID vaccines that alter our DNA. I thought it well worth sharing with you…

Hi Tom, thanks for forwarding your newsletters, I hope you take a break from it every now and then.

We’ve met a couple of times at your market stall during various expos over the years and talked about issues relating to general practice of medical procedures on healthy people.

Here we are, 2020, with a little more transparency than usual but still along way from where we need to be for safety of said medical procedures on healthy people.

I have a background in design engineering of systems for a large financial institution. Over a 20 year period I gained a substantial understanding of IT systems and management of risk implementing those systems with Change Management infrastructure.

A Change as it is labelled usually has several departments to approve before implementation. If it does not have a roll back procedure (used if something breaks to restore back to original state) it is considered high risk and in practice is avoided if possible due to potential high impact.

In other words, if going forward with a Change that does not have a roll back procedure, be 100% sure as far as is practible by testing on a replica system. Testing is to establish that a Change does what is intended and will not break anything in the process.

The latest medical procedures still in experimental phase involve a Change to the human cell system that operate much like a factory with DNA the programming language.

I consider these latest medical procedures to be high risk and potentially high impact as I have yet to see to see any equivalent roll back procedure.

I suppose we could imagine a DNA software simulation run for each individual that might solve the problem of testing prior to administering one of these procedures. This doesn’t exist to my knowledge and I suppose there would need to be robust checking mechanisms to be able to trust such an AI system.

So without an individual testing regime, we’re back to engineering basics, consent provided only with a safe roll back procedure.

Best regards,
David

Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD regarding the upcoming COVID vaccines:

Last week I must have been asked 20 times about the new COVID vaccines. Here are my thoughts. Please pass this informatiion onto many as you can. People need to have fully informed consent when it comes to injecting foreign genetic material into their bodies.

1. The COVID vaccines are mRNA vaccines. mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine. We have no idea if it will be effective or safe.

2. Traditional vaccine simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction. The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.

3. The mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction. So, in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.

4. These new vaccines are additionally contaminated with aluminum, mercury, and possibly formaldehyde. The manufacturers have not yet disclosed what other toxins they contain.

5. Since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely. That is why the flu vaccine changes every year. Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper.

6. Absolutely no long term safety studies will have been done to ensure that any of these vaccines don’t cause the cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines. If you ever wanted to be guinea pig for Big Pharma, now is your golden opportunity.

7. Many experts question whether the mRNA technology is ready for prime time. In November 2020, Dr. Peter Jay Hotez said of the new mRNA vaccines, “I worry about innovation at the expense of practicality because they [the mRNA vaccines] are weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.” Dr. Hotez is Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he is also Director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development.

8. Michal Linial, PhD is a Professor of Biochemistry. Because of her research and forecasts on COVID-19, Dr. Linial has been widely quoted in the media. She recently stated, “I won’t be taking it [the mRNA vaccine] immediately – probably not for at least the coming year. We have to wait and see whether it really works. We will have a safety profile for only a certain number of months, so if there is a long-term effect after two years, we cannot know.”

9. In November 2020, The Washington Post reported on hesitancy among healthcare professionals in the United States to the mRNA vaccines, citing surveys which reported that: “some did not want to be in the first round, so they could wait and see if there are potential side effects”, and that “doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic”.

10. Since the death rate from COVID resumed to the normal flu death rate way back in early September, the pandemic has been over since then. Therefore, at this point in time no vaccine is needed. The current scare tactics regarding “escalating cases” is based on a PCR test that because it exceeds 34 amplifications has a 100% false positive rate unless it is performed between the 3rd and 5th day after the first day of symptoms. It is therefor 100% inaccurate in people with no symptoms. This is well established in the scientific literature. See the attachment (False Positive PCR testing is up to 100%!) for more information on this. If you go to the CDC site (file:///C:/Users/docto/AppData/Local/Temp/cdc_97230_DS1.pdf ), you can see that the weekly death rates in the US are now lower than they normally are during an average flu season.

11. The other reason you don’t need a vaccine for COVID-19 is that substantial herd immunity has already taken place in the United States. This is the primary reason for the end of the pandemic.

12. Unfortunately, you cannot completely trust what you hear from the media. They have consistently got it wrong for the past year. Since they are all supported by Big Pharma and the other entities selling the COVID vaccines, they are not going to be fully forthcoming when it comes to mRNA vaccines. Every statement I have made here is fully backed by published scientific references.

13. I would be very interested to see verification that Bill and Melinda Gates with their entire family including grandchildren, Joe Biden and President Trump and their entire families, and Anthony Fauci and his entire family all get the vaccine.

14. Anyone who after reading all this still wants to get injected with the mRNA vaccine, should at the very least have their blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies. There is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized.

Here’s my bottom line: I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine. That would be safer and more effective. I have had a number of COVID positive flu cases this year. Some were old and had health concerns. Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C. Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there isn’t one.

Yours Always,

Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD

Why vaccinate our most frail? Odd vote out shows the dilemma

Two Old Women At Window

CNN beginning to pre-indoctrinate people not to be surprised if death occurs within a day or two of vaccination.

“We would not at all be surprised to see, coincidentally, vaccination happening and then having someone pass away a short time after they receive a vaccine, not because it has anything to do with the vaccination but just because that’s the place where people at the end of their lives reside,” Moore said.

“One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility. That would be something we would expect, as a normal occurrence, because people die frequently in nursing homes.”

(Tom: George Orwell predicted the double speak so brilliantly! They got the vaccine then died but the vaccine didn’t do it, they were going to die anyway.)

“There’s a question about the direct benefit of the vaccine, if given to people who live in those facilities, because we haven’t studied how well it works in that group yet.”

It’s this uncertainty that led Talbot to vote no.

“I have spent my career studying vaccines in older adults. And we have traditionally tried a vaccine in a young healthy population and then hoped it works in our frail older adults,” she told the committee ahead of her vote. “And so we enter this realm of ‘we hope it works, and we hope it’s safe,’ and that concerns me on many levels.”

(Tom: The illogics of this rollout beggar belief.)
“Right now, we just don’t have the data to know how well the vaccines will work in these folks, and so we’re going to need to be cautious at first because we know they are by far the most vulnerable to severe illness and death from Covid. We’re going to play it really carefully until we know for sure that these vaccines will really be effective at protecting them,” Moore said.

(Tom: The vaccine has not been tested in a group of elderly people to see if it increases mortality yet they are rolling it out to everyone straight away. Yep, that’s cautious all right!)

“Moore said not to expect a change in policy out of the gate.”

(Tom: So, despite not having been tested on the elederly and rolling it out to everyone, they will not quickly assess the statistics to determine ramifications! Smacks head. This level of stupidity is absolutely astounding!)

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/04/health/coronavirus-vaccine-acip-nursing-homes-question/index.html