Government: Your child needs to eat this trail mix. It is very healthy. If they don’t eat it, we have the right to deny them basic government services.Moms: Oh! Ok. What’s in it?Government: You don’t need to know that. It is very healthy. It will make them healthy. The entire scientific community agrees.Moms: (looks up nutritional facts label online) WHOA. There’s aluminum, formaldehyde, known carcinogens and aborted fetal stem cells in that trail mix. How can that be safe?Government: Don’t look at that. Trust us. It’s very safe. Trail mix makes your kids healthy AND as a result, the whole world healthy.Moms: Oh! So there’s been safety studies?Government: …………Moms: Like, studies that show that each ingredient is safe? That maybe compare children long term who have and have not eaten the trail mix? That have made sure that children with compromised immune systems or common genetical differences won’t have any short or long term issues as a result of eating this trail mix?Government: ………Moms: Ok, so if my kid DOES have a reaction to this trail mix, can I sue the manufacturer for liability?Government: No. We have exempted them from all liability.Moms: Wait…who IS the manufacturer of this trail mix?Government: Just the top four snack manufacturers. They make all snacks.Moms: Don’t those guys get sued all the time? Haven’t they been convicted of falsifying research? Bribing government officials? And now you have exempted them from all liability on this trail mix?!?Government: Yes. But this product is healthy and very safe.Moms: But what if my kid DOES have a reaction? The nutritional label lists all sorts of horrible possible side effects.Government: They won’t. Or if they do, we’ll try our best to convince you it was just a coincidence. If you’re REALLY persistent, we might award you some money.Moms: How much money have you given so far to parents of children who had reactions?Government: Eh…4 billion or so.Moms: 4 BILLION?!? What percentage of reactions do you think are reported?Government: About 1%, we figure.Moms: Wait, wait, wait. So kids ARE having reactions….there have been NO unbiased, double blind placebo tested safety studies, the manufacturers have been exempted from all liability, those same manufacturers have been convicted of bribing officials & falsifying research, the ingredients (once I found them on my own since you wouldn’t provide me the nutritional label) are concerning, and you STILL WANT MY KID TO EAT THIS TRAIL MIX?Government: Yes. It is very healthy.#justasking#believemothers#trueinformedconsent#somethingsmellsfishy#educatebeforeyouvaccinate#learntheriskscopy and pasteSpread the word Everyone needs to know
The medical profession are straying far too far from the “do no harm” principle! Example 2
Dr Leland Stillman says a COVID-19 vaccine should not be mandatory, and getting people to take it “serves certain special interests.”
The medical profession are straying far too far from the “do no harm” principle! Example 1
Stay as far away from a psychiatrist as possible. ANY contact with them is potentially injurious to your health. They have NO scientific basis for their labels and their treatments are nothing but destructive.
Until When Will You Wear A Mask?
Flu Shot = Fatal Infection
In 1972, Dr. John Anthony Morris reported his research findings on the influenza vaccine to his superiors at the FDA. A distinguished doctor and government researcher, Dr. Morris had been comissioned 13 years earlier to scientifically justify the FDA’s plans to widely expand the flu vaccination program.
To his expectant audience, however, his results were thoroughly disappointing. Dr. Morris reported that the flu shot provided no measurable net benefit, in part because the injected product failed to stimulate antibody production in the lungs, thus allowing for viral replication in this sensitive area.
It was later realized that the lack of benefit also derives from the flu shot’s ability to increase vulnerability to viruses not covered in the shot, including unmatched strains of flu and different respiratory viruses dangerous in their own right.
Dr. Morris’ finding of no net benefit of the influenza vaccine has been repeatedly verified with contemporary data, including a study by Simonsen et al. (2005) that found that the large increase in flu vaccination of the elderly between 1980 and 2001 failed to decrease flu season mortality, and a study in Britain which found that the vast increase in flu shot uptake by those who had just turned 65 (vs. those who were just a bit younger) provided no decline in hospitalizations or deaths.
Important data on flu-shot coverages & C0VID mortality:
https://homevaccineeducationnetwork.com/flu-vaccine-and-covid-19
No Power To Make Medical Decisions
This, from a doctor too.
Watch this video now to get the data on what is potentially in the pipeline:
Dr Carrie Majed talks on Transhumanism
https://www.facebook.com/docofdetox/videos/1040414946376277
HCQ Recommendations
One wonders what must be the motive for suppressing its use whan so many find it successful…
The Undeniable Truth Against Vaccines from Parents, Nurses, Doctors, Scientists, and History
This is a comprehensive summary of vaccine related data.
Chinese virologist claims she has proof COVID-19 was made in Wuhan lab
(Tom: This is the fourth such independent report I have seen that the virus was man made. Not to say that multiple reports makes a story true for that is a technique commonly used to add credence to a lie, so I am looking forward to seeing her proof.)
A Chinese virologist who has reportedly been in hiding for fear of her safety has stepped out into the public eye again to make the explosive claim that she has the scientific evidence to prove COVID-19 was man-made in a lab in China.
Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a scientist who says she did some of the earliest research into COVID-19 last year, made the comments Friday during an interview on British talk show “Loose Women.”
When asked where the deadly virus that has killed more than 900,000 around the globe comes from, Yan — speaking via video chat from a secret location — replied, “It comes from the lab — the lab in Wuhan and the lab is controlled by China’s government.”
She insisted that widespread reports that the virus originated last year from a wet market in Wuhan, China, are “a smokescreen.”
“The first thing is the [meat] market in Wuhan … is a smokescreen and this virus is not from nature,” Yan claimed, explaining that she got “her intelligence from the CDC in China, from the local doctors.”
The virologist has previously accused Beijing of lying about when it learned of the killer bug and engaging in an extensive cover-up of her work.
She had said that her former supervisors at the Hong Kong School of Public Health, a reference laboratory for the World Health Organization, silenced her when she sounded the alarm about human-to-human transmission in December last year.
In April, Yan reportedly fled Hong Kong and escaped to America to raise awareness about the pandemic.
https://nypost.com/2020/09/11/chinese-virologist-says-she-has-proof-covid-19-was-made-in-wuhan-lab/